Andrew if they provided the link it would only be convenient for junkies like ourselves who decide to dig a little deeper than a piece produced by americans about Kenyans! I like you googled it, found it, read and listened to it, and now I am thinking what a coll project to do here in the states with our most blighted communities. I believe hearing the daily lives of individuals who live in underserved commmunites throughout the world might be able to expand their voices by hearing the problems that other face across the globe and connect them almost like a co-op. In essence all of the voices could help eachother by connecting their shared trials and tribulations and also by giving them a venue to discuss the role of problem which are most needed to being solved.

I smell a grant application, coming, any takers!

I am really confused gozone, and no you do not have my head spinning. I think Andrew is addressing a question as to whay the link was not placed in the article, when many times links are placed in articles in the WAPO! I aslo think he is saying Kudos to WAPO for doing the article but then dropping the ball on the link for those of us who would follow the bread crumbs down the rabbit hole!

I was confused as to what you were really saying? It seemed as if you were saying that the Slum TV piece in the WAPO was somehow Andrew's doing? Which it isn't as he said he was just reading the WAPO this morning and came across this wonderful article about the hardships people face in poverty in Kenya, and how there is a group of activist who tell their stories vis-a-vis internet media. The WAPO who has used links embedded in their stories in the past did not do it this time, thus having the need for us junkies to google search for it! Maybe it was not in there because if an IT problem or maybe it was because the did not know of the link, whatever the case it would have been helpful to have the link accessable via the article!