A Republican-Hugging Debate: The Sins of Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Wearing blue is sometimes just not enough.
I hug a lot of Republicans -- particularly today's "dissident Republicans in foreign and economic policy", and there are some Dems I won't go near -- and the flip is true. I hug a lot of Democrats, and there are a lot of Republicans I won't go near. That's part of the reason why I am a registered Independent today and won't unconditionally support either party.
But Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL-20), a Co-Chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) Red to Blue Program, has many up in arms because of the Republican-hugging she is doing in South Florida to the detriment of her own party and her own stature as a significant force in Democratic politics.
For the record, I do think that there are some cases where helping a moderate Republican makes a great deal of sense -- and I'm fully aware of the avalanche of email I will now get calling this view naive. I have supported the work and efforts of such Republicans in the past as Jim Kolbe, Steve Gunderson, Chuck Hagel, Richard Lugar, Lamar Alexander, Jeff Flake, David Dreier, Pete Domenici, John Warner, Jon Huntsman, and many, many others -- even John McCain. I admire Robert Zoellick, Robert Kimmitt, Brent Scowcroft, Edward Djerejian, Carla Hills and hundreds and hundreds of other leading Republicans.
But the Republicans that Debbie Wasserman Schultz is hugging tightly are three Members of Congress who have actually had the power to make the Cold War colder in a small area of the world off of the U.S. border -- Cuba. They have thrived despite the phenomenal failure of the US embargo of Cuba and have succeeded in keeping a more serious interest-driven US foreign policy toward Cuba from ever taking hold.
Two of the Congressman that Debbie Wasserman Schultz wants to protect are brothers -- Lincoln Diaz-Balart (R-FL-21) and Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL-25). They are nephews by marriage (ended by divorce) of Fidel Castro himself. They are the sons of the former Speaker of the House in Cuba during the tenure of US-friendly dictator Fulgencio Batista. Knowing them and their family history gives one insights into the unique and bizarre family feud that the US-Cuba policy standoff is really about.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz seemingly turns a blind eye to the suspension of justice, the nepotism, and the corruption that have surrounded the Miami side of the US-Cuba policy feud. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL-18) has helped protect and then celebrate the achievements of Cuban-American terrorists -- particularly Orlando Bosch and Luis Posada -- in both Florida and in her Congressional role in Washington. It is truly shocking to read what Members of the US House of Representatives have been complicit in as told in the disturbing chronicle of the underbelly of US-Cuba relations, "Twilight of the Assassins," by Ann Louise Bardach that ran in November 2006 in the Atlantic Monthly.
The involvement of the Diaz-Balart brothers and Ros-Lehtinen in outrageous perversions of legal justice should give anyone pause -- but Red-to-Blue Co-Chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz hugs them as tightly as she can.
Either Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz does not read, is ignorant of the background and activities of these three Republican congressman, or she is complicit. Which is it?
An intrepid blogger and constituent of the Congresswoman wrote this about his encounter with Schultz recently:
. . .While leaving the site of the luncheon, my friend and I spotted Rep. Wasserman Schultz and her aide waiting for their car, and so, unwilling to let this opportunity pass, I approached the congresswoman, introduced myself in my "meatspace" identity, and identified myself as a blogger with a tremendous amount of respect for her voting record and her performance in Congress on behalf of Florida. However, I continued, "is it not counter to your responsibilities as co-chair of the Red-to-Blue program in the DCCC to openly refuse to support the Democratic candidates who oppose Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and the Diaz-Balart brothers in Miami?". . .Rep. Wasserman Schultz told me that she has raised money actively as co-chair of Red-to-Blue on behalf of candidates all over the country. Indeed, she said, she expended a tremendous amount of political capital in Washington and in Florida to help get Ron Klein elected in 2006.
Now, in 2008, she has had to deal with the "difficult position" of being in charge of the DCCC effort but also being friends with the three Republicans in Miami -- "I'm especially close to Mario [Diaz-Balart]," she said, "since our days in the state legislature, but I count all [three] of them as friends." And so, while the congresswoman believes the Democratic candidates in those districts -- Annette Taddeo, Joe Garcia, and Raul Martinez (for whom she said she actually has worked in his race against Lincoln Diaz-Balart) -- are strong, she "just can't cross that line personally" to campaign actively against her friends. It would be too hard to criticize them. . .
This essay by National Security Archives Senior Fellow Peter Kornbluh and Center for Democracy in the Americas Executive Director Sarah Stephens, "The Terrorists Among Us," is really about the nurturing of a strain of virulent military activity inside the United States directed at a foreign government that is not fully subject to the monopoly of control any modern and responsible state should maintain.
Ros-Lehtinen, the Diaz-Balart brothers, and Wasserman Schultz help coddle and protect militants who train and have weapons caches that they hope might be used to eventually invade or attack Cuba with. They are not part of the Department of Defense or the system of national security of the US -- and are in a way similar to a home-grown version of Hezbollah -- and Wasserman Schultz should not expect the spotlight of the Democratic Party or of the nation as a large to go away unless she modifies her own behavior and direction.
-- Steve Clemons publishes the popular political blog, The Washington Note
















It's a trade, Steve. She gets them to support the Likud position on Israel and, in return, she supports them on Cuba.
She is probably the Member of Congress farthest right on matters relating to Israel, serving as an enforcer of the Likud position on Israel (in fact, it's probably her #1 priority in Congress).
They don't care about Israel. She doesn't care about Cuba. They want her in Congress yo support Cuba Libre and she wants them in Congress to preserve the Israeli-Palestinian status quo.
It's a new kind of logrolling. You defend my favorite foreign country (or right wing part of that country) and I'll do the same for you.
March 21, 2008 7:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
The truth is so much easier to say, and tends to be shorter!
March 21, 2008 9:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
MJ,
I watch C-SPAN a lot, I like to watch the debates in the House and Senate. I've felt for some time that Lincoln Diaz-Balart, (I've not seen much of his brother Mario) and Ros-Lehtinen, though quite Republican, are more concerned with Cuba than the United States.
As to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, I saw her on Congressional committees and was impressed, but with this latest action, I'm afraid you're right, its a case of Debbie being more concerned with Israel than the U.S. Debbie is forging an unholy alliance, much like the John Hagee/Israel alliance. Nothing good for Israel will come out of this.
Asto Steve Clemons feeling there are times to support moderate Reppublicans, if he means with votes, then he chances a Republican controlled House or Senate.
March 21, 2008 10:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent comment, Mr.Rosenberg. Right on the mark.
March 21, 2008 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you, Viktor,
Best to Ilsa
March 21, 2008 8:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ditto
March 21, 2008 9:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Take note, this is terrorism. American sponsored terrorism.
March 21, 2008 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Florida has replaced Louisiana as the most corrupt state in the country.
The same money that the Republicans are supported by supports the Democrats.
There is no government by the people, for the people, only government to have results for the powerful and influential!
Democracy is not to be found in Florida only Plutocracy!
March 21, 2008 10:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Welcome to bi-partisanship.
March 22, 2008 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately, there does not seem to be an articulated position by the Democrats which addresses the grievances by the exiled Cuban community in South Florida. This therefore does create a vaccuum for the extreme right to exploit.
The truth is that just as the Baltic expatriates who enabled strongly anti-communist politicians like MacCarthy to rise, Cuban and Venezuelan expatriates in South Florida will seek out those politicians who are attentive to their grievances.
Because the "revolutions" in the home countries are leftist revolutions, these expatriates embrace politicians on the right here in the United States, and the Republican party courts them actively. It appears that Democrats have written them off the way they have written off extremely red constituencies in other parts of the country. In addition, though not the fault of Democrats, too many on the left have been willing to advocate for Castro and Chavez. I refer here to certain highly visible celebrity figures.
I have heard these expatriate communities dismissed as not representative of the people who do benefit from these "revolutions" going on in their countries. Florida Cubans are viewed as the rich elite despite the fact that the majority are people like Elian Gonzalez's mother, poor and willing to risk and lose their lives in open sea to leave their countries. When this is pointed out, the US embargo is blamed for the hardships being fled. Such dismissive attitudes breed strong bitterness and over and over it is expressed at the polls on election day, in editorials and radio discussions, and in support for organisations that do address the grievances of these communities.
Consequently, although it is reassuring that US public opinion is moving away from the failing policies it has embraced toward Cuba, the left must understand the grievances of the hundreds of thousands of Cubans and Venezuelans who have sadly left their homelands. If they listened to some of the music that for years has been playing in the airwaves in South Florida, that which I attempt to articulate here would become much clearer.
March 22, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
A Democrat who supports a Republican over a Democrat for election is simply giving up his or her own power out of misplaced friendship or loyalty. There is such a thing as being too consistent in all support of a Republican. The Republicans have never made a fetish of such a silly consistency the way too many Democrats do.
M.J. explains why Debbie might do it, but even assuming her issues are important to America, that does not justify refusing to work for the defeat of Republican Congresspersons.
March 22, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I live in Representative Schultz district . Unfortunately, most politicians are about self preservation and that is what this deal is about. The " Party" is only as important as each members self interest. Unfortunately, or perhaps not, Senator Clinton and her supporters, including Representative Schultz, would rather see the party destruct rather than allow the clear delegate winner Obama , to start his General Election campaign. The only way they can win is to destroy our brightest star ( notwithstanding his flaws which we all have many). They will not succeed because, win or lose, he has already shown his depth and substance, but they will try until the bitter end probably to the extreme detriment of the Party . These people believe there opinion is more important than anyones except the lobbyists that sustain them. Change is coming amd it will either happen now or as Chuck Hagel has stated perhaps by a third party. After all, why should a dem ( 46 years old , white , jewish) continue to support a party which my representatives wont and are in essence tearing it down. I am tired of it and so are millions of others. tlabra
March 22, 2008 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
If the race is shut down now, count the Democratic Party as destroyed -- many Clinton supporters will definitely feel she has been unfairly treated and will bolt.
270toWin.com will show you that currently Clinton is probably ahead in the ability to win the necessary electoral votes. They are neck and neck in popular vote especially if you recognize Michigan and Florida preferences. Negative attacks have occurred from both sides -- Obama is inexperienced for one (truthful) and Clinton's running a racist campaign (false) for another.
The party is run almost completely by Democrats who volunteer to take part. Have you? It is not some coporate sponsored entity although various groups can control it unless the citizens take part.
March 22, 2008 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink