TPMCafe
« A Stock Transfer Tax: The Right Medicine for Wall Street | Home | Total BS on Wall St. »

The Fed’s Forced Marriage of Bear Stearns and J.P. Morgan

user-pic

The news that J.P. Morgan bought investment house giant Bear Stearns for just $236 million, or $2 a share, sent tremors through financial markets around the world today. This is company whose stock was worth almost one hundred times as much a year ago. Its building alone is valued at close to $1 billion, which suggests that all the other assets of this 85 year-old investment bank had a negative value – Bear Stearns liabilities exceed its assets.

Further confirming this view is the fact that the Fed apparently had to make guarantees to J.P. Morgan of $30 billion in order to get the bank to take Bear Stearns even at this price. That suggests the bank had a lot of real garbage on its books. The markets are right to be worried. Of course with the $8 trillion housing bubble in full meltdown, there will undoubtedly be much more bad news for the banks in the months ahead.

One person who does not have to worry is James Cayne, the recently departed chief executive of Bear Stearns. According to the New York Times, he walked with $232 million in compensation over the period from 1993 to 2006. This is just another example of how the global economy rewards extraordinary talent.

The official line is that the Fed had to get involved and make the guarantees in order to keep the markets in order. This is not clear. It is not easy to accept Fed pronouncements these days. After all, just last year Chairman Bernanke was telling us that the problems in the subprime market were likely to be contained. It is time that the Fed comes clean with both an honest assessment of the severity of the problem and increased transparency in its behind the scenes deals with the big banks.

There is something a bit obscene about billions of taxpayer dollars going to the country's richest people, when average workers can't afford health care for their kids.


33 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Lesson learned:
1) Regardless of how badly you screw up, if you're an executive you're still worth millions a year.
2) Deregulation rocks!
3) The Federal Reserve is a nest of socialists for the wealthy.
4) If you screw up big enough and badly enough, you too can reap the rewards of socialism for the wealthy.
5) We are all gonna have to pay for deregulation.
6) This is just the beginning of the mess. It gets worse.

user-pic

It is most certainly obscene.

Where are all those who complain about poor people on Welfare?

I would like to hear them now complain in a loud outrage about this move: The very rich getting millions of dollars from Welfare...

user-pic

I have turned off the stock ticker that I use to track my retirement funds.
It's too depressing to watch all that red and be helpless to do anything about it. At least I don't have a subprime mortgage.
And it doesn't warm my heart to think of all the have-more executives getting their bonuses even when they screw the pooch like this.
The greed's over. Now comes the fear.

These so called professional top executives allowed their companies to invest in garbage mortgages that were inadequately secured, with credit extended in many cases without even verifying the borrower's income. In fact the borrowers were aware that their income would not be verified.

The real question is not why they walked away with so much money, but why are they not going to jail.

user-pic

And people get angry when someone points out that God would be unlikely to bestow his blessings on a country that steals from the poor to give to the rich. Remember, ye who castigate Rev Wright, for the rich man to get to heaven, he must sell all he has to give to the poor. Our country robs the poor to make the incompetent rich yet richer. One doesn't need a Biblical God to read the writing about our future.

user-pic

But Bush says everything's fine! More tax cuts will solve everything.
And the band played on.

No comprehendo why it's wiser to do this absurd bailout of an investment bank with negative assets than to just let it die on its own. It isn't like the bailout is going to prevent the markets from panic selling; everyone knows that if the Fed thinks it has to do a stupid deal like this, most of the high-flyers of the financial system are in the tank, and it's going to happen anyway.

For the next stupid act, we'll have another big cut in the prime rate, which won't do anything for anybody except raise the price of oil and other commodities even higher. And sow the seeds of the next great bubble.

Hello, Congress? (We already know where the executive branch's head is.)

user-pic

Nice to note the guy that gets away before the collapse.
But, I see very few references to the $6-8 billion that will probably be set aside to provide "signing bonuses" to the current crop of managers at BS, supposedly necessary to help put things back together. Kinda like in those movies where the crew is wading thru the swamp, and of course they need some local swamp creature to "guide" them for a price.
THIS is a travesty.

This is really something indeed. Here you have people struggling to keep their home due to the subprime mess. Which in part, was caused by the same money folks who knew the risk associated with lending people with no credit or poor credit history. In order to pay back what they were loan only to have that same loan to be pay back at an higher interest rate. Can somebody tell me you sign off on this idea. What gave them the idea that this would work? GREED IS THE POWER OF ALL EVIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

user-pic

Anyone who is anyway involved with the Bush regime doesn't have the ability to "come clean" on anything. The conservative movement, with Bush currently at the helm, has based everything they know, on falsehoods and lies. They can't stop now.

Cayne was apparently a very busy man, and he sure did earn those big bucks, with his very own version of Three Card Monte:

http://www.reuters.com/article/bankingFinancial/idUSN1649428620080317

(Via Atrios)

big picture: this is the unwinding of all the debt that has built up in our country. no matter what the fed does, the unwinding will continue. financials markets are going to be ugly for a long time to come. there may be bounces along the way where the talking heads declare that the worst is over, but it will not be.

note to jeffgee: the problem is not your stock ticker. turning it off is like an ostrich who puts his head in the sand! people would be wise to get out of stocks and other risky investments. our gov't (including the dems) are going to try to get people to stay calm and stay put (in stocks)... this is absolutely the wrong thing to do! use bounces to get out! move your 401k's into that money market fund (hopefully one that is filled with t-bills!)

this unwinding process is just getting started. asset prices are over-inflated. stocks, housing, commodities, art, you name it, are all coming down over the next couple years (not days, weeks, or months!)

Let us not forget that our CEO-President has a history of bankrupting companies that he has run...only to be rescued by friends of Daddy. (I question whether there are any friends with pockets this deep to step in to save the U.S., W's latest business deal--not after the Carlyle debacle.)

My next question which is slightly OT is: who on earth is going to pay W to give a speech? That's what he says he is banking on. That would be like asking Hoover to talk about the Great Depression--well, maybe that isn't so OT after all.

user-pic

(I question whether there are any friends with pockets this deep to step in to save the U.S., W's latest business deal--not after the Carlyle debacle.)

There is. It is called the IMF/World Bank. When the dollar tanks and we have runaway inflation, they will step in. This is how it has worked in the past with other central banks such as the Federal Reserve in other countries. The problem is, our government may no longer exist in its present form once the IMF comes in to turn things around. (there is a documentary out on what they did in Jamaica) I hope it doesn't come to that. I'm concerned that we may not even have an election by the time November rolls around. But then again, I may worry too much.

user-pic

According to C-SPAN this morning;

Bush announced his administration is on top of the problem in the markets.

Um, that's what I'm afraid of.

On top, and in the missionary position? :-)

That's funny, I heard the Dubya's favorite position is on the bottom--because he only knows how to screw up!;>

user-pic

Email exchange I had today with friend who works at JPM:

- You lot overpaid for Bear...

- *%*# off.

- Jeez, sorry, I was being sarcastic. I actually think you guys did pretty well.

- I'm not being sarcastic. This whole thing sucks. Where in my contract must I work for Uncle Jamie's charity?

On a side note, the SEC and other regulators around the world have been camped out today on the trading floors of all the big dealers. I don't know what they think they hope achieve, much less what they might know, but I have never seen this happen before.

But top of the pops today was when the CNBC news ticker flashed "Bush says markets are operating efficiently". Herbert Hoover couldn't have put it better.

I'm not sure what you mean by billions of dollars going to the country's richest people.

The Bear Stearns equity holders (The rich people?) are getting wiped out (Down 97% in 24 hours). And it's the debt holders who are making out. And the idea that making sure our banking system doesn't collapse is only beneficial to the rich is a bit naive.

Last time I checked the biggest investors in the country were primarily pensions.

Bush, in his Saturday radio address stated:

...the government must guard against going too far in trying to fix the troubled economy and that "one of the worst things you can do is overcorrect. [Snip]

...the recently adopted program of tax rebates for families and businesses should begin to lift the economy in the second quarter and have a stronger impact in the third quarter. But he urged caution about doing more, particularly about the crisis in the housing market, where prices are tumbling and home foreclosures have soared to an all-time high.

"If we were to pursue some of the sweeping government solutions that we hear about in Washington, we would make a complicated problem even worse -- and end up hurting far more homeowners than we help," the president said."I wonder if Bush's speech writers have pulled out all of Herbert Hoover's speeches to be retreaded?

Krugman Friday made the point that this "...looks increasingly like one of history’s great financial crises.

The next steps will be up to the politicians."

While Bush does his "Hoover" imitation, the Republican in Congress have pinned their hopes for survival in the November election on total obstructionism.

This is going to be an "interesting" year - and not at all pleasant for a lot of people, to include those who Friday worked for Bear Stearns.

This current economic situation, like the Enron Crisis that was sort of a "John the Baptist" type advance warning, is also a direct result of the Reagan Revolution as it has worked out over the last three decades. Would the problems be as severe had Glass-Steagal not been removed along with most effective financial regulation?

So the CEO's compensation over 13 years, $232 mil (lucky 13 for him, unlucky for the firm) is almost equal to what the entire company was acquired for $236 mil? Guess we know who made out better there.

I'm a little short

I wonder . Do you think Ben will cash a post dated check?????

How about George? A microloan?

user-pic

The logic for enormous executive salaries is almost precisely the same as for staying in Iraq: when the news looks good, the folks at the top deserve all that money because they're creating wealth. And when the news turns bad, they have to be given bonuses because otherwise they'd be demoralized. And who knows what kinds of bad decisions they'd make then.

user-pic

Next up on the bailout schedule:

Lehman Brothers

Wonder what Glassman "DOW 36,000" has to say about this? Heh.

Isn't deregulation a wonderful thing? The only way to fix this mess can only be more deregulation! Oh, and tax cuts for the wealthy.

Even then, it would be undervalued.

First: It's not taxpayer money. It is money that is CREATED by the Fed. It simply prints more money.

Second: We don't KNOW for sure, as of this moment, whether Bear Stearns' portfolios were full of junk. I think the more likely situation is that JP Morgan Chase simply got a hell of a deal because they were in the driver's seat - Bear's only other option was bankruptcy.

Third: The whole PURPOSE of the Fed is to do things like this - stabilize the financial market so as to avoid things like panics and depressions. If you don't like it, then you have to ask yourselves what's the purpose of having a central bank in the first place.

Finally, all of you who think the answer to this problem is "regulation" - what kind of regulation do you think would have stopped this? What type of super-regulator do you think can wave a magic wand and make the financial markets obey his will?

user-pic

. . . what's the purpose of having a central bank in the first place.

Excellent question!

Looking at 100 years of BoE history Alexander Hamilton would have said that the purpose was to reduce the cost of capital by establishing a trustworthy borrower. Once trust had been established in the national bank, the state banks as generators of "money" would wither and die, because they would be unable to compete in the "trust" game.

The problem today is that a whole new crop of "state banks" -- GSEs, investment banks, hedge funds, sovereign investment funds, etc. -- have appeared. These financial entities create "money" just as the old "state banks" did. [Note: I enclose the word money in scare quotes, because Alan Greenspan told us years ago that no one, and certainly not the Fed, knows how to define "money"]

Over the past 5-6 years there's been a huge increase in the supply of "money" - maybe we should call it M4 -- most of which was not productive as funding economic investment (see, ridiculous subprime and Alt-A loans and M & A buyouts at ridiculously inflated prices).

So, chemjeff, should the Fed be defending this supply or should we allow it to deflate back to a sensible 2003 level?

Why are we so scared of a Great Depression scenario? Today has nothing in common with then. Time to stop being slaves to some defunct economist.

user-pic

"First: It's not taxpayer money. It is money that is CREATED by the Fed. It simply prints more money."

Have you heard of inflation? It is a hidden tax. That is what happens when the Fed prints more money and increases the money supply. Each dollar is worth less as the new money filters into the economy. The taxpayers do pay, for a long time to come.

Jim Anderson
http://www.thetruthaboutcredit.com

The meltdown is really accelerating. The candidates do not seem to have a clue. The public is still evaluating candidates on personality what their preacher or spouse said. Get your shelters ready we are descending into the maelstrom.

user-pic

The game with the Federal Reserve is bailout. That is how we deal with these problems in our current system. We use more debt to solve problems caused by debt. Here is something I read in an investment newsletter this morning on this:

All of the capital J.P. Morgan will use to buy the brokerage house is being borrowed. The Fed is putting up $30 billion in cold cash to help shore up Bear’s balance sheet.

“J.P. Morgan and the Fed are stepping in,” Dan Amoss explains, “because they realize the type of liquidity crisis that would unfold if they do not.“

J.P. Morgan is likely a monstrous counterparty to derivative trades with Bear Stearns, and could find itself in the trouble, too, if Bear starts defaulting.”

But more than that, “the bailout is an effort to keep the financial system functioning,” Amoss says. The Fed needs to keep up appearances “until their Term Securities Lending Facility is implemented at the end of March. They intend to keep Bear Stearns on life support for the next two weeks, not bail out BSC shareholders.”

We made a big mistake with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Their tactics are what led us to what happened in 1928. Are we getting led there again?

user-pic

This problem didn't start with Bush (tho his Admin has made it orders of magnitude worse). Go back before Ronny Raygun, even, back to the Nixon/Schultz scuttling of the FDR Bretton Woods system. Creation of the current, utterly bankrupt and defunk floating exchange rate system is what unmoored our economy and opened the door to the corrupt gambling casino mentality and operationally clinically insane system now called "globalization". Mix in the creation of the Petrodollar system in London, in which oil at the wellhead costs less than $10 to produce, gets bought and sold a hundred times by speculators until it magically costs $110/BL. Add the systemic destruction of the regulatory regime built by FDR, under Carter and Reagan mostly, but by all Admins since Nixon, add water and stir. Top off with Greenspan's quadrillion dollar derivatives extravaganza, trillions down the Iraq rathole, brown in the oven for 15 minutes and Voila! The biggest sh!t souffle in history.

It's about over folks. This is not the beginnings of a recession, or even of a depression. This is the collapse of the entire post-Bretton woods financial system. It already collapsed last summer. Decades of dis-investment in productive industry and infrastructure, coupled with the wholesale flooding of the earth monetary aggregate with nothing backing it up has created a singularity on the event horizon. The black hole that has been created will cause a vacuum that will suck the wealth out the planet in a way Ross Perot never imagined. The loan crisis/credit cruch didn't cause it, they are post-mortem manifestations of the diseased and deceased host. The Fed, the EU and the finacial oligarchy that controls them are desperately throwing money ("liquidity") at the corpse hoping to resusitate the Frankenstein beast. It won't work.

First we need, like in a good 12 step program, to acknowledge that the dead beast in the middle of the room is indeed dead, and beginning to smell to high heaven. Next we admit to the errors of our ways. Then we quickly resolve to implement an FDR-like solution:

The Housing and Bankers Protection Act of 2007 must be adopted and set into motion immediately. Protect homeowners and federally charted banks from foreclosure and backruptcy (small and medium sized local banks, not the multinational casino banks or investment banks).

A two-tier credit system, in which a.) U.S. government credit for physical-economic recovery programs is provided at between 1-2%, and b.) other utterances of credit-injections float more or less freely (gambling bets on non-productive sectors can get credit only at much higher rates, if anyone is still fool enough to make the loans at all).

The U.S. government must now immediately approach the governments of Russia, China, India, and others for the prompt establishment of an international, emergency fixed-exchange-rate system, ending the presently hopelessly bankrupt floating exchange-rate system.

Dear "Dean Barker":

You wrote in this "article" that:

"It is time that the Fed comes clean with both an honest assessment of the severity of the problem and increased transparency in its behind the scenes deals with the big banks."

Ugh. You are in over your head.

Q: Who is editing these columns?

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, TPM? I created this account just to object to Dean's ignorance.

Is this for real? Do you know how the "Fed" became the "Fed?"

user-pic

I can't understand how the Fed can force Bear/Stearns to sell at $2.00/share when it closed on Friday prior at $30.00/share. The ONLY reason I can thnk of is some illegality they uncovered at BS. Why haven't we heard of the "free market" and "market corrections?" This is SIMPLY more corporate wellfare. Except this time it "is in your face" without shame or conscience. I also can't believe BS is the only company in that shape. Why these cretins aren't in the dock is beyond me. The financial help should go to the people who were enticed into mortgages that put them on the edge of forclosure the minute they signed the paper. Mortage brokers inflated some numbers and deflated others just to make the borrowers look acceptable. They took their commission and said "what a good boy am I!" They should give the money to people that were sucked into this mess and let them give the properties back to the banks that hiold these "sub-primes." Then the mortgage and housing markets will correct. Again instead of jail the evil doer pond scum in this swamp will be buying bigger yachts and G5s. Only in America!

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »



Book Club Calendar


Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address