TPMCafe
« Dynamic Solidarity | Home | This Week's Recommended Reader Blogs »

'Gospel Voters' and a Return to Prophetic Faith

user-pic


Ideology and political expediency have trumped the Gospel’s prophetic call to justice and peace for those who have recently dominated the debate over faith and politics in America. But a narrow interpretation of faith in the public square is at odds with our nation’s great religious movements.

The Catholic social tradition in particular offers an unequivocal critique of policies advanced by leading neoconservatives on the religious right who have trumpeted the Iraq war and a holy trinity of tax cuts, unregulated free markets and a Darwinian brand of corporate capitalism that has been devastating to the poor and most vulnerable among us.

Preemptive war and tax cuts for the wealthiest do align with a clear political agenda. But they do not square with the teachings of Christ, who preached “good news” to the poor, kicked the money changers out of the Temple and taught us to love our enemies. The Biblical prophets spoke out against greed and imperial arrogance, reminding kings and the people to serve God humbly and to embrace the widow, the orphan and the stranger in their lands.

A new movement of Catholics, evangelicals and mainline Protestants more interested in speaking truth to power than selling out our faith to win elections is now challenging Democrats and Republicans alike to build a culture of the common good where democracy works for more than a privileged few. We could call these religious Americans -- the new “Gospel Voters” – people of faith guided by biblical admonitions to side with the weak over the strong and to love our neighbors as ourselves. These voters are increasingly outspoken about the scandalous gap between rich and poor (the largest since 1929), the shame of 47 million Americans without health care and an unjust war in Iraq that is a humanitarian disaster.

It’s offensive to people of faith-- and all citizens who bring their values into the voting booth-- to assume that any one political party has a monopoly on morality. And it’s irresponsible for the media to perpetuate old story lines now being rewritten by this powerful movement of religious Americans who are embracing a robust vision of the common good.

Even as Christian evangelicals are increasingly diverse politically and speaking out boldly on urgent issues such as global poverty and climate change, exit polls are still stuck in the past. In Iowa and South Carolina pollsters only asked Republican voters if they were evangelicals. The false assumption is that Democrats are unlikely to care much about religion, tone deaf when it comes to matters of faith, blind to biblical calls for justice and compassion

For many years, this story line made at least some sense. Democrats often dismissed traditional religious values and pro-life positions as incompatible with progressive politics. At times, the Democrats and many religious Americans mistakenly conceded debates over culture, the family and bioethics to those who were more than willing to galvanize voters in a strategic effort to create what the late Jerry Falwell called a “moral majority.” But the so-called “God gap”—the double digit advantage Republicans have held for a decade among Americans who attend religious services once a week or more – is shrinking. “Gospel voters” recognize that economic justice is a moral issue and helped minimum wage initiatives succeed in all six states where they were on the ballot in 2006. Faith-based organizers are standing up for the dignity of workers, promoting health care for all as a human right and insisting that all immigrants must be treated with compassion and respect.

In a press briefing before President Bush’s final State of the Union address, Rev. Larry Synder, president of Catholic Charities USA and Ron Sider of Evangelicals for Social Action, among other prominent religious leaders, called on the president to focus on reducing poverty, ending torture and taking seriously the threats of global climate change. These are defining moral issues – at the center of our varied traditions -- that Gospel Voters care deeply about as they grapple with how faith speaks to our most profound political challenges.


6 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I'm particularly struck by how Marcus Borg and Dominic Crossan support Brian's view that the past and the present can serve to inform our actions. They suggest that two questions be asked of scripture: What did the passage mean to individuals at the time it was written, and what does it mean for us today. Thoughtful answers to these questions honor the past as well as providing the foundation for living in today's world...and it keeps from the tyranny of labeling.

Whenever I have tried to convert the fundamentalists, I have found Paul to be my enemy. I believe you are clever to write about "Gospel Voters," because I believe you know that the Gospel is not what the fundamentalists follow. They follow the letters of Paul and, to a lesser extent, certain parts of the Old Testament.

I am very clear when I argue with a fundamentalist. I tell them that the Bible has been crafted by translations, politics, sects, canonicty, and mistakes. I tell them that I believe Paul is not holy. I tell them I believe the Gospel is good, and that I am in love with Jesus.

Then they will usually tell me that I am a heretic, and that the Bible is perfect-- but at least I have made an argument they can respect. Unless you take them head on, you cannot make a dent. They are not so much interested in taking the Bible literally, as they are in reinforcing their own prejudices.

Christ and the Gospel, in my experience, are not only remote from their belief system, but, more importantly, are something they are unpersuaded by. For example, on the point of marriage, if you were to point to the words of Jesus "some are Eunuchs for God," or "they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels," a fundamentalist will be unpersuaded. They will quote Paul, they will quote the Old Testament, and they will feel vindicated. Again, I am very direct-- I will say "Jesus does not want you to marry, he wants you to be celibate." But the teachings of Jesus, specifically the Gospel, are unimportant to them.

While I find the "Gospel Voters" tactic clever, and perhaps a source of encouragement as far as framing the debate or agenda setting goes, I do not find it a powerful antidote to the fundamentalist poison. Unless I am misinformed, and there is a serious effort underway to convert people along these lines, I think what we need is not conversion. What we need is deprogramming, because fundamentalism is not a religious sect. Fundamentalism is a cult, based on the writings of Paul, not on the teachings of Jesus or the Gospel.

user-pic

But a narrow interpretation of faith in the public square is at odds with our nation’s great religious movements.

It's also at odds with the Enlightenment, the U.S. Constitution, and with Madison's Memorial and Remonstrance.

Except for the abortion issue, it does not seem logical for Christians to support Republicans. Making abortion illegal will be going back to the rich getting safe abortions, while the poor bleed to death from unsafe abortions. I think Bush probably opened a few eyes in many churches.

Published on Sunday, October 20, 2002 by the Observer/UK
Iraq War 'Unjustifiable', says Bush's Church Head
by Ed Vulliamy in New York

President George Bush's own Methodist church has launched a scathing attack on his preparations for war against Iraq, saying they are 'without any justification according to the teachings of Christ'.

Jim Winkler, head of social policy for United Methodists, added that all attempts at a 'dialogue' between the President and his own church over the war had fallen on deaf ears at the White House.

user-pic

I find myself persistently unpersuaded. It strikes me that littleblackpropaganda is correct in that fundamentalists and fundamentalism is a world view that the bible is used to support, but does not necessarily spring from the bible. It's a form of authoritarianism, and they pick and choose what they like from the bible that reinforces their world view.

The recurring mistake of people on these and other threads is that they assume that the collapse of the religious right as a political force will inevitably mean the revival of the religious moderates or religious left.

Sorry, no. Two points:

1) There's no alchemy that will transform a right wing christian into a left wing christian. All we're looking at is a lapse into political impotence and irrelevance. The people will stay the same.

2) The religious moderates or religious left have had plenty of opportunity to assert themselves, to articulate a brand of Christianity distinct from and challenging to the right. They chose not to do so. They made themselves passive, submissive, marginal and irrelevant. I don't see that changing.

Can someone who learned her theology from the "Kremlin on the Charles" actually present the Catholic Church's teachings and not some other faith or ideology?

And when did Christ come to create Gospel Government?

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address