TPMCafe
« Do the Math | Home | NY Human Rights Division Takes On Payday Lenders »

Dr. King on War and Poverty

user-pic

As we celebrate the life and achievements of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., I am reminded of his prescient and courageous speech against the Vietnam War, delivered at Riverside Church in Manhattan on April 4, 1967, just one year before he was assassinated.

The speech is much too rich in content, analysis, and rhetoric to summarize here, but this segment is particularly appropriate at a time when the country is sinking into recession, poverty rates are on the rise, and we are in the midst of a seemingly endless war that will cost taxpayers and our economy as a whole over $2 trillion at the least:

"There is at the outset a very obvious and almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam and the struggle I and others have been waging in America. A few years ago there was a shining moment in that struggle. It seemed as if there was a real promise for the poor, both black and white, through the poverty program. There were experiments, hopes, new beginnings. Then came the buildup in Vietnam, and I watched this program broken and eviscerated as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war. And I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic, destructive suction tube."

I wish his words didn't resonate today as clearly as they do. It's up to us to change that.


21 Comments

| Leave a comment

King spoke against the triple evils of racism, materialism, and militarism.

user-pic

~

Ah ... Yes he did, Tom! Yes he did.

"I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. When machines and computers, profit and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered."


 I find those words there, the most prescient in the entire speech.

~OGD~

And we should not forget how that speech was received by the mainstream press:

Time Magazine “demagogic slander, a script for Radio Hanoi."

The NY Times editorial headlined “Dr. King’s Error.”

He was criticized as by the more conservative wing of the civil right's movement.

For those of us that are today trying to end the Iraq war, remember that the antiwar movement was fighting the same forces then as we are today.

user-pic

~

You are correct. The corporatist media, and those firmly stuck in constant limbo haven't changed one iota in all these decades.

The march continues on it's way to overcome.

~OGD~

And the Reagan/Bush/Cheney gang are anathema to King's ideas.

MLK was right to protest the Vietnam war, but he was at the same time incredibly naive about the Soviet Union and the harsh conditions they imposed on their satellite countries.

Huh? Evidence, please.

that is to say he was highly critical of American militarism, but a real threat to freedom did exist as evidenced by the Berlin Airlift, Prague Spring, Korean conflict, Cuba, and a lot of other attempted Banana Republic takeovers.

What evidence do you have that King was not aware of this?  If you referring to Guatemala in 1954 with your last four words we were the ones who were the threat to freedom there when we kicked out the elected official Arbenz in a CIA operation.

i think you're missing my point -- that there was some justification for US militarism, given the global situation.

As usual, we once again have to call bullshit on Brook.

The point is valid for eastern Europe, but not for Asia. And the Vietnamese, in particular, were a proud and persnickety lot who were never going to be lockstep allies of their nemesis China, or the USSR.

When was MLK naive about communism in eastern Europe?

Sorry for vague reference. I meant Eastern Europe was tightly controlled by USSR, while Vietnam was not.

I haven't refreshed my memory on the Riverside speech, afraid to admit I only listened to parts of it on NPR last night. I don't think King discussed Europe at all in the speech, only the Asian countries, and mainly Vietnam's struggle to throw off colonialism.

Dr. King expanded on his Vietnam speech later the same month. It's my favorite quote.

"And don't let anybody make you think that God chose America as his divine, messianic force to be a sort of policeman of the whole world. God has a way of standing before the nations with judgment, and it seems that I can hear God saying to America, "You're too arrogant! And if you don't change your ways, I will rise up and break the backbone of your power, and I'll place it in the hands of a nation that doesn't even know my name. Be still and know that I'm God." [Sermon at Ebenezer Baptist Church, April 30, 1967.]

Also

And I don't know about you, I ain't gonna study war no more.



"To save your world you asked this man to die; Would this man, could he see you now, ask why?" W.H. Auden

I think the big mistake made regarding vietnam was to link it to the korean experience. There you could argue a united front had contained Communist expansionism, and US leaders probably thought they could reproduce the same effect in Vietnam. The problem being Vietnam was totally different culturally and geographically. You also did not have a united coalition. Western Europe was in no mood to assist as they did in Korea.

The war on poverty may not be going well. But I do have to say that the war on the poor is going swimmingly (a little Katrina joke there).

Yes, in the fight against the poor, the rich and comfortable take no prisoners. The wealthy struck a devastating series of blows against the poor in Louisiana as a result of Hurricane Katrina, with hundreds killed and tens of thousands scattered to the winds. Together with Rita, the two hurricanes were a knife edge in the battle against the poor.

The poor are on the run, scattered, demoralized, disorganized and helpless.

"The poor are on the run, scattered, demoralized, disorganized and helpless."

Val, there are plenty of organizations working to help the people in that region, and speaking as someone who has actually been down there and seen what is being done first-hand, I didn't witness any of the demoralization you spoke of. However, if you want to volunteer and spend a week or two down there, you might give us an alternative report.

I've spent most of my legal career working in the fields of poverty and aboriginal law, doing my best to make a difference.

Now, I haven't been down to New Orleans. But I have kept up on reports from down there, and its not a good story. Many tens of thousands of New Orleans residents are still displaced across the country, large sections of the city are not being rebuilt. The redevelopment plans seem to exclude the poor, and this has been an ongoing political controversy. Basic services in New Orleans, schools, legal aid, courts, etc. are still crippled.

But hey, you went down on a drunken kegger and tried to get girls to show you their tits. Good for you. I guess you're an expert.

no, i went down to work with relief agencies, and i actually touched the indians. I think my first-hand experience trumps your page-surfing, but again I invite you to go down. Relief agencies welcome anyone who will help, and I met people from all over the world -- even a bunch of Japanese that came to help.

user-pic

hite, through the poverty program. There were experiments, hopes, new beginnings. Then came the buildup in Vietnam, and I watched this program broken and eviscerated as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on
bags manufacturer

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address