Walter Mondale on US-Japan Challenges and the Power of the Vice President
Last Thursday, the 6th of December, I spent my evening at a 50th Anniversary black tie dinner commemorating the founding of the Japan America Society of Washington DC with former Vice President of the United States and Ambassador to Japan Walter Mondale. I was the guest of Society President and former Ambassador John Malott -- and I've taken a few days to mull over both Mondale's speech and a discussion I had with the former vice president privately.
On one level, Walter Mondale's speech seemed safe and non-controversial, but reading it again -- his remarks were densely packed with some important messages.
First of all, Mondale addresses the realities of 'divided government' in both Japan and the U.S. -- and in a nuanced passage refers to Japan Ambassador to the U.S. Ryozo Kato's comment that the "relationship is under stress." And then Mondale notes that Japan as a subject, language, and focus of diplomatic efforts is no longer drawing the best and brightest.
Mondale stated:
Tonight, we certainly can celebrate the strength of the US-Japan relationship. Bilateral strategic thinking now occurs in a regional and global context in response to various challenges including the rise of China; North Korean nuclear threats; terrorism; the energy crises and the growing and serious risks of global warming; not to mention the increasing risk of global economic instability. Addressing these issues together, as we do, signifies our dedication to a better future for our own citizens and others around the world. Working together, as allies, as democracies, as the world’s two largest economies, nations with a shared, deeply rich history of cooperation is a blessing to be nurtured by all of us.The other day, Ambassador Kato was quoted as saying our relationship is under stress. We’ve certainly have many challenges, including coordinating our approaches to North Korea, implementing the far-reaching program to restructure American bases in Okinawa and mainland Japan, and, finding common ground on our arrangements for burden sharing and host nation support.
Dealing with these challenges is further complicated by divided government in both of our countries and the prospect of upcoming elections. America, for example, finds itself divided over the Iraq war. In Japan, we see differences over Japan’s refueling operations in the Indian Ocean.
In this respect, one of the largely unappreciated assets in our relationship is the community of gifted, experienced, often language proficient, career officers who have spent their careers in Japan and in the United States, supporting the crucial dialogue between us. Ambassador Kato is a good example. There are many others of you in this room. E.g., Bill and Judy Clark, Bill and Peggy Breer, Rust and Kris Deming, Bill Sherman, and the best diplomat of all, Jean Pearce.
Both governments need to continue to ensure that we select and train the best officers. When American officials look to Japan, they continue to expect to see superb counterparts, dedicated to our relationship. And when Japanese officials look to America, at State, Defense, the NSC, Treasury, and elsewhere, they expect to see their equivalent in important positions.
I realize that for many this subject may not be as sizzling as discussing Saudi Arabia, Iran, or Iraq -- but Japan is an important country and has key resources, particularly financial, in dealing with any of the world's next set of tackled challenges.
But what I find interesting is that there is very little discussion of "how" Japan-passing became the norm it seems to have become. The rise of China is only a part of the story.
In fact, I think strategic decisions taken by Prime Minister Koizumi that helped spoil Japan's unique model as a modern, 21st century state that derived its sovereignty from multilateral embeddedness.
Koizumi's decision to essentially sidestep the United Nations as the key legitimatizer of its national security actions and to do what George Bush and the United States asked it to do in Iraq made Japan's acts seem arbitrary and not principled. With this single action, Japan became a "normal state" in the sense that it made itself look like any other supplicant of the United States and behaved along the lines of classic military alliances. Before this time, Japan had been the most important nation preserving and promoting international integration through multilateral institutions -- and it has an impressive array of Japanese leaders heading many of the world's most important international institutions.
Japan's power model was based upon collective action -- and when it deployed its forces to Iraq without UN mandate -- it became a bland, ordinary nation.
There are other challenges today -- and I agree with Zbigniew Brzezinski that "America's challenges in the Middle East are the 'defining challenges' for the United States in this era." Thus, it makes sense that the distractions of Iraq and Iran as well as China are impacting the numbers of those tending Japan.
But the bigger reason is that Japan made itself ordinary. It could have been a rather unique model for thinking about the look and design of a different kind of 21st century state. That does not seem to be the case today.
Mondale's speech also addressed "mega threats" of climate change and nuclear proliferation -- quoting Strobe Talbott. These same mega threats I should note were outlined as the last section of George Soros's last book, The Age of Fallibility: Consequences of the War on Terror -- and are becoming the new mega challenges drawing international attention.
He also reflected on the important "soft power" work of Richard Armitage and Joseph Nye. It's a short, dense speech that is worth reading as a serious roster of big problems as seen from the vantage point of one of the country's elder statesmen.
But the part of the evening that was most interesting to me was the private, somewhat lengthy chat I had with Mondale about how the Office of the Vice President had changed -- and how the Office of the Vice President under George W. Bush had written itself explicity as an institution of its own in to many of the executive orders on secrecy and national security directives. We talked about the National Intelligence Estimate on Iran and how this was probably going to worsen the divide inside the Bush White House.
I can't report on what Mondale specifically said to me on these issues out of courtesy -- but I can say that he bears a small part of the blame as he was the first Vice President of the United States to have an office in the West Wing. It all started there. . .
It's also interesting to note that two of the guests at Ambassador Ryozo Kato's home hovering around at the huge "Emperor's Day" celebration on December 3rd were none other than Scooter Libby and Douglas Feith. So, at least some part of the DC establishment are connected with Japan -- just the wrong part.
-- Steve Clemons publishes the popular political blog, The Washington Note

















Walter Mondale is as mediocre as ever, referring to a mythical US "divided government". Divided over what? And he seems clueless about Japan.
Regarding Japan, perhaps the reason that Japan, if true, has become "a bland, ordinary nation" is that this the way that the US and China like it. Why expect Japan to work within the United Nations when with twice the population and twice the economy of France -- Japan has the second largest economy in the world -- it is refused membership in the UN Security Council?
Japan serves the US as its military anchor at the north end of the East China Sea, and was used by the US in its anti-Iraq coalition to refuel US ships in the Indian Ocean. China has problems with Japan because of memories from WWII. There are recent indications of bettering relations between China and Japan, which the US will probably try to discourage.
Perhaps Walter just had a bad day.
ecotourism
WeGoEco.com
December 11, 2007 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Japan didn't diminish itself by joining the US in Iraq. In the eyes of the world Japan is US occupied territory with major bases there. These bases have no other purpose but to pose as military threats to primarily China and then Russia. Japan has also given very provocative support to Taiwan in collaboration with the US.
If Japan really wants the international respect that its economy deserves it will have to stop whoring for the Americans and ask them to remove those bases from Japan and Okinawa.
December 11, 2007 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
If Japan really wants the international respect that its economy deserves it will have to stop whoring for the Americans and ask them to remove those bases from Japan and Okinawa.
Which, given deep regional tensions, would lead to Japan more quickly renouncing Article 9 and building a more muscular military. Which, given deep regional tensions, would lead to more of the same. A region-wide military build-up wouldn't really benefit anyone.
Not to say that I don't see where you are coming from. I used to live near a cluster of military bases in Japan, and there is decidedly a price to pay for having them on your soil (once I wandered into a residential area owned by the U.S. military, and it was like a two-second flight from Japan to the American suburbs). But it's not exactly simple.
December 12, 2007 4:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Steve Clemons labors under the handicap of a terrible delusion. Foreign governments do not want to deal with American "experts" on their countries. Any such "experts," to the extent that America ever produces any, would probably deserve the label of "spy" far more than "diplomat." No. Quite to the contrary, foreign govermnents want to deal to the greatest extent possible with ignorant but well connected American lackeys whose corrupt venality foreign governments can expoit to best achieve their own purposes. Hence the names of convicted felon Lewis Libby and neocon idiot Douglas Feith (whom the none-too-bright General Tommy Franks called "the stupidest fucking man on the face of the earth") do not stand out as anomalies at American diplomatic gatherings, but rather as the expected, disreptuable norm.
Japan, Taiwan, and even Mainland China lately, have proven masterful at co-opting the corrupt American "elites" into selling out America's scientific, industrial, and economic interests for their own personal aggrandizement. Among current and ex-official "lobbyists," "consultants," or "strategic introducers" (i.e., "agents of foreign governments") the name of influence-peddler Henry Kissinger stands out in infamy much more than the rather tepid, trawling-for-trifles Walter Mondale.
As for the laughably naive supposition that the American government actually wants to recruit, train, and employ knowledgable "experts" on other nations, I can only relate what a State Department recruiter told me during a job interview I had after graduating from California State University Long Beach in 1977. Looking over my Curriculum Vita and noting my eighteen month experience as a Navy translator/interpreter during the War on Vietnam; my year-and-a-half as a foreign exchange student studing Mandarin in Taiwan; my degree major of Economics; my degree minor in Asian Studies; and my significant background in Japanese, as well, he said:
"You have obviously prepared yourself as well as anyone I have ever met. Still, we get all our white guys from Ivy League schools like Yale and Princeton. I came out here to the West Coast looking for minorities. I can't go back and tell my boss that I came all this way only to return with another white guy who speaks three Asian languages."
So, I went out and got a day job as a substitute teacher in a barrio high school while also working nights as a security guard at the oil-storgage depots in Wilmington. I managed to support my wife and two kids for a year doing that until I finally got a "decent" job as a self-taught computer programmer for the Hughes Aircraft Company. So much for what the American government says it wants in the way of "trained" or "expert" foreign service personnel.
As the brutally honest State Department Recruiter also told me: "We want to show the world many different-colored faces to demonstrate our multi-cultural heritage." So, we've shown the world the multi-colored-faces of Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice, and Alberto Gonzales while continuing to recruit our "white guys" from Ivy League schools like Yale and Princeton and Harvard. As a consequence of both irrational policies, we've got Ivy-League graduates Deputy Dubya Bush and New York Senator You-Know-Her fomenting and enabling needless, disastrous wars just because they think they can do so -- and become fabulously wealthy in the process -- without ever having to admit their egregious errors or change policy once proven monumentally wrong.
So as a matter of current and historical fact, the rest of the world clearly sees the two well-known faces of American hypocrisy; and which American official to bribe still constitutes the only knowledge about America that most foreign countries need, or want, to know. Henry Kissinger, Lewis Libby, Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, John Bolton, Walter Mondale, et al, show up at "diplomatic" gatherings precisely because they fully expect foreign recruiters to expect to find them there.
To summarize, then: America as a nation doesn't know shit about the rest of the world, and the rest of the world's governments -- with the full and enthusiastic co-operation of the corrupt and venal American one -- fully desire to keep it that way.
December 11, 2007 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Walter Mondale is a class act, down to earth, willing to serve his country where needed at little profit to himself, loyal husband, true liberal, etc. To include him in the same sentence with the likes of Libby, Feith, Wolfowitz, and Bolton should rate you a 0 rating on that post. And he's no Ivy League snob either:
Walter Frederick ("Fritz") Mondale was born on January 5, 1928, in Ceylon, Minnesota, the son of Theodore Sigvaard Mondale, a United Methodist Church minister, and elementary school teacher Claribel Cowan Mondale. He spent his boyhood in the small towns of southern Minnesota, where he attended public schools. His half-brother was the Unitarian minister Lester Mondale. He was educated at Macalester College in St. Paul and the University of Minnesota, where he earned his B.A. in Political Science, graduating in 1950. Mondale did not have the money for law school, so he enlisted in the U.S. Army in part to take advantage of the G.I. Bill. He then served for two years at Fort Knox, as a corporal in the U.S. Army during the Korean War. He graduated from the University of Minnesota Law School in 1956, having also served on the law review and as a law clerk in the Minnesota Supreme Court under Justice Martin A. Nelson. He began to practice law in Minneapolis, and continued to do so for four years before entering the political arena.
December 11, 2007 4:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Foreign governments do not want to deal with American "experts" on their countries....America as a nation doesn't know shit about the rest of the world....
This is really inane. First, granting that most Americans don't know much about the rest of the world doesn't imply that there aren't some who do (like you, perhaps). And granting your experience with State doesn't imply that some of those with expertise don't work for our government.
More to the point, though, are you really saying that most other governments prefer to work with American personnel who know nothing about their countries? Isn't that kind of integral to what's gone wrong in the last six years?
December 12, 2007 4:08 PM | Reply | Permalink