GOP Announces Plan to "Coordinate the Hate"
Disturbed by what many observers are calling an “unfocused” and “incoherent” message from Republican presidential candidates, the Republican National Committee has announced a campaign to rally the party faithful -- and its national leaders -- around a “hard core” of political themes involving atheists, immigrants, Muslims, gays and lesbians, and even evolution and taxes. The campaign, titled “Coordinate the Hate,” plans to open in Ames, Iowa this week and launch an eight-week tour of major primary battlegrounds.
“Huckabee’s surge is just the latest symptom of the problem,” said one analyst. “Before this, it was the attempt to cast Thompson as Mister Excitement. The root problem is that we have an array of niche candidates who offer intense, concentrated hatreds of one group or another, but no ‘big tent’ candidate capable of hating everyone at once. We need to coordinate the hate for 2008.”
Even Huckabee supporters acknowledge that their candidate has run into difficulties on this score. “We’ve got a guy here who goes around saying, ‘I’m a conservative, but I’m not mad at anybody,’” said one campaign staffer. “Well, that sort of thing might get you a nice word or two in the New Yorker, but it’s the kiss of death on the campaign trail. Look at what we’ve had to do with immigration: we’ve had to disavow every sane thing Huckabee ever said, like ‘we’re a better country than to punish children for what their parents did,’ and cobble together some wacky 120-day mass deportation program and a bunch of ‘interlocking’ cameras on the border. We’re dealing with an enormous hate gap, and I’m not sure we can catch up this late in the game.”
Another Huckabee aide expressed hope that the governor would get a badly needed “hate bounce” from the revelation that, in 1992, he had proposed quarantining people with AIDS and eliminating federal funding for AIDS research. Spokespersons for the Giuliani and Romney campaigns, however, suggested it would be too little too late. “Detention camps for people with AIDS is very 1990s,” said a Giuliani staffer. “But 9/11 changed everything, and Huckabee brings nothing to the table when it comes to torture. The Republican nominee has got to be someone who’s willing not only to waterboard Muslims personally, but to ridicule them afterwards and make a few snappy remarks about sleep deprivation the next day.”
Some observers, noting that the Republican field is divided among candidates who hate taxes, Muslims, atheists, Mexicans, gays and lesbians, evolutionary theorists, and versions of their earlier selves, have suggested that the solution lies not in a “Coordinate the Hate” campaign but in a more radical effort, known as the “Rudy Tancromnabee Project,” to combine the brains of three or four candidates using experimental technologies developed by mad scientists. “It sounds crazy, but it just might work,” said Dr. Grover Horowitz of the American Fusion Institute. “If we can come up with a composite ‘unity’ candidate who can hate big government, immigrants, homosexuals, scientists, atheists, and Islamofascists all at the same time and at the same level of intensity, we won’t even need to have a primary.”
Dr. Groverwitz acknowledged that the plan is “dangerous” and could have “unforeseen” side effects. “It all depends on getting the right people into the right pods at the right time,” he noted. “One misstep, and we could wind up with a candidate who provides illegal immigrants with police protection for their mistresses at taxpayer expense, or a candidate who releases a serial rapist and murderer because he believes that Bill Clinton and the Council on Foreign Relations are building Interstate 35 in order to form a North American Union. There’s a lot of full-bore nuttiness rattling around in these candidates’ brains, so it’s kind of a crap shoot.”
Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, however, reacted strongly to the idea of asking mad scientists to combine individual candidates, calling it “deeply offensive.” “I profoundly resent the suggestion that candidates’ brains should be fused together,” Romney said in a prepared statement, “because I resent the suggestion that I am incapable of hating all these groups by myself. No one has worked harder than I have to purge every last vestige of decency from his being or to appeal to the basest instincts of the base, and I have demonstrated time and again that I am willing to adopt any and every position necessary to win this nomination. Let every candidate know, whether he wishes me well or ill, that I shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, espouse any belief, oppose any foe, and appease any lunatic in order to assure the survival and the success of my campaign.”















Sorry, but you cannot satirize the Republican party. It exists is a special dimension in which satire and reality intermingle and become indistinguishable from one day to the next.
December 10, 2007 9:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's precisely where the NAFTA superhighway is going to lead us, Jeff. To that special dimension.
What does "satirize" mean?
December 10, 2007 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's also precisely where our secret Rothschild overlords want us to go. They've been planning this moment in history for the last thousand years.
December 10, 2007 11:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good thing they stopped Pope John Paul I from spilling the beans, huh?
December 10, 2007 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
You said it, brother. That was a close one.
December 11, 2007 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was always suspicious of his successor, who claimed to have selected his name in honor of his three predecessors. Obviously, that should have been John Paul John Paul. Does he think we are fools? Bwahahaha!
--
Howard
*equal opportunity offense to both extremes*
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" [George Santayana]
December 11, 2007 6:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK, I almost fell for the first paragraph, before I realized this was April Fools Day in December. Funny though.
December 10, 2007 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
sat·i·rize (st-rz)
tr.v. sat·i·rized, sat·i·riz·ing, sat·i·riz·es
To ridicule or attack by means of satire.
December 10, 2007 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
This brings to the fore the burning question about the modern Republicans - is it even possible to satirize today's angry, brain-dead zombie, movement conservative and evangelical extremists?
Doesn't the satire have to have some kind of objective known end point of extremism beyond which even the subjects of the satire have been known to never cross?
December 10, 2007 11:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
You've got me there. Their insanity knows no bounds. I am constantly amazed a the crap republicans can get themselves to believe. Clap harder that'll make it all true. Really, really.
December 10, 2007 1:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clap harder that'll make it all true.
Either that or it will turn off and on all the lights and TVs in the room.
December 10, 2007 5:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pfeh. Clapping is for Children.
Grown-up Republicans do it with Loyalty Oaths.
-Dave Adams-
December 10, 2007 11:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
What is really sad is that it is all true, just not for general consumption.
Jan
December 10, 2007 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Isn't this the sort of thing that got Hillary Clinton denounced when she satirized Obama?
Daniel A. Greenbaum
December 10, 2007 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think so. I don't think Hillary said anything about Obama and a mad scientist -- I think her satire was all about thousands of mighty robots.
December 10, 2007 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course a key difference is Berube isn't trying to get elected to anything.
December 10, 2007 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
As far as we know...
December 10, 2007 7:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
It would be difficult enough to find one brain among the top four republican candidates without trying to cobble them together. There only hope is to do what they did in 1980 and have a Hollywood studio make one for them - and find someone who didn't start their make-up career at undertaker's school, the rosy cheeks are a dead giveaway.
December 10, 2007 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
So what people say about the Hate-Talk Express is not just a vicious rumor?
December 10, 2007 10:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not at all! The HTE is coming to a town near you, and the early word among the press corps is that the food and drink are terrific. And you know that makes for happy reporters! Not like that appeasement porridge and chardonnay they serve on the Democrat campaign.
December 10, 2007 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
The fresh brains in chipotle mango prion sauce were particularly tasty and went rather quick.
December 10, 2007 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
So THAT explains it! I'd been blaming the koolaid.
December 11, 2007 6:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great post. Yeah, I think they're in trouble (although Steve's praise for another Republican, Hagel, scares me). Giuliani appears to hate everyone, but he's really just infatuated with himself. Thompson doesn't hate everyone; he just plays someone who hates everyone on TV. Paul can't hate everyone, because it's up to the market to say whom to hate. Huckabee isn't informed enough even to have heard of half the groups he's supposed to hate. McCain can't hate anyone, because he can't afford the microphone. That just leaves Romney, who mostly just hates losing.
John
http://www.haberarts.com/
December 10, 2007 11:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Speaking of brains: Mine is still tumbling trying to understand what there was about Berube's post that was supposed to be satire. I just don't see it.
Hoppy in Sacramento
December 10, 2007 12:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
The opposite of "hate" in politics isn't "love," it's something like "reasoned understanding" or "thoughtful consideration." Thus I rest my case against framing. Hate offers up unlimited "frames" but thinking really doesn't do that well. I know Lakoff means well, but dang, has anyone counted the cognitive costs of framing issues on the left?
Neoboho
December 10, 2007 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hubert Humphrey's 'Politics of Joy'
December 11, 2007 8:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Michael,
What is it called when you "get" all the brilliant humor but are unable to partake yourself? Besides frustrating.
I just love you guys!
December 10, 2007 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't give yourself away. Just jump in and hang on.
December 13, 2007 6:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
I eagerly await the DLC and the DNC coordinating their centrist response.
December 10, 2007 3:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brilliant satire. Worthy of The Onion.
December 10, 2007 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hate? They'd better be careful with even the appearance of having that, lest they be confronted with literal New Testament statements on the subject. “Compassionate conservatism” didn't quite pan out, but “tough love” resonates far and wide.
Let's see, what things are tough? Waterboards, steel fences, locks on abortion clinic doors, paddy wagons, door rams, pavement when the hospital dumps you, …
December 10, 2007 6:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
BradtheDad beat me.
Yeah. Expecting this on The Onion's front page this week.
December 10, 2007 11:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmmm... sounds like a job for Michael Savage.
And he's not averse to changing his name either.
-Dave Adams-
December 10, 2007 11:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
On the other hand, they don't hate America. That's liberals, you understand.
John
http://www.haberarts.com/
December 11, 2007 8:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ya, we got da big big hate, John!
December 11, 2007 10:53 AM | Reply | Permalink