TPMCafe
« Hillary with Open Eyes | Home | Harvard Prof Says All Criticism of Lobby Is Anti-Semitism »

America's Self-Damaging Embargo of Cuba

user-pic

In all of the noise about Iraq, Iran, Mukasey, FISA, and the upcoming Annapolis Peace Summit on Israel/Palestine, I neglected to mention that a vote was taken in the UN General Assembly condeming America's embargo against Cuba.

The vote was 184-4. The four were the United States, Israel, Marshall Islands, and Palau. Micronesia didn't even vote with the U.S. and abstained.

Japan voted against us. Germany voted against us. The Philippines voted against us. Poland voted against us. Mexico and Canada voted against us. The UK, Iceland, Brazil, and Singapore voted against us.

And while Israel voted with us, Israeli firms are nonetheless managing citrus groves in Cuba.

Hillary Clinton has unfortunately said that she would continue the Bush administration's policies on Cuba -- and that there are more differences between her and Barack Obama on the family-damaging restrictions on travel and trade than between her and George W. Bush.

I hope that she finds a way to change her mind -- because we need a NEW direction in US foreign policy not hug-sessions with the past, particularly policies that have clearly failed not only recently but over four decades.

-- Steve Clemons publishes the popular political blog, The Washington Note


4 Comments

| Leave a comment

Steve, good piece. The troubling thing about Clinton's position is that, like her position on Israel-Palestine, it is lobby-driven.
Even more than her position on Israel, her Cuba position only makes sense in the context of pandering to a special interest.
I mean, nobody can objectively believe the embargo works, and certainly not HRC.
Or am I being (God forbid) cynical.

The only achieveable goal for the embargo is to soothe the anger of (long-ago) dispossessed Cuban elite. It's pure spite, and everyone knows it, including its supporters.

America's Cuban policy is more than just a failure. It is a counterproductive policy that

  • adds to the punishment people receive for their unfortunate fate of being born in a communist regime;
  • allows the Castro government to scapegoat the U.S. for their own dismal failures;
  • makes Fidel Castro appear to be a hero, a David taking on the giant, instead of a totalitarian dictator;
  • greatly increases the probability that the regime will continue on even after its charismatic leader is dead;
  • implies that America does not really believe in the power of the free-marketplace, whether the commodities traded are material goods, or ideas.

The troubling thing about Clinton's position [on any given issue] is that...it is lobby-driven.
Please! No more shocks like that! My heart won't take it!

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address