TPMCafe
« When the Political Can't be Personal | Home | Practically perfect in every way »

Good morning TPM Cafe

user-pic

Over the next week I'll be elaborating on themes of my new book of non-fiction stories about Mexican immigrants to the United States.

The book is called Antonio's Gun and Delfino's Dream: True Tales of Mexican Migration. (www.samquinones.com)

The stories in it grew from 10 years (1994-2004) I spent covering Mexico, and especially immigration, as a freelance writer.

Mexican immigration to the US is one of the most important issues facing both countries. If you're American or Mexican, it will change your country for years to come.

Here are some ideas I don't think are commonly understood:

1) Immigration to the United States is a disaster for Mexico.

Mexican immigrants aren't educated but they do have the drive, daring, energy, and gumption that is a country's lifeblood. It is a monumental loss to Mexico.

2) Immigration from Mexico does little to change the conditions that push people to leave.

Instead, immigration creates more immigration.

Meanwhile, remittances from immigrants are so vast ($23 billion in 2006) that they allow that country's elites to avoid making the deep changes needed if Mexico is to become a country that poor and working-class people don't feel they have to leave.

A related point: No changes we make to our laws will stop illegal immigration if Mexico remains a country that poor people are willing to risk death to leave.

3) Mexican immigration is unique among the waves of immigrants to the United States in at least two ways:

a) Mexican immigrants are now everywhere across the United States -- from Anchorage to Atlanta; they're the largest influx of foreign-born workers to the South since slavery.

b) They have settled in small towns, not just big cities such as Chicago, NY, San Francisco and Boston, which have been the destinations of most immigrant groups up to now.

This is enormously important for our country.

4) Effectively, the largest urban renewal project in the United States is the reconstruction of immigrant villages in Mexico with new streets, plazas, and especially shiny new houses, all built with immigrant dollars.

This is happening across Mexico. Villages are being reconstructed at great cost and to virtually no productive effect because all those gleaming new villages are entirely empty and will likely never be occupied.

I’ll get to the point about the houses and villages in a later blog.


46 Comments

| Leave a comment

Welcome.

So, immigration is bad for Mexico. But is it mostly good for those who come here? Because that's what I'm most concerned about. Seems like they have an overall good effect on America's culture and economy, as immigrant groups always have.

Still, I'm with you on fighting poverty in Mexico so that people don't feel that they have to come here. But we should accomodate those who want to live here.

thosethingswesay.blogspot.com

Until there are jobs and birth control in Mexico we can expect immigration here. Any parent will leave their home country to save or vastly improve the chances of their children. Also, a tradtion of immigrating has been established and is supported by the immigrants here (as in every previous immigration.)

Walls and the like are expensive and probably ineffective given our coastlines. The real solution is in Mexico.

You really can’t have it both ways.

If you encourage the most productive people of Mexico to abandon Mexico and come to the United States rather than stay and reform Mexico’s economy how do you fight poverty in Mexico? Sending them money won’t do, sorry.

Walls and the like are expensive and probably ineffective

indeed. The anti-immigration group is ignoring a rather fundamental principle of economics: supply and demand. So long as there is a demand for inexpensive labor which Americans are unwilling to fill, and so long as there is a supply of such inexpensive laborers in Mexico who can't make a decent (or even survivable) living in their home country... they will find a way to get here. More Border Patrol won't stop them, a 2100 mile long wall won't stop them.

If we are willing to turn ourselves into a police state, that's about the only thing that will have any real success. Do we really want that?

haven't we learned anything from eastern Europe during the Communist era? Walls and border guards won't stop people from seeking freedom and opportunity.

And if you discourage them from coming here, you hurt the U.S. economy and make our culture less fun and interesting.

People should live where they want to live.

thosethingswesay.blogspot.com

Then I'm more sure than ever that the answer to the problem lies in Mexico. We should flood Mexico with more capital, plus more things to make it appealing...not just for Mexican immigrants to the US but for US emigrants to Mexico. Turn it around. See if they like us as much as we like them.

And if you discourage them from coming here, you... make our culture less fun and interesting.

 

Yeah, gang warfare is da bomb! 

 

Latinos have made California's culture so "intereting" that the whites are all leaving! 

 

"You say I'm a dreamer.  We're two of a kind.  Looking for some perfect world that we both know that we'll never find." - Thompson Twins, "Hold Me Now"

The "real solution" is in both countries. Here in the USA we need to allow labor unions to organize more easily the workers who take "the jobs Americans won't do". That would quickly increase the pay and working conditions until those become "the jobs American unemployed willingly do". When that happens employers will hire Americans and legal immigrants in preference to illegal immigrants, just to avoid unnecessary trouble. That ends the supply of low wage jobs that attract illegals.

In Mexico, of course, the first thing is to help a true democracy to flourish there. That cuts profits for American corporations who like having a near dictator in charge in Mexico. Who would prefer to deal with a union instead of a bribeable government official? In fact the entire bribery culture of Mexico needs to be eliminated.

Neither country acting alone can solve this problem.

Hoppy in Sacramento

"People should live where they want to live."

While I agree with your first sentence, the one I've quoted is a problem for me. The world a lot of poor people for such a blanket statement.

Jack

One fact that is never discussed accurately, or fairly, that massive waves of illegal immigration has truly undermined American wages, most especially those of working poor and lower middle class American citizens, those least able to survive without being able to afford or survive long term un and under employment.

What is troubling for me is the fact that too many who use this forum either have no understanding or empathy for those poor and lower middle class American citizens. It's as if they refuse to be cognizant of the realities of the dire poverty, suffering, hunger, homelessness and even death that is imposed on those American citizens because of this. My statements aren't exagerations, I have experienced these problems, and the death of my husband resulted from the overburdening of the health care system in my state causing the cuts at the public hospitals in my former state that denied him the specialist he desperately needed as a transplant patient, causing a cancer that was survivable to go undiagnosed until it was far too late.

We have a limited amount of resources in the US, and have been experiencing an ever declining pool of jobs since the 1980s when outsourcing started. We do not lack workers, but we do lack leaders who will stand up for American citizen workers, and their rights.

I appreciate Mr. Quinones recognizing the fact that illegal immigration does nothing to change the corrupt Mexican, Central and South American governments, but I would appreciate it if he would start targeting organizations like La Raza, MALDEF, LULAC and others that take millions from the US Chamber of Commerce and other corporate interests and remain silent about the corruption of the Mexican, etc.. governments from south of the border. Those organizations are solely interested in power and profit, not the human rights interests they claim to be in aid of.

They serve the interests of those who seek to recreate the status quo from south of the border in the US.

Again, America is a sympathetic nation, we are a generous people, but it is exploitative to take advantage of that and demand that working poor and lower middle class Americans be denied their ability to work and have an opportunity to lift themselves out of poverty.

There needs to be a concerted focus on demanding or forcing change south of the border, rather than assisting in the attempts of corporate interests to destroy the lives of working poor and lower middle class Americans.

The world has a lot of poor people partly because movement of capital is mostly unrestricted while movement of people is mostly restricted. Let the people follow the money, I say. If Americans were more willing to surrender their passports and never travel again, they would have more credibility in telling poor people elsewhere to stay where they are.

The post is interesting. In particular, I am curious to hear what ways you think the spreading out of Mexican immigration has been important for the country. I think it heightens the possibilities for real intercultural understanding as well as animosity. It is one of the main factors driving the backlash against immigrants in the past year or two.

Secondly, I look forward to hearing your ideas for promoting change in Mexico, or rather "assisting" change, since "promoting" has been tarnished by our Middle East misadventures.

I am very sorry to hear about your husband. No one in our country should go without the health care they need. I don't feel, though, that the problems with our health care system can be laid at the feet of immigrants, who are mostly locked outside of the system. The system needs to be reformed in ways that the three Democratic frontrunners have proposed.

One fact that is never discussed accurately, or fairly, that massive waves of illegal immigration has truly undermined American wages, most especially those of working poor and lower middle class American citizens, those least able to survive without being able to afford or survive long term un and under employment.

This is one of the most contested factual issues in the immigration debate, with Card providing evidence on one side and Borjas on the other. It's not been clearly settled to my satisfaction, but I'm no economist. I think wage stagnation has other, more important sources (a skewed tax structure, inadequate health care, and the easily exploited cultural myth of social mobility), but having a large pool of workers without recourse to unions or the legal system may be a contributing factor.

We have a limited amount of resources in the US, and have been experiencing an ever declining pool of jobs since the 1980s when outsourcing started.

I think you'll have trouble finding many reputable economists who support those positions.

They are jobs Americans have always done, and are willing to do. It's the reason that American construction jobs that lifted Americans out of poverty, jobs in masonry, electrician jobs, plumbing, landscaping, painting, meat packing plant jobs, and many more were held by American workers up until the past few years. Those jobs provided wages to keep a roof over ones family's heads, food on the table, health insurance and even the ability to purchase ones own home and afford ones children a college education.

The American dream too many here take for granted because they are ignorant of their own family's blue collar roots, is not some abstract concept. It's the ability to lifet ones self out of poverty, to live free of fear and uncertainty. If it's not ignorance, then it's the same greed their neo-con peers are infected with. If you started becoming activist because you were concerned about losing freedoms, I have news for you, your activism has become perverted by something that will only achieve a loss of freedom.. not too bright of you.

The snearing disdain for the American working poor and lower middle class, here, is proof of one thing, those who voice it aren't progressive, they are regressive and as fascistic as the corporate elite they purport to disdain. They are the same sort who serve as lackies for the corporate interests in the Bush administration, and will never be listened to by the majority of American voters.. perhaps that is why they are so mean spirited and snide about the suffering faced by the poor?

History tells us one thing for sure, it is those same snearing types who are hoist by their own petard. Their political movements and ideologies are the first ones to put their necks on the chop. If things do end up going their way, it's something to look forward to.. watching those who crowed so loudly bring it about be torn apart by the monster they helped create.

I know of families across the country who have lost homes, their livelihoods, have become homeless, seen their families fall apart, suffered illness because they can no longer work in their own countries because of illegal alien labor taking their jobs away.

What is needed is to bring back what the late President Eisenhower's plan. We do need to start massive deportation, we also need to become very punitive to corporations and every other employer of illegals. That includes even those who hire illegal nannies and housekeepers. Stiff, huge fines and jail time. Perhaps even rewards for those who report illegal workers, and protections for those whistleblowers. Eisenhower repatriated illegals by putting them on naval vessels and sailing them 500 miles down Mexico's coastline, and putting them ashore in a coastal town. There should also be fines levied against illegals who are deported. But those who self deport will be allowed to retain any monies they earned here. Within a few weeks most would have left of their own free will, those who remain will be more easily rounded up and deported.

We need to impose stiff tariffs on goods imported from south of the border, and inform the WEALTHY governments of Mexico, Central and South America that those tariffs will remain in place until they raise wages and opportunities in their countries for their own poor, that requires raising taxes on their wealthy and corporations. We need to tell them that a NAFTA is responsible for illegal aliens entering the US, that that illegal, unconstitutional agreement is null and void.

There also will be no more aid to such wealthy countries, they don't need subsidies any longer. We will use the funds by the elimination of aid and from tariffs to recompense our states and cities for the expenses incurred by illegal aliens.

I'm a liberal democrat, and I have news for those who want to snear at my comments, the majority of the American people, democrats as well as republicans, and independents too, and those who are rank and file labor union members included are in favor of this. I have friends from coast to coast, from members of a carpenter's union in SE Massachusetts, to construction workers in California. They are black, brown and white, they have been almost exclusively democrats, but will never vote for a democrat again who supported amnesty, or anything approaching that. Neither will they vote for greens, or anything of the leftist persuasion.. only for those who oppose it.

If you think you've achieved anything, perhaps you have.. we might see a government returned to republican control, both the white house and congress. They'll never vote for Clinton, or Obama now either after his flip flop on immigration. Me, if Edwards loses the primary, I'll vote for hopefully a least offensive republican candidate or write in a candidate whose name is being mulled as a protest vote.. and it's not Nader either.

We feel that the democratic party has taken us for granted, and the left is the same as the right wing.

Wages in Mexico, etc.. are lower than in the US, but so is the cost of living. Your refusal to address the fact that we're talking about jobs Americans have always done, and continued to do until they were taken away reveals your own Bush-like abusiveness and corporate-troll mentality.

In the US the American people fought for change, it wasn't handed to them. They fought for better wages and our rights. You seem more interested in enslavng and exploiting poor workers than assuring them "freedom and opportunity".

If jobs are denied them, they have no reason to come here. It is also far more expensive to subsidize them to make up for the low wages they are paid then it is to build a wall. It costs the city of Los Angeles one billion dollars a year, just in welfare, health care, food stamps, housing subsidies and incarceration illegal alien criminals. That doesn't even include the costs of education.

"Mexican immigration is unique among the waves of immigrants to the United States in at least two ways"

What the Mexican migrants, I know and have worked with, most remind me of are the internal migrations we've seen in this country.(except there are a lot of them) The move of blacks from the South to the northern cities. Poor rural whites from the hills of Kentucky and Tennessee to the booming post war cities like Detroit and Chicago. A group I'm very familiar with is my father and uncles , and their neighbors who left small rural farms in Missouri and Oklahoma to go to California and find work. Much like my Uncles , who stayed in California, these Mexicanos, I've worked with, talk of getting enough money to go back home; open a store, buy a farm, ect.Ask them if they won the lottery tomorrow what would they do? They answer to a man "go back to Mexico". Some will and do. But a lot like my uncles will marry a local girl, buy a house and settle down. It's the way of life

Jack

Walls may not "stop people from seeking freedom and opportunity," but they sure are effective at preventing people from finding what they are seeking. From germannotes.com --

Pre-Berlin Wall (1949-1961) -- "around 2.5 million East Germans crossed into the West"

Berlin Wall (1961-1989) -- "During the Wall's existence there were around 5,000 successful escapes into West Berlin. 192 people were killed trying to cross."

Economists who are ideologically far left or far right can twist things to suit their agendas, and they do. From what we have seen, wages in industries have declined drastically over the past few years in what manufacturing jobs, construction and other related fields, even nursing.

Economic studies have shown that in cases where there is a real shortage of labor, wages increase to attract workers. What we have seen is American wages in fiels that used to pay 16 to 18 and 20 to 25 dollars per hour, drop to 8 to 10 dollars an hour because of illegal aliens underbidding American workers.

In my families experiece, once my husband was admitted to the oncology ward, the other person sharing the room, was an illegal alien from Mexico. He was covered by medicaid. Incidently, we got to know his family, and while I have nothing against them, we even became friendly over the three weeks, I would see them arrive and leave almost daily, they drove an SUV that had to be worth at least 15 thousand dollars. My husband had medicare, but was told he needed medicaid as a supplemental policy, but we were denied it because we had an old car, the state agency told us it had to be worth 4,000. though it wasn't. When my husband died, I sold his car to raise money to pay what bills we had and only got 100. dollars for it.

In the state of RI, illegal aliens do receive social services like welfare, food stamps, medicaid, housing subsidies. It's been exposed that they do so using fraudulent documents, and because Hispanic organizations put pressure for the applications to be approved without the same documentation American citizens have to comply with. You should educate yourself on the reality, not on the myths that are perpetuated to stifle the protestations of suffering, working poor Americans who are being discriminated against. Otherwise you are no different than those who believed the myths of those who supported the Jim Crow laws of the 50s and 60s to demean the civil rights movement.

Face it, your "activism" is in the interest of depriving American citizens of their civil rights, whether for corporate or ideological profit motives. You see to oppress innocent citizens based on your hatred and lust for power and control over their right to self determination. Believe me, I don't need to see a white hooded robe to pick up on that.

Not really, capital movement is helping alleviate some of the poverty in the world, think of the investment in China, Vietnam, ect. The problem is these modern factories exist along side farming techniques that are from the middle ages. James Fallow's web site on the "Atlantic" web site. posted pictures he took of western China. (last week I think) They were harvesting the grain by hand and threshing it by walking on the wheat heads. What a chinese farmer harvests all day long an American farmer does in 5 seconds.

Jack

It didn't take long to attract the left wing nativist. It is why I stay away from most of these discussions about immigration.

My hispanic neighbors are hard working honest people with strong families. I like them I admire them. I would certainly rather live and work with them than a lot of Americans I know.


Jack

yup, I'm pissed


As I remember the preferred route became south into (?)Czechoslovakia then to Germany.

Just like any wall we build between us and Mexico will be circumvented.

As I recall, my friend Cisco's brother Jose brought him and a group of friends up through east Texas, where they aint building no fence, yet.
They got a great story about being hungry and cooking armadillo over an open fire.
According to Cisco it tastes real good if you haven't ate in a couple of days.

Jack

Jack

Caca de vaca.

ecotourism
WeGoEco.com

It's interesting you bring up the KKK, because they have been active in opposing immigration. No one has to guess where they fall in this debate, they are happy to tell us.

TV images of pollution-challenged Trabants crossing the Czech border in 1989 only emphasize the fact of  their complete absence in the prior 28 years of the Wall's existence.

And even without a shoot-to-kill policy (we won't adopt that tactic, will we?), the entry of 10-15,000 armadillo eaters a year isn't going to upset anyone.

I'm neither left wing or right wing. Nor is my opinion "nativist", it's based on my recognition of the human and civil rights of American citizens.

Yours seems to be based on maintaining the status quo perpetuated by the corrupt governments in Mexico, Central and South America, and imposing those status quos here. The only thing I can't say I know is whether this is based on your being racist/supremecist, or that you wish to personally profit from the gutting of American wage and workplace protections?

American workers are among the hardest working people in the world, not only that, they worked and fought to bring about changes that helped lift people the world over out of poverty, and to inspire those peoples to pursue their rights and freedoms.

As a nation we have historical moments to be ashamed of, but we have more than made up for it by our much stronger history for our stands against tyranny and oppression. Perhaps that is what angers you? You believe people should be little more than slaves to be exploited for your profit?

There is nothing wrong with taking a stand in favor of protecting the human and civil rights of American citizen workers. To take a stand against the corporate and ideological zealots who seek to enslave and exploit them. Against homelessness and hunger. If you want to label that nativist, go ahead and try it.

Its comments like this that make me miss the newsgroup format. Give us a kill file, please!

Jack

The comments on this post just reaffirm my position that immigration cannot now be discussed meaningfully in this country. Emotions rise much faster than reason. Perhaps we should all give ourselves a big pat on the back for our accomplishment in being born here - something many of us are inordinately proud of.

Hoppy in Sacramento

Molly Ivins on walls and stuff:
Are they insane? As Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano observes, “Show me a 50-foot wall, and I’ll show you a 51-foot ladder.” Meanwhile, Republicans in the Senate have constructively declared English the national language. That’ll fix everything. Every foreigner at our borders will stop and say: “Gosh, ma foi! English is the national language here. Good thing to know. I’ll begin speaking it immediately.”

ecotourism
WeGoEco.com

As I say, you can't have it both ways.

If you want to encourage ambitious Mexicans to come to the United States for your cultural entertainment, why just Mexicans? Wouldn't you be better entertiained if we encouraged people from a wide variety of cultures and limited the number of Mexicans? Assuming that we cannot practically admit all who wish to come hers.

Unless labor unions can organize illegal immigrants, how does raising the cost of domestic, legal labor not give employers the incentive to seek illegal immigrants to reduce their cost structure?

Wages in Mexico, etc.. are lower than in the US, but so is the cost of living.

You've stressed accuracy in argument and position, mm, so I want to say that the above isn't quite true.  Mexico suffers from a dual economy - one is domestic and the other is international.  You are correct in saying that Mexico is a wealthy country, I believe.  It has tremendous natural resources and first class climate for agriculture.  However, that wealth has been channeled into an international economy that is out of reach of rank and file Mexicans.  The United States has played a devil's role in this unfortunate situation.  For example, the "Green Revolution" which targeted Mexico begining in the 40s was essentially a guaranteed loan program for Mexican growers, augmented with agriscience products such as high yield seed etc.  The program itself was the brain-child of the Rockefeller Foundation.  It was actually very successful - it brought in huge profits to the US banks that participated in the loan programs.  But the downside was that because of the financing of large scale agribusiness, the costs of equipment, pesticides and fertilizers, and of course interest, the products had to be marketed through the various commodities exchanges in New York and Chicago at prices competitive with Iowa or Nebraska farm products.  The point is that the price of beans grown in Mexico became too expensive for Mexicans.  It didn't happen overnight, of course.  Subsistence farming in Mexico continued for several years, but declined yearly (just as the viability of US small farms did) until it reached a crises level in the 70s, when the US began experiencing huge pressure on its southern border.

It was President Avila Comacho who brought the Wall Street program to Mexico.  His predecesor, Lázaro Cárdenas, had a better plan, IMO, with his land reform program by restoring the old ejido system of land tenure.  Mexicans could apply and obtain small farms (but not land title).  But what was omitted was credit.  This has been the cause of failure of just about all land reform movements in Latin America.  You got the land, but you didn't get farm loan credit.  If the Rockefeller Foundation was an actual humanitarian organization, they could have pushed for a micro-loan program and supported the ejido beneficiaries.  But that wasn't the objective of the Green Revolution.  The objective was to make money off the backs of Mexicans, Latin Americans, and a host of other "third world" nations where the Green Revolution (the Cold War answer to the "Red Revolution") was implemented.

I think if you assess this history fairly, you'll see that our current spate of immigration problems is yet another instance of blowback of the excesses of the Cold War. Mexico is currently under the control of the individual Mexican beneficiaries of the Green Revolution, which by and large were all members of the older Mexican oligarchy class.  Capital flight is a huge problem in Mexico, now exacerbated by NAFTA.   

So I ask you, mm, why blame the poor Mexican for this.  She/he didn't create these conditions.  It is the brain-child of politicians and banks in the US and Europe, for the most part.  And we are living with the results.  Whose breaking the backs of our labor unions?  Not Mexican immigrants.  Union busting is a way of life here in the USA these days.  

Neoboho

mm232 represents a large constituency of folks who have bought into large parts of the "dream" but fail to understand capitalism as the force exploiting workers on both sides of the border and effectively pitting them against one another to diffuse their energy.Understanding our class struggle is the same and that nationalism stands in the way of true solidarity is very difficult for blue collar folks immersed in capitalist cultural mythology.I would urge mm232 to think real hard about where the injustice and "oppression" originates.Think about how much democracy really exists.

Oh, don't sell us so short. Isn't it possible that we're all both capitalist tyrants AND white supremacists?

The English as a national language movement always reminds me of my neighbor, Angelo. It was about 15 years ago I had just bought my first house in the neighborhood. I was setting on the front porch watching the world walk by when a small dried up looking , obviously drunk man walked down the sidewalk. Dug a beer out of the 12 pack he was carrying and said something incomprhensible to me. But the offer to stop a while and share a beer is much the same in any language. In the next hour I learned my first words in Spanish (no they aren't polite)and a phrase that echos in my mind any time these discussions come up.

Angelo, being very earnest, as only a drunk can do, looked at me and began shaking his finger in my face.

While doing this he said, "No Mexicano".

Then pointing to himself he said, "Puerto Rico".

Then thumping his chest real hard with the point of his finger, he said "American".

Listening to this old man and his broken English basically throws the whole "English as a natioal language" in the trash bin. We are a bilingual nation.

Jack

No law can be enforced 100%.
Should we stop enforcing all laws?

There is no democracy in socialism or in any other branch of the disease of Marxism, so quit attempting to exploit poverty and suffering for your parasitical ideology. It's based on slavery and oppression.

Regulated capitalism does work, and as imperfect as the US has been, it's been far superior to any other form of government.

I know the difference between the old world disease of caste system and privelege, and choose the new world of rights, freedom and self determination. That's not "buying into" anything, it's thinking for myself, rather than letting a drone like yourself think for me. ;)


What irks people like you is the fact that poor Americans, of all races and ethnic origins haven't been brought under your thumb, we aren't as stupid and ignorant as you attempt to paint us.. thus the need to demean and insult us. I'll bet it just slays you that those you consider inferior see you for the transparent fool that you are..

thats a red herring and you know it

Jack

It's not a red herring.
The same logic that it's used against enforcing immigrations laws can be applied to any law,
speeding, tax cheating, prostitutions, drugs, ...

I really like "fail to understand" thing.

As I said a red herring , irrelevant to the discussion.

Actually, You are correct.
I put my comment in a wrong place.
I commented on Janet Napolitano's observation.

The KKK speak out of hatred, America's poor and struggling lower middle classes are speaking out about the realities of long term un and underemployment brought about at the request of the same people demanding open borders and gutting of American wage standards and workplace protections, the US Chamber of Commerce and the corrupt government of Mexico.. and I won't leave out the looney left who believe that if they rationalize open borders they'll finally have dupes to sacrifice themselves in the long dreamed of "revolution", lol!

Incidently, yave_begnet, you seem to have as much hatred as the KKK, you hate poor and struggling lower middle class black, brown and white American citizens who are seeking to petition their government to seek redress, just as the US constitution affords them the right to do. So, you're classist and racist.. wonder why?

No more money for Mexico, it only goes into the pockets of the corrupt government and the elites of both extremes. Nope, the gravy train is over with.

Tough love is called for. Cut off the aid, end NAFTA, cut off access to jobs, and impose an Eisenhower style program of raids and deportation 500 miles down the Mexican coastline. Those who have to be deported will leave without monies they've earned here, those who self deport get to take it with them.

Enforce the laws, build a fence and teach the Mexican, Central and South American people to do it for themselves.. petition their own governments for higher wages and better life. They seem to know how to protest and conduct work stoppages, it's time they did it at home. Americans did, and no one was lobbying for us.

If you infer that they aren't capable of such things, then it's your racism showing.

Oh, grow up already.

mm, come on down - there's plenty of work here in the fields of the Imperial Valley.  $6.25 per hour, $7 if you're lucky.  I'd recommend the Spring/Summer season, where the temp is a charming 120 degrees.  But seriously, there is a labor shortage here, even with the large city of Mexicali a stone's throw away. Many Mexicans aren't that interested in the deal. Any unemployed poor US citizen can work here.  

Neoboho

deleted

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »



Book Club Calendar


This Week

Blood and Politics: The History of the White Nationalist Movement from the Margins to the Mainstream, Leonard Zeskind

Next Week

Henry Waxman, The Waxman Report: How Congress Really Works

July 13-17

Justin Fox, The Myth of the Rational Market: A History of Risk, Reward, and Delusion on Wall Street

July 27-31

Plenty Enough Suck To Go Around, Cheryl Wagner

« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address