Union Tries to Choose a Candidate
The Service Employees International Union (SEIU), with 1.9 million members throughout the country, is deliberating over which Democratic candidate to support. This brief piece on the Times website probes into the thinking of the SEIU delegates. It seems that the candidate that the union is most excited about (John Edwards) is not that who is viewed as having the best chance of success in a national election. On the one hand, after the experience in recent presidential elections, one could argue that it is good to see that the union is being pragmatic about how to best advance its members' interests. On the other hand, it is interesting to note that some within SEIU, despite its vast membership, are playing "follow the leader" instead of shaping which candidate is the front-runner. This blog is not about politics, but it is about the middle class. While one union is certainly not equivalent to the middle class, there is an interesting question of whether that segment of American society is able to be an agenda-setting force in the political or policy world, or if it too is only able to play "catch up".












I wonder how many voters Edwards loses because of support of the SEIU? I mean the vast percentage of U.S. voters are not a member of any union.
On a side note, if this blog is about the middle class I would argue that when janitors join the ranks of the middle class there is something very wrong with our economic system. At my college vacuuming around desk furniture was simply not on the curriculum.
September 20, 2007 7:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
My father was a local president and higher level elected official within the firefighters union. Given that, I would never support a candidate backed by this particular union given their policies, many of which directly harm the middle class!
September 21, 2007 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Which union are you referring too as directly harming the middle class? The SEIU or the IAFF?
Plus, what do you make of the IAFF early endorsement of Dodd? Seems to me kind of wasted, though it is a strong statement and shows some leadership on the part of the IAFF.
I wonder if it is the right type of leadership, though.
Marc
September 25, 2007 9:57 PM | Reply | Permalink