TPMCafe
« Israel: Never Missing An Opportunity to Miss An Opportunity? | Home | Pak Attack »

Condi Antoinette Rice Says: Let Them Eat Cake

user-pic

Washington Post reporter, Glenn Kessler, has just published a new biography of Condoleeza Rice. According to news reports, there is an anecdote in the book that perhaps best expresses the way the Bush Administration overall feels about workers--and about their own exhalted right to rule.

According to Rice's best friend, Stanford University's Prof. Coit Blacker, when our Secretary of State was on a shopping trip to purchase some jewelry and the saleswoman brought her earringt that she didn't deem worthy of her salary (paid for by us, the taxpayers), Rice snapped "Let's get one thing straight. You're behind the counter because you have to work for the minimum wage. I'm on this side because I make considerably more."

This, of course, from an Administration official who is part of a gang that had to be force fed a federal minimum wage raise. Let's hope she shows a bit more respect for the foreign leaders with whom she negotiates than she apparently does for the milliions of workers who pay her salary and who can't afford to call out a salesperson or be so rude.


65 Comments

| Leave a comment

Amen Joanne:

What a perfect metaphor for the utter contempt this Administration has shown for American working men and women. It really makes you cringe when you think that this is the crew that will never hesitate to put its spin on what it means to be a loyal and patriotic citizen in this country. Heaven forbid that respect for our brothers and sisters in the workplace should not be a fundamental component of real and genuine patriotism.

I really don't think people even realize how far to the right this Administration has taken us relative to even prior GOP administrations, including Reagan's, when it comes to workplace issues.

Bruce

Second Amen!

It's all about money for her - thanks, that clarifies it. And about who is on which side of the counter.

And... tell me again....who sat at the counters, to make sure she could end up on the moneyed side?

Just another sad commentary about the people who represent us to the world.

Please....

Wow. Sounds like a scene from Comedy Central's "Lil' Bush." I haven't found that show funny. Maybe because these guys are impossible to parody.

thosethingswesay.blogspot.com

I think maybe you insult Marie Antoinette who was pretty much clueless about how the rest of the country lived.  Condi knows and apparently relishes a superficial measure of superiority.  Then again, maybe she is just plain mean.

 

Why she is GW's wife, or didn't you catch that Freudian slip by Miss Condi, and as a conjoined compassionate Conservative would never dole out anything but cake.

Now don't jump on me because I take their side for once, but might it just be that the clerk was being a little patronizing to a black woman?
dc

What do you base THAT on?  That is an assumption with absolutely nothing to back it up!  Condosleeza's words speak for themselves.  If the Secretary of State can't be diplomatic to a saleslady who has absolutely NO relative power, I guess we can see why our status in the world is so abysmal.

Jan

If this event happened while Rice was in the Administration, I am bit unclear about when this occurred, I want to know how she could be so stupid to act that way in public. Davcbr did raise a good question about the color of the salesperson and whether there was a racial tinge to the story.

Daniel A. Greenbaum

I'm gonna defend the writer. There is always a possibility that the clerk was condescending. We cannot deny that could have occurred.

Nevertheless it does not excuse Condi's behavior.

I think the alternative explanation carries more weight - but still, the writer has a point.

There are many partisan reasons (which I agree with) why Rice may be seen as utterly without worth as a government functionary; as a toady, an enabler, perhaps, but little more.

And, there are arguments to be made that, in those areas where she did apply herself and her abilities, Rice's actions make her complicit in war crimes under International Law -- and should be prosecuted for her role in them.

However, this story of the Secretary and the Salesperson isn't up for argument, and isn't apocryphal -- it's a recounting of a first-person observation. And, it's in line with descriptions by others of how Rice behaves.

Consider this quote, from the same individual:

" ... there was 'a certain condescension in some of her meetings with senior deans or senior members of the faculty,' said Coit Blacker, one of Rice's best friends and the director of the Stanford Institute for International Studies. And so 'she took 'em down a peg, took some very senior people down a peg, and that didn't sit well with a lot of them.' " ("Condoleeza Rice At Stanford", Mark Z. Barabak, Los Angeles Times, January 16, 2005)

I don't belive that arrogance, stupidity, and deceit are race-based traits. After all, look at the Leader she idolizes, and serves.

Seems like they picked women like this. Think of goodling and others. Ready to put others down. Call them on the carpet.

Seems like they had one mold for men, another for women.

(meant to reply to Jemand von Niemand - but it didn't happen that way.... not that I'm gonna complain about it and put anyone down here....)

Add: women, who would thereby rise to their level of incompetence.

Men too, of course.

I can only surmise that Prof. Coit Blacker is hard-up for friends. Any acquaintance that acted as described would not qualify for the status of best friend.

I recently read an article on Rice which included a comment by a former student of hers at Stanford, "She's a light-weight." (Are we surprised that George would hire anybody who wasn't a light-weight?)

Unfortunately for Ms. Rice she confirmed her former student's critique when she disparaged a store clerk. (Light-weights in over their heads remind me of Mr. Bush's singular demonstration in front of a 'lowly' reporter by ordering a glass of water and getting it in a nano second. He turned to the reporter on receiving it and said, "Now, that's power.")

Isn't it about time somebody started posting on the Internet resumes of political candidates and potential appointees to Cabinet positions?

I doubt this story very much. It is hard for me to imagine her gratuitously insulting anybody. I don't like the Bush policies or Rice's role in them either, but ...

It may not be true but I find it easy to believe.

Of course, the liberal retelling of the story is a complete lie, like most Democratic Party fabrications about Dr. Rice.

Rice was shopping near Palo Alto back in her Stanford Days when a white salesperson insisted on showing Dr. Rice the costume jewelry instead of the real thing. When Dr. Rice insisted on being shown the real jewelry, the salesperson remarked that Dr. Rice was "black trash" under her breath.

Rice wouldn't let that pass for one instant. She immediately upbraided the salesperson by suggesting that :

"Let's get one thing straight. You're behind the counter because you have to work for the minimum wage. I'm on this side because I make considerably more."


She then said. "Now I suggest you do your job. Show me the real jewelry".

This was a white sales attendant assuming that a woman could only afford the costume jewelry because of the color of her skin. You intellectual car battery thieves are buying the Marie Antoionette version of the story because you are too effing lazy to do basic research, and because it follows a Narrative that you don't want to question.

Sander Vinocur once wrote that the Internet is in need of Editing. This blog post is living proof.

Jo Ann Mort deserves a good hiding. Or at least deserves to sit down and write a letter of apology to Condi Rice and racist store clerks everywhere for misrepresenting them as martyrs.

What a bunch of Clydes you people are! You people hate Condi Rice so much you're reduced to endorsing petty racism from a jewelry store attendant. What the hell's going to happen when Giuliani brings home the Electoral College on Election Night next year?

Here's a hanky in advance for your good cry....

"History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it."-Winston S. Churchill

Thank you for the clarification. That makes much more sense to me.

But I'm surprised that you consider this kind of character assassination typical of the liberal media. I associate it much more with the right-wing blogosphere, Drudge and such. Anyway, it pains me when I see it come from either side.

thanks for the clarification, but you still get a 0 for being an asshat.

It is sad when people revert to namecalling and petty prejudices against those who do not deserve it and the shopkeeper should have been fired on the spot for her racist remark--given that section9 is truthful and accurate; that's not a given either.

My sense is that when section9 calls Democrats goofy, perjoritive names, there is another issue at play. It's a form of Foxy rhetoric that appeals to the slam, bam, sitcom, school-yard, cage-fighting mentality.

The fact is that Doctor Rice has given her gender, race and advanced degree huge smudges by blindly following this intellectually starved, secretive and dishonest administration down the rabbit hole on so many issues. Small wonder that she is not given any benefit of doubt. I, for one, wish I could say I believe the United States' Secretary of State...but alas...she's going to have to work a lot harder to regain my trust.

Whether you doubt it or not, look at the source -- and this, from someone at least a close 'friend'. Try to imagine what people who know her and *don't* much care for her would say.

But, do your own research. Let us know what you find.

Oh, Good God, this is par for the course for liberals.

Democrats been flogging that August 6th PDB for years, when in fact, it was a reflection of a hideously incompetent CIA in dire need of reform. The Memo told Rice absolutely nothing, and told Richard Clarke even less. But Democrats took the easy way out and blamed Rice, when in fact, the memo itself showed an Agency completely at sea and totally hoodwinked by Men in Caves.

Why not do the difficult thing and tear CIA apart root and branch and emulate what George C. Marshall did to the U.S. Army before WWII? He later became one of this nation's greatest Secretary of State. A good Democrat, too. Hellsbells, why save the institution from itself when you can blame "Bush's Workwife"?

Of course, we did the same grabastic nonsense during the Clinton impeachment, so you can see how it works both ways. It's your guy's turn to host the fanatics, now. Oh well...

Want a good read? "Legacy of Ashes" by Tim Wiener, Pulitzer guy from the NYT.

"History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it."-Winston S. Churchill

Trust me, I'm being both truthful and accurate. The story is well known around Stanford and among people who know Dr. Rice's history, which you apparently do not. Sheesh, it was published in an article about her back in 2001, before the attacks.

You just don't want to believe anything but your own narrative, which doesn't surprise me at all.

Typical of the partisan hackery that passes for analysis around here. Things could be worse. This could be Democratic Underground. You're just angry that your narrative isn't what it was cracked up to be. That's okay. Imagine my disappointment when Bill Clinton kicked our asses in 1996. Of course, he only beat Bob Dole, so that softened the blow a bit.

"History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it."-Winston S. Churchill

Of course, we have no reason to know which version of the events is true even now. Given racism in America and the ideology of entitement in the Bush code, I'd certainly have no problem believing either one. But what fascinates me is that even Rice's defender here, for all his irresponsible scorn toward liberals, actually agrees that she said this.

I can see that anger, especially justifed anger, can lead one to say all sorts of things. Had she given off a four-letter word, I could understand it. Had she put the woman in her place by saying that, as the person on the other side of the counter, she had better start providing service. But what she actually says is that you have no voice if you're poor, and you'd better shut up and accept that.

It's a horrible thing to say. I don't care if the woman were racist. Suppose that a black man had refused to show Laura Bush, a white woman, the full range of services at a bank because women don't understand such things, been upbraided, and then muttered under his breath "bitch." Would we be cheering her on if she told him that he's on the other side of the counter because he's just a nigger and he better get used to it?

John 

http://www.haberarts.com/

Race wasn't an issue in this discussion, until davcb brought it up -- in an honest way; I think it's really being used as a red herring by commenters who would grasp at any excuse to, well ... defend the indefensible, meaning the crew which Rice is an integral part of.

You can't paint Rice as someone who has been engaged in a principled, disciplined struggle against racism on the one hand, and excuse her behavior because of it on the other.

It comes down to this: Either the salesperson *was* simply a racist idiot -- or Rice's response was out of proportion and inappropriate no matter what her color was.

Rice reportedly is no bargain-huntress; she looks to very high-end shops for her merchandise -- the Ferragamo store in Midtown Manhattan at the height of the Katrina disaster an all-too-visible case in point, and which says something about her personality and character very similar to the central example in Jo-Ann's post.

It's possible -- but not probable -- that Rice went to 'Your Discount Diamond Center' on the day in question. And it is possible, but not probable that any higher-end or exclusive jeweler would employ any salesperson who would treat anyone of color in an insulting or offhanded manner.

Even if this occurred in her Stanford days -- again, Possible, but not Probable. I live in the Bay Area, and people who live and work here are fairly sensitive to cultural and racial issues; so are our employers -- and that's good.

If this incident occurred after 2003, then it is possible that the salesperson didn't like Rice's politics. This seems much more probable to me.

In which case, if they made Rice feel slighted, that wasn't appropriate -- but, Rice didn't handle it as a diplomat might. She might have simply said, 'I'd had in mind something a bit more -- expensive', or, 'Excuse me; may I speak to the manager, please?'

But -- no. She escalated -- and the way she did it was to say, effectively, "I am someone -- you're nothing." And to choose that response out of a range of options says something else about Rice as well.

Rice is an arrogant, ignorant tool. She deserves to be short-shrifted in service, anywhere, in my book.

I used google. The story cited by Jo-Ann Mort is straight from Haaretz, so it is not a product of "sloppy blogging". but of reporting. No word in the story about "muttering under her breath", just that Condi was offended by being shown the cheap stuff.

I tried longer, and no earlier anegdotes could be found, so I suspect that our trolls either invented their version, or the version circulating in Stanford differed from what the eyewitness said. The book will apear in September.

I saw the same quote from Haaretz earlier, and nope, no mention of those special little details -- there or anywhere else.

I'm always amused at the lack of citations when trolls create their own realities -- possibly because fantasies have no footnotes.

Well, you know -- liars do prosper... for a while, anyway.

I'm surprised that the appropriate response to a racist remark is an assertion of relative wealth. "Money talks, nobody walks" -- this wasn't the spirit of the Civil Rights movement in America, and it certainly wasn't what Dr. King taught. But I haven't walked a mile in her shoes, I admit.

Charming to see the GOP playing "the race card" anyway, when it means a black person's point of view. The don't get the chance often.

John 

http://www.haberarts.com/

I think I'd like Dr. Rice to be discredited by the disastrous ideas she believes, the disastrous policies she supports and the disastrous President she works for. In other words, by the content of her character.

A lightweight teacher-pleaser. She won't leave a mark, her policies aren't any such thing, only vapid hand-waving.

OK, rant over. I like Winston Churchill on wealth, 1909:

The best way to make private property secure and respected is to bring the processes by which it is gained into harmony with the general interests of the public. We are often assured by sagacious persons that the civilization of modern States is largely based upon respect for the rights of private property. If that be true, it is also true to say that respect cannot be secured, and ought not, indeed, to be respected, unless property is associated in the minds of the great mass of the people with ideas of justice and of reason.

It is, therefore, of the first importance to the country -to any country -- that there should be vigilant and persistent efforts to prevent abuses, to distribute the public burdens fairly among all classes, and to establish good laws governing the methods by which wealth may be acquired.

I agree. There are so many legitimate and real reasons for criticizing Rice and the rest of the administration that it's not really worth it to take these cheap shots.

What the heck is a "Clyde"?  Are you lashing out at the Scots?

What the hell's going to happen when Giuliani brings home the Electoral College on Election Night next year?

Well, when they arrive at his pad he'll offer them spumoni and Strega.  He might get a vote or two that way, but we'll put the bastards that caved-in in jail along with the rest.

Save your hanky, pardner...you'll need it. 

<>Neoboho
Why not do the difficult thing and tear CIA apart root and branch and emulate what George C. Marshall did to the U.S. Army before WWII? He later became one of this nation's greatest Secretary of State. A good Democrat, too. Hellsbells, why save the institution from itself when you can blame "Bush's Workwife"?

Gee, do you suppose that we Liberals and Democrats could get the Bush Administration to engage in an open, honest and constructive dialog with us on effective intelligence activitivies?

On what planet and in in what century would that occur?

-Dave Adams-

So just how do you know that the version you've posted here is accurate? Were there any witnesses to this exchange? Anyone ever go back and get the clerk's side of the story?

-Dave Adams-

Even during the Civil Rights era Condi's family was high-class African American Republicans in Washington D.c. as I understand it.

When the Republican party went really bad, she went with it. She had already made hers. Being trained as a Soviet Intelligence analyst, I doubt seriously that she ever had a chance to do anything else.

I think it is safe to assume that this refers to the same Coit D. Blacker.

Both at Stanford, both Soviet specialists. I'm sure it is a very small world.

Jo Ann Mort provided her source.

Yours is ...?

Trust me, I'm being both truthful and accurate.
Why would we not trust you when you provide so many reliable links and references? Let me guess: Bill O'Reilly? He never lies. Ann Coulter? Michael Savage? Drudge? Wait, don't tell me. Rush? Oh, I know. Scaife.

Not only don't we know if it is true, we don't know the circumstances and it is gossip.

Oh, Good God, this is par for the course for liberals.

Says it all, doesn't it?  Hugh Hewitt couldn't have said it better.  :-)

aMike

On August 3, 2007 - 6:29pm section9 said:

You intellectual car battery thieves are buying the Marie Antoionette version of the story because you are too effing lazy to do basic research, and because it follows a Narrative that you don't want to question.

I took your advice and did basic research and I'm here to report you are correct. I received confirmation of the accuracy of your description of events from Rush and Sean. I stand admonished for believing the liberal version of this story.

By the way, I don't steal car batteries, I steal hub caps.

And this is the point:

the defense offered does not exonerate Ms. Rice

It does do far more to explain why she would slip and let her prejudice show in public ... but to basically say, "look lady, we are not defined by the color of our skin, but by the size of our paychecks" is confirmation of the charge being made by those who use the story to attack her.

It is hard to see why those who offer it as a defense of Ms. Rice would see it as an effective rebuttal unless they share Ms. Rice's prejudice ... "we have money, so we are better than people working for minimum wage" ... that is, of course, unless they are simply intellectually lazy and did not bother to think it through.

Thx for that Churchill quote, Tom.
Quite on the mark......
As for Condi- a designer prison jumpsuit, fitted by a ill tempered minimum wage prison employee.....

I lived in the SF Bay Area for 30 years.
"Around Palo Alto" is meaningless...certainly she was not in East Palo Alto...which leaves upscale Palo Alto or across the bay in SF...but let's say she was at a mall in PA...she was a full prof at the Farm...your version is interesting...but doesn't pass the giggle test...why would Condi be at a store in a downscale mall? Why would she go to a store that sells costume jewlery?

No, she would have gone to an upscale mall, to an upscale store, and she'd have been dressed in a manner appropirate for a full prof at Stanford...and the clerks would be well used to such people and would be on commission, with the minimum wage as a kind of "extra"...

and even if it were the weekend and she was, perhaps, wearing a "casual" outfit...I don't see Condi ever stepping out in torn hip-huggers, low-rise, flip-flops and having a cell glued to her ear or doing anything to suggest she can't afford the more expensive items...

No, the story makes too much sense...arrogant, authoritarrian...condescending...hyper-scenseative...crude...banal...a perfect republican grande dame...a regular aristo, circa 1788...unconcerned with the growing number of menacing looks along the parade route...

Amen to that!

In my work I frequently think, and sometimes say, that no matter the abuse you may have received (growing up), still that gives you no right to inflict that on others.

Gold Rule. Simple. Don't lower yourself - even if someone else has done so.

Is it me, or have we experienced an uptick in trolling of late?

Something's going on here... And it's not about the thread.

Seek Wisdom

Perhaps the salesclerk couldn't disguise her contempt for Ms. Rice's role in the biggest lie ever told in American history: the "mushroom cloud ...." Nothing racist about that. Condi's comment was pure elitism, revealing that she has no class, no compassion, and no diplomatic skills whatsoever. Remember what she was doing while New Orleans was drowning? Shopping for shoes. "Retail therapy" must be her way of dealing with personal failure.

Morgan

With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plea; but to tyrants I will give no quarter, nor waste arguments where they will certainly be lost.
-- William Lloyd Garrison (1805 - 1879)

The same thought occured to me, but god knows we've seen this woman condescend to reporters, citizens, other world leaders, Senators, congressmen. Behind the scenes accounts (Suskind, Clarke) indicate that this woman is as baselessly arrogant and full of herself as Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and all the other deluded, entitled incompetents in this administration when faced with a reality-based dissent from what they want to do.
I was just reading through an old profile of Brent Scowcroft, who was her mentor in gov't and nat'l security, and she was pretty condescending to him when he tried to explain that she (they) didn't know what the hell they were getting into in Iraq. The only people at that dinner meeting were Rice and Scowcroft, and one of them told people that she was dismissive of him.

Ah, one of America's dirty little secrets.  Po' white folk bettah suck it up and take it.  And RICH folk, black or white, can act out against po' folk, white or black, without guilt.  Thanks, everybody for reminding me.

Just remember, the largest demographic of po' folk is WHITE.  Another dirty little secret.

American race policy is aimed at distributing blacks across wealth, not at distributing wealth to poor people.

Condi's got the rule right, "I got mine!" "Now would you peon behave like you are supposed to?" 

I don't believe either account.

Good detection, Marlowe.  I didn't get past wondering how one shops for jewelery.  You look in the glass cases and see something and ask the sales person to get it out.  That's about all I know about it.  The only place I can imagine having costume jewelery and the good stuff in the same case is Walmart or Kmart.  I don't think Macy's would have $2.50 acrylic "jade" errings next to $250.00 jade errings.    

Neoboho

Rice was shopping near Palo Alto back in her Stanford Days when a white salesperson insisted on showing Dr. Rice the costume jewelry instead of the real thing. When Dr. Rice insisted on being shown the real jewelry, the salesperson remarked that Dr. Rice was "black trash" under her breath.

Section9: prison slang for convicted pedophiles kept in confinement for their own protection. Geez. Talk about a nickname choice.

Okay, that's the goofball version. Now what's the real story? Seriously, some halfbaked asshat comes in with his retardo crap, I'm supposed to take it seriously?

When did this incident take place. Who were the participants? Do we have the salesgirls side of it? Are we seriously supposed to expect that a salesgirl could get caught mumbling 'black trash' and not get busted out of her job?

This is from section 9? That says it all.

Quite poss--that could have provoked her behavior. But to paraphrase MLK your true character is revealed in how you respond in moments of crisis and conflict. So it looks like her true character is arrogance. Let's say the clerk deserved a good eye-roll or tongue-lashing: responding to racism with classism only reflects Condi's desire to distance herself from oppressed peoples (she was pissed that being black made her subject to this type of treatment, but not so pissed about class stratification) or maybe just a desire to become the oppressor. Hmmm...looks like mission accompd.

Val,

"retardo crap" heh heh heh :-)

A little observation about saleswomen: I know at least two ladies with husbands that have comfortable income who work as saleswomen because it is a nice job, and if it also pays, so much the better. One is working in a boutique, another in a store with toys. While it is hard to imagine someone working in WalMart for that reason, a jewelry store is a fair bet.

I'm not looking to argue the veracity of the story, but frankly, it seems like too good a story to be real. I'm not saying it's not real, nor am I saying it is. It's just a little suspect.

That said, I believe Condi Rice has distinguished herself as hopelessly out of her depth as both National Security Advisor and as Secretary of State. That she is churlish, selfish, or unkind, is just a footnote to her failure in public service. Perhaps if I were as bad as she is in my job, I might snipe at innocent bystanders such as sales clerks.

In a way, that makes her a little sympathetic. Unfortunately, her chosen profession is too impactful for a clueless hack, which mitigates any sympathy I might have for her.

Back to my point: Condi needn't be rude, classist, self-important, or cruel to be deserving of our contempt. Her unimaginable incompetance is her defining feature.
/c

In the blogosphere every one is an expert, so no one is an expert.

That's funny. I think she's done an excellent job in her different roles, excellent being defined by advancing the agenda of her employer.

Condi Rice has a favored anecdote of how her paternal granfather obtained his education based on faith, family and education but fails to realize that her Grandfather Rice succeeded because of a quota system. She is justly proud of him because of his intelligence, determination and character which were greater than that of most young men of his time, black or white. Nonetheless, if he had been required to compete for a seat at college on the basis of his then attainments he would have been shut out. Instead he applied to a segregated college which in effect has a 100% quota for blacks and went on to prove what he could accomplish. If he had had to compete on the basis of what he knew coming in against all the young me of his generaton, he would have failed to get into college. If he had been provided with access to education he would undoubtedly succeeded but he had been denied access and it is still the case in our society that blacks do not have the same access to education as do whites.

I don't think that Condi pays any attention to race at all--mainly because she's been so busy getting ahead at all costs to worry about the plight of other African-Americans. This is lifelong behavior, evidenced by her (lack of) recollections of the struggle for Equal Rights, despite growing up in Birmingham Alabama at the height of the movement--she was too busy practicing the piano!

I'll agree with you on her stint as Sec State, but the whole "Bin Lauden Determined to Strike Within US," followed by not remembering her unscheduled July meeting with Tenent, well that can only be charitably called a royal f*ck up. I guess if you consider it the defining moment of the Bush presidency, then maybe she gets props for throwing her boss a bone.

/c

In the blogosphere every one is an expert, so no one is an expert.

Yes, the stores I frequent have a range of prices, but what kind of store has both very cheap jewelry and very expensive jewelry?

What kind of salesperson starts with the cheap stuff? Don't they want to make the largest commission they can?

Here is another possible scenario: in a very fine store, the salespeople recognize an important person on sight, they meet them at the door, and escort them through the store. They treat their customers with exquisite politeness.

I have only gotten that treatment once, when I was apparently mistaken for somebody else, but I know that it does exist.

I am having some difficulty believe the basic premises of the story, but maybe I just don't understand the details.

I am trying to make sense out of this. Let us suppose that the store in question is middle-range, neither exclusively very cheap nor exclusively very expensive, so they have a fairly wide range of prices. We are not talking about fabulously expensive jewelry of the sort that Princess Diana would have worn. Let us suppose that Rice was not recognized as either famous or affluent. For the story to work, Rice does not look in the glass case. If the salesperson was trying hard to make the sale, the salesperson might have intervened before Rice got to look in the case. In that case, it is unlikely that the salesperson was trying to push the cheap stuff. So Rice chose to not look in the case. Rice asks the salesperson to recommend something. The salesperson thinks Rice is poor. Even so, the salesperson wants to make a maximum commission. If the salesperson is a racist, maybe the intention is to humiliate Rice. Either way, the salesperson brings out the expensive stuff. Even if the salesperson thinks Rice is poor, the worst case from the salesperson's point of view is that they have to sweet-talk Rice into buying something she can't afford and going into hock with a payday loan service.

I don't get it.

I will try again.

It is only deliberately humiliating if the salesperson brings out the cheap stuff knowing that Rice could afford the expensive stuff. That means that the salesperson's racism or class resentment was stronger than their desire to make a good commission. I don't know people like that, so I don't know how plausible that is. If Rice was expensively dressed and acting "uppity," some old-fashioned racists might think in those terms. On the other hand, you would not necessarily have to be a racist to object to Rice's behavior on its own terms. If this incident actually did occur, it may or may not have been provoked. I would think that people who work in upscale stores would be accustomed to dealing with assholes, regardless of race.

I still don't get it.

Proctor's Department Store???(as in proctology)

But I've figured it out (ahem):  Rice spotted a piece of tinsel in the case, and asked to see it.  The salesperson told her it was cheap costume jewelery, so Rice puts the spin on to cover her embarassment. Grover Norquist just happened to be walking nearby on his way to purchase some tax-deductable boxer shorts, and he heard the whole exchange.  We know the rest of this sad story.

Neoboho

Perhaps we should take this as yet another clue that the great divider in the country is less and less race and more and more class?

Well intentioned liberals have a tendency to fall into the trap of dividing potential allies. During the Katrina disaster liberals kept harping about the blacks who suffered in NO, which they most certainly did. But poor gulf-coast whites in Mississippi found themselves about as badly abandoned. By exclusively showing our outrage over what happend to blacks, it's a pretty good bet we unintentionally aliented poor whites who got clobbered too.

It's overprivilidged bastards like Condi with help from useful idiots like the fundamentalist vs everyone else. I know this sounds radical as hell but, so help me, from where I sit, that's how things stand.

But poor gulf-coast whites in Mississippi found themselves about as badly abandoned. By exclusively showing our outrage over what happend to blacks, it's a pretty good bet we unintentionally aliented poor whites who got clobbered too.

Excellent observation.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »



Book Club Calendar


Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address