Talking the Talk about Bad Debtors
"Revealed preferences" is a great term from economics. It means pay attention to what actors do, not to what they say. Professor Katherine Porter has put together a fascinating study of bankruptcy and the credit industry in her new paper, "Bankrupt Profits: The Credit Industry's Business Model for Post-Bankruptcy Lending." She uses revealed preferences to inform the debates on bankruptcy abuse. She says, in effect, stop listening to what the credit industry says about the opportunism or moral slackness of people who file for bankruptcy. Instead, look at how the card issuers treat people who are bankrupt.
Creditors talk the talk, but do they walk the walk? Katie's got the numbers.
It's a great research set up: If the industry really thinks most people who file for bankruptcy are cheats, charlatans and the like, then they should avoid the recently bankrupt. Character doesn't change. But if they really think the people who file for bankruptcy try to pay if they possibly can, then the card issuers will solicit them for new business post-bankruptcy.
Porter has the data: The credit card companies try to scoop up these families like ducks scoop up June bugs. Or, as the more scholarly Porter puts it, "empirical evidence on post-bankruptcy credit solicitation suggests that the industry sees bankrupt debtors as lucrative targets for high-yield lending."
Either way, 96.1% of the debtors had received credit solicitations in the year following their bankruptcies--big, fat "we want to lend to you!" letters. And 87.7% of the bankrupt debtors had received offers that explicitly mentioned their bankruptcies. The revealed preferences are unmistakable: When people are bankrupt, the card companies are ready to welcome them back to the debt-fold with plenty of new plastic.
The post-bankrupt debtors are more attractive because they can't file bankruptcy again for eight years. But if the card companies believed they were bad actors, then they should avoid these people anyway because bankruptcy isn't the only way to avoid paying. Even at the height of the bankruptcy filings, more people defaulted on their loans and just walked away than chose bankruptcy. Barring a bad actor from bankruptcy is not the same as getting a bad actor to pay. These card companies who want to lend money must have concluded that folks in bankruptcy are not such bad actors after all.
The implications of Porter's work echo throughout the policymaking world--bankruptcy law, debt collection, credit card regulation. The credit card companies may rail against the "bankruptcy abusers," but Porter's work suggests that they talk the talk, but they don't walk the walk.
















I know first hand they don't walk the walk!
I filed bankruptcy in 2005. Citibank and BOA, who I had listed on my BK
say the bankruptcy mark next to their names on my credit report are scheduled to be removed in 2007. I have a feeling this may mean they will be flooding my mailbox with offers. Ah, just in time for Christmas! No thanks! BOA is the Bank Of Opportunist as far as I am concerned and Citibank is nothing but a bunch of crooks!
I wish both of these co's had appeared at the meeting of the trustee. I would have loved to ask them some questions!
Before my case was even discharged I was flooded with offers from Capital One. I never had them in my wallet and never want them there!
The online article I read 12/6/2005 quoted one of their Vice Presidents by the name of Rowen as saying these words:
The people who get discharged are going to get credit right away. Once they are discharged they can't file BK for a long time again.
The newley bankrupt are also card free and keen to re establish credit, making them music for direct mail solicitations than their over carded, non bankrupt peers. And because they are eager to get their mitts on plastic again, the newly bankrupt will swallow the punishingly high interest the credit card co's will charge them because of their so called subprime status.
Travis Plunkette is quoted in the article as calling them diabolical!
I agree!
I don't want a credit card ever. I don't care about their "rewards".
My reward is being debt free!
I will never go back to debtors prison!
Bonnie
http://pupart.1hwy.com/
August 2, 2007 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ouch BabyBelle it sounds like you've had some painful times.
I'm no fan of the credit industry (nor the insurance industry for that matter). I too see them as vile, greedy opportunists. And after a dust-up with credit card nightmares while in college, I went many years without them. But I found that the way the entire system is wired that in doing so I actually did myself a disservice.
I may be mistaken here but it's my understanding that your credit rating (a worth index of sorts) is largely based on how much debt you are allowed to carry. And without playing their game, you are excluded from many aspects of life unless you are willing to endure great hardships and have large sums of actual cash in hand. I must say again, I may be mistaken in this. But that's how I put the pieces together. But without any credit cards and other such viewable debt, my credit did not improve. This seems wrong to me on several levels.
Credit cards seem to be one more example of what happens when you remove strict regulation and allow "the market" to make the rules. Besides, hasn't banking in general been viewed as a generally evil and corrupt institution essentially since it's inception? I seem to remember several great minds in the past warning us about the dangers that banking could reap on society (now I need to go read up on that again!)
August 2, 2007 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Careful. Credit cards are a cleverly set financial trap. The first thing is to convince you that you can't live without them. Then you are set up contractually to be snared into a financial trap.
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 2, 2007 9:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
"My reward is being debt free! I will never go back to debtors prison!"
way to go! I use my credit card for cash management; i.e., I keep almost every single penny in interest earning CD's. Since I typically charge about $1500 a month (includes phone, groceries, gas, etc..) that comes out to about $75 in extra interest and about $200 via "cash back."
I tend to prefer your approach-- over policy, since guns can only kill you if the trigger is pulled and prohibition doesn't work.
To boldly go...
August 2, 2007 9:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't be surprised if someday they find a way to get you to pay all those "rewards" back. Usually that happens when you get caught with your pants down, so to speak. Its hidden in your contract.
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 2, 2007 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
The first thing is to convince you that you can't live without them.
based on my experience, this isn't necessarily how people would get snared. I bought a keyboard on an interest free, 12 month credit card and have to pay it off ($2300) by october 13th.
I continually remind myself of this because, since then, I wanted another keyboard, another bike, etc... and it took a lot of discipline to say no!
if I wasn't so vigilant, I would have broken down, comprised and rationalized minimum payments.
The only policy I'd make, if I ran the world, would be to mandate a "personal finance" class for those who pay two or more minimum payments a year. i.e. something similar to the defensive driving classes.
since people claim ignorance about ARMS and option ARMS, I'd probably mandate a defensive driving like financial course before you could sign one too!
I know you're stunned that I would recommend classwork! but my defensive driving instructor made it clear that "being right" is "sometimes wrong" if it puts your life at risk and you're "margin of safety" is all that matters.
To boldly go...
August 2, 2007 9:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
you see... I used to be just like you. I played the OPM game with the credit card company and thought I was pretty savvy. That was until they caught me in a small slip up, and a hidden contractual clause that is not even expressly written in the contract. Slip up once, and it will cost you big. The credit card companies know human nature and how to manipulate it. They control the money in this country, and you'll pay one way or another. For additional insight, see here.
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 2, 2007 9:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
that was a great video! I have my "ron paul for president sign" right next to my "kucinich for president sign"!
if you hadn't replied, I was going to add to my post and suggest that if people don't attend a "defensive personal finance class," the ability to make "minimum payments" would go away. of course, the credit industry would balk at this since I've heard that it packages up credit card debt, just like mortgages, and sells it!
perhaps my policy should really be: "in order to get a credit card, you have to take a 'defensive personal finance course.'
should there be a "borrowing license" that is similar to a driver's license?
BTW: when my cash flow got squeezed last year, I borrowed against one of my CD's and paid off this "self-made-loan" within 2 weeks and it cost me about $2 in interest.
To boldly go...
August 2, 2007 10:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
beleive it or not, I had an AT&T Universal Card and, until I could pay it off electronically, I used to forget to send in a check about once a year; however, the company was nice enough to issue payment extensions which essentially waived late fees and interest charges!
maybe, because the credit industry was so flexible with me, I stand behind them to this day!
for example, they even waived late fess and interest charges after I admited that they didn't lose my check because I found it under the seat of my car-- it apparently fell out of the bundle of mail that I took to the post office!
now CITI owns "Universal Card" and they've been similarly nice when I've paid on time (the date on the bill) but the electronic payments didn't clear on time.
Regardless, I now pay 2 weeks in advance to make my life a little less hectic and, under rare events, additional time to pay.
To boldly go...
August 2, 2007 10:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Indentured servitude anyone?
This is how they do it now.
August 2, 2007 11:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Some of those great minds in the past are probably turning over in their graves!
Shortly after I filed BK I talked with the woman who recommended the lawyer I used.
She asked me how everything went and I told her Capital One was flooding my mailboxe with offers of credit. I said I wasn't interested in any credit cards. Her reply was, how are you going to re establish your credit?
I'm in no hurry to re establish credit. That big old black mark of bankruptcy is gonna be on my credit report for ten whole years. Individaul creditors may remove it from the accounts I had with them, but the info from the federal district court will remain.
Every credit card offered to those after bankruptcy has a yearly fee. Some are worse than others. Anyone who is fresh outta BK should be building an emergency fund... not paying yearly fees to any CC Co.
All of them have universal default which every expert says is a dirty trick.
Even if I got a credit card, how much would it improve my credit rating with the big black mark of bankruptcy on my record for ten years?
I think that overshadows everything for the time being. I don't have any need to re establish credit at this time.
I have heard Professor Warren say to pay your essentials. Thats what I am doing.
In fact, that is what many people in this country are doing. Those who follow Dave Ramsey have ditched their credit cards and those in a self help group called Debtors Anonymous have done the same and if they are following the program they are not taking on new debt.
I am glad there are more and more people who are saying no to credit cards.
Bonnie
http://pupart.1hwy.com/
August 3, 2007 4:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think a finance course is a great idea!
I filed BK under the old law, but understand with the new law people have to take classes.
I watch a show called Moneywise on PBS every weeknight.
I missed the first half of the show last night but caught the end where they showed a class. They talked with students at the end who now have hope they can manage their finances and
get out of bad situations.
I recommend Moneywise. It's the best finance show on TV. It's down to earth with some great guests and it always features real people in real situations who tell what they are doing to improve their financial lives
Bonnie
http://pupart.1hwy.com/
August 3, 2007 4:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
That was heavy stuff, but interesting. That was the first time I have heard Ron Paul.
Oh, I agree the CC co's know human nature. Robert Manning spells it out very well in his book Credit Card Nation, with the words
"Americas Addiction to Credit" in the sub title.
These CC co's that send offers to the newly bankrupt are counting on addicts to accept these dreadful offers and unfortunatly many do.
If legislators *really* want to stop repeat bankruptcies then I suggest they put a stop to these co's sending these offers to the newly bankrupt for at least ten years... the same amount of time that bankruptcy remains on a persons credit report.
Bonnie
http://pupart.1hwy.com/
August 3, 2007 5:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Okay...
You've been warned. If you want to submit yourself to a contractual relationship with a financial and legal predator, that is up to you. Some people have to be burned before they learn. I did, and I learned my lesson well.
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 3, 2007 7:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Even if I got a credit card, how much would it improve my credit rating with the big black mark of bankruptcy on my record for ten years?"
Yes, it can stay on your reports for 10 years, however, over time that big black mark fades and has less of an impact. This is why rebuilding credit really IS necessary. I'm with you, I HATE the idea of paying a credit card company anything, but having a credit card does NOT mean carrying balances. You can be one of those dreaded 'deadbeats' - which is what the credit industry calls people who pay off their bills every single month. It will help to build your credit - but you are not paying interest and you are not really carrying debt, but you will build a history of on-time payments.
I'm 2 years post-discharge. I don't WANT any credit cards, but realistically, in todays credit-driven world, you have to play their game to some extent, but you play by YOUR rules - not theirs. Obviously you NEVER charge more than you can pay off in a single month. In 2 years I have a really good start on rebuilding my SAVINGS, and the only cards in my wallet are 2 gas cards which survived the bankruptcy with zero balances. I use my debit card for everything and if I don't have the CASH to pay for what I want I don't buy it.
Society has to get away from the 'gotta have that new gadget NOW' attitude - learn to separate the NEEDS from the WANTS and weigh the difference. Would I LIKE a new iPod (I don't own one yet), yes, I've decided I want one - but until I can buy it CASH, I won't get one. Can it wait ? Of course it can, iPods are not going to disappear in the near future, it'll be there on the shelf when I'm ready, cash in hand ! I bought my new flat screen LCD TV the same way, CASH, and by waiting I got a better deal by comparing pricing and doing a little shopping.
We also need to institute mandatory financial education classes in our schools, starting long before the last year in high school. Kids entering college are barraged by credit card companies and most are clueless of the consequences of using those cards !
I'm debt-free and saving for retirement - not paying interest and fees to financial vampires.
August 3, 2007 8:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is *supposed* to be a free country
and everyone *should* be able to establish decent credit without having to play games with predators. Paying your essentials & having saving should say enough!
Credit cards offered to people out of bankruptcy all have yearly fees. They all have Universal Default. Just what someone fresh out of bankruptcy needs!! Ha!
These co's are not out to help anyone but themself!
Some of them say in the fine print you need to make at least 12 thousand a year to qualify for one of their cards! 12 GRAND A YEAR!!! How can anyone living in America even get by on such a low amount? Issuing a credit card to them is a cruel joke and an invitation for disaster!
Our society has to get away from this idea that *everyone* needs a credit card! Just as some people should never touch alcohol, some should never have a credit card.
We can agree that financial education is necessary .
Bonnie
http://pupart.1hwy.com/
August 3, 2007 9:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Re: Even if I got a credit card, how much would it improve my credit rating with the big black mark of bankruptcy on my record for ten years?
The "big black mark" starts fading to a hazy grey and eventually washed-out white after just a couple years. It counts less and less toward your FICO score (which weights recent data far more heavily than old data) and lenders are less and less concerned about it. I don't know if you were a "credit addict" or not, but if your BK was due to circumstances outside your control (like job loss, divorce or medical issues) then it's probably safe for you to start restablishing credit. But safely and carefuly. ONE (and only one) credit card with a LOW (
August 3, 2007 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
though I hope you have a friend or relative from whom you could borrow money in a true emergency.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'm not depending on anyone but my own emergency fund.
August 3, 2007 11:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's important to point out what Professor Warren isn't saying here. She's not saying that credit shouldn't be extended to people who have been bankrupt. You could argue that it should be extended to such people. Bankruptcy is supposed to be a "starting over" after all and credit can be an asset that people shouldn't be barred from using.
What she is saying is that the willingness of lenders to extend such credit is proof that people who go financially bankrupt aren't morally bankrupt, as was contended 2 years ago when the banruptcy laws were reformed.
This is a good argument for repealing the bankrupcty law reforms. The industry lied.
Another good piece of evidence is that after bankruptcy reform, the industry didn't respond by lowering lending fees. They should have, as risks to lenders decreased.
thosethingswesay.blogspot.com
August 3, 2007 12:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
What she is saying is that the willingness of lenders to extend such credit is proof that people who go financially bankrupt aren't morally bankrupt, as was contended 2 years ago when the banruptcy laws were reformed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh, I thought she was saying that CC Co's who solicit the newly bankrupt are looking for easy targets. I still believe that.
One of the Vice Presidents of Capital One has me convinced after giving his shameful interview about the newly bankrupt being eager to get their mitts on plastic and will swallow punishingly high interest.
http://pupart.1hwy.com/
August 3, 2007 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
well, who isn't a predator? every body wants my money! the federal government, the state government, the local government; car companies, credit card companies, health care providers.
I just don't see a way to get away from the predators... I see too many vultures circling, ready to swoop in....
To boldly go...
August 3, 2007 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Re: One of the Vice Presidents of Capital One has me convinced after giving his shameful interview about the newly bankrupt being eager to get their mitts on plastic and will swallow punishingly high interest.
You only pay that punishingly high interest if you doi not pay off your balance each month. Now, the credit card companise may well hope that people who have been through bankruptcy are such credit junkies that they will immediately charge themselves up to hilts and so pay those interest rates, but a sensible person would not do this, but rather would use the card very sparingly, if at all.
August 3, 2007 3:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Spot on destor23, spot on.
August 3, 2007 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Finance courses, maybe. But, perhaps, also "plastic anonymous" meetings?
I haven't had any finance courses and, until I landed here (from Poland) in '73, I had never even seen a check, much less a credit card. But it seemed self-evident, from the second month I had the card (with it's credit line of $300, in '73), that the "minimum payment" was but so much hogwash. You either paid in full, or you were in debt permanently, because of all the fees, interest, penalties, etc.
I've been one of those "deadbeats" that Drt50 talks about at 11:51AM, ever since. My card is issued by my bank and I pay in full, *at my bank*; I wouldn't put it past the cc management to claim they didn't get my check in time and slap me with a late fee and interest on purchases I haven't even made yet. This way, I have a time stamp to *prove* when I paid, in case there's a dispute. Besides, it saves on postage :)
Plastic is a great convenience but it's a tool; it's your servant, not your master. I never, ever, charge more than what I can put my hands on at the end of the month (ie what's in my savings account, working *for me*). Granted, I've never yet had to use my Visa for absolute essentials and/or emergency (healthcare); it's always been something I wanted rather than needed.
August 3, 2007 7:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're right, but I'm sure there's no "hope" involved in banking. Just like the insurance business, I bet that they know exactly what percentage of BK's will go for the minimum monthlies again, and structure their fees accordingly.
BTW I just got an offer in the mail today listing a "standard" APR and then a "default" APR for late or over-limit balances of "up to 29.99%". Thirty percent interest!! Thanks, Joe Biden.
August 3, 2007 9:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
"to be used sparingly in urgent matters only when cash is unavailable, or cannot be used at all (e.g., renting a car)."
This is a recipe for disaster. If you borrow money when you have money problems, it is like throwing gas on a fire. This is part of the trap that credit card companies set ON PURPOSE. They know everyone has a financial crisis sooner or later, usually once every ten years. Instead of using debt for emergencies, you plan ahead and have an emergency fund of at least 3 to 6 months of expenses.
As far as rental cars and other travel expenses, debit card work just as well as credit cards. There are a few rental car companies that won't do debit, but sometimes they can't tell the difference. Just go to the rental company that will accept the debit card if they refuse you. You are the customer, and they have competition. Credit cards are NOT a requirement. That is just what they want you to think.
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 4, 2007 8:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Plastic anonymous is a great name for a self help group, but there already are group meetings called Debtors Anonymous that use the same 12 steps that AA uses. I have never been to any of their meetings, but have talked with members on the phone. They are dedicated to getting their financail lives straightened out and not taking on any debt.
A few weeks ago on In The Money on CNN they showed a meeting in progress but of course didn't show the members faces, because it is anonymous.
Plastic is a great convenience but it's a tool; it's your servant, not your master.
Your words ^^^ should be part of every financial class.
Very well put!
Bonnie
http://pupart.1hwy.com/
August 4, 2007 8:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, that is true. I am sure they do hope that. They make a whole lotta dough from those who
are not wise with CC use or fall into hard times and don't have emergency funds to pay .
I still agree with Travis Plunkette of the Consumer Federation of America who called them diabolical.
Bonnie
http://pupart.1hwy.com/
August 4, 2007 8:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
The credit card companies are on record that it is their goal to get customers who can't pay their bills. 75% of their profits come from these customers. This is also documented in one of Elizabeth Warren's books, and also Robert Manning's research. You may think it is smart to pay off your credit card every month, but there are countless traps that will trigger problems. It is their goal to get you to spring one of those traps. If you swim with sharks, sooner or later you'll get bitten.
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 4, 2007 8:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, whatever...
Professor Warren is not complaining about the posts here. :)
Bonnie
http://pupart.1hwy.com/
August 4, 2007 8:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Another good piece of evidence is that after bankruptcy reform, the industry didn't respond by lowering lending fees. They should have, as risks to lenders decreased."
This is insightful. The industry uses the risk argument all the time. When the government helps them out in some way to reduce risk, such as reforming the bankruptcy law, they get what they want and respond with continued high interests, They give complex answers to the risk questions, and always justify their actions with their math. However, they never intend to lower interest rates. I wish congress would recognize this. They have let this argument influence them repeatedly and then credit cards never lowered rates after they got what they wanted.
Also, 50% of bankruptcies are a result of medical problems which create enormous medical bills that medical insurance doesn't cover. Consumers are not as irresponsible as the banking industry says. The issue is that these people believed that credit cards were there to cover their financial emergencies. They probably would have gone bankrupt anyway, but the credit cards made the numbers larger, and the credit card companies make enormous profits from these people, especially under the new bankruptcy laws.
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 4, 2007 9:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
All these stories are about the "dark side of the force." There is, howver, another side to credit cards. I usually have over $5000 in credit card debt and have not paid interest on this for years. Because of my excellent credit rating, I keep getting offers for credit cards with "teaser" rates of 0% interest for periods of about 1 year. As the end of any such period is beginning to approach, I replace such cards with new cards with the same 0% interest rate, use those and pay off the cards on which the 0% offer is expiring. Therefore I have been able to borrow over $5000 for several years at 0% interest. I have enough money in my saving account to pay this debt off, but since I earn about 5% interest on the money in the savings account, this would obviously be a mistake. Of course, with the universal default trap, I do have to keep very close track of my payments to make sure I get them in on time, or the jig will be up.
The moral is that if one has the will power to pay off the credit card debt during the grace period, so that one does not have to pay interest on it, and can get a card without an annual fee, one definitely should use credit cards to make one's payments and not debit cards. By doing so one builds up one's credit rating, and gets credit cards on more and more favorable terms may be able to get to the 0% interest level (I am not sure how easy or difficult this is.)
Of course people who are addicted to getting into serious credit card debt should not use them, just as alcoholics should never take a drink.
August 4, 2007 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I should also mention that using credit card payments to build up one's credit rating will make it possible to borrow at a lower interest rate when buying a car or a house.
August 4, 2007 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
"to be used sparingly in urgent matters only when cash is unavailable,"
If one has built up one's credit rating by using and paying off the cards during the grace period, and has several cards with high credit limits, they can be used as a TEMPORARY buffer to help one through a period of TEMPORARY financial problems, which is not available to people who do not have this available.
August 4, 2007 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
hey jim,
I think You'll Like This Jim Cramer video.
The bond market is apparently "worse than the tech bubble" in 2000.
shit's hitting the fan folks and people will smell it.
Cramer says: "we're spending billions to build homes in Iraq and people are losing their homes here." God, that is so nasty! It's certainly better to lose your home because you over bought than from a bomb over head!
What a souless man!
To boldly go...
August 4, 2007 12:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
I really think that people who have problems with credit card debt will get much more useful advice listening to the Susi Orman show than listening to your paranoid warnings.
August 4, 2007 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sure. Suzy Orman is financed by Fair Isaac. I think she is a little biased. She advises people to use credit cards because she is paid to buy into their lies. Be careful who you listen to. I think people would do much better to listen to Dave Ramsey.
My warnings are "paranoid" until they come true. You'll probably get your turn someday to see the reality of the situation, if you aren't prepared. My warnings are based on well researched facts that are published and widely accepted by experts such as Elizabeth Warren. I just don't beat around the bush.
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 4, 2007 3:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
You see, the "temporary" problem becomes more permanent when things get out of hand, which they tend to do in many cases. You take on significant risk when you go into debt to cover expenses. You are assuming you will do better than you did before you got into debt. That doesn' happen too often, especially if it was an emergency. Especially when you start juggling accounts and get caught with a lower FICO score and universal default kicks in. You need to see the documentary movie, Maxed Out
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 4, 2007 3:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
You might say your financial plan is to build on a house of cards.
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 4, 2007 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Re:: If you borrow money when you have money problems, it is like throwing gas on a fire.
I am not talking about catastrophes I am talking about situations where you may need to bridge brief cash flow deficiencies. I keep my savings in a mutual fund. It takes three business days to access the money (a good idea since it prevents me from spending it on a whim). A couple months ago one of our cats got sick and ran up a unpleasant vet bill. I paid with my credit card, and (in this case) covered the debt by cutting back on some other anticipated expenses; at need, I could also have withdrawn money from my savings. As long as you pay off the card within the grace period, it IS a good deal (%0 interest for crying out loud!). Or another example: I just charged $370 in dental expsenses, but I am going to be paid back for that by my FSA at work. Again, no risk. Now obviously some people may not be disciplined enough to do this, they may use their credit card foolishly. But though I am certainly not ignorant of the sorts of racaiouspractices Elizabeth Warren highlights here, it is possible to work aroudn them by careful behavior, and a fairly large fraction of peopel do exactky that (40% of credit card holders have no revolving debt).
Re: As far as rental cars and other travel expenses, debit card work just as well as credit cards.
No they don't. Several companies will not take them at all (and that means you may not be able to get the best price). And many that do charge a large deposit against your checking account that may not clear until a week or so later-- which can lead to bounced checks and high bounced check fees.
August 5, 2007 5:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Re: The issue is that these people believed that credit cards were there to cover their financial emergencies. They probably would have gone bankrupt anyway, but the credit cards made the numbers larger
The real issue here is that we do not have universal healthcare (And, incredibly, I recall you arguing against universal healthcare elsewhere!). At least in these cases the people did get the healthcare they needed, and it was the banks that got stiffed, not the healthcare providers.
August 5, 2007 5:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
I assure you the banks didn't get stiffed. They charged high interest, significant fees, etc. Then by the time they get into bankruptcy and settle for 50%, they still made a tidy profit.
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 5, 2007 7:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
I assure you the banks didn't get stiffed. They charged high interest, significant fees, etc. Then by the time they get into bankruptcy and settle for 50%, they still made a tidy profit.
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 5, 2007 7:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
"As long as you pay off the card within the grace period, it IS a good deal (%0 interest for crying out loud!). Or another example: I just charged $370 in dental expsenses, but I am going to be paid back for that by my FSA at work."
That is how it starts... next time its bigger, and the next bigger. Until it becomes a problem.
"No they don't. Several companies will not take them at all (and that means you may not be able to get the best price). "
I used to buy $20,000 a month in travel in my business for hundreds of travelers. I have dealt with this. I have to disagree with your assessment. The hotels want a card to reserve your room. Often, you will find that prepaying a room gives you a big discount if you negotiate it. Rental car companies want to rent you cars. You are the customer. You have the power. Some wont take debit cards if they know they are debit cards. They will take a deposit, yes, but do you blame them? If you use your card, you will get it back immediately when you turn in your car.
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 5, 2007 7:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
"As long as you pay off the card within the grace period, it IS a good deal (%0 interest for crying out loud!). Or another example: I just charged $370 in dental expsenses, but I am going to be paid back for that by my FSA at work."
That is how it starts... next time its bigger, and the next bigger. Until it becomes a problem.
"No they don't. Several companies will not take them at all (and that means you may not be able to get the best price). "
I used to buy $20,000 a month in travel in my business for hundreds of travelers. I have dealt with this. I have to disagree with your assessment. The hotels want a card to reserve your room. Often, you will find that prepaying a room gives you a big discount if you negotiate it. Rental car companies want to rent you cars. You are the customer. You have the power. Some wont take debit cards if they know they are debit cards. They will take a deposit, yes, but do you blame them? If you use your card, you will get it back immediately when you turn in your car.
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 5, 2007 7:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Some of them got stiffed so bad they are actually sending offers to people who have listed them in their BK and telling them:
WE WANT YOU BACK!!!!
Now tell me, if these co's were "stiffed" then why on earth do they want someone back who has "stiffed" them? Are they gluttons for punishment, stupid, or what???
I know the answer!!! So do they!!!
Bonnie
http://pupart.1hwy.com/
August 5, 2007 8:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Suzy O and Ramsey both have some good advice, but they are also peddling thier books etc. which is fine but....
If anyone wants to watch a great financial show without all the drama, check out Moneywise on PBS.
Common sense and great guests are the best discription of it!
Bonnie
http://pupart.1hwy.com/
August 6, 2007 8:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Since I have enough money in my savings account to pay the credit cards off if push comes to shove, how is my financial plan built on a house of cards?
I just recently replaced my old American Express credit card on which the 0% interest option had expired with a new 0% credit card which will give me the 0% rate for a year. This is one of 3 0% credit cards I currently have. For the other 2, the 0% offer will expire by the end of the year, so I am currently paying them off and using the new American Express card.
If I ever buy a house, I will be able to borrow at a very favorable rate of interest.
August 6, 2007 4:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just because some people cannot handle debt and use it wisely does not mean that others, who can, should not use it.
Your argument is similar to arguing that because some people cannot handle alcohol and become alcoholics no one should drink.
August 6, 2007 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you do not have the money to pay for essential expenses, taking on the risk of using a credit card is preferrable to not being able to afford neccessities.
If you cannot see a doctor when you are sick, taking the risk of using a credit card is preferable to doing without medical care.
If you do not have the money to pay your rent, taking on the risk of using a credit card is preferable to being evicted from your apartment.
If you are hungry and cannot pay for food, taking the risk of using a credit card is preferable to going hungry.
All life involves taking risk. Rational behavior involves balancing the banefits and risks against each other.
August 6, 2007 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have used credit card virtually from the time that they have become available and have never had serious problems. Just because you can't handle them does not mean that no one else can either.
August 6, 2007 4:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
The bankrupcy reforms were a sell out to the credit card companies. I strongly opposed them. The rules clearly need to be changed so that they are no longer stacked in favor of the credit card companies. But it does not follow that people who can handle credit should not use them.
August 6, 2007 4:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ron Paul is a radical Libetarian. He believes that the government should do nothing to help the poor and disadvantaged, should not provide even the minimal help for getting medical care for the poor, such as medicaid and health coverage for poor children, should not protect consumers and workers against preditory corporations, should not protect the voting rights of minorities against discrimination by powerful entrenced groups, etc. His philosophy of what the government should do is the exact opposite of Kusinich's. If this kind of attitude toward what the government should and should not do appeals to you, Ron Paul is your candidate, otherwise he is not.
August 6, 2007 4:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good for you Capt Video.
I have never said that others will run into serious problems. I know many people who use cards responsibly.
Those who can't shouldn't have them, period! Seems the message in our society is that we all "need" at least one to establish credit or re establish credit.
Thats's what bothers me.
And CC co's that flood the mailboxes of the newly bankrupt are disgusting. There are some who are just too weak , desperate or don't understand just how dreadful some of these offers really are.
Let the newly bankrupt find these co's if they want credit after BK. Not allow these co's to bombard them with these offers.
Paying ones essentials and having savings should be enough to show a person is responsible enough to get a decent rate on a mortgage or a car loan.
Just as some should never touch alcohol, some should never touch credit cards.
Bonnie
http://pupart.1hwy.com/
August 6, 2007 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
My suggestion of avoiding credit cards has nothing to do with your ability to "handle" them. It has more to do with a contract that strips you of all rights, yet pretends to protect you with disclosures. It is a contract that has hidden terms that you agreed to fulfill, though you are unaware of them. (perhaps you believe they won't enforce them, or that you are clever enough to avoid them - based on your anctedotal personal experience, which is what they want you to think.) That alone is enough to refuse to agree to the terms of their contract, but there is more...
Credit card companies are on record stating their intentions. They are in the business of getting customers to default so they can charge extra fees and jack up interest rates. They literally are in the business of stealing from the poor, and now enslaving them for life by depriving them of bankruptcy protection. That alone is enough to boycott the companies, I'm sure you agree, but there is more...
Credit card companies and banks are so powerful now that they have been able to get a bankruptcy bill passed, top priority, MBNA alone contributing more than $600,000 to Bush's re-election campaign, and getting a bill the country did not want passed first thing after Bush was re-elected, before anyone knew what was happening. This is also related to fallout from the original legislation that created the problem - the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which was sold as protection for the public, but was actually a law that undermined the U.S. Constitution by giving tremendous monetary power to a private corporation owned by banks, who are motivated purely by profit (the ones who are stealing from the poor).
Being a customer of a credit card company endorses what they do. You are sending a message that their actions are acceptable and their contractual terms are agreeable. You are compromising your values of helping the poor in exchange for a little convenience.
Is convenience more important than your principles and your freedom?
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 7, 2007 8:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is an unfair assessment of Ron Paul. He simply doesn't believe government help is the answer. It hasn't solved the problems for the entire history of the country, what makes you think it suddenly will with a new program? Each new government program has created a bigger government and increases government overhead. We aren't getting our money's worth from our taxes. There is a reason we have a growing problem with poverty, and it isn't a lack of government programs to help the poor. We need to address the problem, not the symptom.
Too bad no one wants to really hear the truth of the matter. They like the lies that come out of Washington now, because they wish it were true.
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 7, 2007 9:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
The point is to be prepared before you get into that situation. If you aren't, credit cards simply delay and intensify the inevitable. We need to face a problem when we have it, the sooner we do the less painful it will be.
Yes, we must take risks in life, but some are not worth the reward. Risk financial collapse in exchange for convenience? I don't think that is justified.
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 7, 2007 9:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Since I have enough money in my savings account to pay the credit cards off if push comes to shove, how is my financial plan built on a house of cards?"
You are borrowing money to justify borrowing more money at a better rate. You spend money on interest so you can spend more money on interest. That sounds like a plan for financial success. ;-)
Why do you think the credit card companies sell 0% interest so hard? (hint: it is profitable to do so) Why do you think they let people who pay off their credit balances every month to avoid interest payments? (hint: it is profitable to do so)
Credit card users spend 12 to 18 percent more than when they use cash, according to a study by Dunn & Bradstreet. Do millionaires get rich with reward programs from credit cards? i don't think so. What do broke people do? They use credit cards. According to the American Bankruptcy Institute, in 69% of bankruptcies credit card debt is blamed for the bankruptcy.
Juggling 0% interest cards isn't smart, it is deceived. There are better ways to get a low interest mortgage.
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 7, 2007 9:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Jim,
What is your opinion of ATM's in church lobbies?
Oh, they call them
Automated Tithing Machines!
Bonnie
http://pupart.1hwy.com/
August 7, 2007 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Never heard of them being in church lobbies, nor seen them there. Am I missing something?
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 7, 2007 5:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
You Tube has the CNN video that tells all about ATM's in some churches. Do a search there and you will find it.
Bonnie
http://pupart.1hwy.com/
August 7, 2007 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting. I'm not opposed to using new technology to achieve God's purposes, however, I am not a fan of letting the bank get a piece of the action with the merchant fee. I also don't want to encourage churchgoers to use plastic to pay. I am really opposed to the machines that take credit cards, for obvious reasons.
The pastor that is doing this probably needs to think more about how he uses his money. If he buys everything with a debit card, he has let himself become dependent on convenience. That is a step in the wrong direction.
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 7, 2007 8:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
His philosophy of what the government should do is the exact opposite of Kusinich's.
both are strong supporters of civil rights and that, in my opinion, preserves democracy.
To boldly go...
August 7, 2007 9:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
At this point in my life if I was in any of the situations you described, I would contact a church and ask for help and not use a credit card. That to me is rational behavior.
If you have ever seen some of the credit card offers that are sent to the newly bankrupt,I am sure you would tell anyone to stay clear of these Goliaths of Greed. Read the terms on some CC issuers like First Premier or Tribute. You can easily find them doing a search. These are two of the co's that flood the mailboxes of the newly bankrupt. Unfortunately, some fail to read the offer and fall for these traps. Others are just desperate and don't even realize what they have gotten into until it is too late.
Tribute was started by an heir to a family who made big money in the debt collection business. I am sure Tribute knows all the traps and tricks and even more !
I am not against CC use for those who can handle them responsibly. I am against predators contacting the newly bankrupt who are in a vulnerable position. If they want credit, then let them go find the predators. Don't allow the predators to contact them .
Bonnie
http://pupart.1hwy.com/
August 8, 2007 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't oppose getting everyone access to healthcare. I think the problem goes much deeper than a lack of a government program to address the concern. The problem with this and the bankruptcy issue is one of materialism. This is most obvious at Christmas. We have forgotten what the holiday is about. Go here and see a revolutionary idea that could change the world, if we just change our approach to Christmas. Ten billion dollars gets clean water to everyone in the world. 15 billion feeds everyone. In America we spend 450 billion at Christmas. Get the picture?
Jim Anderson
The Truth About Credit
Facebook Profile
Ministry WebsiteAugust 10, 2007 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
ACORN has predatory-lending and foreclosure campaigns that try to educate people before they play into the hands of unscrupulous lenders and help them if they do. Low-income people are particularly vulnerable to these lenders as they often don't understand the terms and trust the "experts." A large number are elderly.
August 10, 2007 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink