TPMCafe
« Laws Alone Can't Protect Workers' Rights: Stories from Beijing and New York | Home | Subsidizing the Rich and a Free Market are Not the Same Thing »

Miscellaneous

user-pic

1. I wasn't invited again this year to the Allen & Co. media mogul bash at Sun Valley, but I was in 1997 and then I predicted, while sitting next to David Geffen, that the Internet would overthrow the structure of the music business. Still another prediction from which I personally made no profit and yet which proved completely true.
2. The music touring business is showing record profits. Only the intermediaries, who package and yet neither sing nor play, have suffered from the overthrow.
3. The Wizards really have to trade Etan Thomas along with Spanish star Navarro in return for some relatively low paid but very tall man who blocks shots. Unless this happens, Agent Zero will leave the team at the end of the coming year.
4. There doesn't seem to be an antitrust policy

any more. That is because we don't have antitrust politics. None of the candidates emphasizes it; indeed, few even mention it. Policy comes from politics, not the other way around.
5. The Washington Post has it completely wrong: most of what needs changing in order to reduce global warming is not a problem in economics but culture. For instance, if everyone in America knew how to eschew buying an I-Phone (or its equivalent in terms of unnecessary but amusing expenditure) in order to save Africa from burning up over the next century, I bet we would all do it. And $2,000 a person (the device plus the AT&T contract) would make some big advances. That is $600 billion after all. You can buy a lot of green power for that number. But caught in the web of our beliefs and values, we do not know how to see this connection and make that choice. That is not economics but a cultural, or if you prefer, informational failure.
6. Of course we need to find a way to use nuclear power -- especially in developing countries. Indeed, the World Bank should primarily focus on loaning money to encourage non-carbon energy generation in developing countries. But, sadly, it won't, for the reason implied in paragraph 7.
7. About two-thirds of the problems in battling climate change result from the vested economic interests of the current holders of power in the global economy, and not from the cost of changing to green power, much less from the inability of technology to discover alternatives to carbon energy.
8. The primary path to success in converting to green power from carbon power is antitrust policy, which means we need antitrust politics --we need to treat the energy industry as Ma Bell was treated in 1984: break-up to stimulate innovation.
9. The reassembly of Ma Bell is a big problem for America but oddly you can't find an economist to say so. You can't find too many economists in today's day and age to say what really are big problems. But I love Brad DeLong.
10. I don't see how the Redskins make big advances without a big defensive lineman being added to the team. And the O-Line is old.
11. Don't you think Bud Selig should decide if he's happy or sad that Bonds is breaking Aaron's record? How long does one need to think about whether to celebrate or ignore the event, which is certain to occur soon?
12. How come in its article today about the super-rich the New York Times mostly featured Democrats? What's up with that bouleversement of expectation? On the other hand, out of the 15,000 families that make a kaboodle every year according to the article, what's your guess on the percentage that vote Democratic?
13. I bet the green tech conference in Aspen this coming week is not well covered in the mainstream media, yet is more interesting than any article in any MSM about climate change in the coming two months.
14. The novel is alive, fun, and well. See "Raw Shark Texts" for an example.
15. I don't see why "saving Africa" is necessarily a bad idea for non-Africans to hold; isn't the point of progress the development of a greater complexity of commitments to other people and other ideas than those one has grown up with?
16. I'm quite concerned that Conan won't be as consistently funny as Jay, who, albeit quite mainstream, is quite daring in his own way. Maybe this transition is Dave's Last Chance.
17. Ralph Nader thinks he may run again? I guess he hasn't done enough harm. So, is there such a thing as a group of Naderites who could rise up en masse and cause him to come to his senses? Probably not. He's a celebrity. But why? Why shouldn't the MSM decide never to write another word about him; that would do him in politically.
What makes him news? It's a circular feedback loop to write about him.
18. I don't see how the Republicans resist nominating Romney. He has all the money and his opponents are self-destructing. Well, what was good for American Motors is good for America, I guess.
19. I saw that one of the many who lied to a grand jury about the quiz show scandals has just died; the whole group is now almost gone. The idea that television would tell the truth is itself long gone.
20. I think Balkinization is a great legal blog. Very daunting expertise demonstrated often! Now where is a similarly skilled blog for MBA's?


5 Comments

| Leave a comment

"The music touring business is showing record profits. Only the intermediaries, who package and yet neither sing nor play, have suffered from the overthrow."

Not so. Here in Nashville a lot of songwriters and session musicians are hurting as well--and since songwriting and session work underwrites the real creative community here, it threatens its future. As usual, you guys think the only model for making music is rock bands. Cole Porter would be screwed in the present environment, but you wouldn't even notice.

anti-trust. now there is what has become a foreign concept.

the most monstrous anti-competitive, monopolistic combines, involving the keys to the amerikan economy, have been countenanced since the enthronement of the corporations' puppet king, ronnie raygun.

but all of a sudden, an uncritical acquisition is being opposed by the bushit ftc[i thought ronnie had castrated it 27 years ago].

opposing whole foods acquistion of wild oats. how does this make any sense?

mackey, though having revealed himself recently to be delusional, was, i think, a bushit pioneer[and if not a pioneer, a fan, and major contributor]. surely that should have allowed to him to do almost anything, even murder his wife in the cause of bushism.

but acquiring wild oats is being opposed by the moribund federal trade commission. huh?

the only explanation i can come up with is that wild oats' majority stockholder is ron burkle, a major dem. and the bushies just don't want to see his anti-reptillian coffers augmented.

Reed, I gotta hand it to you. With literally nothing at all to say, you managed to fulfill your committment to contributing a post every week, without once saying anything. That is a rare skill you possess.

Hoppy in Sacramento

Bud Selig: His decision will be announced at the 59th second of the 59th minute of the eleventh hour. As long as no money is on the line, this is a man who would rather split the difference than eat. Remember the 2002 All-Star Game.

"I don't see how the Republicans resist nominating Romney.": And yet, resist they do. He's outspent everyone, but his numbers do not rise. He's running third in some polls, fourth in most, far behind Giuliani (and soon, Ol' Fred) in all. The proper comparison is not to American Motors, but to (not Gerald) Ford: Romney's an Edsel. Despite some objective advantages over competing products, Repubs aren't buying him -- and won't.

Hoppy's nailed it, as usual. I've come to think that it's too simple to oppose cautious DLC types to courageous leaders. It doesn't just simplify some issues, whether to overlook divisions on even the left over trade or Clinton's curious mix of a genuinely liberal voting record, better than that of her opponents, with a cautious refusal of leadership. But it also groups too many together as the center. I've thus my own subgenres to offer.

There are the "liberal hawks." That's, say, the Ikenberry/Slaughter faction, and they continue to scare me. There is someone with a conviction that politics takes compromise, like Ed, and I often at least feel I can argue with him, since he isn't committed to a reactionary agenda, just unable to go near it. (I admit that openness wouldn't hold for someone like Matt Bai, but once you become a media expert, you play god.) And then there is just someone with no special needs other than to hang out with the right Beltway crowd and maybe get a good dinner at which to share sports gossip or a bureaucratic appointment. I'd put Reed in that crowd, which is why I didn't take his vague post last week that sounded hawkish as seriously as others perturbed by it. Steve C. fascinates me as partaking of all three.

John

http://www.haberarts.com/

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »



Book Club Calendar


Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address