TPMCafe
« Edwards, Poverty, and the New York Times' Matt Bai | Home | The Bush administration should have known »

No Breaks, Big Debt

user-pic

Professor Warren’s recent post and Dan Geldon’s follow up on student loans reminded me of a conversation I had recently about education debt. The conversation centered around why post-secondary education costs are not a tax write-off like, for example, business expenses? While there are some tax provisions designed to help curb the cost of education, such as the Hope Credit, costs associated with education are largely not defrayed, in stark contrast to the wide scope of business write-offs.

In light of the growing importance of secondary education to the service economy, it is puzzling to me that the tax code fails to create educational incentives in the same way it does for business. A tax break for educational expenses would benefit those who chose to pursue higher education. In light of all the claims about the need to educate Americans, why aren’t we doing more to make education affordable?

I wanted to run down some of the arguments I have heard about the advantages and disadvantages of making all post secondary educational expenses into a right off.

POINT:
Tax relief will disproportionately help the wealthier segments of the population because they also tend to have more access to post-secondary education.

COUNTERPOINT:
True, but its conceivable that people will be more likely to take on educational debt if they know that their expenses will be a tax write-off. Furthermore, there are ways to cap the write-off so it doesn’t apply to those with more than a certain maximum income.


POINT:
Schools will raise the price of tuition and counteract the benefit of the tax incentive.

COUNTERPOINT:
It is possible to include incentives against this, and many state systems are statutorily limited in their ability to raise tuition.


POINT:
This is a very expensive proposition; it is not revenue neutral.

COUNTERPOINT:
Aside from the fact that it would very likely reduce the number of bankruptcies in this country as education debt is growing at an alarming rate, it seems a small price to pay for creating larger educational incentives. Furthermore, as mentioned above, the educational tax breaks could be made more affordable with income caps.

POINT
There are other more comprehensive ways to reduce the cost of education.

COUNTERPOINT
True, but this seems like a good start.


1 Comment

| Leave a comment

Mercedes:
I notice on the 2006 1040A Form, Line 31 Education Credits says, in part:

"If you (or your dependent) paid qualified expenses in 2006 for yourself, your spouse, or your dependent to enroll in or attend an eligible educational institution, you may be able to take an education credit. See Form 8863 for details..."

The instructions go on to explain some disqualifying factors, including income limits. You can not take the credit if your income is over $55,000 filing separately or $110,000 if filing jointly.

I don't believe all of the tuition is eligible for credit, rather, some fraction of it, as I recall. We used this a couple years back when my wife was attending classes.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »



Book Club Calendar


Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address