DC Talks, States Act
The dirty secret of the Democratic takeover of Congress is that they still haven't passed any significant legislation. Bush hasn't even had to use his veto pen on anything other than the recent Iraq bill. Most initiatives are still going to their grave in the US Senate.
Yet progressives are winning serious victories on health care, on clean energy, on voting rights, on gay rights and other issues across the country; a number of state legislators have already finished their 2007 sessions (they're quicker) and Progressive States has highlighted important victories this year here and here. Just a few highlights from states like Washington, Iowa, New Mexico, Maryland and even partially-Republican states like Indiana:
Washington:
- Became the second state to offer new parents paid family leave.
- The legislature enacted SB 5093, which would extend health coverage to all children in families earning up to 300% of the poverty line by 2009-- extending coverage to 38,000 children, including undocumented immigrants, in the next two years.
- Washington approved greenhouse reduction targets, HB 1210, that set a goal of emission levels 25% lower by 2035 and 50% lower by 2050.
- Washington funded a mapping of the broadband digital divide in the state to prepare for comprehensive legislation in '08 to move towards universal buildout.
- It created a domestic partnerships option for same-sex couples, giving such couples legally recognized hospital visitation, autopsy authorization and inheritance rights.
Maryland:
- Passed a first-in-the-nation state living wage law, HB 430, to assure that workers on government contracts get paid a decent wage.
- Set another precedent by becoming the first state to sign onto a national compact by the states to allocate its Presidential electors to the winner of the national popular vote-- a system that will go into effect once states accounting for a majority of electoral votes agrees.
- SB 392 scrapped existing voting machines in favor of ones that produce voter-verifiable paper records.
- SB 488, will restore voting rights to repeat ex-felons once they have completed their sentences.
- By enacting "Clean Cars" legislation, Maryland will be helping to lead the nation in demanding tougher emission standards in cars sold by 2011.
- Amended Maryland's Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) to significantly expand requirements for solar energy within the state's energy mix.
New Mexico:
- New Mexico approved public financing for contested statewide judicial elections and barred financial services and investment contractors from giving gifts or campaign contributions to state officials.
- New Mexico raised its minimum wage to $7.50 over two years, increasing the income of an estimated 160,000 workers statewide.
- HB 436 creates a state Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) worth eight percent of the federal EITC for which a family is eligible.
- HB 92 will strictly regulate predatory payday lending, restricting loans to 14 to 35 days, prohibiting rollover loans, and capping interest rates.
- It became the first state in the nation to create a Renewable Energy Transmission Authority to administer renewable energy use in the state and mandated that 20% of state's energy come from renewable sources by 2020.
- The state also enacted a Green Buildings Tax Credit to help boost sustainable building.
- SB 269 creates a solar tax credit for solar electrical and thermal systems that, in conjunction with federal credits, will give consumers about 30% off the cost of typical residential solar systems.
Iowa:
- Created the Iowa Power Fund, a $100 million investment in the state's renewable energy industry in a bid to, in the words of Governor Culver, make Iowa "the energy capital of the world."
- Iowa approved Election Day Registration, a key reform to improve voter turnout in future elections.
- Raised the minimum wage by $2.10, a relief for low-income state residents.
- The legislature approved an increase in the states Earned Income Tax Credit, SF 590, to seven percent and made the credit refundable.
- Iowa became the 18th state to ban discrimination based on sexual orientation and the 11th state to ban discrimination based on gender identity.
- Teacher salaries will advance to the national average, a $250 million teacher pay increase.
- The legislature voted to end paperless electronic voting and move the state towards voter-marked paper ballots.
- The Senate passed a resolution opposing the President's escalation in Iraq.
Arkansas:
- This was the year that schools started to get fixed, after $456 million of a projected $919 million budget surplus was set aside to pay for court-ordered replacement and repair of the state's public school facilities.
- Signature success of the session was tax relief for the working poor in the state, as 81,000 lower-income families were eliminated from the tax rolls through a raising of the minimum taxable income levels. Taxes on groceries were cut in half, reducing the rate from 6% down to 3%
Even in Indiana (with a Dem House, but GOP Governor and Senate):
- The legislature approved $90 million in funding for all-day kindergarten.
- On health care, Indiana used a cigarette tax increase of 44 cents to fund expanded health care for 200,000 uninsured state residents who earn up to 200 percent of the federal poverty line ($41,300 for a family of four).
This is just a handful of the states that have already ended their sessions-- and doesn't include states like California, Illinois and other even more liberal states that are still in session and discussing even more far-reaching health care, consumers and labor reforms.
But whether the issue is paid family leave, health care, renewable energy, or voting reforms, the states are where progressive policy is being pioneered.
One reason that states usually CAN act is they don't face a filibuster allowing a minority to block all new legislation. States are actually democracies where "one person one vote" actually decides majorities, so it's natural that they are where progressive action will likely remain-- with the feds usually catching up years later.















Nathan, the US Senate is designed to be a roadblock to sudden, ill-thought out legislation. The fact that the former GOP majority chose, instead, to turn over their jobs to Bush and simply rubber stamp whatever Bush asked for, doesn't change that. I'm not unhappy about the current pace of legislation.
Imagine the alternative - a mad rush to dump a pile of legislation on Bush's desk for him to veto, just for political gain. All that would accomplish is talking points against the Republicans, and a lack of adequate time and manpower to do the serious investigating now in order.
A Congress dominated by one party and the presidency by the other party will always result in few pieces of legislation being passed. Only a president willing and able to compromise for the sake of movement in the direction he believes to be forward can counter that. We don't have such a president.
Hoppy in Sacramento
May 8, 2007 2:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
They may not have passed any significant legislation, but they stopped some that would have became law if the Repugs still held Congress. The Dems stopped the Bush freight train running down the tracks; no more blank checks, no more White House and various Depts, like Justice, free of oversight; and now the Dems are forcing Bush and the Repugs to vote against popular bills, like the pharmaceutical import bill,
and the war, which gives Dem candidates ammunition in 08.
May 8, 2007 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hoppy: "A Congress dominated by one party and the presidency by the other party will always result in few pieces of legislation being passed." Especially if "dominated" means a virtual tie, a one-vote majority if you can bring Lieberman on board. And especially if Bush is the ultimate imperial presidency, prepared to ignore Congress.
So Nathan, why is labor whining about the Democrats and not mobilizing for victory?
John
http://www.haberarts.com/
May 8, 2007 6:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are right about the tiny majority the Democrats have in the Senate, and about the imperial (largely unconstitutional) president we now have. But, even a 5 vote majority won't make passing legislation any easier if the minority is determined to stop it. The Senate rules are designed to stop a majority from steamrollering over the minority. Now when the Democrats were the minority, they weren't determined to do anything but plead not to be hit. Different ball game then.
Hoppy in Sacramento
May 8, 2007 6:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
...not to mention they're also scaring the shit out of the people who are trying to turn this country into an Authoritarian Police State.
I give them a B+, maybe an A-.
-Dave Adams-
May 8, 2007 6:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hoppy:
Is what you are saying that the Democrats (with a majority, or at least with control of all committees and with control of which bills reach the floor of the Senate) are allowing the Republicans (without a majority, and without control of all committees and without control of which bills reach the floor of the Senate) to control the agenda of the Senate?
May 8, 2007 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, I am saying that the rules of the Senate can be used to stall any legislation almost indefinitely if a determined minority wishes to do so. That minority has to be larger than 40% to do that, but it is, in this case. So, the Republicans are not setting the agenda, they are preventing the Democrats from doing so. That leaves the Senate rudderless, other than doing investigations.
If the Democrats were as monolithic as the Republicans, this couldn't be done, but Democrats do exercise a lot of independence, and vote depending on issues, not just by playing follow the leader. So, the Democrats can never get enough votes on any one issue to force it thru the Republican road blocks. Even the Iraq funding measure had to be padded with pork to get enough Democratic votes to pass.
Hoppy in Sacramento
May 8, 2007 10:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
What's interesting is that even in the responses, the obsession with DC continues in defending the lack of progress in DC, instead of discussions on how to further the successes outlined in the states.
Why the obsession with DC? States spend almost as much money, they more directly control schools, prisons and a range of other public projects, most court cases are decided under state law, not federal law, yet most progressives are obsessed with federal legislation.
The rightwing doesn't make this mistake. They put serious money and think tank power behind state-level policy from "tort reform" to TABOR "tax revolt" legislation to anti-gay marriage laws. Most rightwing "wedge" issues are state issues, not federal, yet progressives still largely ignore discussions of state policy.
May 9, 2007 4:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I pretty much agree with that. Then again, federal issues are the issues that get national news coverage by the MSM.
May 9, 2007 5:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's an easy excuse, but the rightwing has consistently made messaging state issues like gay marriage a priority and have thereby gotten the national press to cover those issues. Many progressives ignore state issues and haven't consistently messaged them on a national basis, so it's hard to just blame the media.
That said, there is local media in fifty states that can be pushed to see local issues in the national context-- and that's the media most voters read or see. So you can do "national" messaging state-by-state if coordinated. And local media loves to cover local politics far more than DC politics, since they can include local personalities and stories.
May 9, 2007 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Um....it wasn't an excuse, it was an observation.
It also wasn't a disagreement with your post.
May 9, 2007 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
"...not to mention they're also scaring the shit out of the people who are trying to turn this country into an Authoritarian Police State."
Yep, they have Gonzalez spinning like a whirling dervish and looking like an undereducated rank amature to boot.
May 9, 2007 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, in WA, we have a pretty savvy legislative leadership group that's done a nice job of moving the spectrum left WHILE expanding Democratic majorities. The Republicans have basically been marginalized in the western half of the State (where the vast majority of the population is), and there have even been some pickups on the dry side near Spokane...and the issues that have been chosen have been ones that it's hard for the Republicans to get picky on.
The Democrats also put a rainy day fund up for a public vote, a pet issue of the Republicans for years, and stole their thunder on that as well, leaving them basically to grouse about how much the D's are spending on education and so on... not really a winning formula, I think.
More like this at the state level, please- smart strategies and policies that get popular support and marginalize the Republicans into their 30% die hard conservative bedrock and little else. Hopefully progressive change can bubble up to the Congress...
May 9, 2007 2:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
With such a small majority in both Houses of Congress, it seems naive to expect sweeping legislation. I agree with others who state that the Democratic Party is now effectively acting as a huge "speed bump" for the total control of a totalitarian "democracy" and the advancement of Bushie's "unitary executive" concept of governance, enabled by the Pubbies for the past six years.
We are now seeing many oversight hearings that have been woefully neglected for the past six years. The very dirty laundry is finally being aired in public, and likely is going to tarnish the Christofascist patina for decades.
It will take significant swinging of the pendulum for sanity and common sense to return, but slowly our country is coming back.
I'm watching Gonzo's testimony right now and he's even more of a disaster this time around than he was before.
May 10, 2007 9:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, you're preaching to the choir, here. Here's a diary of mine on DailyKos from 2004 called "It's the state governments, stupid":
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/11/11/234344/12
13 comments. I followed up with a "State Government strategy session," with five ideas for better ways to organize at the state level:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/11/12/14559/544
An amazing 0 comments. Not sure what that means, other than that I've never gotten the hang of DailyKos...
I also think as we go forward with a progressive DC agenda, make it more federal and less national may make it easier sledding.
May 10, 2007 9:53 AM | Reply | Permalink