« Rat-a-Tut-Tut | Home | You Can Look it Up »

Letter to George Tenet

user-pic

The following was sent to George Tenet today in care of his publisher. The letter, written by a group of former intelligence officers, reflects disgust with George Tenet's effort to burnish his image with his new "tell" all book.

28 April 2007
Mr. George Tenet
c/o Harper Collins Publishers
10 East 53rd Street
8th Floor
New York City, New York 10022
ATTN: Ms. Tina Andredis

Dear Mr. Tenet:

We write to you on the occasion of the release of your book, At the Center of the Storm. You are on the record complaining about the “damage to your reputation”. In our view the damage to your reputation is inconsequential compared to the harm your actions have caused for the U.S. soldiers engaged in combat in Iraq and the national security of the United States. We believe you have a moral obligation to return the Medal of Freedom you received from President George Bush. We also call for you to dedicate a significant percentage of the royalties from your book to the U.S. soldiers and their families who have been killed and wounded in Iraq.

We agree with you that Vice President Dick Cheney and other Bush administration officials took the United States to war for flimsy reasons. We agree that the war of choice in Iraq was ill-advised and wrong headed. But your lament that you are a victim in a process you helped direct is self-serving, misleading and, as head of the intelligence community, an admission of failed leadership. You were not a victim. You were a willing participant in a poorly considered policy to start an unnecessary war and you share culpability with Dick Cheney and George Bush for the debacle in Iraq.

You are not alone in failing to speak up and protest the twisting and shading of intelligence. Those who remained silent when they could have made a difference also share the blame for not protesting the abuse and misuse of intelligence that occurred under your watch. But ultimately you were in charge and you signed off on the CIA products and you briefed the President.

This is not a case of Monday morning quarterbacking. You helped send very mixed signals to the American people and their legislators in the fall of 2002. CIA field operatives produced solid intelligence in September 2002 that stated clearly there was no stockpile of any kind of WMD in Iraq. This intelligence was ignored and later misused. On October 1 you signed and gave to President Bush and senior policy makers a fraudulent National Intelligence Estimate (NIE)—which dovetailed with unsupported threats presented by Vice President Dick Cheney in an alarmist speech on August 26, 2002.

You were well aware that the White House tried to present as fact intelligence you knew was unreliable. And yet you tried to have it both ways. On October 7, just hours before the president gave a major speech in Cincinnati, you were successful in preventing him from using the fable about Iraq purchasing uranium in Africa, although that same claim appeared in the NIE you signed only six days before.

Although CIA officers learned in late September 2002 from a high-level member of Saddam Hussein's inner circle that Iraq had no past or present contact with Osama bin Laden and that the Iraqi leader considered bin Laden an enemy of the Baghdad regime, you still went before Congress in February 2003 and testified that Iraq did indeed have links to Al Qaeda.

You showed a lack of leadership and courage in January of 2003 as the Bush Administration pushed and cajoled analysts and managers to let them make the bogus claim that Iraq was on the verge of getting its hands on uranium. You signed off on Colin Powell's presentation to the United Nations. And, at his insistence, you sat behind him and visibly squandered CIA's most precious asset—credibility."

You may now feel you were bullied and victimized but you were also one of the bullies. In the end you allowed suspect sources, like Curveball, to be used based on very limited reporting and evidence. Yet you were informed in no uncertain terms that Curveball was not reliable. You broke with CIA standard practice and insisted on voluminous evidence to refute this reporting rather than treat the information as suspect. You helped set the bar very low for reporting that supported favored White House positions, while raising the bar astronomically high when it came to raw intelligence that did not support the case for war being hawked by the president and vice president.

It now turns out that you were the Alberto Gonzales of the intelligence community--a grotesque mixture of incompetence and sycophancy shielded by a genial personality. Decisions were made, you were in charge, but you have no idea how decisions were made even though you were in charge. Curiously, you focus your anger on the likes of Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, and Condi Rice, but you decline to criticize the President.

Mr. Tenet, as head of the intelligence community, you failed to use your position of power and influence to protect the intelligence process and, more importantly, the country. What should you have done? What could you have done?

For starters, during the critical summer and fall of 2002, you could have gone to key Republicans and Democrats in the Congress and warned them of the pressure. But you remained silent. Your candor during your one-on-one with Sir Richard Dearlove, then-head of British Intelligence, of July 20, 2002" provides documentary evidence that you knew exactly what you were doing; namely, "fixing" the intelligence to the policy.

By your silence you helped build the case for war. You betrayed the CIA officers who collected the intelligence that made it clear that Saddam did not pose an imminent threat. You betrayed the analysts who tried to withstand the pressure applied by Cheney and Rumsfeld.

Most importantly and tragically, you failed to meet your obligations to the people of the United States. Instead of resigning in protest, when it could have made a difference in the public debate, you remained silent and allowed the Bush Administration to cite your participation in these deliberations to justify their decision to go to war. Your silence contributed to the willingness of the public to support the disastrous war in Iraq, which has killed more than 3300 Americans and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis.

If you are committed to correcting the record about your past failings then you should start by returning the Medal of Freedom you willingly received from President Bush in December 2004. You claim it was given only because of the war on terror, but you were standing next to General Tommy Franks and L. Paul Bremer, who also contributed to the disaster in Iraq. President Bush said that you:

played pivotal roles in great events, and [your] efforts have made our country more secure and advanced the cause of human liberty.

The reality of Iraq, however, has not made our nation more secure nor has the cause of human liberty been advanced. In fact, your tenure as head of the CIA has helped create a world that is more dangerous. The damage to the credibility of the CIA is serious but can eventually be repaired. Many of the U.S. soldiers maimed in the streets of Fallujah and Baghdad cannot be fixed. Many will live the rest of their lives missing limbs, blinded, mentally disabled, or physically disfigured. And the dead have passed into history.

Mr. Tenet, you cannot undo what has been done. It is doubly sad that you seem still to lack an adequate appreciation of the enormous amount of death and carnage you have facilitated. If reflection on these matters serves to prick your conscience we encourage you to donate at least half of the royalties from your book sales to the veterans and their families, who have paid and are paying the price for your failure to speak up when you could have made a difference. That would be the decent and honorable thing to do.

Sincerely yours,

Phil Giraldi

Ray McGovern

Larry Johnson

Jim Marcinkowski

Vince Cannistraro

David MacMichael


80 Comments

| Leave a comment

Hear! Hear!

George, time to make amends by joining the anti-war and impeachment movements after you return your medal.

Tom

Bless you Phil, Ray, Larry, Jim, Vince and David, you are shining stars.

Thank you for your letter.

"We write to you on the occasion of the release of your book, At the Center of the Storm. You are on the record complaining about the “damage to your reputation”. In our view the damage to your reputation is inconsequential compared to the harm your actions have caused for the U.S. soldiers engaged in combat in Iraq and the national security of the United States."

Excellent comment.

Tom, agreed.

Bush cheapens the Medal by bestowing it on the undeserving.

Let's not pick on Georgie-Porgie. He's just one careerist among thousands sucking at the teat of the military and intelligence industries loved and admired in our soon-to-be-forgotten republic.

I've been waiting for someone to write something like this for ages. I remember when Tenet joined in with the right wingers in the congress to trash democrats when they were taking stands against the war, and the lead up.

The man is an out and out bastard for attempting to profit from this now that the monster he helped create has bit him in the proverbial ass.

J. McCutchen

Give the royalties to the wounded and the survivors of the dead.

The more I read of what's in this book, the more disgusted I become.

From the Washington Post

A perennial problem, he writes, was a tendency by intelligence analysts to assume other people thought like they did.(!!!!) When judging whether Hussein was lying when he said Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction, "we did not account for . . . the mind set never to show weakness in a very dangerous neighborhood." One of the "lowest moments of my seven-year tenure," Tenet recalls, was when a congressman told him in a public hearing in the spring of 2004 that "we depended on you, and you let us down."


Crying all the way to the bank

I'm curious - does Tenet address the Valerie Plame affair in his book? Has he ever said anything about it?

David Corn

........Tenet may feel--as he claims--damn lousy about the screwed-up National Intelligence Estimate that helped pave the way to war in Iraq. But he did not feel bad enough to resign--or to disclose earlier what had gone wrong. He sat on the story and now is peddling it for personal profit.....if Tenet indeed believed before the invasion of Iraq that Bush and Cheney were pushing the nation to war without adequately assessing the threat or assessing options other than full-scale war, he had an obligation at the time to make that known--at least to members of Congress, if not the public at large. He did not do so. Consequently, he owes the public a full accounting and an apology--not a sales campaign.

Yes Ellen. But this is the careerist who deserves to have his body dragged through the streets and hung from a bridge - not in Fallujah, but in Louisville. Along with Generals Abizaid & Franks.

Great letter...

 

Tenet is as culpable as Bush and Cheney when it comes to the Iraq debacle and it's subsequent carnage. Accepting "blame" for it once he is out of power is all fine and dandy.  But if he feels there are wrongs to be righted, a money making literary mea culpa, on it's own, isn't gonna fix things.  If he truly feels that way, he needs to do more or he will just be profiting by writing about the illegitimate war of aggression, which he was instrumental in starting.  That would say a lot about his character...or lack thereof.

 

Oh, please, please.

Can't I have Myers and Sanchez, too. Oh, and Michael "Constitution? Never heard of it" Hayden, and Miller of Guantanamo and Abu Graib fame, and William "My God is bigger than his" Boykin. I'd add the Joint "Come out, come out, wherever you are" Chiefs, but no one's seen them since the war began.

George Tenet is one of the scums in this horrible nightmare. But as far as I'm concerned, Larry Johnson is one of the heroes. Thank you for your service, sir.

Isn’t there a law that someone who commits murder cannot then profit from it by writing a book about it? Seems the intent of this law if not the letter of this law applies to Tenet.

One more Bushite who belongs in a dungeon at Abu Ghraib under the tender care and mercies of Iraqis who have lost family, friends, and country.

What I suggest is that disabled veterans and families of those soldiers who have died in Iraq bring a civil "wrongful death" suit against Tenet and others who participated in bringing on this fiasco. While immunity may protect such people in the end, the publicity of such a suit and the legal costs thereof might reduce the profit Tenet, Bremer, Franks, etc have made because of their parts in this war.

The thought of Tenet and others getting rich off the blood of our soldiers is an insult to America and frankly, evil.

It's too bad the analysts, if LJ and his friends are any measure, don't run the Directorate of Operations. If so we could be rid of Bush/Cheney and cohorts. It has never bothered the right wing to to use black ops to achieve their domestic political ends. I'd also like to hear the mockingbirds sing a message more consistent with the above letter.

Whenever two people meet, there are really six people present. There is each man as he sees himself, each man as the other person sees him, and each man as he really is.

William James

May I suggest an assignment for Larry Johnson? Get a comment from Robert Macnamara about Tenet, his book, and what the proper action should be. He's some one who has, at least, apologized for his mistakes and a comment from him could be very telling.

thosethingswesay.blogspot.com

George Tenet and Colin Powell will go down in infamy.

The blowback on Tenet's book has already begun. After '60 Minutes' he may get run out of town.

i will say this once, and once only...

mr. tenet, you can go directly to hell... along with colin powell, you were in perhaps the best position to speak out in real time on the - now - very clear fact that the bush administration was railroading the united states into an illegal war with iraq... now, you want to sell me your fracking book... screw you AND the horse you rode in in...

http://takeitpersonally.blogspot.com/

Does Tenet reveal, in his "tell" all book, whether he sent Wilson's report on Niger to Dick Cheney? Chris Matthews asked Tenet about that, and he answered "Ask Cheney".

If Cheney ignored that report - that's the smoking gun for impeachment, imho!

Frankly, since he has now admitted being culpable in promulgating a fraud that led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people, he should be charged with war crimes and turned over to the Hague. He is not a stupid man.

He knows what he did and that it is criminal and reprehensible. Unlike the idiots in the WH, he sees the writing on the wall and knows that it will all (or mostly) be revealed eventually and that there will be consequences.

He's trying to avoid a criminal sentence or a trip to the Hague by pointing the finger in another direction. A classic case of muddying the waters. What's great is that people are seeing through this deception and holding him accountable.

But IMHO, they're not holding him accountable enough. They should be telling him to go to the Hague and reveal the details of what he knows. Turning in the medal is the very least of required actions. All profits from his book should go to help the wounded in Iraq. Criminals should bot be allowed to profit from their activities.

Keep your eye out for a guy named Michael Scheuer, ex CIA and head of the Bin Ladin Desk for a number of years during the 90s.
he left the CIA in 2005. This guy already wrote an op ed condemning Tenet, BUT.....

I first saw this guy Scheuer on C-SPAN's Washington Journal about 18 months ago and I was very impressed. He seemd quite knowledgeable on Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan and al Qaeda. He gave what I saw as objective analysis on terrorism, 9/11, Iraq etc. It was a good informative C-SPAN session.

By the way, he wasn't real happy with the Bush White House and IRAQ. Then...

I didn't see him for a bit, but then he recently turned up at a Senate hearing on Terrorism and Iraq and lo and behold, he was now a right winger, condemning Clinton, Democrats, etc.

He turned up again on Washington Journal about 8/10 days ago and again he spewed the right wing mantra; Clinton, Democrats, blah blah blah.

He's now with The Jamestown Foundation, a conservative think tank. He may have saw the light; there's money to be made if you join the right wing noise machine.

CNN just reported Scheuer said to Tenet; (paraphrase) 'Go back where you belong, to the Democrats.

I'm posting this to alert people to this guy because he's getting some air time in this Tenet story.

Actually, McCain wasn't (and isn't) silent. He's leading the charge to continue the stupidity in Iraq and dig an even deeper hole for ourselves.

Tom

J. McCutchen

George Tenet, Drama Queen

Reminds me of that other CIA 007 blowhard, Cofer Black


All the better though, for now we know that Richard Clarke told the truth and CRice fiddled, blundered us into 9/11; that George Bush is a liar, and Cheney an indictable war criminal

Gee I never knew this

Sorry Larry, I had to watch. I like to watch

I watched most of Tenet's segment on 60 Minutes tonight. He's still saying that CIA analysts screwed up and that, although no one could know for sure, the prevailing opinon in CIA was that Iraq had chemo and bio weapons stockpiles and that work on nuclear weapons continued. His only complaint was the leak of his 'slam dunk' comment and its interpretation in the media, which he says had to do with marketing a sales pitch to the public rather than winning the war, an even worse betrayal in my opinion.

Many sincere thanks to Larry and his colleagues for an excellent letter. Tenet
deserves every word of it.

Tenet was interviewed on 60 Minutes, and it was not pretty.

About missing clues on 9/11: somehow, he did not mention Richard Clarke. But here Tenet was most plausible.

After 9/11, "we did not torture": he could try to make the case that CIA tortured in very exceptional cases, and took measures to minimize the inherent cruelty of the process. Probably, there is no such case to make.

Planning war with Iraq: here Tenet was at his most convoluted. He knew that Iraq had zero connection with al-Qaeda, did he ever stress that point to Bush and Cheney? He said that at the numerous "principals' meetings" no one ever questioned if this war should be waged, the only discussions were when and how. Now, Tenet was one of the very few principals (one of six?). So he is very much responsible for this sad fact.

The case of Saddam's WMD: Tenet honestly believed in the entire bunk that Powell, in fron of him, told UN. Mind you, after months of futile inspections, inspections that took input from CIA. And this bunk included quite bogus analysis of satelite photos, bogus interpretations of intercepted telephone calls, (were the debunked aluminum pipes spinned once more), plus conclusions from the testimony of Iraqi defectors for which CIA had testimony of other defectors claiming totally different things.

Interviewer asked some "difficult questions", even repeated them, but he did not deign to make a meaningful follow up. Why inspections did not alter the intelligence assesment? Why CIA condoned a massacre of thousands of prisoners in northern Afghanistan? Whose idea was it to have a "ligh footprint" in Afghanistan (reason given by Tenet for the failure at Bora-Bora). Why was he silent before elections of 2004 and 2006?

J. McCutchen

The Politico's cartoon sums matters nicely

The Spinners Are Spun

Tenet believed it, yet my 9th and 10th grade students in World Affairs Club in 2002-03 could see right through Powell's BS by reading the European press online. Sorry, George, I don't buy it no matter how much you whined on Sixty Minutes.

Tom

Scheuer's a creep; he's always been a creep. But Lang says it better, here.

What I'm still waiting for more clarity on is the supposed meeting between intelligence chief from Italy, Gen. Nicolo Pollari and Stephen Hadley, which supposedly presented the debunked Niger claims directly to the VP even though the CIA had debumked them.

Larry, do you know much about the Niger embassy breakin? Anything that has been officialy announced? I know that there was a breakin and papers suddenly appeared around this time.

Been looking for the word "groupthink" for a while, even though I knew it, it eluded me to describe many social problems I've seen in group decision making I've been involved with. When the steering starts going awry there Can Be a tendency to not disrupt people who might not like what you say.

COWARD:
a person who lacks courage in facing danger, difficulty, opposition, pain, etc.; a timid or easily intimidated person.

Been there though, but then hopefully grew up a bit and realized it was best to call things out when you should, not simply when you could.

Now if I could just get the art of real rhetoric down....

Tenet was a clown tonight. But just like Richard Clarke, there are seeds for thought in what he says, take them, move on to the next goal, holding these bastards accountable for their lies. "greeted as liberators","ties to Saddam","mission accomplished","support the troops"... all lies.

LJ,

There is something missing on your letter, although I must say it is an excellent letter. Your letter did not include all the damages that Tenet had caused to the people around the world. Many countries are terrified by threats from America to join in the fights against terrorism and Innocent civilians are injected with imaginary fears of the Muslims around the world.

Reportedly, innocent civilians were kidnapped and tortured in Germany, Spain and Italy and God knows how many innocent civilians that were kidnapped, tortured and not reported. America also intimidates countries to keep their own citizens (Muslim sympathizers) on the watch list. Just because civilians simply did not agree with America’s imperialist attitude towards other nations, they were being labeled as terrorists or terrorist sympathizers and were closely watched by the secret services of their own countries.

Christian missionaries from America were making headway in Iraq under Saddam Hussein’s regime, all of a sudden, all Christians become a target the Muslim. Now, Christians around the world are blamed for something that Tenet had created. God has given America wealth and power and yet America has turned around to commit atrocities in other countries under the pretext of fighting terrorism. May God have mercy on the soul of Tenet and ask him to stop spreading irreversible fear around the world. God did not create this world so that America has an upper hand over the rest of the world. God creates the world so that everyone can live in harmony with diversities in culture and language and life style. God has not asked America to impose American values on other countries.

Katrina is God’s way of expressing his anger over the merciless killing in Iraq by the American soldiers. The late Pope John Paul II had asked America not to attack Iraq. Despite repeated pleads from the late Pope John Paul II and foreign leaders, America proceeded with atrocities and showed no mercy. Tenet’s actions and inactions have caused much grief to many families both within America and around the world. It is about time that Tenet confesses to the world and seeks repentance from God. Only God can save him. Only God can teach him the real meaning of forgiveness and only God can forgive his sin. Money, status and power can only give Tenet that much, once his power is gone, Tenet is nothing but a fool. The same also applies to GW Bush and D Cheney and C Rice and those who hold power in high office.

Regarding Saddam/Iraq, Tenet all but admitted he and his CIA were either incompetent or as irresponsible as Bush.

His attempts to solicit sympathy for himself because the CIA was full of "good people" was pathetic.

His avoidance of the Valerie Plame controversy was interesting.

Like so many others, Tenet was on the "Iraq team" during the run up to the war, but since it turned out to be a monumental f**k up he now tries to distance himself from it.

Bottom line; He tried to make himself out to be a victim.

I understand the CIA getting the story about WMD wrong. It was not until December, 2002, according to Cobra II, that Saddem informed his generals that they did not have the biological and chemical weapons they thought. However, given the nature of the NIEs, estimates not certainties, why didn't Tenet urge Bush continue letting the U.N. inspectors continue their worker rather than an invaion before either Afghanistan was more secure, Bin Laden captured or killed and the armor and other equip necessary for Iraq was ready?

Another question raised by Cobra II is why didn't the CIA get virtually anything about Iraq correct? The military went in and found most conditions other than they expected.

Daniel A. Greenbaum

Could you provide a link to these specifics from Mr. God, which seem to differ from those cited in the name of the aforesaid Mr. God by Mr. George W. Bush? Both of you seem to claim to have a direct pipeline.

--
Howard

*equal opportunity offense to both extremes*

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" [George Santayana]

From what I understand, the UN weapons inspectors were given information on the locations of WMD by the Bush gang a number of times and every time the inspectors went to the location they found nothing.

Howard,

God is the worst mass murderer in the history of the universe; floods, tsunamis, earthquakes, hurricanes, famine, and locusts.