Open Thread
Do you use the reader blogs? Do you read them (button above) or write on them?
I've been trying to figure out a coherent system for promoting them to the front page. We have a feature for recommending things you like, but not enough people use it for it to be a perfect criteria. So I've also been considering how relevant it is to the day's news or the day's discussion on the site. Thoughts?
Advertisement











Comments (38)
Before the format change there was a side-bar (far right) on the front page with reader blogs, and they got moved up as they got higher reader ratings. I read more reader blogs then, and was more inclined to write my own.
When I read them now, it is usually because I see them on the left when writing a comment. I am often so impressed by the quality and breadth of the writing, and I miss that old format because it was more likely to catch my eye.
Jan
April 18, 2007 8:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. Tom
April 18, 2007 8:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Shifting topics a bit, I almost never look at or moderate Discussion Tables anymore. Having a side bar for them also might help.
Tom
April 18, 2007 8:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with CVIlle Dem that the sidebar should return. I think that front-paging highl-scoring blogs in some way, whether more in a sidebar or fewer in the center, would encourage people to frequent them. The best score, I think, would be a combination of recommendations and new comments, and I think making this clear would naturally encourage more people to rate and comment.
I would resist tying promotion to short-term relevance. I often prefer the topical freedom of writing blog entries rather than discussion table posts, and I enjoy reading the blogs for their variety.
April 18, 2007 8:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Read 'em and write 'em. Front paging them sounds like an editorial challenge.
What do you think would work best, Andrew?
April 18, 2007 9:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I read them, write them, recommend them.
I like Mr. Foo's idea, that some combination of recs and comments within a certain period of time would "bounce" that post to the featured list.
Would it make sense to have a "featured" list, that combined both the Discussions and Blogs? That is, regardless of either or, the posts that are either newly posted from the Disc queues *or* have lots of recs/comments are highlighted on the front page?
Dissent Protects Democracy.
April 18, 2007 9:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, to both of your questions. I have no opinion on front paging.
April 18, 2007 9:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Could we have a separate tab for reader blogs? A chronological list of blogs could be shown on one side. But maybe only show the title and author, so more of them could be shown on one page (or perhaps reduce the number of lines of text to, say, three or four rather than up to 9 as we have now). Perhaps there could be some button to click for the reader to decide if the blog listing should be organized according to date or by number of recommendations. The other side of the page could be organized more or less as the front page of the Cafe is now, with selected articles showing more information. I think more people would read them if it were organized this way.
This would be just a minor variation of the sidebar scheme. The sidebar does encourage more to read them, but is very haphazard in terms of how long a blog happens to appear there - several people writing blog entries at the same time can push a good piece down into oblivion.
As it is now, like CVilleDem, my tendency is to read them primarily when I see them on the current sidebar on the Comment page (although often not there either, as once one clicks "Post Comment" they disappear). I don't think confining their content to current or timely discussions is necessary or desirable - we have the Discussion Tables for that.
I'm a little puzzled by your comment about a "button above":
I don't see any button for blogs anywhere. I know when I was using the Opera browser a while ago the top row of tabs didn't appear (there were two rows then). Could I be having a similar problem with firefox now?
I notice you're asking a lot of questions about what it's like to use TPM Cafe, Andrew. I appreciate the interest.
Know your enemy well, for in the end that is who you become. ~~Old Chinese Proverb
April 18, 2007 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
I, too, would be glad to see the reader blogs return to the sidebar.
And I agree with Mister Foo that reader blogs ought not be promoted to that sidebar based on relevance to a given day's or even week's news.
I think if you're going to trust (and depend upon) the insight and thoughtfulness of TPM readers to pore over documents, follow local stories with national implications, participate in book clubs, etc., there's a point at which you have to uphold what once seemed like the distinctive underlying premise here: Renewal of our malignant civic conversation depends upon placing on an equal footing the insights of articulate, thoughtful people in all walks of life, with those of the traditional media commentariat - talking heads, politicians, journalists, scholars, academics, and policy analysts- whose voices have historically defined, sometimes in profoundly self-serving ways,
what our civic converstion has been.
Renewing the visible role of reader-bloggers here in asserting that premise would be a welcome improvement.
April 18, 2007 9:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
First things first. Get rid of some these boring liberal has-beens hogging the front page. What's-the-guy's name from Columbia wrote
April 18, 2007 10:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
I read and write blogs.
I agree that an entry quickly gets lost in the mass of entries and sinks into oblivion. As for my own entries, I console myself by saying I write for my own mental health, not for fame and fortune.
It would be nice if there were an easier way to access blogs and to have them somehow rated and presented according to some set of qualitative benchmarks. Whether it's reader ratings, number of comments, editor's picks, I'm not sure it matters so much.
The possibility of being posted on the main Cafe page is exciting, and there's no shame in leaving those selections up to an editor for whatever reason he/she chooses that day. It adds a bit of creativity to the process, while the qualitative benchmarks approach on a separate blog page could provide another path of merit (as well as narrow the number of entries for editors selecting for the Cafe page) for entries.
It's all good.
Ted
April 18, 2007 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
There is a button immediately to the right of the TPM Cafe logo. It is the same color as the background but does have a discernable border. The text reads: "Reader Blogs: Everything under the sun" clicking on the text should do it.
To answer the question, no I don't read the Reader Blogs. There are only so many hours in the day and I prefer to take my chances getting some attention from people who are listened to. One comment coming to the attention of Josh or MattY or DeLong or Sawicky has that much more chance of passing through to effect the actual policy, while working at the layer below that by using a Reader Blog or writing Diaries seems a little pointless. After all anyone can have their own blog (I have two - one totally inactive, the other static) and point back to it.
Of course there are risks of mixing it up with the Big Dogs, because you can look awful stupid awful fast. Trust me on that one.
April 18, 2007 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
The redesign had the effect of demoting user generated content. Along with the increase in content that's commissioned, the placement of blogs and discussion tables had the effect of relegating user generated content to a seldom trolled backwater.
The discussion tables, in particular, have languished. I've stopped writing there and almost never moderate. It seems to me that they duplicate blog content, and since they are both put in the background anyway, one or the other should be dropped.
The discussion tables used to be a source of good content and interesting follow-on discussions. The blogs never seemed to generate as much interest. But back when discussion entries appeared periodically on the front page, they were clearly widely read, and also linked to by other sites. It was not uncommon for a user discussion post to generate over 100 comments. (I was surprised when I found one of mine linked in a few places.) That doesn't seem to happen anymore--again, because I think the content is not easily visible.
If it were my call, I'd drop the blogs and reinstitute a more prominent position for the discussion tables, with editorial intervention to have one discussion on the front page per day. But the blogs could be treated the same. If that were the case, I'd replace the discussion table tab with a blog tab. Right now, it's hard to find the blogs.
In answer to your question, I occasionally write, read and rate blogs here. In fact, that's usually the sequence. I write an entry, and in the process of checking for comments on that entry, I see someone else's and read that, and rate it when I think it's very good.
I miss the old interface and Kate's active role in promoting good user generated content. This interface has made the site less discussion friendly, which is what I value in a blogging environment.
I also want to note that this is not a threaded/not threaded, rated/not rated sort of issue. It's a moderation and volume of content issue. FDL is a rich discussion area because there is only one active post at a time, and the threads are heavily moderated. No ratings, no threads. Slate's fray is a disaster, because it is largely unmoderated and generates a huge volume of low signal to noise ratio content. Time's Swampland is generating some good content, and I assume it is being pretty heavily moderated.
The user-based moderation here has worked pretty well--mostly because there's a common interest in the community of keeping the tone civil--and troll-rating actually works out pretty well.
Looking at the tabs, I only read election central and the coffee house these days. Perhaps you could consider eliminating or combining the other tabs. In my case (and I suspect many others), links from TPM Cafe is what leads me to find content in the subsidiary sites.
April 18, 2007 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bruce: Thanks for your reply, but the button doesn't show up - not on the main page, nor any other page. I'm thinking perhaps it's a browser issue related to my use of Firefox and not IE. (I do happen to have a link I bookmarked long ago that will get me to the reader blog page.)
Now I'm kinda wondering if there are other things I'm missing. Could this be happening to others who use Firefox? Andrew, I hope you notice this.
Know your enemy well, for in the end that is who you become.~~Old Chinese Proverb
April 18, 2007 11:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wordie,
Thanks for bringing this to my attention, I've never heard of people not being able to see the button! Can you see the other graphics in the header (the icon, the tabs, the "home" and "about" buttons?
Has anyone else experienced this?
April 18, 2007 12:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Andrew, I also wanted to mention that I like how you've been asking questions in these open threads. I think it's a great idea. I liked the "lurkers" post -- as a one-percenter, it was great to hear from so many new and/or unfamiliar people.
I wonder if in some of your open threads, you might call attention to some of the "hidden" features of this site. Or, at least ask if people know they exist. Like, for example, as long as you log in, you can keep up with the various conversations here with the "new" link that's next to all the posts.
Or, there's a "recent posts" link (here) that's called the "tracker," that shows every post that contains recent comments, as well as how long ago those comments were written.
Many people on the lurkers thread asked how many of us could comment in and follow everything that's going on at the site, and the "new" links and the "tracker" are two of the ways I've found that make it much easier to follow what's going on.
That, and of course, being independently wealthy and not having to work. (Kidding. DEFINITELY kidding...)
Dissent Protects Democracy.
April 18, 2007 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
The problem, Andrew, is that it doesn't look like a link. You have three interface elements jammed onto the top--tabs, 2 rows of text hyperlinks and two logoed links (and a third of some guy with a pipe that does nothing). It doesn't, as they say, read. Up until this moment, I did not realize that it is a link.
April 18, 2007 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can see the coffee cup icon, "home" and "about." I can see only one row of tabs. Is that all there is? I know there used to be two rows of tabs, and in Opera I couldn't see the upper one (the one that had tabs for Supreme Court Watch, Yglesias, Bolton Watch, etc.), although I could see it in one version of Firefox (when I upgraded there was intermittant trouble with seeing the upper row of tabs). There is a light gray banner sort of shape where the second row of tabs used to be. All that it holds now though, is the coffee cup icon and as Jay describes him, "the guy with the pipe." Is that how it is for everyone?
I had presumed that with the re-design, we went back to only one row of tabs. It's hard to know if I'm missing anything else, for obvious reasons. :-)
Know your enemy well, for in the end that is who you become. ~~Old Chinese Proverb
April 18, 2007 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like that little guy with the pipe.
April 18, 2007 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree that the design is highly imperfect. For now, though, we just need to make sure what we are trying to present is showing up. Once we have the time and the money, the design here will more radically change.
April 18, 2007 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I somewhat agree with this statement. A lot of the opinions displayed on the front page are the textbook, traditional liberal opinions. It's as if the authors had to pass a test for liberal-ness in order to post.
I am a liberal. Most of my family are liberals. Most of my friends are liberals. But, none of them consistently hold the liberal opinion on every single issue discussed on this website or in the real world. It is completely unbelievable that every single main page author on this site agrees with the traditional liberal opinion on every single topic.
I'm not sure what kind of change you should make. Voting and consensus and promotion of stories is fine and good. But for a website, that tends to promote the same ideas that everyone has heard so far and which everyone agrees upon. You need some way to promote the controversial topics and ideas which half the people won't like, but will stir up the pot and create some real discussion about issues.
April 18, 2007 2:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about a moratorium on bandwidth-hogging, or server-clogging, "improvements?"
This site has gotten S - L - O - W in recent days, while others I visit have not.
April 18, 2007 3:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'd never noticed the guy with the pipe. He definitely reminds me of 18th-century America, for some reason. That actually makes sense, I guess, in an odd way.
Anyway, I think that the reader blogs' button was easier to find when there were more buttons -- for the Bolton Watch etc.
Oh, and I do like the idea of a "recommend blog" list that would hit the front page, even as a sidebar. It was one of my favorite features; it also made it easier to get into the reader blogs (wheat, chaff, etc.).
April 18, 2007 7:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wordie, your firefox view sounds different than my ff view. I made a screen clipping of the top of this page and posted it here if you want to see what mine looks like. (I think this will work.)
In our civilization, and under our republican form of government, intelligence is so highly honored that it is rewarded by exemption from the cares of office. Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
April 18, 2007 10:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I never noticed it before, but I can see it. It is probably a browser thing, because with Firefox, the comment text box bounces around in weird ways, which I assume does not happen for Microsoft Infection-Explorer, so something gonzo happening with Opera would not surprise me in the least.
I would have noticed it if it had a tab. That button is a method of hiding it in plain sight.
April 18, 2007 11:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
The way to expose the user blogs more widely that fits into the present design of the site is to have a "User Blogs" tab in the tab row, with the highest rated user blogs showing up in an "Overheard in the Coffee House" section in the left margin, picking up where "Overheard on the Blogs" leaves off.
April 18, 2007 11:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sometimes TPM Cafe works fine w/Firefox and sometimes the front page is broken up. Never happens with TPM and TPM MR.
I've had the Reader Blogs button disappear at times, too.
Someone else here made a comment about TPM Cafe being slow. My biggest problem is that Reader Blog posts with a number of comments attached are very slow to load.
I read just about every Reader Blog post but not the Discussion Tables ones, btw.
April 19, 2007 4:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
I read the readers' blogs, and occasionally comment on them, when they appear on the front page. I've been to the linked area, but not very often, because when I do get there what I find is pretty chaotic and also quite the mix of stuff from great to inane. I have a couple of suggestions which might send me looking more often. I don't know how practical they are from a technical point of view, but here goes.
Thanks for the chance to add my two cents. (Each of these is at least a half-cent idea). :-)
aMike
April 19, 2007 8:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, it did work! Thanks very much, seashell, for taking the time to do it.
The only thing that's missing for me is the Reader Blogs button. No wonder I don't read them much. What ff version do you use?
Know your enemy well, for in the end that is who you become. ~~Old Chinese Proverb
April 19, 2007 8:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
amike: All of those ideas sound good.
I especially like your idea #2; it would be nice to be able to easily see if a blogger who one would like to read regularly had written anything new. It's only possible to do that now through a fairly laborious process.
I suggested earlier that there be a list of blog titles and authors on the main blog page that was sortable, so one could sort by date posted or by number of recommendations, but maybe adding author as a sort key would be good too. (Perhaps this idea would be difficult to program, but who knows, maybe Drupal already has a module that could do that easily.)
Know your enemy well, for in the end that is who you become. ~~Old Chinese Proverb
April 19, 2007 9:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, there are other problems as well. Some people run auto-ad blockers. Even if you "permit" ads on TPM, the embedded scripts, such as the buttons, just don't work right. The buttons at the top of my browser page vary with the weather, it seems.
April 19, 2007 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
I have posted blog entries, only to have them roll off the main user blog page within a short time because others post shortly after me. Your post can be not interesting and stay because no one else is inspired in the same timeframe, or it can be genius (mind you, that would not include mine) and disappear before anyone sees it.
I would suggest that Andrew select a blog that he likes and provide it some sort of priority locations once a day. Also, the blogroll idea, seems good. It might be possible to have some system of indicating how many unread posts are behind each link? Andrew could selectively post blogs that he thinks are good to a priority page and the blogroll could be there?
When you suspect your blog will disappear after 45 minutes, you feel pretty discouraged about continuing to post.
April 19, 2007 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Your two cents must be pre-inflation money. All four ideas strike me as good, but I particularly like numbers 1 and 4.
I'm particularly struck with number 4. Perhaps the Cafe management (after appropriate consultation I presume) could suggest a list of group blog topics and then bloggers could self-select for one or more groups.
While I tend to focus on international relations, particularly of the war sort, I'd dislike being put in a single box. From the blogs I've read there seem to be a sizeable bunch who lean to one area but have a wide range of other interests.
April 19, 2007 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seeing as how the America Abroad room has been abandoned by its former contributors, its tab might as well be given to the blog link. Such a change would give an ironically apt coup de grace to the collapse of that forum.
April 19, 2007 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bring back Stirling Newberry and give EJ Graff a long vacation.
Jan
April 20, 2007 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bring back and keep Chalmers Johnson!
Tom
April 20, 2007 6:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think some of this might relate to how the adverts load. Frequently when I try to read beyond the break, everything loads save one thing. Usually it is the site waiting for a reply from google ads or something like that. Perhaps because google is busy, or perhaps because there is no ad contracted for, I don't know enough about that kind of thing, everything just stops. Then I can't use the rating button or post a reply, or do much of anything. Sometimes hitting the refresh button helps, but not always.
aMike
April 21, 2007 6:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
You might want to note that in the space of less than two hours tonight a user named CafeNow has become so inspired as to post 4 blogs, essentially crowding out all other blogs from the main user blog page.
Perhaps you should have a process that substitutes your new blog for your old one so that any particular user cannot have more than one blog on the main user blog page unless you, Andrew, decide to promote it there.
April 23, 2007 10:08 PM | Reply | Permalink