« Health Care and The Right's Tactics | Home | Big business and Single Payer »

Imus Will Be Fired by Friday: Count On It

user-pic

Gwen Ifill understands that revenge is a dish best served cold. She bided her time and then gave Imus the shiv today, while the old racist twists in the wind.

The contrast between Ifill and the white boys Jeff Greenfield, David Gregory, James Carville, Bill Maher and Ham Jordan (all of whom are rallyng behind Imus) could not be more stark. Cannot the old bigot come up with a single African American to support him. What about some Clarence Thomas type? Surely, there has to be some thoroughly discredited African-American who will stand with Imus. If not, wow.

Imus is meeting with the Rutgers team later today. Come on, women, do the right thing. Do not accept his phoney apology and demand that he be sent packing (over to satellite, no doubt, to join his fellow low-life Howard Stern).

In any case, Imus is done. By the end of the week, he'll be gone. For all its faults, our country grows ever more serious about eradicating hate speech. After this, we can get all these creeps off the air who use the term "fag" with abandon.


150 Comments

| Leave a comment

Who really cares about erradicating hate speach. Let's erradicate racism.

There are probably legitimate joking uses for Imus' phrase. His was not one of them. He was not paraphrasing, putting himself in black shoes, or being ironic.

He was possibly substance-impaired, but that's no excuse. The only thing left is the door. It's not like he'll be on the street panhandling for beer money. Sayonara.

For all its faults, our country grows ever more serious about eradicating hate speech...

so someone will be putting a gag on Bush and his cronies?

honestly, if Imas is fired, it's all theater since the nytimes (judity miller, for example), as well as the tv networks, are full of nasty comments, images, lies, deceptions and innuendo...

If Imus does get fired watch for him to lash out. What he said was horrid, but relatively mild compared to what you hear rappers and right wing talk radio saying every day.

Imus knows what these other cretins are saying and pretty much getting away with, and I think all this groveling he's doing is probably building some resentment inside him.

He might explode.

No he won't. He's an incredibly profitable product. He may have to fire McGuirk to prove that he's going to lose the racist schtick.

See a tongue-in-cheek visual of Imus and his newfound buddy, Michael Richards, hanging out and counting sheep...here:

www.thoughttheater.com

Has anyone seen Alan Keyes lately?

There has been a press conference, and the Rutgers womens' basketball coach will be on CNN's Situation Room today.

What about some Clarence Thomas type? Surely, there has to be some thoroughly discredited African-American who will stand with Imus.

While I completely disagree with the view of the law that Clarence Thomas has I don't know if he is "discredited" in terms of being an "African-American". 

 

jconnorflynn,

Who really cares about erradicating hate speach. Let's erradicate racism.

Sure, that'll happen.  Maybe we could start by applying some accountability and fairness to the communications industry whereupon a more level playing field would compel these talentless creeps to really compete in a marketplace of ideas.

james Carville supporting Imus...what a surprise that is.

"After this, we can get all these creeps off the air who use the term 'fag' with abandon."

MJ,

From your mouth to G-d's ear. As a gay man, I will celebrate the day that happens!

Not sure what will happen with Imus, Donny Deutsch of CNBC and the end of an advertising company thinks Imus will be canned.

However from the New York Daily News an example of the world we live in:

"But the JV and Elvis show on WFNY (92.3 FM) was already making 'nappy-headed ho' jokes yesterday and JV said it's almost impossible to draw strict content lines outside of Federal Communications Commission-prohibited areas like curing."

From the same article Howard Stern

"'He's apologizing like a guy who got his first broadcasting job' said Stern 'He should have said F-k you, its a joke.'"

"On the other end, Opie and Anthony of WFNY, who have a friendly rapport with Imus, mostly joked about the case.

Anthony said a black host could have said what Imus did, criticizing what he called a 'double standard.'

Imus also picked up an endorsement an endorsement from Star ex-morning host at WQHT and WWPR.

'Don Imus is a national treasure,' said Star, 'and people better get over it.'"
[NYDailyNews.com]

Thus radio in America today.

Speaking of double standards. The anti-Semitism that is disguised as anti-Israeli or anti-AIPAC commentary but which regularly repeat the hold anti-Jewish lies are a regular feature of TMPCafe. Not a thread started by M.J. Rosenberg is not a festival of anti-Semitism. Perhaps not only Imus should lose his job.

Daniel A. Greenbaum

Homer Hewitt

IMUS - ENOUGH ALREADY

Don Imus is now challenging the Trent Lott record for number of apologies. He has apologized daily on his show and in conversations with Al Sharpton and many others.
With the media paying undue and hyped attention to this story, his opportunities to apologize will be endless.

Imus needed to acknowledge his guilt for his thoughtless, reprehensible remark, but other than that, his sincere apology should be to the Rutgers basketball players whom he gratuitously insulted. We don't know what he may have done with respect to them or to Rutgers, but scholarship or other funds might not be a bad idea.

Those who know Don Imus, such as Tom Oliphant, are supportive since they know that he is in no way racist. That does not excuse the remark, but it certainly justifies forgiveness.

To put the matter in perspective, remember that a large part of his shtick is the cutting remark, often a bit offensive. He trades insults with his guests and attacks injustice with relentless criticism. Although close to the line, his comments are not really serious, such as when he called Governor Bill Richardson a "fat sissy" and the New York Knicks "chest-thumping pimps". Also, Imus constantly refers to Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld as "war criminals", although here he may be serious.

None of this excuses his Rutgers remark and, as Imus has said, he has been "humiliated". A two week suspension may be appropriate but cancellation of his program would not. His show is usually entertaining, it supports good charitable work, and it provides thoughtful, strong comment on political and other events by Imus and his
intelligent, influential guests.

And when generals and other high officials get away with reprimands or less for such actions as permitting Abu Ghraib or lying about Jessica Lynch and Pat Tillman or Iraq's connection to 9/11 or nuclear materials, cancellation of Imus in the Morning would be overkill.

homer www.altara.blogspot.com

Howard Stern a low-life? No Way!!

I don't know about Gwen Ifill and "shiv" sticking on her part - she is one class act. What a great response to Imus' crude insults and low class performance in popular media.

I don't think her point was revenge at all. Its an appeal to holding more civil standards in the hope that others don't suffer what she has in the past. Shit-canning Imus would be one good way to get the point across that insulting language and behavior are simply not acceptable in civilized society. Especially where the behavior is repetetive. What good is an apology when the perpertrator simply goes out to transgress-for-ratings again and again?

I have ALWAYS admired Ifill and am a big fan of "Washington Week." On the other hand, you can't pay me to listen/watch Imus and his ilk.

For those numbnuts that will try to make a "Free Speech" issue out of this, a reminder: 1st Amendment "free speech" is protected from state (e.g. government) action -- MSNBC is a private employer. They can - and should - fire someone for such insulting, degrading and un-civil conduct. Even if it does give ratings a temporary bounce to keep this moron on the air.

Jimmy the Greek said something far less egregious in my book and CBS fired him none-the-less. I think CBS is still on the air...?

Jimmy the Greek said: "During the slave period, the slave owner would breed his big black with his big woman so that he would have a big black kid—that's where it all started."

Remember that "Black" not "African-American" was the more widely used and politically correct term at the time (1988). "African American" was only just coming into use then.

Whatever.... go Gwen go!

The fact that Imus looks at Ifill and sees a cleaning lady is proof enough that he is a racist slime.

Chris, it will happen. As Tony Kushner said in "Ange;s in America," history only moves forward. Of course, it lurches backwards alot too!

user-pic

"Speaking of double standards. The anti-Semitism that is disguised as anti-Israeli or anti-AIPAC commentary but which regularly repeat the hold anti-Jewish lies are a regular feature of TMPCafe. Not a thread started by M.J. Rosenberg is not a festival of anti-Semitism. Perhaps not only Imus should lose his job."

Daniel, you distract from your substantive point when you return to throwing this bomb. Please, on BOTH SIDES, don't go close to this accusation without doing so in reasoned and substantive form.

Doing anything else will result in having your commenting privileges temporarily, and then permanently, revoked.

Very interesting -- and although I've never listened to an Imus show (I think I saw him once on Larry King and couldn't get over his drawling speech impediment), I find this whole dust-up very interesting.

Are you saying that Imus plays the role of the "court fool"? that he sticks a pin in the balloon of PR hyped celebritydom? that he is the voice of left-behind-males? of Barbara Ehrenreich's "Stiffed"?

And that this time, he put his pin in a myth (young black student-athletes) which the society isn't ready to give up on?

Andrew Golis: thanks. Greenbaum is continuously calling other posters anti-semitic.
His gross manners are especially inappropriate when he refers to MJ Rosenberg who has been involved in the battle for a secure Israel since the late 60's. We were volunteers together in Israel during the Yom Kippur war.
MJ is pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian, as anyone who cares about Israel should be,

I imagine it might be harder to do than one thinks. For example, when Ann Coulter's daily e-mail updates are advertised on Talking Points Memo's main website...

Of course there's only so much a webhost can do to limit advertising links. However, it just shows how profitable advertisers think this kind of vile is. And, since everything in our society is run on money, well... we'll need a definite paradigm shift in bottom-line priorities.

~~~~~~~~~~~
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.


Come visit PROJECT: Lucidity.

For those numbnuts that will try to make a "Free Speech" issue out of this, a reminder: 1st Amendment "free speech" is protected from state (e.g. government) action -- MSNBC is a private employer. They can - and should - fire someone for such insulting, degrading and un-civil conduct. Even if it does give ratings a temporary bounce to keep this moron on the air.

Agreed, the hand-wringing over the outrage is just silly. The right to free speech and the right to dissent are inseparable; dissent is the reason free speech exists, and the repudiation of unacceptable speech is an important social control.

As Ben Franklin once said, "Of all the sacred rights enshrined in the right to Free Speech, perhaps the most sacred is the right to tell some asshole to shut the fuck up every once in a while. Especially that jackass Adams." From the Constitutional Convention, I think.

Speaking in my dual capacity as founder of the United Semitic Peoples' Kemalist Front (we have a few [7] high prestige single digit numbered membership cards available) and Ashkenazim for Divestiture, I implore my compatriots to eschew the conflation of "Semite" and "Israeli" (let alone the conflation of anti-Likudnik and anti-semite) One may see the swastika hidden in the mogen david without being an anti-semite.

nb. I am not a self-hating jew. I'm fine with me, it's those other guys who piss me off...

MJ asks:

"Cannot the old bigot come up with a single African American to support him. What about some Clarence Thomas type? Surely, there has to be some thoroughly discredited African-American who will stand with Imus. If not, wow."


The answer is yes as follows:

Talk radio host Armstrong Williams: "I can never forget during the time of Hurricane Katrina that he was one of the few people who had a national audience in this country who spoke out and said, 'What is wrong with America? Why are they singling out these people for this kind of treatment and this kind of neglect?' He said there's only one conclusion that I can come to is the fact that they have black faces. And this is not right. This is not who America is. And I've got to tell you, I can't forget that. You can be outraged with him, and you should be outraged with him, but you've got to take the man's life in balance. He's one of the few people who brought attention to the plight of those people in New Orleans, and they happened to be black" ("Countdown," MSNBC, 4/9)."

http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/archives/2007/04/hotline_after_d_189.html

yup. Imus has a constitutionally protected right to be racist slime and he seems to exercise it regularly.

MSNBC is free to hire and fire racist slime.

I hope they will choose to exercise their freedom to fire this racist slime.

I have chosen to exercise my right as a civilized person to tune Imus and other demogogues OUT.

If enough people chose a similar exercise of freedom, Imus would have no audience, no ratings and no job.

M.J. Rosenberg says:

The contrast between Ifill and the white boys Jeff Greenfield, David Gregory, James Carville, Bill Maher and Ham Jordan (all of whom are rallyng behind Imus) could not be more stark.

MJ is obviously anti caucasian, he should get fired!

In the broader context of public civility or whatever you wish to call all of this Imus strikes me as one of the least offensive of persons that entertain us daily. And if you include all forms of entertainment then there are a lot of people that ought not to be able to perform in any venue anywhere on this planet. I am especially mystified by black rappers that do and say the most outrageous things and get paid a lot for it with an awful lot of people paying to listen to it. I really think the black community ought to be looking inward because if there is one thing that is harming the black community in this country it is their own self-perception. The black children of this country have their self worth and perception of their place in society harmed every day because of this and nobody so much as bats an eye. There are boundless videos that depict the most awful treatment of black women by black rappers. It is nonsensical to think any of this will change if the black community doesn't change itself. Music and videos carry a powerful message and if that message is explicitly condoned within a community then the community has no authority to condemn others who do likewise. Imus was wrong and everybody gets it. I'm just not sure if the standard for rendering that judgement is commonly shared, across the board, by blacks and whites alike. My eyes and ears tell me it isn't.

thepeoplechoose

I'd be more sure of Imus' racism if he attacked blacks all the time, or most of the time, but that's not the case, Imus attacks everyone, its his schtick.

If a serial killer murders 15 men and 4 women is he a misogynist?

He may be a racist, but before I declare him as such, I need more evidence than a few insults among the thousands over the years.

Imus was outraged at Katrina. Whoop de frickin' doo.

I don't think you were defending Imus, lally, but I just wanted to respond to that.

Yes, much of rap is offensive, but it is not a Black community thing, only. Mega corporations (mostly run by white men) are making mega bucks off of offensive music and videos and selling these products to a lot of kids, many of them white. In fact, when rap wasn't mainstream it was less mysoginist, was mostly consumed by Black people, and largely focused about the struggle of Black people in this country. Since it's come into the mainstream and become a consumer good for people outside of the Black community, it has quickly gone down hill. Not to mention that every offensive thing you see in rap videos today is part of our broader culture. We are a racist, mysoginist and violent society. The images may be extremes, but they weren't thought up in a vacuum.

Imus is not a black rapper and black rappers didn't insult these women. Young women at college on scholarship ARE trying to change their community. What makes this so sickening is not just what Imus said, but the reaction of those like you who cannot see beyond what Imus said to who he said it about. This is about black college women insulted through no fault of their own.

As to blaming black rappers, I came of age listening to white rockers who had plenty of dirty language to use against white women, but I don't recall any establishment insider radio star assuming that such language applied to all white college women.

I don't consider rap/hip hop to be in the same league at all. Jewish comedians have always made fun of Jewish ethnic traits, sometimes in very rough terms as the (horrible) Jackie Mason does. But coming from Jackie Mason (or Seinfeld or Stiller or Jon Stewart or Sarah Silverman) it's one thing. Coming from Steve Martin or George Carlin or Ray Romano it would be something else. Whoopi Goldberg's riffs on women would be unacceptable coming from a man.
That is the way it is.
Chris Rock can say it and Don Imus can't. It is worth noting however that Chris Rock would never ridicule college kids. His targets tend to be of the OJ variety.
Imus's specialty is going after the powerless.

cfaller96.

Thanks for not confusing the words I quoted with my own opinions. Not all posters are so clear about those little details.

I wasn't defending Imus, but unlike the vast majority of posters on this subject, I have actually watched his program and am familiar with not only his stupid, sniggering, disgusting frat-boy "comedic" schtick but also how obsessive he gets about certain subjects that engage his interest and outrage.

Those posters who have pointed to Imus producer Bernie are correct in targetting his contributions to the tone of the show and I would add the creepy sidekick supposedly born-again Charles to the list. But Imus bears the ultimate responsibility as the roles both play are part of a long-standing mechanism employed by the show in guise of their "entertaining" comedy segments.

In addition, I have yet to see any mentions of one of the most frequent targets of Imus & company; Arabs and Muslims. They are not only used in the loose comedic sense, but are on the recieving end of real hate speech that doesn't even pretend to be funny.

Don't even get me started on the embedded sexism that runs throughout the whole program......

Imus is nothing but the voice of well connected insiders from John McCain to John Kerry, from Tim Russert to Oliphant. He caters to politicians and journalists who would rather be celebrities than do their real jobs. No way is he the voice of left-behind males. He's the voice of the most highly privileged white men from Boston to DC. He sells their books. They sell out.

Bluebell's comment about rock is well stated. Mysogyny and racism in the broader culture is what we need to examine. We have plenty of examples where mysogyny and racism are held up and glorified. How many old westerns, deemed classics, are out there that show the cowboy harassing, exploiting, abusing women and people of color? How many commercials do I have to watch where something's being sold with a woman's body? Or where the value between a woman and beer is actually questioned? Even on this site there have been side-bar advertisements for checking out Paris Hilton's sex tapes or Pamela Anderson's boob falling out of her shirt. As a black woman I am constantly offended, and it's not only by rap videos! Why is no one here talking about how America really needs to take a look at itself and think about its character as a whole.


My impression of this thing is that it comes at a strange time. I don't think Imus will get fired over this, but in a year or two he'll be off the air. The long term political climate change is evident and the hatefilled low-education angry white guy shtick is on its way out.

On 'our' side there is a sense that the political shield wall in public opinion for this crude and ugly "entertainment" is partly broken, perhaps more so than is the case, though it is undoubtedly at (very) long last weakening dramatically. So there's perhaps some zeal to charge at the thing, born of an incredibly long period of offenses, which is acted on before the defenses are in fact weak enough to be stormed and truly broken. I think that's what folks like Tom Oliphant are trying to say- their sense is that we're not actually there yet.

My feeling is that we're in a period of cracking and frantic orthodoxy among the bigot-qua-reactionary political bloc. There's a lot of anger breaking out in public and inability to handle criticism and shouting down of their critics and opponents going on- and brazen lying, foolish bravado, desperate attacks, vicious interference against critics and opponents. Imus got infected by this- he gets infected by everything. It's all manifestation of Reinhold Niebuhr's statement about frantic orthodoxy being the result of doubts, not of certainty.

We've seen this movie before in slightly more civilized form when moderate Republicans started cracking and getting doubts about the hardliners and their agenda last winter, and again when the Republican true Right wing saw its program and sway over the electorate failing last last summer and early fall. Now it's the hardcore reactionary wing's turn.

Holding together is a vital part of this in its first phase, when they're "winning" i.e. drowning out their opposition in counterattacks and noise and the dust and bad dogmas still widely believed they throw up, which is where we are now. That exhausts itself, and the second phase is all about the facts and debunking and exposure overpowering them- fraying and infighting and exposure and people walking away, selling out the others.

Well, if Imus goes, so should all the other "talking heads" who rave and ramp on tv and radio against "fair and balance" media! I can only hope that the ones who opened this Pandora's box is really ready for the lash-bash that may take place. So all you Rush listeners, heads up...and too all you other raving freaks who say crap and lie to hide your real intentions are given the boot!
Imus spoke with out thinking! He should be punished for his hate bashing, but this is against a sports team that is women, so what about the bashing of lies to persuade peoples views regarding the direction the Country has gone? What makes this different, only the population it bashes and not a class of people! Race is NOT the problem here, it is hate on people end of story, bottom line and all how talk rage should be give the boot right out the door!

Imus's sin is that he is too good a cultural weathervane...crucify him as he embarrasses to many; and here I thought whipping boys were passe.


"Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."

Thomas Jefferson


Speaking of double standards, I'd be interested in hearing how you really feel about Arabs and/or Germans.

Matt Y. made a good point on his blog. Just what was the joke even? When Chris Rock or Sarah Silverman or South Park uses racist language in a joke it is part of a well...joke, and the difference between the funny ones ones and say Michael Richards is that they generally make a larger poin