TPMCafe
« THE OTHER FUNDAMENTALISTS, OR, THIS POST IS NOT ABOUT ALBERTO GONZALES | Home | The Regulatory Moment »

One State's Approach to the Subprime Meltdown

user-pic

Last week, I posted about a new report from the Center for American Progress laying out potential ways the federal government should respond to the subprime mortgage meltdown.  Today, I attended a hearing in Massachusetts to learn more about how officials are tackling these issues on a state level.

Witnesses at the hearing included Boston's Mayor Thomas Menino, Secretary State William Galvin, Attorney General Martha Coakley, and state Senator Jarrett Barrios, the sponsor of one of the bills before the legislature.  These witnesses proposed a number of short and long-term approaches to tackling the rapid rise in foreclosures in Massachusetts, including:  the establishment of a state-run foreclosure prevention fund to provide victims of predatory lending alternative financing; requiring that third-party counselors help borrowers assess if a loan is in their best-interest; placing additional good-faith and fair-dealing ethical requirements on subprime lenders; establishing a "right to cure" to allow borrowers more time to become current on a loan; and having a state agency grade lenders and deny licenses to those that engage in unconscionable conduct. 

Moreover, Attorney General Galvin urged the legislature to declare a housing emergency and require judicial review of any foreclosure.  This step would not only help uncover more victims of abuse, but it would also provide more time for homeowners to find alternative financing so they can keep their homes.

Certainly, not all subprime lenders are abusive, and many deserve credit for investing in lower-income communities.  Nonetheless, too often they profit off undisclosed fees and by trapping unknowing clients into loans they cannot possibly afford to repay.  Disclosure laws are important, but almost nobody has the wherewithall to read through hundreds of pages of legal documents at a closing -- so all this work is needed on the backend too.  Hopefully other states will follow the lead of Massachusetts by taking these issues on -- and soon.


6 Comments

| Leave a comment

Lots of sound and fury, here, so let's see if we can talk some sense.

There is little doubt that lenders in the subprime and alt-A markets have had an effect in pushing up home prices above their long term trajectory. Or that stricter lending standards recently imposed by federal regulators and higher costs of credit derivatives and of participating in the carry-trade have partially closed the subprime refinance window. The result is that foreclosures will increase and will affect lower income borrowers more than higher income ones.

Should we allow the market to clear itself or should we intervene?

If we believe that lower middle-class neighborhoods should be protected from a catastrophic (although relatively short-term) disequilibrium of values brought on by foreclosures and repossessions, then, we should intervene.

And the best way to do that is to have the government (state or federal) insure and subsidize the subprime refinances. The interest rate on the 10-year note is no higher today than it was in 2004, and there is no reason why we cannot afford to subsidize these borrowers until home values catch up to the current inflated prices and those borrowers who are in over their heads can bail out.

 

Re: The interest rate on the 10-year note is no higher today than it was in 2004, and there is no reason why we cannot afford to subsidize these borrowers until home values catch up to the current inflated prices and those borrowers who are in over their heads can bail out.

Since the cost of housing is definitely inflated beyond normal market pricing, and is certainly out of step with median income, wouldn't we better off if we be far better off to allow housing proces to fall back to what they should be? That would help home-buyers and obviate much of the need for the risky lending that has contributed to this mess. Sure it would speculators and house flippers, and disappoint people who confused their house with a winning lottery ticket, but who ever said a house should be a get-rich-scheme?

That's the issue: tough love or not so much.

Some neighborhoods are beyond salvaging, but consider the overall damage when large numbers of homes across entire cities are allowed to go REO or into foreclosure. Remember, the next door owners own their homes outright or have (had?) substantial equity in their homes. Their neighborhoods are being turned into slums -- and all the fault of Greenspan and Bernanke(?).

The middle class benefited from low interest rates -- the S&P500 is up 75% over the last 4 years and 401(k)s are up substantially, too. IMO it would be selfish and graceless to accept our benefits and turn around and tell lower middle class folks they're on their own.

We may have to bail out some undeserving speculators and others foolish enough to buy into the "American dream" meme. But that's a small cost to pay when justice is at stake.

Why would neighborhoods turn into slums simply because their housing prices return to reasonable market levels? Seems to me that would make it easier for people to buy those houses. The current situation, where housing has become unaffordable (except via risky financing) seems to be to be a far bigger problem. By the way, I would support some sort of limited bail-out for people who are in trouble with these sorts of loans, limited of course to people actually occupying the homes they bought.

Remember when the only way to buy stocks was through a full-service broker? Even if you already knew which stocks and how many shares you would want to buy, you would still need to pay the broker's hefty commission fee. You may not have needed or even wanted his or her advice, but you had no choice but to pay the full fare anyway.

The Internet changed all of that. You can now do your own investing without having to worry which particular stock the broker is attempting to push that day. He or she may have had little regard for you and your needs, but primarily had the need to fatten his or her own wallet.

An area of investing that could be made far more efficient is mortgage lending.

Everyday in America, thousands of consumers are victims of mortgage loan officer schemes that ultimately cost the borrower thousands of dollars more than they originally were led to believe. This is so common, that “predatory lending” and its impact is a growing concern among consumer interest groups and government regulators.

Wouldn't it be nice if, like in the ability to purchase your own stocks, you could do your own research and choose your own loan without having to worry about the needs of a greedy, self-serving loan officer (many of whom have been written up, after the fact, in the press)? Their extreme practices have even led some trusting consumers into foreclosure.

Thanks to a mortgage company in Chicago, the Internet and technology, you now have the ability to go online and within about 15 minutes receive a loan approval for their client without having to go through the traditional mortgage process. The system is so sophisticated that it is predatory lending proof. The computer does not have the ability to charge a consumer more because it thinks the borrower does not know any better. It simply evaluates the client and gives him or her the right program at the right price, saving the consumer’s money and time.

Jonathan Cosie, CEO and founder of MortgageTrends & RealEstatePro News, has endorsed this technology as a 2006 Top Industry Technology pick stating that “This is the first, true self-serve online mortgage solution we have ever seen. Other online lenders state that you can do a mortgage online, but the reality is that you either give them information that they sell as a lead to loan officers or they have a loan officer call you. Both of those scenarios often lead to added costs and frustration to the consumer. Our team is very, very impressed with this concept.”

Once your information has been entered, a loan manager works with you to complete the loan package in a low pressure environment. After the financial information has been evaluated, you simply selects the type and term of loan that they are interested in and the system then immediately begins the underwriting process. You can view all actual (not estimated) closing costs for each loan match presented. This leaves little margin for error and no opportunity for predatory lending practices. Once a loan is selected, the loan manager gets the client to closing on time, with no “packing” of fees. No games and no gimmicks.

In the same way that Amazon.com has changed the way consumers buy books, this mortgage company in Chicago will soon change the way that borrowers buy mortgages, forever.

Hey Ted! Glad to see you back to enter your second comment in 10 months of membership.

I'd love to know what search terms you enter (or other method you use) to flag a posting on TPMCafe which is in your area of marketing interest.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address