Gonzales: I Told You So
Some folks have noted that the prosecutors scandal means that the plan to push Gonzales onto the Supreme Court has been undone. But what's incredible is that this corrupt guy was ever even under consideration. Partially, he owed his theoretical viability to the idea that he was more liberal than other people Bush might appoint.
But I take a certain perverse satisfaction in long hating Gonzales as embodying the corruption that would be the Bush administration. From a Common Dreams piece I wrote in December 2000:
it is shocking that he would appoint as White House Counsel a man embroiled in controversy for taking contributions from Bush's Vice President's firm and favoring that company in judicial decisions. Bush has a history of using the courts to favor his corporate supporters and the appointment of Gonzales shows that he has no attention of abandoning that tradition he established in Texas.
Gonzales should have been a Rosetta Stone from day one of the Bush administration, showing the degree of partisan and corrupt politics that would become the norm.
As the linked article detailed, Gonzales acted as the judicial bagman for Halliburton and Bush's political interests as a sitting judge. If he was willing to sell-out as a supposedly independent judge, how could anyone be surprised at vendettas against disloyal federal prosecutors. Gonzales, he understands being a loyal partisan and no other values have ever seemed to matter to him.















Not even...Family values? I'm shocked!
BTW did you see the update at Huffpo about the upper-level DOJ attorney taking the 5th on this? I'm with Arianna. Let them impeach Gonzales; it would be over in a couple of months, and the White House can't protect themselves from having to actually tell the truth. Going to court of these suppoenas would let Bush run out the clock.
Jan Knaus
March 26, 2007 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dominoes... Knock down the easiest one first, that appears to be Gonzales. Once the impeachment dominoes start falling, perhaps we will get to fry other bigger fish.... (yes, I know I have mixed metaphors)...
March 26, 2007 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I saw someone on TV say that prior to Bush taking him under the wing, Gonzales never tried a case in court, never ran for office, and was never appointed to a position by anyone in or out of the political system. But he did keep Gov. Bush's DUI record secret when Bush was called for jury duty.
ol Rubber Stamp Al.
March 26, 2007 2:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bush is the captain of the ship. He's the guy who sets the course. Whoever is manning the helm is following his course. Typically Bush, unlike a legitimate ship's captain, passes off responsilibity for irresponsibility (and nefarious deeds) on his part to the guy at the helm. In the real world, there'd be a mutiny before the captain sank the bloody ship. In Bush's world, he yet again is getting off free. Just how much of this crap are we going to put up with. Maybe after we've hit the iceberg and it's too late?
Gonzales's behavior is far from excusable, but why is the individual calling the shots blameless - yet again.
March 26, 2007 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
(Homer Simpson voice): Mmmmm... fried dominoes.
thosethingswesay.blogspot.com
March 26, 2007 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
What's interesting is that in Bush's world, veracity-challenged Al Gonzales actually IS one of the less ideologically bad alternatives. All things are relative, you know.
But please recall that it was Fredo who took Priscilla Owens to task for being such a -- how to put this delicately -- whore for corporate interests in cases before the Texas Supreme Court. Owens is now a federal judge, of course.
And Fredo is still W's favorite legal vending machine. Whatever he asks for the machine gives him.
March 26, 2007 3:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone have an easy link to the confirmation votes for Gonzales? Any links to speeches prior to his confirmation? I'm very curious which Democratic Senators voted for him. Granted the tradition generally is to confirm the cabinet the President wants, but if Texas media was publishing this sort of thing way back in 2000, and Nathan Newman was fighting the good fight at Common Dreams (SOME of our elected officials must read it, mustn't they?) I can't see why Democrats, even in the minority, didn't raise Cain about this appointment. Maybe they did. I do nap occasionally.
aMike
March 26, 2007 3:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
There was very little opposition to Gonzales when he was going up for White House Counsel. After all, the thinking goes, that position is essentially the President's lawyer. There was a lot more concern when he went up for AG. I take it the second confirmation hearing is the one you are concerned about?
March 26, 2007 3:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I guess we can be thankful for little favors. The rrouble is, though, that the Right seems to have a bottomless supply of corrupt, incompetent bootpolishers. If they do indeed get the chance to install another, uh, "Justice," I have complete faith that they'll easily find someone even worse than Abu G.
March 26, 2007 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yup.
Not so much concerned as curious. Especially about the field of Senators contending for the nomination now. How many of them gave a pass on Gonzales? I suppose it was a long time from Nathan Newman's Common Dreams Article and the Texas Papers' Comments on Judiciary hanky-panky in Texas (I used to love to read Molly Ivins on that), to the confirmation hearings, and having confirmed once, the tendency would be to confirm again, and Senators probably have attention spans no longer than the average American's. But you'd think some of the Democratic leadership would have researchers in their offices preparing materials so they would be ready to raise a little holy heck about this kind of thing.
aMike
March 26, 2007 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Um....Ted Olson?
March 26, 2007 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am sitting here watching the criminal Gonzalez change his story to "set the record straight" and he is just lying through his teeth.
Now he is talking about how wonderful a job his department has done and how he has to reassure the American public that they are doing "the Peoples' Business."
In the spirit of the metaphor/cliche fest that we have all justifiably, and joyfully joined in on here, I would like to add my own: Although "absence makes the heart grow fonder," "OUT OF SIGHT OUT OF MIND."
We have to keep this front and center as a starting point. If Bush was smart he would dump Al and say that even though he was doing a "heck of a job" this "contrived issue" is interfering with important stuff. Bush may realize that if he throws this guy under the bus ALL the dirty laundry may get aired if old Al gets a wild hair!
But then again, if Bush was smart, the neocons would never have made him their boy-king and he would be doing what he does best: clearing brush in the armpit of America.
Jan Knaus
March 26, 2007 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's funny to consider that part of John Ashcroft's motivation for leaving the AG post may have been that he was unwilling to go this low!
March 26, 2007 4:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
LET THE EAGLE SOAR...................................................................... Maybe he just thought he could make it on iTunes!
Jan Knaus
March 26, 2007 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, Bush 41 spied him at his law firm, but he wouldn't follow dad to Washington, so W. pounced on him.
Tom
March 26, 2007 4:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
aMike, just google Gonzales senate confirmation. I did it yesterday, actually. IIRC, the Dems voting to confirm were pretty much the Lieberman-Torture caucus: Lieberman himself (surprise!), the Nelson twins (FLA BIll called for him to resign today); Mary "Who? Me?" Landrieu, Mark Pryor and my own less than useless DINO Ken Salazar. Even Biden and HRC voted against him.
I'm glad somebody pointed out his smackdown of Priscilla Owens, in the interest of fairness. I was going to point out that before becoming involved in BushWorld, he was a real estate lawyer, big deal wheeling and dealing, from what I understand. He met Harriet Miers through the Houston Bar Association, got to know Bush, told him how the Christian Student Fellowship got him through Harvard after growing up with an alchoholic daddy, and Chimpy was in love.
Gonzales is not even a crony: He's a Bush family retainer, and that's why the Princeling is digging his heels in. He doesn't like to be told who to have over for playdates.
March 26, 2007 4:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
FOX BULLETIN! GONZALES RESIGNS, ED MEESE APPOINTED AG.
March 26, 2007 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
At least it's not John Mitchell - Comeback (from the dead) of the Year!
Tom
March 26, 2007 6:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, remember the good old days under John Ashcroft... who woulda' thought it.
March 26, 2007 6:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
ARGH!!!!!!!!
March 26, 2007 6:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Hagen
Thomas "Tom" Hagen
Tom Hagen was found, homeless, at age eleven by Sonny Corleone, a boy who took him home and persuaded his father to take him into the family.
After graduating from law school, Hagen offered to work for Corleone as though he were one of the Don's own sons. Hagen acted as consigliere to Don Corleone,
When Tom asks why he was being removed, Michael answers by telling him he just isn't "a wartime consigliere". In the films, Hagen grudgingly accepted this decision and remained loyal; however, in the novel, it was heavily implied that Hagen's removal was a ploy by Michael to misdirect the family's enemies, and he still held a high position in the organization. towards the conclusion of The Godfather: Part II,
Michael reveals to Tom Hagen that the reason that Michael has held Hagen to a limited role is because he intends for him to be the next Don, and has needed to shield him from direct knowledge of certain actions.
Hagen, artfully reminding the doomed Frank Pentangeli, a history buff, that Roman senators marked for death were given an honorable exit: to commit suicide, other than to face a more violent death, Roman senators and high-ranking officials would kill themsevles once a plot was discovered against the emperor, and the official in question being one of the conspirators.
This way, the conspirator's family would receive a pension for the rest of their lives and be well taken care of.
March 26, 2007 6:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Keep in mind that Ashcroft is not as dumb as Gonzales. He probably remembers what finally became of another John..... Mitchell.
March 26, 2007 7:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Classic TV
Keith Olbermann ran a segment with Deputy WH Press Secratary Dana Perrino mentioning a transcript of Gonzales from CNN to clarify what the Attorney General had actually said.
A reporter then asked Ms. Perrino how she could point to a transcript to verify statements when the WH didn't want statements to Congressional committeees by WH employees to be transcribed to insure nothing was taken out of context.
Watching her stumbling through the admission that her statement was contradictory, but that this was the official WH position was just amazing.
Gonzales is clearly a liar. Ms Perrino is a paid WH employee who is enabling his lies. Even the WH Press Corps should be able to detect the prevarication.
March 26, 2007 9:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are we gonna have to start those old chants again? Franco is (I assume) still dead....
March 26, 2007 10:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bush may be the captain of the ship, but Rove and Cheney are on the other side of the radio. Bush is just a spokesman for power.
March 27, 2007 12:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
There's a contest with a lot of contenders - "Who's the dumbest Bushie?" or "Are you dumber than a fifth rater President" or "Dumb Bushie - a Redundancy" or "Put Your Country in Jeopardy" or "Wheel of Misfortune" or "The Price is Wrong" or "Washington Squares" or "Lack of Concentration" or "Will we be Survivors" or "Who wants to be a Halliburton Millionaire", etc.
Tom
March 27, 2007 12:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama voted against Gonzales. His statement about his reasoning demonstrated excellent judgement and once again, sounds prescient:
.
March 27, 2007 1:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sad isn't it? I do wish the Bushies could make up their mind whether "The Godfather" is going to be their how-to guide or whether it will be "1984".
March 27, 2007 4:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Kenneth Starr.
March 27, 2007 4:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
The only thing the White House press corps(e) can detect is where the free donuts are located.
March 27, 2007 4:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think we ought to mount a petition drive urging him to appear on American Idol. I want Simon to have a crack at him. <snicker>
aMike
March 27, 2007 6:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think we have a new meme here.
March 27, 2007 10:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't even joke about that!
Tom
March 27, 2007 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ah yes, back to the Starr Chamber... Perhaps, what... Perperdine University(?) would regain its reputation after 10 - 20 years?
March 27, 2007 7:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am starting to believe that Gonzales is toast and that the Administration is just keeping him around so that he can absorve all the abuse from the Congressional Hearings.
My prediction: he'll resign in short order to "spend more time with his family."
March 30, 2007 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
When Gonzales leaves Government who will hire him? If he didn't hook himself to the Bush bandwagon he'd be an ambulance chaser in Texas. Gonzales was just the chewing gum on Bush's cowboy boot, wherever Bush went Gonzales went. Maybe he can get a job clearing brush on the Bush ranch.
I can't imagine The Federalist Society inviting Gonzales to join. The Heritage Fnd? Nah.
Harvard Law School?
March 30, 2007 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe that Pepperdine University School of Law is the location where morally troubled Republican Attorneys go... Ken Starr is their dean.
March 30, 2007 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought Starr lost that offer. Anyhow, if he didn't, then Gonzales becomes the chewing gum on Starr's shoe.
My point is this; after he received his law degree, what has Gonzales ever accomplished that wasn't tied to Bush?
March 31, 2007 5:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
I watched the recent White House Press Briefing and it was business as usual; lame humor from the podium reaps uproarious laughter from the reporters. After the briefing ends I usually utter the following...."And a good time was had by all."
March 31, 2007 5:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't you think that Bush will need a lawyer or two after he FINALLY slinks away to the desert? Or Paraguay? If the latter he'll even need a bilingual one. I don't think we need to worry about Al being without a job. If anyone on the hill had any balls he would have to worry about joining Scooter for lying to Congress, which is a felony whether under oath or not.
Jan Knaus
March 31, 2007 7:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Think again...
March 31, 2007 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink