TPMCafe
« Two market failures | Home | But Does AIPAC Want to Go to War? Or Stay at War? »

More and More Americans Can't Make the Mortgage

user-pic

More and more Americans are unable to make their mortgage payments. According to recent reports, almost 5% of Americans were past due in the last three months. While this is the highest level for the overall mortgage market since the beginning of 2003, it's not the end of the story. The "sub-prime" market three-month past due rate is up to %13.33.

While this is a cause for concern in many ways, three specific concerns jump out:

1) The effect of even small rises on American families. Each small percentage change represents hundreds of thousands of American families struggling to pay their bills. The moral challenge this puts before us should not be ignored.

2) The timing of this problem and what it says about how our economy is structured. Because the economy is pointing up according to some of our traditional statistics (unemployment is significantly less than early 2003 for example), it leads to worries that this may only be the beginning - and if we face more difficult economic times these numbers may get much higher even than they are today.

3) The effect on companies engaged in these markets and their lenders. There seems to be a crisis developing in the mortgage market: (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/11/business/11mortgage.html) and while some of these companies have not been the best corporate citizens in the past - if this market was to crash many, many companies and employees would be caught in the free-fall.

Lots of reasons to keep an eye on this issue in the future...

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/14/business/14lend.web.html?ex=1331524800&en=246292a380ad4d7a&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink

 


44 Comments

| Leave a comment

Actually, the freefall in the subprime lender market is already having an effect on the stock market. Just look at what happened today.

Satellite Sky Blog

Find the Truth. Do Justice.

the mortgage bubble wasn't much more sane than the dot com bubble. You've got all these people out there with interest-only mortgages. They're left holding the bag now, but they knew they were living above their means when they signed the dotted line.

Each small percentage change represents hundreds of thousands of American families struggling to pay their bills. The moral challenge this puts before us should not be ignored.

I think the moral challenge is really putting those in jail who:

a) tried to systematically inflate assessments;

b) found ways to give cash back at closing;

c) lied on "stated income" loans;

d) implied that "creative financing" was more than just a carrot;

e) failed to tell people that renting was a better choice than buying;

As one who tries to live "below my means" and "in harmony with nature," I see no moral imperative to worry about families who did something stupid... because their children aren't going to enjoy economic prosperity doing stupid things either.

I think that Christopher Dodd wants to bail out "subprime mortgages" because, as they say, he doesn't want them to turn into "junk bonds" because overcharging the poor for being poor is a very lucrative business....

I'd feel a whole lot better about the whole home mortgage thing if we had better transparency about what actually ends up happening to your monthly payment. There's something fishy going on in the lending world, needs that sunshine...

We lost our home several years back because we could no longer make the payments after illness and job loss drastically reduced our income.

It is a problem that is widespread, and the MSM isn't doing anything to put a human face on the problem. Thanks for putting this out there for discussion.

I see no moral imperative to worry about families who did something stupid...

It's not just people being "stupid." Sometimes, life just sucks. See mm's post, below. 

Dissent Protects Democracy.

while I wish Sterling Newberry was around to do triage, I sort of wonder if mortgages are part of economic warfare. for example, if the Chinese have a trillion US dollars, and we create a trillion dollars of "housing wealth," then the Chinese have only $500 million after inflation. i sort of see this same trade problem between the US and the mideast since all our dollars wind up over there and i think ethanol is a way to funnel oil through big ag and generate dollars over here to balance what winds up over there-- at least, that's what I think economists try to do when they "design economies."


what can the MSM do about it? in my case, I live in a rental and feel happy about it. I could get a mortgage but, in this economy, I just don't feel comfortable about making long term commitments because of outsourcing, etc....

however, despite this fear, I found out that, historically, the average homeowner bought their first house in their 30's but, nowadays, realtors are going after younger folks and making them anxious about spending their money on rent.

mcs, I apologize for not stating my point more clearly, but my intent was that while the MSM acts as a mouthpiece for the Bush administrations pretense of a bouyant economy, most Americans are not sharing in it.. and in fact the reality, if covered honestly by the MSM would do much to dispute the false claims of the administration. Especially to those next in line for the chopping block.

I remember a media that did a better job reporting the realities. Journalists who weren't so disconnected and removed from average Americans. We need to get back to a media that serves the public interests.. that was what I was trying to relay. Thus my appreciation for this topic of discussion.

Do you REALLY think it's people being "stupid?" You are sadly misinformed, it generally has to do with illness, and the accompanying loss of income that generally entails. There was a Harvard study not too l.ong ago that showed even a modes t debt of $3,500 was enough to get the financial sharks going with their 30% interest rates and the minute your credit score is in trouble EVERYTHING costs more, from car insurance to monthly payments. Being the 'christian' nation we apparently claim to be, the FIRST thing we do to people in need is screw them out of all their assets as quickly as possible, then we maybe, possibly, give them aid, after humiliating them as much as possible.

I hope it never happens to you, don't think "living below your means" will save you when you're looking at a few hundred thousand in non-covered medical expenses.

They'll take it ALL.

Or are people "stupid" for getting sick, now??

Good Grief!

CSPAN junkies visit http://spannerbackup.ipbhost.com

I remember when bankruptcy reform legislation was going through the congress we heard that the majority of people who filed for it was because of illness, job loss or divorce. I can't remember the exact figure, but it was significant. No one plans illness, but it happens a lot more than you think, including to young healthy people. So many of us are one, two or even three paychecks away from our lives falling to pieces. Here is what happened to my family.

My husband had a good union job, he was an AFSCME member. We had one child, I worked as well. By '93, our rent had increased dramatically, we lived in a tenement apartment, and as we had savings and felt secure, we decided to purchase a small, modest home in a slghtly better neighborhood. We received a low income mortgage, with an interest rate that would not exceed 6.50% interest rate. We weren't even paying more than what our apartment rent had been.

We didn't vacation, we were pretty darned frugal. Our one luxury the entire time was a home computer for our daughter. We had one old car that we'd purchased used.

Once my daughter was in jr. high I got a tech certification (no degree) and had a decent paying job at Fleet Bank. Our sole focus was helping our daughter to get the best education she could and eventually get into college.

In 1996, my husband was diagnosed as needing an organ transplant, but he was still in the early stages and was very healthy. In fact we had no idea he was even ill, he felt and looked as healthy as a horse. He took care of himself, didn't drink or smoke. We were told it could take three or four years for his name to reach the top of the list and get the transplant, but there were no guarantees. They are very straightforward with you. They also tell you that if you lose your health insurance and do not get on medicare or medicaid, you will be removed from the transplant waiting list.

In 2000 my husband's employer found out about my husband's condition and started harassing him. Even being a union worker did not help protect him from this. He withstood it for about ten months, by which time he was diagnosed with severe depression brought about by the fear of what losing his job and health insurance would bring. I took the Family and Medical leave act to care for him, during this brief time Fleet was taken over by Bank of America (none of the workers saw this coming) and my job was lost due to downsizing. My husband was terminated in 2001.

His doctors dumped him as he had no health insurance, and because we had a car they claimed was worth at least four thousand dollars, refused to provide him with medicaid. I fought for two years and got him on medicare. Not even the specialists at the public hospital would take him as we had no supplemental insurance, despite how sick he was.

I got another job, though I wasn't paid as well. We struggled and managed to keep the house up until 2003, and it was foreclosed. We never declared bankruptcy.

Up 'til spring of '06, the only medical care he received was from a GP. At the end of May he was hospitalized for what we thought was something minor. They diagnosed cancer, Burketts Like Lymphoma in a very advanced stage. We were told by the oncologist, if he had been seeing the specialist he needed, even without testing for cancer, it would have been diagnosed earlier at a far more survivable stage. He received one dosage of chemotherapy and died three weeks after the diagnosis.

This is happening all across the country to people every day. Even middle class people have lost jobs, or been diagnosed with critical illnesses who have never experienced a lacking of health care are feeling this pain. You have to be wealthy to be immune from this. It's destroying lives.

There are many reasons that families default on their mortgages, including job loss and illness. Still, the subprime market encourages bad behavior. For example, take an ARM. The buyer qualifies at the rate of today's payments. In three years, the payments could, of course, more than double as the loan baloons.

Add to that problem the fact that underwriters use the standards provided by the lender rather than, say, some more established national criteria. As a result, buyers can qualify for loans that will require up to 50% of their gross (I said gross, not net) income. That can work with an ARM, as well--meaning that, in a few years they will not have a prayer.

Why do lenders do this? Because they fully expect and intend to package the loans with some first class paper and sell it to bigger institutions. Why do borrowers do this? Some just don't worry about tomorrow. Some expect to pick up much better jobs or win the lottery. And many expect that real estate prices will continue to inflate and that they can resell the house if the payments get too high. In the meantime, it's a great pad, you know!

As soon as the economy turns sour, this is going to explode. Coupled with an explosion in the budget defecit (because we will have less revenue and have to pay more in interest to sell government debt), this is going to make the dot.com crash look like child's play.

are people "stupid" for getting sick??

the word "stupid" is certainly a loaded word but I don't see why people would ever assume a mortgage that requires a road "without bumps" through life.

the mexican immigrants, i'm told, live one family per room.

if that "quality of life" sounds terrible, and you "supersize" your living space, then you're taking on additional risk.

I hope [that] it never happens to you, don't think "living below your means" will save you when you're looking at a few hundred thousand in non-covered medical expenses.

I know the statistics regarding medical issues, and the associated risk of going bankrupt, but in this housing bubble, people are clearly getting mortgages they can't afford.

I save 50 to 60 percent of what I make because I know that, one day, I'll be footing a big health bill.

the mexican immigrants, i'm told, live one family per room.

So much for the American Dream, eh?

The Third World, with the collaboration of American elites, is dragging us down to its level.

if that "quality of life" sounds terrible, and you "supersize" your living space, then you're taking on additional risk.

A civilized society would provide social safety nets to protect families in such circumstances.

As one who tries to live "below my means" and "in harmony with nature," I see no moral imperative to worry about families who did something stupid... because their children aren't going to enjoy economic prosperity doing stupid things either.

I suppose it shouldn't be surprising to see spoiled upper-middle-class hippies join ranks with the financial fat cats.

Whenever I hear people say crap like "in harmony with nature", alarm bells go off. I think: "That person wants to steal our prosperity."

To clarify: We have never lived "in harmony with nature" ever since we settled down to a sedentary agricultural lifestyle thousands of years ago.

The state of nature sucks. It is a state in which mortality during childbirth is alarmingly high, life expectancy is a few short decades, and disease runs rampant. As Hobbes described, life under such a situation is nasty, brutish, and short.

No one lives in harmony with nature and thank God for that. Nature is the ENEMY to be kept at bay. To embrace "harmony with nature" is to treasonously let enemy troops inside the city walls.


People who "have prosperity" usually take it from someone else...

When I say "in harmony with nature," I'm suggesting "be happy with what you have."


I suppose you have more hope than I do!

This appeared a few days ago in the WallStreet Journal:

BOGOTÁ, Colombia -- President Bush has brought an unaccustomed message for Latin Americans on his weeklong swing through the region: I feel your pain. And he is taking it to some unaccustomed places -- hotbeds of poverty and disaffection that he generally has missed on earlier trips.

I couldn't stop laughing at the image...


I heard on 'Guns and Butter,' a popular KPFA show, that the US would ask the arabs to buy the bad loans to keep the market going... it sounded reasonable because they have such a big trade surplus, I imagine, that they can easily absorb the loss since their income stream is spread over the entire population.

Life is getting interesting! whoa, whoa!

A civilized society would provide social safety nets to protect families in such circumstances.

As you know, safety nets only catch you, they don't lift you back up!

If people were serious about safety nets, they wouldn't be wasting their money on SUV's, McMansions, watching TV, etc...

In a civilized society, does a doctor take care of the poor or his family?

You can believe that resources aren't scarce, but I'll ask you to wake up!

believe me, my life has sucked many times! I used to have no health care and I worried all the time. After I stopped worrying, my life got better! It was a really hard thing to do. Hell, I even forgave George Bush because, being selfish, I didn't want to spend another minute being angry at him.

I remember when bankruptcy reform legislation was going through the congress we heard that the majority of people who filed for it was because of illness, job loss or divorce...,

1: I've lost several jobs because, as a technology worker, outsourcing kept knocking at the door. Thus, I save "as much as possible" and study "as much as possible."

Perhaps because i'm "flying high now," I believe that it's possible to roll with the ups and downs in life;

2: I've stayed single because I'm an independent thinker and I know that divorce would lead to poverty quickly when the "joint assets" were liquidated and split.

Thus, I'm sticking with partnership arrangements;

3: I don't think that anyone can prepare for illness! I know that your doctor said "if your husband had seen a specialist, things would have been better" but my aunt, who now has advanced MS, was told the same thing! That made her head spin since her specialists kept saying: "there's nothing wrong with you, it's in your head!" As far as I know, she had access to the best healthcare possible and she is also a fully trained nurse-- yet they missed the diagnosis.

Unfortunately, doctors often do a poor job...

BTW: I really hope that you're getting your life back! It must have been very hard to lose your husband... surely a priceless friend...

People who "have prosperity" usually take it from someone else...

It doesn't have to be that way. Many Western societies are equally prosperous (perhaps more so) and far more equal than the United States. It is a combination of jingoism and ignorance that makes many Americans think they have the best of all possible socioeconomic systems.

When I say "in harmony with nature," I'm suggesting "be happy with what you have."

If everyone thought that way, we'd still be living in caves. We can do better, and we must.

After reading through this thread, I feel like I have to say something here. I generally agree with the themes that mcs is trying to point out. I have a long hard history of being a liberal, but I have also learned that there will always be stupid things going on.
I see a lot of energy being spent talking about people falling beihind in their mortgages because of illnes. Well yes, there should be some protections for people in these circumstances. But somebody please tell me... is there currently some strange increase in illness in this country? No.
In order to save some truly rich people from losses in the dotcom bubble, and to ensure that GWB's tax cut thing "worked" Mr Greenspan and the gang lowered interest rates to riduculous levels. The excesses of the dotcom era were absorbed by a new bubble.
If people think the good times will be forever, then they are stupid. I do not know of any mortgage closing that did not have all the documents there to be read and signed. Most often there is an atorney present. If you sign on the line "knowing" you'll have a better job in 5 years, then you are taking what is called risk.
There is not more illness going on; there is a contrived market that got stretched to the breaking point. Artificially low interest rates enabled less than honest sellers [who are always present] to take advantage of some stupid people [who are always present]. It's hard. And as a liberal it always bothers me, but I also know that I would rather channel my energy into 1. taking care of myself [what can I do for others if I'm introuble?] and 2. caring for those who work hard and do not seem so "entitled" to supersize their lives.

dc

This lastest problem shouldn't suprise anyone. Once a decade bankers demonstrate they can be pigs and stupid at the same time. Especially when there is a lot of money floating around.

There are people who shouldn't be loaned money especially when interest rates are rising. However, there is always someone who can't resist taking the risk to make the profits that come from charging premium interest rates for sub-prime loans.

If Congress gets involved as Dodd seems to want to do a problem for a relatively few families and a handful of piggish lenders can be turned into a crisis. If borrowers who can't repay loans are somehow protected from the dangers of borrowing then who won't lend to them? This is how the S&L Crisis occurred.

Daniel A. Greenbaum

Re: the minute your credit score is in trouble EVERYTHING costs more, from car insurance to monthly payments.

Helpful hint: If your credit takes a dive stick with your current car and homeowners insurer no matter what. Few if any insurers check credit scores at renewal time (it costs them $$ everytime they ruin a credit report after all); most only do so when writing new policies. So even if you end up in sub-sub-prime land, your premiums are unlikely to go up for that reason if you just keep renewing an existing policy.

Re: I don't see why people would ever assume a mortgage that requires a road "without bumps" through life.

By that thinking no one should ever assume a mortgage or make any kind of financial commitment at all. We shouldn't even rent! Maybe we should just live under bridges?

Re: In order to save some truly rich people from losses in the dotcom bubble, and to ensure that GWB's tax cut thing "worked" Mr Greenspan and the gang lowered interest rates to riduculous levels.

Interest rates were lowered (starting before Mr Bush was even in office) to keep the economy from falling even deeper into recession (which is of benefit to us all, not just the rich). This is standard practice, not something Alan Greenspan cooked up to help out his friends. And the cut in interest rates did nothing to stop anyone from losing a lot of money in the bear market of 2000-01. Look at the stats.

If everyone thought that way, we'd still be living in caves. We can do better, and we must.

It all depends on what you love. I think nature did pretty well without man's intervention.

Some people use labels like "third world country" even though, before we "improved them," they didn't have the pollution, environmental and the other problems we have.

When I see the McMansions built on farmland and/or wetlands, I don't think immediately: "that's an improvement over what was there" instead, I think: "that's an abombination." Some like the SUV culture, others don't.

Re: I don't see why people would ever assume a mortgage that requires a road "without bumps" through life.

By that thinking no one should ever assume a mortgage or make any kind of financial commitment at all. We shouldn't even rent! Maybe we should just live under bridges?

What I am talking about are stories like this:

“It was all too easy for Jason St. Martin of Franklin to get a $600,000 loan in the summer of 2005. ‘I’m a teacher. There’s no way that I could have afforded a $600,000 loan for two years,’ St. Martin said.” [MORE...]

In some sense, teachers ARE paid well since their retirement benefits are good and, therefore, they can pay off bills even after retirement... However, taking out a $600,000 loan on speculation seems over the top.

Re: I think nature did pretty well without man's intervention.

Humankind and all it does is as much a part of nature as any daffodil, piranha or earthworm.

yes, we're definitely all one big happy creation!

did you see the movie "Happy Feet?" it was cute
to see the penguins communicate with man through
dance...

A civilized society would provide social safety nets to protect families in such circumstances.

What does this mean, joshua? 80% of our federal budget is spent on social safety nets, already. There's a nasty insinuation here, but I'll give you a chance to explain yourself.

mm, any good insurance agent could have helped you here. When an employer terminates you they have to offer COBRA for 18 months, and most states require a Guaranteed Issue plan from state carriers for people coming off COBRA after 18 months.

Second, he should have been able to get disability through his union or his employer on a Guaranteed Issue basis. There were a lot of options available to you.

80% of our federal budget is spent on social safety nets, already.

I don't think this statement is right. Interest payments on the national debt take up, I think, one-third of the national budget alone. Then military spending takes up probably another one-third. That, at best, would leave 33% of the federal budget for "safety nets."

I am wondering where you get the 80% number from. Some conservative think tank? It sounds like something they would say.

Satellite Sky Blog

Find the Truth. Do Justice.

80% of our federal budget is spent on social safety nets, already.

Actually, 20% of our federal budget is spent on the military. Another 9% is spent on paying interest on the national debt. 12% is "non-defense discretionary" spending, much of which has nothing to do with social safety nets.

Source of the above figures: The Concord Coalition (a center-right group focused on reducing the budget deficit).
Source of the 80% figure: Brook Dataski's ass.

There's a nasty insinuation here, but I'll give you a chance to explain yourself.

I'll say it outright: our spending priorities in America are grossly immoral, not to mention un-Christian.

much of which has nothing to do with social safety nets.

I suppose that it depends on what your definition of "safety net" is-- as Bill Clinton might say.

To some, having the military around, to save their asses, is a safety net. To others, military spending is their "safety net" because it's the goose that lays the golden egg.

The debate about how the government should "spend money " is ageless and the debate about what's pork and what's not will never end...

Joshua, why would you get your numbers from a think-tank when the federal budget website gives it straight from the source?

My totals include Social Security, HUD, Medicare, Vet Affairs, Health and Human Services, Education, and Agriculture. (Because farm subsidies help which group the most, Josha? Yes, the poor)

In addition 15% of the Defense Budget is spent on humanitarian projects all over the world that help a lot of poor people as well.

You add those numbers up and you're north of $ 2 trillion dollars. If the social spending budget is immoral at $ 2 trillion dollars -- one has to ask the question -- how much more do we have to spend to become moral?

I suppose that it depends on what your definition of "safety net" is-- as Bill Clinton might say.

There is some room to debate on the margins, but it's not really that difficult to define what constitutes a safety net and what doesn't.

To some, having the military around, to save their asses, is a safety net.

If we were concerned with protecting our asses, we'd only need to spend enough to maintain our nuclear deterrent. That, plus 300+ million privately-owned firearms scattered around the country, is sufficient to deter any sane adversary.

Everything else is for empire. You might be in favor of that, but at least be honest about it.

My totals include Social Security, HUD, Medicare, Vet Affairs, Health and Human Services, Education, and Agriculture. (Because farm subsidies help which group the most, Josha? Yes, the poor)

The VA budget is military spending.

Your assertion that agricultural subsidies help the poor is absurd. No other commentator I've read has ever claimed this. In fact, such subsidies often are designed to increase the price of foodstuffs. These programs may or may not be wise, but they're certainly not what most people would consider a safety net.

In addition 15% of the Defense Budget is spent on humanitarian projects all over the world that help a lot of poor people as well.

That doesn't count - first, because it doesn't help Americans, and secondly, because I don't trust the DOD's assessment of their beneficient intentions.

You add those numbers up and you're north of $ 2 trillion dollars. If the social spending budget is immoral at $ 2 trillion dollars -- one has to ask the question -- how much more do we have to spend to become moral?

As much as it takes. There's no set dollar amount; the results are what matters.

Farm subsidies act as a shield against the boom and bust cycles food prices would normally be subjected to in their absence. Stable food prices help the lower classes the most. America has lower food prices than any Western country i've visited. You get sticker shock in a country like Switzerland, for example.

It doesn't surprise me to hear you argue for more money to be spent, but I've added up my taxes from federal down to my painful property taxes, and I'm paying as much as I am willing to pay. I think I speak for most middle-class Americans as well. You've got an uphill battle selling that idea.


peter is robbed to pay paul.

These programs may or may not be wise, but they're certainly not what most people would consider a safety net.

You just seem to have one definition of saftey net. Profit, in my mind, is a safety net because I over charge you so I can put money in my bank account for leaner times. The politics of wages often seems centered on a living wage and people like myself try to set prices beyond the living wage and use the excess as a safety net. of course, I could also gamble it away!

As much as it takes.

Resources are limited and that's what we fight over. The WallStreet Journal has written that veterans will bankrupt our country so there will be a "happy medium" between taking care of them and taking care of the others.

I'm a pacifist because I don't believe that wars are moral. If people go to war, they suffer the consequences of their immorality.

In my mind the end, the fully cared for soldiers, doesn't justify the means-- the war that created the "philanthropic opportunity."

the results are what matters.

Right, and we all try our best and none of us live up to the moral ideal...

Do you even know what COBRA is? It means that you remain enrolled in your health plan, but you pick up 100% of its cost.

If you were previously paying 25% of a $1000/month policy, you now have to pay $1000/month WITH NO JOB.

COBRA works under certain conditions, but for those on the margins, it's not an "option".

We had MortgageIT first they sold our loan to EMC last year Nov. We had so many different troubles with MortgageIT from the start we wanted to rescissions our loan but they wouldn't answer us or talk to us until after the 3 day then this is what they said 3 days of Rights of rescissions has gone way too past the 3 days of Rights Of Rescission and if they ever got audited they would be fined. We wanted to refinance because we ran into some problems so we wanted to lower our monthly payments and pay a little to some credit card's but that not what happen we really got screwed.It a long Story would have to sit with you or talk to you on the phone to explain everything.

We didn't even know we had a interest only loan until now after all this happen I started doing research on our loan reading up on the computer then we notice that we have an interest only loan and that if we pay early that we may have to pay a penalty.

We wrote all over the place the Banking Department and OCC The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency- Federal Trade Commission -HUD -Better Business Bureau they have don't noting they all pass the buck.

So we were stuck with this mortgage and we can seem to get out of it. We try refinancing and know one will touch this loan. . Anyway we were stuck with the loan and they sold our loan right away to EMC.Well things got even harder for us with this loan because the payment were higher then our first Mortgage so we had to file bankruptcy.
We file bankruptcy back in Fed 2006. When we file the trustee said he would pay the bal that we were back up to our mortgage company EMC out of the money we send him and for us just to keep paying our mortgage payment like it we just started.Our payments are up to date but they are claiming we owe them 12,019.90 .We are being charge late fee inspection fee and we were put in a Suspense account and something Elsa call outstanding advance due by borrower. We called EMC and we requested a complete "life of loan" payment history that includes a rundown of how all our payments have been applied from the inception of the loan to the present time, and which includes all of the charges that have been imposed whether paid or pending.
We requested a payoff statement good through January 1, 2007 I spoke with Gloria Craig on DEC 11,2006 at 315 PM her extension is 14880 from the Bankruptcy Department she gave me a hard time and told me that I pay my bankruptcy lawyer good money and that he should ask for it. I told her I was going to have my loan audit then she agree to send me the information but as yet I have not received anything just my statement for March. I am sure our Mortgage is one of the Mortgage EMC is suing MortgageIT for. Bad loans draw bad blood. My husband and I we feel that MortgageIT prey on us because we were under duress and now with EMC we feel they are Servicing Fraud with us.

Our loan is also Subprime and iterest only we could of gotten a better loan we had income my husband score was at the time of the refinance was 0618 Experian 0605 with tranunion and 562 with Equilfax. Now that I been reading on the internet and with all the information we feel they took avandtage

here are some groups and forum I just started so that we can inform others on what going on with Mortgages today.

Click here: EMCMortgageCorpServicingFraud - View topic - EMC - This Site is on Mortgage Servicing fraud please join us and sha

http://www.care2.com/c2c/group/PredatoryLending

http://smurflilly.livejournal.com/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MortgagePredatoryLendingFraud/

http://my.yahoo.com/p/4.html

http://www.freewebs.com/smurflil/mortgagefraud.htm? token=b31302ef8d2c3deb110bd203be0

http://www.freewebs.com/smurflil/

http://predatorylender.blogspot.com/2006/11/lillianfraud- book.html

http://www.withmylife.com/viewUser.html?vuid=613

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index; _ylt=Aj1k0l5VK7kLoIbJ81dWFCPsy6IX?qid=20061118090545AAC26vN

http://www.freepowerboards.com/mortgagefraud/portal.php

http://groups.msn.com/MotrgagePredatoryLendingMortgageFraud

http://groups.msn.com/ MortgagePredatoryLendingandMortgageFraud

http://groups.google.com/group/emc-mortgage-servcing-fraud/ web/ms-fraud

http://www.freepowerboards.com/mortgagefraud

http://groups.myspace.com/ MortgageServicingFraudAndMortgagePredatoryLending

http://www.hoverspot.com/profile.php?UserId=836604

http://forums.recordonline.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?msg=69.1& nav=messages&webtag=th-business&redirCnt=1

http://www.dataplace.org/groups/group.html?id=70

http://groups.google.com/group/emc-mortgage-servcing-fraud/ web/emc-mortgage-servicing-fraud-forum

teachers ARE paid well since their retirement benefits are good.

Not that good. I get 2% of the average of my last three years' salary per year worked, so 30 years work gets me 60% of my salary as pension, and that is reduced in turn by about 7% for each year before 65 I retire.

My SS benefit is reduced to $40 dollars a month by the WEP and GPO, even though I worked for 15 years in the private sector before becoming a public school teacher. SS would be in excess of $500/mo, except for the offset.

I do have a 403b TSA -- no employer match, so it's basically whatever's left at the end of the month -- that will never see a balance before withdrawl in the six figures.

So retirement means $30,000 p/a, more or less.

Not bad if the mortgage is paid off, the kids' education loans are paid off, and no major medical comes up before Medicare, but not the lap of luxury. No room for error, though.

Patria est ubicumque est bene. Their 'homeland' is wherever they can turn a buck. Cicero, Tusculan Disputations

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »



Book Club Calendar


Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address