The Weekend Buzz
A Jonathan Alter piece in Newsweek last week set off a flurry of discussion about the history of Rudy Giuliani on Friday. Matt Yglesias remembers Rudy as crazy, mean, and power-hungry. Ezra Klein worries that Rudy's nearly nuts enough to call an end to elections. Stranger at Blah3 has a great rundown of some of Giuliani's less flattering moments as New York's mayor. Mark Schmitt has a hard time remembering Giuliani as "anything other than a vain and dangerous authoritarian."
On Sunday, convervative bloggers Ross Douthat and Andrew Sullivan each pondered Giuliani's actual prospects. Douthat linked to polling showing many Republicans don't know much of Giuliani's social liberalism, but still thinks he has a shot (based loosely on the case originally made by Glenn Greenwald). Sullivan hopefully theorizes that Rudy could be the man to bring the Right back to social sanity.
Of course, the big candidate of the weekend was Barack Obama...
Even before Senator Obama could officially announce his candidate Saturday morning, a mini-controversy boiled up over a pre-hit piece on his possible weaknesses by the Politico's Mike Allen. One of the pieces of dirt Allen predicts Obama will be hit with is supposed inconsistency over how he describes his name:
When he was growing up, his family, friends and teachers called him “Barry.” Then as a young man, he started insisting on “Barack,” explaining in a memoir published in 1995 that his grandfather was a Muslim and that it means “blessed” in Arabic. His dad, who was Kenyan, had gone by “Barry” -- probably trying to fit in when he came to the States, his son figured. On the campaign trail during his 2004 Senate race, Obama told reporters that “Barack” was Swahili for “blessed by God.” Whatever its origins, the exotic, multicultural name...
Unfortunately, Brad DeLong notes that the apparent inconsistency falls apart quickly:
Two minutes of Googling would have told Mike Allen that "barack" is both a Swahili word meaning "blessed by God" and an Arabic word meaning "blessed." There's been lots of trade between Swahili-speaking East Africa and the Arabic-speaking Middle East for millennia. That "barack" is a word in both languages is part of the same process by which the largest Swahili-speaking port in the world has a pure Arabic name--Dar es Salaam, meaning "House of Peace."
DeLongs debunking was widely linked to. Matt Stoller took the occasion to document Allen's history of echoing superficial conventional wisdom.
Of course, Obama's speech was also an occasion for many to reiterate their thoughts and concerns more generally. Ezra Klein is unhappily skeptical about whether Obama's actions can match his ambitions, and Christopher Hayes compares some progressives' sense of the emerging candidacy to the "punk-rock-band-gone-MTV disaffection" of a hidden gem going mainstream.
Finally, on Obama's response to an attack from Australian PM John Howard, Atrios is typically dead on in capturing liberal sentiment: "More Like This."















Thanks, Andrew. Unfortunately, Guiliani is looking more and more like the candidate to beat on the Republican side, according to some polls and pundits.
I'd like to add this link to Steve Clemon's article, As Saudis Fill the Void, America Loses Control of the Game, posted Saturday at the Washington Note. The article is about last week's deal between Fatah and Hamas to form a Palestinian unity governement, brokered by the Saudis, but, according to some foreign policy people (Eliot Abrams is mentioned specifically), opposed by the Bush Administration. It's a great article - a must-read.
Politics is the art of preventing people from taking part in affairs which properly concern them. --Paul Valery
February 12, 2007 3:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Right behind you, Wordie, with a link along the same lines from The Financial Times, As America looks the other way, China’s rise accelerates.
And from the enemy within, Fox has announced that it is going to start its own business channel in competition with CNBC, (in)appropriately named, Fox Business Channel. Taking a page from the bestselling neocon book by Douglas Feith, How to be Wrong Every Time, Roger Ailes said,
There goes the market.
War does not determine who is right - only who is left. Bertrand Russell
February 12, 2007 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks to you, Andrew, I read Ezra Klein's comments which you linked to.
Klein is wrong about everyone agreeing about prevention in Health Care Reform.
While I admire HR 676(Conyers/Kucinich), for example,the bill does not have much prevention in it? Most of the other presidential candidates are not really fully embracing prevention at all?
Obama referencing prevention is his announcement speech set him apart to a degree. We'll see where he takes it?
Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton, Pa
Advocate of Prevention in Health Care Reform
February 12, 2007 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dude, you like totally missed something
This weekened we started hearing a revived drum beat about an Iran-Al Qaeda connection:
The Washington Post reported on Sunday Feb 11th that
Source: U.S. Keeps Pressure on Iran But Decreases Saber Rattling, Wash Post Sunday, February 11, 2007Yet 16 hours earlier, the same Washington Post had reported:
Al-Qaeda Suspects Color White House Debate Over Iran, Wash Post Saturday, February 10So it appears that Iran has been turning at least some of them over – just not to the US.
Question: Is it even legal for Iran to turn these suspects over to the US, when they're not US citizens? What about in light of revelations of the use of torture?
Ironically, Feb 10th Washington Post article states that these suspects include “high-value” targets such as al-Qaeda spokesman Sulaiman Abu Ghaith of Kuwait – yet the Washington Post fails to mention that Kuwait simply wouldn't take him back from Iran:
Al-Qaeda spokesman 'in Iran' BBC News Thursday, 17 July, 2003February 12, 2007 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Andrew: I'm popping back in to let you know how much I appreciate the Glenn Greenwald article on Guiliani that you posted, which I hadn't yet read when I posted earlier. He believes that Guiliani is a far more formidable candidate than most Dems at this point think he'll be. It was very informative - a good read - although not at all what I wanted to hear.
Thanks.
Politics is the art of preventing people from taking part in affairs which properly concern them. --Paul Valery
February 12, 2007 8:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Glad you liked it!
February 12, 2007 9:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Andrew, that was one frightening article. Rudy seems to be every Democrat's bad dream. He is, if anything, as deranged as Bush, but even meaner. And, the Republicans will likely vote for him, along with a lot of "independents". This really makes me question the wisdom of nominating Hillary as our Democratic candidate.
It's a good thing the election is two years away!
Hoppy in Sacramento
February 12, 2007 10:06 PM | Reply | Permalink