Noble Nobel
Can you think of anyone who deserves the Nobel Peace Prize more than Al Gore? He's certainly someone who didn't ask what the country could do for him, but rather what he could do for his country, and the world. His personal courage, in the face of not only defeat but mindless negative commentary from the mainstream media, has enabled him to wake up the sleeping world on climate change and sound the clarion call of honesty about Iraq, civil liberties, and the real risks to the American Dream.
Advertisement










Comments (20)
An Oscar, a Nobel and the Presidency, all within one year!
Go Al!!!
(kidding...he's not going to run...)
Dissent Protects Democracy.
February 1, 2007 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'd vote for him, and he doesn't even have to eat lutefisk.
aMike
February 1, 2007 11:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Courage? What courage does it take to advocate for "global warming." The opponents are routinely called deniers, industry shills, or worse.
The sons of the prophet are noble and bold,
and quite unaccustomed to fear.
But the bravest by far in the ranks of the Shah
was Abdul Abulbul Amir
February 1, 2007 11:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Anything but that...
February 1, 2007 11:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
A prophet is never honoured in his own land...
There's a tomb rises up where the Blue Danube rolls,
And graved there in characters clear,
Is, "Stranger when passing, oh pray for the soul,
Of Abdul Abulbul Amir.
A splash in the Black Sea one dark moonless night,
Caused ripples to spread wide and far,
It was made by a sack fitting close to the back,
Of Ivan Skavinsky Skavar.
February 1, 2007 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
I thought Time magazine should have named him Person of the Year for 2006 instead of copping out.
I can't tell you how many times I now hear rueful references to global warming made during some surprisingly warm break in the weather. Next will be Jay Leno poking fun, not at those who say global warming is real, but at those who say it isn't. If he hasn't done that already, that is.
These are signs of a critical mass building in public consciousness on an issue--a necessary although hardly sufficient precursor to effective action being taken to address this paticular one, with all of the vested interests and automatic pilot societal and global tendencies standing in the way of doing so.
Al Gore was out there in the wilderness for years and years on this issue before things have gotten to this point. Just because he might be the first to tell you so doesn't mean he wouldn't be right about that.
February 1, 2007 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course, it's easy to side with Al Gore.
It's easy for all of us to say, "Global Warming is bad."
He's done a lot more, a difficult challenge, and it takes some personal courage. He's trying to change the world. Anyone who takes that on requires courage.
Dissent Protects Democracy.
February 1, 2007 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks Reed Hundt
I posted below on "my blog" on TPM Cafe a few days ago
By Dr. Rick Lippin
Neo(no longer wooden)Al Gore is America's only choice for President in 2008. Gore highly intelligent,seasoned,presidential in demeanor,and-the magic phrase-highly electable
But two salient further justifications stand out in my mind.
1)Gore was, by any measure, the first major U.S. politician to go green. His movie "An Inconvenient Truth" was just nominated for an Academy Award. The environment will remain a major issue in 08.
2)Our nation needs to cleanse itself from its justifiable collective guilt for literally stealing the Presidency away from him in 1999 and handing over the highest political office in our land to his opponent who almost ruined our once great nation.
Now -how do we get Al Gore to run?
Be Well,
Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton, Pa
http://medicalcrises.blogspot.com
February 1, 2007 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did you actually just ask this question?
Can you think of anyone who deserves the Nobel Peace Prize more than Al Gore?
Are you so stupid that you can't? Reed Hundt, of course, served under Gore in the 90's and can hardly be looked to for critical thinking on the topic, but the rest you shouldn't be embarrassing yourselves. A hawkish (for most of his career) centrist ex-senator makes a slide show about global warming and you think he deserves acclaim as the world's greatest champion of peace? Get a grip. Al Gore might make a fine President - I voted for him in 2000 and would happily do so again - but I prefer giving Peace Prizes to people who, you know, significantly advance peace. How about
- the brave Turkish writers who press for acknowledgment of the Armenian genocide
- the Middle East Muslims who are trying to start a Muslim museum of the Holocaust, trying to tell the truth about what happened to the Jews in WWII
- the many people in the peace movement in Israel itself, pushing to end the settlements and strive for peace with the Arab states
The truth is that the Nobel Peace Prize has been severely degraded since it was awarded to Henry $#@!ing Kissenger, so Al can have it for all I care, but if the question is, can we think of anyone more deserving of recognition for their work for peace, the answer is yes. Bloody hell that I have to point that out.
February 1, 2007 7:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
See a tongue-in-cheek visual recounting Al Gore's recent successes and the possibility of a more "lofty" goal...here:
www.thoughttheater.com
February 1, 2007 7:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your "slide show" in fact is only the most recent iteration of a 20 year campaign, waged mostly alone among global leaders, to wake up the world to what is now, at last, recognized as a massive calamity. If you must be sour, at least be accurate.
February 1, 2007 9:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can practically hear his acceptance speech now: "Hey, I didn't just warn the world about global warming, I invented global warming!"
February 1, 2007 10:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here here!
February 1, 2007 10:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can we please let go of this "Nobel Prize nomination" fiction? These "nominations" have absolutely no weight and are not screened in any way. One can "nominate" Sean Hannity for the peace prize--or even Sean Hannity can "nominate" someone for the peace prize. Please, please, please, leave some credibility to Al Gore--if he claims that he's been nominated, he will only look like an idiot.
February 2, 2007 5:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
A giant ego will do nicely. That and desire for fawning approval from your political cohorts fills the bill. No need for courage.
The sons of the prophet are noble and bold,
and quite unaccustomed to fear.
But the bravest by far in the ranks of the Shah
was Abdul Abulbul Amir
February 2, 2007 6:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, this isn't quite true. Some goofball group has been circulating the word that Rush Limbaugh has been nominated, but that has been amply refuted over at Eschaton.
Here, Courtesy of Wikipedia are the rules and regs.
Gore has been nominated as has been reported by 221 News Organizations at last count. What I find most interesting about his nomination is that it was submitted jointly by two Norwegian Parliamentarians from opposite ends of the political spectrum.
Given the alarming report out of Paris and the report the American Enterprise Institute, funded by Exxon and one of the dark powers doing Bush's bidding offered cash to scientists to dispute the United Nations report.
Gore is one of the few persons with enough global recognition and personal integrity to combat the Oil Interests. For this alone, he deserves the nomination, and perhaps the Nobel...we'll see who the other nominees are.
aMike
February 2, 2007 8:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mr. Pot, meet Mr. Kettle. It takes a pretty honking big ego PROBLEM to put this at the end of everything you say:
(If one has a screen name like yours, that is)
Jan Knaus
February 2, 2007 9:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sure you know him well enough to say that.
Dissent Protects Democracy.
February 2, 2007 10:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
A 5 cause I laughed...I am assuming you're not serious.
Dissent Protects Democracy.
February 2, 2007 10:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
What can I say? I couldn't resist. Actually. I hope Mr. Gore gets every bit of credit for bringing as much publicity to the very real problem of global warming to the forefront humanity's problams.
This is indeed the "giant elephant in the living room," that so many people want to pretend is not really there, and we cannot ignore it any longer! It's not an American problem, or a European, or a Chinese problem, or a Democratic problem or a Republican problem or a liberal problem or a conservative problem. It is a worldwide human problem! And that is the serious truth.
February 2, 2007 10:53 PM | Reply | Permalink