Mid East Peace Quartet Meets Tomorrow in Washington
Secretary Rice will host the principals of the Quartet tomorrow in Washington. It will be the first Quartet meeting during the German presidency of the EU and with the new UN Secretary General Ban-Ki Moon (the Russians make up the foursome). Question is, almost four years after launching a Road Map that has gone nowhere and six years since the last Israeli-Palestinian official political negotiations at Taba, whether anything will actually move this time or will it be more declarations and platitudes? Somewhat surprisingly the prospects are not all bleak.
The situation on the ground is clearly not encouraging with two disturbing competitions being held in parallel. One is over whether more Palestinians can be killed by their own people or by the Israelis. The other, a more internal Israeli affair, over which public figure can be ensnared in the most damaging scandal. In such a predicament, it would be all too easy for the Quartet to cry “gevalt,” nothing can be done. Easy but wrong. One of, if admittedly not the sole, reason for the ongoing deterioration at so many levels is that collectively the parties, the US and the international community have failed to generate any peace process dynamic or hope for the last six years. At best, there have been piecemeal attempts at day-to-day crisis management. But surely by now, someone must have realized that the piecemeal arrangements cannot be sustained in the absence of a political horizon. A statement made by Secretary Rice in Kuwait City on her most recent Middle East visit suggests the message may be getting through: “it seems to me that it may be more difficult to negotiate a provisional state than just to go to the end game.” But pursuing a new political process while simultaneously discouraging Palestinian President Abbas from reaching a cohabitation government of national unity with Hamas is very unlikely to create the conditions for success. The idea that there could be a decisive military victory – either for the Abbas government against Hamas in Palestine or by the Siniora government against Hizbullah in Lebanon – remains part of the delusional ideological myopia of this administration. So, too, is the dogged determination with which the administration continues to isolate Syria from the political process, virtually guaranteeing a continued Syrian spoiler role on the Palestinian issue (and in Lebanon and Iraq for that matter).
The Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group got it right when they called for a renewed US effort at Israeli-Arab peacemaking on all fronts, for re-engagement with Syria and for a major push on an Israeli-Palestinian permanent status agreement. Of course these recommendations were not so much rejected by President Bush as ideologically pilloried. Many Democrats and some Republicans too have called for a diplomatic surge as a key part of the alternative to Bush’s military escalation plan (or “staying the course plus 20,000”). Part of that diplomatic surge needs to begin tomorrow with the Washington-hosted Quartet meeting.
A tri-lateral summit with the US, Israelis and Palestinians is being considered for later this month. The Quartet should welcome and encourage such a summit and clearly fix its goal as a renewal of the six-year moribund Israeli-Palestinian process of political negotiations. But is Secretary Rice ready to push a political process that addresses the big issues or is she still stuck in a Road Map cul-de-sac of her own making? This administration may continue to reject what is evident to the rest of us, namely the dramatically helpful regional repercussions of a successful effort on the Israeli-Palestinian track. But it would be a splendid irony if an administration that has done so many of the wrong things without understanding their broader negative regional implications would do this one right thing oblivious to its positive knock-on effect.















Daniel - I do not share your optimism about the Quartet meeting. I do not see any of the participants having any "skin" in the game and as a result all we will get is "talk". While I appreciate your efforts to get at least peace negotiations started, I see nothing coming out of the Quartet ever.
The Warmongers are accendent and if something happens with Iran, the whole Mideast will explode and that will take many years to settle down. As I have written elsewhere, in 5 years it will be impossible to get the settlers out of the West Bank and Israel would never abandon them to a Palestinian state.
February 1, 2007 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mister, why don't you do something useful instead of bloviating: tell everyone who will listen that there are 3 Israeli soldiers kidnapped last summer by thugs. NOTHING will happen in terms of Israeli acceptance of any terms until those three are returned safely.
February 2, 2007 2:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is amazing how rigid and stubborn are people's views about the Middle East. First, the Quartet is bull; a collection of big guys trying to push around the Israelis and Palestinians just because they are little guys.
The Baker-Hamilton study has a perfect solution to the Iraq problem in 1991; it has very little to do with Iraq 2006/7. A solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will help to lessen the Iraq quagmire to the same extend that the Surge will bring "victory" to current junta in the US. If it weren't sad, it's a very funny joke.
As much as the settlers are repugnant (especially those from Brooklyn), the settlement are not the obstacle to peace. The territorial compromise was chartered in 2000 and involves land swap and partial removal of settlement.
The Quartet can only hinder; it cannot help. There are several serious problems to solve and the main one is only infrequently mentioned. the Clinton-Barak-Arafat 2000 agreement didn't happen, mainly, because it didn't consider the Palestinian refugees. Without such a solution, just forget about peace. The problem is immensely tough. They cannot go back to Israel and there is no room for them in the West Bank.
Please guys, go to a mind gym and work on more agility. Stop believing the MSM, Arab and Israeli propaganda. There never was an occupation without settlements; look at Europe over the last 300 years; settlements were the main game in town. Europe has peace now after they all killed each other ad nauseum.
Actually there is progress the last four years. The Likud is in its last throes, the Palestinians are finishing their internal conflicts (everyone has them), Gaza is much freer and suicide bombers are rare.
What is needed is economic aid for the Palestinians (instead of the stupid American European stoppage), forget about road to peace that lead to nowhere and try to find a solution to the refugee problem.
February 2, 2007 3:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sage - There are 10,000 Palestinian prisoners who will have to also be returned safely.
February 2, 2007 4:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bradly Burston in Ha'aretz seconds the mood of cautious optimism:
February 2, 2007 5:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
I would love to be optimistic. Pessimism doesn't help all that much and realism seems to be something most "realists" claim for themselves as a "self-evident truth".
I heard a bit on NPR which struck me as interesting, and I'd be more optimistic about it if both sides didn't seem to go out of their way to find fault with it. I'm referring to the first appointment of the first Arab Minister in the Israeli Cabinet. The link is to an article in Haaretz, which includes this interesting tidbit:
Good luck, good wishes and support to all of good will.
aMike
February 2, 2007 6:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
I know this is a serious subject and deserves a sober and serious response, but the only thing I can think of is "what a joke."
The U.S. is, for better or worse, the most powerful player in this drama exclusive of the contending parties. As long as we have a delusional, christianist, sociopath in the White House and a incompetent, mendacious cartoon of a Secretary of State, there will be no progress.
The situation in the Middle East will improve only on the happening of one of two occurances: a) January 21, 2009, or b) impeachment and conviction or resignation of the current occupant.
Naturally, I want things to improve as soon as possible.
February 2, 2007 7:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
mjshep,
At least until Europe finally realizes how strong it actually is. The EU is Israel's leading trade partner, and has the overall trust of Palestinian leadership.
February 2, 2007 8:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am proud and grateful for the appointment of Ghaleb Majadele as Science Minister in the Israeli cabinet. Proud because it puts the lie to the myth that Israel is a racist apartheid state, and grateful because Majadele presents an opportunity to stretch the intelectual capacities of Israeli policymakers. As Majedele says in the Ha'aretz interview linked by aMike:
February 2, 2007 8:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Zionista: although I found many of the items on Burton's list very sensilble, I was confused by these three:
Don't staunch Zionist American Jews, including yourself, generally try to convince us that Israel is a purely secular country, or near to it?
Politics is the art of preventing people from taking part in affairs which properly concern them. --Paul Valery
February 2, 2007 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
There really is no debate. Israel is governed by civil law, not rabbinic law (halacha). That said, we are talking about - and Burston reports from - a region in which the distinction between civil and religious authority is often difficult to distinguish.
February 2, 2007 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Soldiers go missing in wars. While the North Vietnamese certainly used POWs as a bargaining chip, eventually, the US made a correct decision to end a war with MIAs. Over time, and with growing friendship with Vietnam, they've made strides -- but the reality is we will never know what happened to a fair number of our people.
On a trauma and critical care mailing list, I often read the insightful comments of Israeli physicians. They recognize the hard rules of disaster medicine -- you can't save everyone when resources are limited.
To continue a war over three men is not, to me, anything other than fanaticism. It will contribute to decreasing support for Israel, along with the intransigent refusal even to hold settlement construction constant.
--
Howard
*equal opportunity offense to both extremes*
February 2, 2007 7:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
It appears there is some reason for cautious optimism, according to the first reports regarding the Quartet meeting. Some of the questions raised in Daniel Levy's article now have positive answers.
Most importantly comes the news that the new US plan is to hold final status talks now, as Rice apparently was hinting about in the statement quoted by Daniel, rather than at the end of the Road Map process. The first talks will occur in the planned meeting between Olmert, Abbas and Rice later this month. So it appears that in this respect at least the US will now follow the recommendations of the Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group.I must add that hopes have been raised and then subsequently dashed so frequently that it's hard to feel too optimistic. And there is so much that will need to be resolved. But I hope your optimism is warranted, Daniel. This is certainly appears to be a move in the right direction.
Politics is the art of preventing people from taking part in affairs which properly concern them. --Paul Valery
February 2, 2007 8:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have to admit to a growing amount of confidence in Israel's Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni.
Ha'aretz, Dec. 27 2006:
February 3, 2007 7:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Zionista mentions the Israeli negotiating position:
Oh well, there goes optimism. There can be no agreement to form a separate Palestinian state, living aside the Israeli one, if the Israelis insist upon a division of land that prevents a viable, functioning Palestinian state from the outset. Do you really think, Zionista, that the Palestinians will agree to this plan? Livni seems to me to be trying to appear to be reasonable and genuine about seeking peace, but what she's saying suggests just the opposite.
Does Rice have the understanding of the conflict necessary to recognize this?
Politics is the art of preventing people from taking part in affairs which properly concern them. --Paul Valery
February 3, 2007 9:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah still think it kinda interesting that the "separation fence" wasn't:
February 3, 2007 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'd like to understand the route of the fence, and whether that may be negotiable as part of the process. It has to make economic, transportation, and security sense for both sides, but strictly following the 1967 border may not be a requisite.
Is there a published route? Has she said the route is workable? Even if part is built, concrete and barbed wire are cheap to tear down and put somewhere else, compared to the cost of occupation and resistance.
--
Howard
*equal opportunity offense to both extremes*
February 3, 2007 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
No doubt about it, Tzipi Livni is hands down the most fascinating Israeli politician to come to power in years. I have my hopes that she and her backers can somehow short circuit Bibi's drive to become PM again.
In addition to her impressive resume and connections, she is one tough customer and judging from her body language in photos of her interactions with Bush and Cheney, Tzipi is not intimidated. She is telling THEM what for.
Tzipi for PM!
February 3, 2007 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are the Israeli people behind her?
February 3, 2007 1:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Howard: The majority of the Wall has been constructed already, and whole Palestinian villages have been razed to make way for it. It further isolates many other villages, depending on what side of the Wall they happen to fall. Palestinian farmers have found themselves unable to tend their olive groves when they are separated from their villages by the Wall, and many groves have simply been uprooted by the Israelis.
Stop the Wall.org, an Israeli peace group, has extensive information and maps regarding the wall, here. B'tselem, another Israeli peace organization, also has some excellent background and analysis of the problems with the Wall, here and here. Wikipedia provides a good summary, here (note the extensive references for further reading). Peace Now, yet another Israeli peace organization, has some good information about the settlements and their impact on the Palestinians, here. And the 2005 Human Rights Watch letter to President Bush about the Wall, here, is a must-read for anyone trying to understand it's impact. Start with the HRW letter and the Stop the Wall maps if your time is limited - I know I've bombarded you with a surfeit of reading matter. If you have time, however, a browse around any of the sites I linked will provide additional information. The suffering that the Wall is causing is well documented, although little known here in the US.
I'm not clear on Rice's outlook on the Wall as it stands now (although Sen. Clinton, on a trip to Israel, said she is in support of it), but her position up to this point has seemed to focus on the ways the Palestinians have not met their Road Map obligations, while mostly ignoring the acceleration of settlement activity on the Israeli side, which is also in violation of basic Road Map responsibilties. Since the move to final status talks is somewhat of a surprise, it seems hard to predict what position Rice may take. My concern is that the unbalanced approach will continue, and the Palestinians will be portrayed as intransigent for not accepting the "facts on the ground" (in other words, the illegal settlements which the Israelis now seek to make part of Israel). It's been pretty well established that the route of the wall has been established not to actually increase Israeli security, but to take more land for Israel. Since the route of the Wall so isolates the remaining Palestinian lands into small non-contiguous bits, it would be impossible for the Palestinians to create a viable state if the Wall were to be the dividing line. Hence the concern...
Of course, it's also possible that Livni is starting out from that position primarily to establish her credentials as a tough negotiator, and will show some flexibility in the actual talks. But in the end, in order for peace to be achieved, both the Israelis and the Palestinians must feel at the end of negotiations that they have gotten a good deal - the best deal possible. A division based on the current route of the Wall is a very bad deal for the Palestinians.
Politics is the art of preventing people from taking part in affairs which properly concern them. --Paul Valery
February 3, 2007 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
The latest polling that I'm aware of shows her running behind Bibi for PM but IMO, that's a reflection of the Likud's huge lead over Kadima, Olmert's and Livni's party and the Israeli "mood" in the wake of the summer war. There's no way to exaggerate the impact that particular excercise in stupidity has had in Israel.
Much rides on the timing of Israel's next elections.
Tzipi is, however, a very popular politician and in terms of her background and experience, has enormous credibility as a defender of Israel's security. Livni hit the ground running on the international stage(s) and has duly impressed the other actors; a fact much noted and appreciated within Israel.
Some speculate that Sharon recognized her formidable assets and "tapped" her for bigger things in terms of Israel's future leadership.
(Whatever one thinks of Sharon, he was a strong leader who could and would chart his own course when he felt circumstances demanded it. So far, signs indicate that Tzipi Livni is her own woman in a similiar vein. There's plenty to suggest a streak of independence runs strongly within her)
February 3, 2007 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink