TPMCafe
« Electoral Victories for the Middle Class | Home | Change Has Come »

I Feel Bad for Bush (Really)

user-pic

I almost feel sorry for George W. Bush.

He is in a terrible situation with two years of political hell in front of him.
And who is responsible?
A group of neoconservative ideologues who put a crazed worldview ahead of the country's interests and of the President's himself.
Successful Presidents like FDR, JFK, Clinton and Reagan tend to be surrounded by people who would essentially die for the leader.
The last thing they want is that policies they advocate would cause their President to fail.
As someone who worked for politicians for decades, I can tell you about the stinging tears in the eyes when you think that you hurt your own boss, the guy who brung you to the dance.
Poor Bush.
I expect Rove is crying today. And maybe a few others.
But the architects of the war -- Cheney, Rumsfeld, Feith, Libby, Perle, Kristol, Wolfowitz, Wurmser -- probably are just angry at Bush himself for blowing it.
In addition to their lack of patriotism, their casual indifference to the loss of 3000 American lives (and 600,000 Iraqis), their creation of an Iraq/Iran/Hezbollah alliance, their destruction of US standing in the Middle East, they destroyed their own President.
Frankly, I hope Bush can somehow use the Baker report to use his last two years to get us out of the mess the neocons made.
That is important to all Americans.
But I have to say that I sympathize for a President who thought he could trust the people around him only to discover, too late, that they cared about as little for him as they do for the country.
Thank God, the neocons are finished. But we all will be paying a price for a long long time.
Especially the widows, orphans, parents, and siblings who lost what no election can replace.


56 Comments

| Leave a comment

I'll gloat when we actually change course. For now, let's just be hopeful and build what momentum for change we can. With a narrow lead at best in both houses and Bush as president, not to mention usual GOP advantages in money, the media, and cut-throat politics, we could be facing inaction. But at least we have the chance at last to make progress toward real change in 2008, and at least inaction is better than a continued march toward fascism.

John 

http://www.haberarts.com/

You sympathize with that snot-nosed, lazy ass, spoiled little rich kid in the White House who never thought being president required him to actually do any real work? F**k George Bush. He will have the legacy he so richly deserves - worst president in history.

Absolutely right. Cant gloat, too many dead.

Not only are Americans paying a price.
So are people in Afghanistan and Iraq.
So are people in Israel, in Palestine, all over Europe, and virtually in the rest of the world.

Maybe it's time to brush off Bush's claimed qualities as a uniter (remember?) and start looking forward on the issue of Climate Change???

I sympathize only in the sense that I cannot imagine what it feels like to be betrayed by his friends.
Not that he doesnt deserve it.

What will be interesting to watch is how
Bush deals with the neo-Cons who are bailing out on him, the traditional libertarain conserviatives like George Will or even Bill Buckley and the evangelical Christians. Each group sees the world very differently and wants different things. The only things that held them together was lower taxes and a reverance for Ronald Reagan. Bush's success help overcome the differences. Now he is going to have more trouble with them than virtually any Democrats.

The elected Democrats are going to move the Party toward the middle. That should make it even harder for Bush.

Daniel A. Greenbaum

I have no sympathy for El Presidente in the least!!!  In fact I wish his party took an even worse beating for him saying "a vote for the dems is a vote for the terrorists".

Not one iota of sympathy from me, lol.  In fact I want to keep on beating on our "decider" with the IQ of 90...he gives me a migraine everytime he opens his pie hole.

And more importantly after 12 long years the dems finally regained control of "The People's House".

Well, you feel bad for George W. Bush and I don't. Lieing warmongers who get their comeuppance don't elicit a lot of sympathy from me.

Tom

and the Senate. We'll have it by Christmas. Leave space under your tree

George W. Bush dug his own hole, and then “stayed the course” long after most rational people would stop digging. 9/11 and Katrina gave him a truly historic American moment, and he chose to stoke conservative fantasies rather than lead the country through the hard choices that historic moments demand. He could have started a Manhattan project to wean America off of foreign oil, or perhaps mobilized military resources to save a drowning American city with the same vigor as he wages a preemptive and fruitless war.

I said to myself on September 11th 2001, “Well, Mr. Bush, I didn’t vote for you, but you are our President.”—and I was ready to follow his lead. Alas he and his cabal were more concerned with the Republican Permanent Majority™ than he was with the welfare of the people who pay his salary. I only wish that we had a better man in office through the years of the Bush II Presidency.

LOL...ho, ho, ho. :-)

This once, anyway, I agree with MR. I get no joy from the humiliation of others -- even those who get joy from humiliating me.

His entire life, 'W' has been a loser. A mediocre student in university, an incompetent businessman, a drunk who could never quite admit that he was one -- a view of his life has that impact of a couple's angry, bitter outburst in a grocery store. You feel embarrassed and sorry for them. And irritated that they didn't save it for later.

"Bush lied, soldiers died." Yes, he did and yes, they did. For that he must be accountable, not only to us and to history, but to his Maker.

I sometimes wonder what he feels, "at night, alone, when the demons come." I think he is capable of feeling his own inadequacy. I think he is well-reflected in this line from Maugham: "Like all men of weak character, he laid exaggerated stress on not changing one's mind." I'm glad I am not him.

We all have our own demons. We should not pick up the stones.

Thanks.

mp

If you have to ask what jazz is, you'll never know.
-- Louis Armstrong

And who is responsible?
A group of neoconservative ideologues ...

Bush is one of them!! He wasn't betrayed by anybody - he got the policies he, himself chose and his loyal followers enacted - and his whole party is now paying the price. Decent Republicans are the ones who should feel betrayed: betrayed by the fantical moron running the White House who has driven their party to ruin.

good point.
but how did the neocons capture the gop?

good point.
but how did the neocons capture the gop?

=== As someone who worked for politicians for decades, I can tell you about the stinging tears in the eyes when you think that you hurt your own boss, the guy who brung you to the dance. ===

People who worked for Clinton, absolutely. People who worked for, say, Eisenhower? Probably.

I doubt very much anyone who works for George W. Bush ever feels this way. He was intended to be a figurehead, and "his people" treat him that way.

sPh

"I sometimes wonder what he feels, "at night, alone, when the demons come."

Here's what I think he feels: he feels that he is the decider who is supposed to lead the country, and the country is weak and irresolute for failing to follow him; he feels he is right and the country is wrong; he feels extremely bitter and blames his feckless fellow-citizens for their infidelity to the Dictator-in-Chief; he feels like he's the guy charging up the hill with a knife between his teeth and that he has just turned around and discovered all his comrades have run away; he feels that God is testing him and that he must soldier on in Iraq on till the bitter end, all alone if necessary.

And he feels like he needs a drink.

I'm glad I didn't see the press conference, because it sounds like Bush put on some sort of mopey, self-pitying, childlike performance which has elicited pangs of victors' guilt and tears of pity from his target audience.

No doubt about it Bush needs strokes and he gets them from Laura, Harriet and Karen. (He certainly never got them from his mother.) With his line-up of enablers, he's pretty free to screw up and never have to pay the consequences or even feel he should pay the consequences.

When the neocons etc. suggested a war with Iraq, Georgie jumped at it. By getting Saddam he'd do what daddy had failed to do and been highly criticized for. George I was good at everything while George II was bad at everything, something that has plagued Bush all of his life, and here was his chance to outshine his father.

To Bush, the war was just a means to get Saddam. At this point, having gotten Saddam I would guess Bush is quite pleased with himself and if people would just leave alone, something those pesky Dems probably won't do for the next two years, he could sleep like a baby.

good point.
but how did the neocons capture the gop?

Ah, that will be a great question for historians. But I think one decisive influence was Bill Kristol's stint as Dan Quayle's chief of staff, which he parlayed into media omnipresence, a network of loving media friends and a reputation as a conservative guru. He followed that up by leading a politically successful take no prisoners strategy against the Clinton health care plan, which must have convinced many Republicans that the bold and aggressive approach was a winner for them in all fields. And many Republicans must have viewed the Bush senior loss in 1992 as evidence for the supriority of the Reagan neocon-like nationalist approach to foreign policy style of the old guard realist internationalism of Scowcroft, Baker et al.

I also think the neocons were successful in showing Republicans how they could peel away a few layers of hardline Jewish voters from the Democrats by adopting a Likud-like Israel policy, without losing other constituencies. This helped further to secure their seat at the table.

Finally, although I'm a little reluctant to use such an invidious term, the rise of neocon ideology in the foreign policy sphere was aided by a Democratic fifth column exercised through publications like The New Republic.

All this just explains how the neocons won an important seat at the table, and secured a major voice in national policy-making. But the crucial final step was that when a variety of voices were heard in Bush's post-9/11 deliberations, it turns out that it was the neocon voice that Bush himself agreed with.

He could have started a Manhattan project to wean America off of foreign oil, or perhaps mobilized military resources to save a drowning American city ....

Excellent. A rarely recognized point is what Bush could have done as President.   And when I say "could of" I mean what would have made sense within his principles (let alone all the "could ofs" that I and others of a different political persuasion would have suggested).

A President has such power to set the national agenda that we forget to analyze initiatives and policies he never pursued. In financial terms the opportunity cost is huge.

Bush recently hinted that his fan club might shrink to just Laura and Barney. That's one prophecy he got right.

The spectacle of neocons leaving the ship like rats has been delightful. They're not just insane; they're cowards, too.

My hunch is that Bush will punish Cheney
for bringing such disloyal rats onboard.

Cheney is out by Xmas.

I sympathize only in the sense that I cannot imagine what it feels like to be betrayed by his friends.

I don't.

I know what it feels like as a citizen to be betrayed by the President of our country. To have a President who rebels and defys the very principles the country was founded on. An individual who uses our US Supreme Court to declare him the President.  Who shouts that we are unpatriotic when  citizens object to his ludicrous notions of war and strips us of our rights as citizens by enacting the 'The Patriot Act'. A President who abandoned citizens in need during Katrina while declaring 'job well done Brownie"  I know what it feels like to live in fear, to have my privacy invaded with wiretaps, and my email scrutinized,  everytime the treasonous face of the President of my country comes on TV to announce more threats to our civil liberties while declaring patriotic citizens terrorists because they belong to the opposing party.  I do not have to imagine these things or the depth of such betrayal because I have lived it for the past eight years.

Piss on Bush!

You feel bad for Bush? He's an arrogant pig, and deserves whatever misery befalls him as a result of his behavior. At any time since his inauguration, he could have governed near the middle, but he didn't. He could have participated in honest collaboration with Congress, but he didn't. He could have respected the many treaties we made over the years, but he didn't. He could have respected the Constitution, but he doesn't. He made his bed, now he can sleep in it.

Sorry M.J., not that I'm ideological on this, its just that I can't find any sympathy for a person who WILL NOT apologize for his misdeeds.

-Dave Adams-

Let the President make a complete accounting of everything he did wrong and put forth a plan to recify it before he can expect sympathy.

Bush is merely in damage control mode.

-Dave Adams-

=== Bush is merely in damage control mode. ===

That may be so, but Rove is in a fight for his life (possibly literally; I can imagine at least one 2008 Repub candidate who would send Rove to Gitmo given a heartbeat of a chance). He is going to be fighting like a cornered Death Eater [1].

sPh

[1] I was going to say "skunk" but realized that was unfair to skunks.

Actually, I'm just being snarky about neocons in the guise of sympathy for Bush. But I stand by my point. These are people who betrayed their own President. I think this may be unpreceented.

Please, Waxman, Conyers and Levin: investigate these people.

Let the President make a complete accounting of everything he did wrong and put forth a plan to recify it before he can expect sympathy.

It is not a matter of expectations. It is a matter of doing what is right. And what is right, moral, just is for us to not act like he would act were we the ones who got routed.

Thanks.

mp

If you have to ask what jazz is, you'll never know.
-- Louis Armstrong

Agree with most of what you said, but this had me scratching my head:

George I was good at everything while George II was bad at everything

What exactly was George the first good at? Please provide more than, say, 3 examples, since you said he was good at "everything."

Jan Knaus

Well stated whiterosebuddy!  Feeling anything except contempt and disgust with Bush is beyond my abilities.  This has been a terrible time for our country, a time that we can only hope and pray will never be experienced by our children and grandchildren.

I wouldn't join the very long line waiting to  do as you suggested, but I would certainly do all that I can do to assist the international war crimes tribunals in bringing him to justice.

Hoppy in Sacramento

The "everything" is how George W. saw it and sees it. Although his father was a good athlete, good in school, a "real" fighter pilot, maybe as important is the fact that Barbara adored him while her relationship with George W, was, to put it politely, distant.

As a child, George W. had rather severe reading problems, was a bed-wetter, did poorly in school, was not a good athlete -and then there's his "military" career, his failed business ventures... Generally, in George W.'s eyes he could do nothing right and his father did everything right.

Frankly, I don't think George H.W. was anything to write home about, but compared to his son, at least how his son saw it, he was a star. (Novels written on the subject abound.)

Thanks. That makes it clearer. That just leaves one question: How in the world did George W get to be president, and how did he accomplish so much of his pathetic plans? I mean, yes, he is the worst president ever, but he got pretty much everything he wanted, including unprecedented power for the executive branch!

How could someone so marginal do it? It will keep historians (and psychologists) felling trees for their books for decades!

Jan Knaus

Don't investigate the people. Investiage the policies, the programs, the system. Iinvestigating the people gets away from the real issues.

Even more important, the focus on people provides a setup for the White House to look like it is solving the problem by excising the people. Dropping Tenet and Rumsfeld  is not enough and does not absolve the President from responsibility.

Did you ever see "The Manchurian Candidate" with Lawrence Harvey? If not, rent it.

I did see it. Do you think the Bushes are the ones who made George? Barbara is a bitch, but she's actually not a very smart bitch. And neither is George H.

Who do you suspect? I agree he fits the pattern very well, especially his complete flip-flop from making fun of Democrats to acting like he is their best friend today. I guess my big question is, what is the finale? Will it be an assassination, planned to annoint the next republican president?

OK, now I'm really scared.

Jan Knaus

Bush thought reading "My Pet Goat" was as tough as it was going to get.

Tom

Dear America,

From the bottom of my heart Thank You, for finally waking up to this excuse of a human being, my understanding of the difference between humans and other animal species is the ability to reason, I rest my case.

Terry

I, too, feel bad for Bush. (really)

 

(Nah, not really)

Before you fall into too deep of a depression, watch what he does next. He’s going to continue screwing up the country for his own bent ideology, the profit of the corporate elite and to try to resuscitate some (fake) positive legacy. Instead, let’s feel sorry for the multitudes that have been crushed by this poor little man that we put in charge of the free world.

Feel sorry for those innocent people he “rendered” to Egypt or Syria or some secret prison to be tortured (to death in some cases). Feel sorry for the working poor who by all counts have slid back towards that pre-reform age of wage slaves. How about the kids added to the poverty rolls. What about college students who are just a little bit afraid to broach touchy subjects and think for themselves, or the non-violent activist groups being watched and infiltrated by the FBI. And then there are the grandmothers and grandfathers that are still choosing between filling their prescriptions and eating so that Phizer stockholders can reap a few more bucks.

Feel sorry for every group from gays to the terminally ill who want to die with dignity to illegal immigrants that have been denigrated for the sake of the politics of bigotry. Feel sorry for us before you feel sorry for George W. Bush.

It's sad that the millions of people around the world including many Americans who marched on 2/15/2003 in an attempt to prevent the Iraq debacle did not have the clout at that time to stop Bush/Cheney/Rummy/neocons, etc.

Tom

I doubt he'll be assassinated because his existence doesn't threaten any robber-barons.

Who do I suspect? Certainly not pere or mere Bush - although Babs does bear an uncanny resemblance to Ma Barker. It's interesting and perhaps a clue that Jeb was always the Bush in line to head the cast, and almost all of a sudden it's George, the screw-up Bush, the guy with a closet full of skeletons.

With Rove in the catbird seat nothing can be eliminated as too impossible or too improbable. Hell, maybe they needed Jeb in Florida to put George in the WH, whereas George in Texas couldn't guarantee Jeb in the WH. Who knows, but it does make for an interesting thought experiment.

…although Babs does bear an uncanny resemblance to Ma Barker.

A related curiosity- this article asks if Barbara’s father is the infamous Aleister Crowley. I guess it’s a remote possibility, though not likely, but I thought it was a funny consideration anyway.

MP:

"It is not a matter of expectations. It is a matter of doing what is right. And what is right, moral, just is for us to not act like he would act were we the ones who got routed."

For me, doing what is right requires finding out exactly what was done wrong. This isn't about retribution, its about making sure that abuses don't take place the next time someone with an authoritarian bent gets into the White House. We need to make it clear that they won't get away with it.

Lets be frank about it- this will happen again. But the tougher we are on the perpetrators today, the longer it will be before they try it again.

-Dave Adams-

MJ,

but how did the neocons capture the gop?

By becoming the Anti-Clinton.  Sorry, I don't have enough heart for schmucks like Premier Boosh.

Dan K,

I also think the neocons were successful in showing Republicans how they could peel away a few layers of hardline Jewish voters from the Democrats by adopting a Likud-like Israel policy, without losing other constituencies.

How powerful are we supposed to believe "hardline Jewish voters" really are anyway?

CVilleDem,

How in the world did George W get to be president, and how did he accomplish so much of his pathetic plans?

He had the Iran-Contra Comeback Crew.  Cheney, Rumsfeld, Abrams, Negropone, Ghorbanifar, Ollie North.... These creeps never went away.  Even Robert Gates is connected.  This Machiavellian white collar street gang climbed into bed with a comfortably deregulated news business.  That's how.

Further, now that Democrats get to set the agenda and head the committees, any failure to move H.R. 3302: Media Ownership Reform Act of 2005 out of the House Energy and Commerce committee must be taken as a fundamental betrayal, because there is simply no way to advance reasoned arguments without access to the means of communication.

Well, now the Dems have the Senate too. And the best thing about this is that Dead-Eye Dick will have to sit there and watch the Dems ram legislation through. He may even have to watch his buddies at Haliburton do the purp walk. All I can do is echo his immortal words, "Go F**k yourself Dick!!!"

A man born with a true metaphor for wealth, with a silver spoon in his mouth, a "man" who used his secret society at Yale to become a playboy rather than a leader who understood noblesse oblige, a man who bragged in public that he didn't have any curiosity, an "oil man" who set out to put more gold in the pockets of himself and others - feel sorry for him? This is a man who is not dumb, although I have heard and seen others tell me so; no, this is a man who is intellectually lazy so allows any one his father knew to become his advisors also. This is a man still playing the role of recalcitrant teen-ager, and yet the greatest country in the world elected him as president.

I cannot, and never will, feel sorrow of any sort for this man. I do and always will feel sorrow for the millions in our country and the millions in Africa, the Middle East and across the world who have lost family members to wars and starvation that he had the elected power to address.

This is a man who still is very dangerous to the United States and to the world, especially the Middle East. He still plans to get Bolton into the United Nations. He still plans to "stay the course" in Iraq and bring home a "victory" or not bring a single young person home from that poor benighted country he and his cohorts have destroyed. His replacement of Rumsfeld with Gates is no improvement at all. Does no one in the MSM remember who Gates is? Does no one in the voting public and in our Lame Duck Congress remember who Gates is? President Bush is still a very dangerous man!

Let us feel sorrow for, and feel pity for the ones he has harmed and not waste a bit of those emotions on the man who will still work at creating more sorrow for more millions before he is gone.

The "greatest country in the world" did not elect him President. Katherine Harris's bogus setup in Florida and 5 Supreme Court Justices who betrayed the 14th Amendment made him president.

Tom

I long ago surmised all of what you have said re: George II's life. Our responsibility as adults is to overcome our childhood struggles and sorrows. There are so many who have had much more terrible childhoods than our president's, and I know too many of them - all of whom who have become productive citizens, none of whom who have set out to destroy their country because they didn't get enough from Daddy and Mommy.

I once read a comment in a well-known magazine years ago that set me back on my heels and set my life on a new path: You are never an adult until you can forgive your parents for being human.

George Bush is not an adult, and there is no one to blame save himself.

RocketEngineer,

All I can do is echo his immortal words, "Go F**k yourself Dick!!!"

The deliciously sweet irony is that the Senator to whom Cheney leveled his vulgar command, Patrick Leahy, is now set to head the Senate Judiciary Committee.

He had the Iran-Contra Comeback Crew.  Cheney, Rumsfeld, Abrams, Negropone, Ghorbanifar, Ollie North....

Let's not forget Kissinger, too!  Who is the one who advised Dubya to 'stay the course' and that he was the 'decider'.

I agree with you. There needs to be a strong deterrent set. I truly believe our forefathers would have hung them from the capitol rotunda. (I know it didn't exist then, but you get the idea, I hope)

I'm actually againstt capitol punishment, but they weren't. Maybe put them in cages labeled "TRAITORS TO AMERICA" in the Capitol Rotundra?

CSPAN junkies visit http://spannerbackup.ipbhost.com

GWB was accepted as the legitimately elected president by the American nation and by foreign governments alike.

To claim that he wasn't elected, or not by the country, or whatever, is a fallacy that brings nowhere.

If you really believe in the words "bogus" and "betrayed" do you also think that the Supreme Court Justices can be convicted? If not, what can be done to change that incongruity?

Although I'm convinced a war crime tribunal would be not only appropriate but one of the best things for America that can be imagined (and for America's standing in the democratic world), it must not be forgotten that there must be a day after too.

America suffers from too much polarization and too little national sense already.

Victimizing the GWB-administration, their enablers and their supporters, would be risky and have little value if not the American nation at large changed its supremacist above-the-law and better-than-others attitudes.

He was never accepted by me. Scalia and Thomas both should have recused themselves because they had relatives (son and wife) involved in the Bush campaign. The 14th amendment was put in place to prevent the type of racial discrimination the GOP practiced in the 2000 campaign in Florida. You have to impeach Supreme Court Justices. I think it's too late for that.

Tom

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »



Book Club Calendar


Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address