A Greater Death Toll in Iraq?
It can't be good news that several private security companies are now withdrawing from their contracts in Iraq due to safety concerns. This will admittedly hurt our troops (these companies often provide support, logistics, etc.) but Iraq's reconstruction as well. But what has been shocking in the news reports is just how many private contractors have died in Iraq, a number not reflected in the overall casualty count.
Outsourcing war has always posed considerable problems; there is little accountability (i.e. in interrogation tactics), and merging public goods with private bottom lines is often not a good mix. Certainly, enough has been written on no-bid contracts and the ever scary Halliburton.
But, one of the main problems with outsourcing seems to me that we can put people in harms way, with their consent and a fuller wallet, for a public (meaning, governmental) cause and yet their death isn't even mentioned as part of the overall rate. Technically, of course, it shouldn't; they are not part of the military. But, there is something slightly insulting to them to not publicly acknowledge their fate, in some way. It also relieves the Defense Department from having to actually say what is the truth in Iraq: without outsourcing, we would need to demand more from our military, a demand we either can't face or don't want to disclose to the American public.
So, finally, only after their departure, we learn that one company -- Bechtel -- has lost 52 employees. 52. That's not an insignificant number, and this is only one company.
It's a troubling number, and perhaps someone has added all such deaths up. It's just worth noting that as we watch the military death count go up, and the Iraq death count skyrocket, there are those who also chose to assist the war effort who did not return.















I agree that nonmilitary Americans doing basically military jobs should be part of the military death count. Privatizied does not nullify their function.
However the linked article does not support your point. In fact there is a totally different point. Bechtel deaths are the deaths of privated contractors doing a clearly nonmilitary job. Bechtel is an engineering and construction company. They went because the government wanted them but even more so because they wanted an early in so they were in a fvorable position for future contracts from the new Iraqi contracts. Bechtel understands the potential market when oil revenue fed countreis undertake building and rebuilding their infrastructure.
November 3, 2006 11:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh I'm sure they'll be welcomed back with open arms. Because what the Iraqi's really really really need is parasites at the trough who will suck down billions of dollars and deliver sub-par performance. Or who'll hoover up mega-contracts, pay themselves mega-bonuses, and then subcontract it all the way down the line to Achmed and his brother, working with crap materials for no money.
I think maybe if they had the chance to decide for themselves, they'll cut out the Bechtel middlemen and just hire Achmed and his brother directly, for better money with better materials. Or maybe they'll just skip that and hire for competence.
Let's face it, reconstruction was corrupt and incompetent, and that includes Bechtel, long before the insurgency got fully under steam.
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the death throes of American capitalism: Enron, Halliburton and Bechtel. Can't build anything but excuses, their big accomplishment, houses of cards and sucking on government tits.
November 3, 2006 4:07 PM | Reply | Permalink