TPMCafe
« On the Road to Strategic Defeat in Iraq | Home | The Troll of a Conservative »

Let’s Re-Balance Our Democracy

user-pic

We need to change the way we elect politicians so working families have a real voice and are no longer overwhelmed by the influence of big money in Washington.

Spent lots of time this week breezing down the West Coast last week and talking to SEIU members in Seattle, Portland, and San Francisco. I saw firsthand their enormous participation in this year’s election – our union’s greatest mid-term effort ever.

In our union we have adopted a more independent view of politics. SEIU members too often don’t like their choices; they don’t feel they have candidates to vote for who understand how hard it is when seven of 10 middle-class Americans say they are living paycheck-to-paycheck, have negative savings, and are one illness away from economic disaster.

I talked with some state employees who just negotiated a contract, but like too many Americans their raises are offset to some extent by ever-increasing health care costs.

I write in my book, A Country That Works, that too often I am confused about whether I am I a union leader or ATM machine, because of the calls I receive from politicians who say, “I need your help” (translation “money”), and rarely, “I need your ideas.”

And politicians have to be accountable to the working families that put them office. They can’t be after our votes the day before the election and after our throats the day after.

Electing candidates who care about working people is so important to the well-being of SEIU members, but we need to change the system so everyday Americans have a fighting chance.

Public financing of all elections would be huge. If a politician tells you that money does not buy influence or access, don’t believe it. The members of our union are very involved in helping candidates win elections for just that reason – it’s the way janitors and security officers, nurses and other health professionals, homecare and childcare workers, and public employees gain a foothold in the system. They pool their small voices, which politicians don’t hear, to create one big voice, which politicians can’t ignore.

You don’t have to believe me, just ask Jack Abramoff and all his associates. Ask the Congressional family members who are “lobbying” their father or husband for special earmarks (funding for pet projects in their district), or talk to all the “K Street” lobbyists. Money matters and it distorts decision-making and our democracy.

There are lots of ways to change the system to make it work better for everyone. Why not universal voter registration? How about the Australian model of mandatory voting with fines for those who choose not to participate? What if we had “fusion” as we used to have in virtually every state, which allows multiple parties to run a single candidate, giving more influence to third-parties? Can we figure out internet voting and/or universal vote by mail? And I know this is controversial, but let’s consider federal term limits of 12 or 16 years so we get fresh ideas and break up the morass of incumbency and the monopoly of Congressional power and seniority.

Those are just ideas, but we need to re-invigorate our democracy, because people our expressing their disgust and alienation by staying home. I am so proud to see our members so active this year – they understand that changing America requires leadership.

If only we had more of it from our elected officials.


6 Comments

| Leave a comment

The two-party system belongs in a museum, not in our modern electoral process. America leads the world in many other ways, so why don’t we stay at the forefront of democratic innovation? Are we just lazy? For example, what is so hard about doing the following:

- Make Election Day a federal holiday
- Lower the voting age to 17 (If they can join the Army at 17...)
- Compulsory voter registration upon HS graduation (registering for the draft is compulsory...)
- Enact something similar to the Arizona Voter Reward Act on a national scale
- End spoiler voting by enacting Instant Runoff Voting
- Reform the Electoral College so the winner of the popular vote wins the presidency

I think money in politics is inevitable. What we need to do is strengthen the simple idea of never a wasted vote. If we were to ever make it easier to vote than to pull money from an ATM, I think American democracy could once again be the envy of the world.

We have a real grassroots campaign going on here in NH-01, we won a primary on less than 30k, and plan to win the race with millionnaire Jeb Bradley with a frugal budget as well. Wednesday night the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard union guys and gals are hosting an evening for Carol Shea Porter and other candidates and my husband and I are looking forward to it! He's running for one of the 400 seats in the NH House!
I believe that our future as a country depends on our getting rid of all that money in campaigns, without that change we will continue on the course we are on, which is toward the end of America as we have known her. I am working hard to get Carol Shea Porter elected as a first step toward taking back our country.

Small State Bias

Just 14% of the population controls 50% of the seats in the senate. These are mostly rural, sparsely settled, mainly western states. They have blocked progressive legislation for much of the 20th Century since most of it was directed at the concerns of the rising urban and industrial classes. There is no reason to believe that they will suddenly become less self-centered. The situation in the house is not quite as bad, but small states are still over represented there as well.

Noble goals are admirable (I've advocated all the ones that Andy Stern has listed, myself), but goals have to coupled with discussions of how to get them implemented. So here is my question: how are you going to get incumbent politicians to support policies which weaken their power to extract money from special interests groups and how are you going to get them to vote for policies which put their current incumbency at risk?

--- Policies not Politics
Daily Landscape

By "change the way we elect politicians" do you mean the same way you, Andy Stern changed SEIU leadership? Stopping union workers from being able to raise up through the ranks to leadership.. what is your intention, for elites like yourself to hand pick/hire leaders who will do things your way??? Why do you believe SEIU worker's shouldn't have the right to rise through the ranks? Why have you imposed a glass ceiling?

Why do you believe Americans would fall for your scam? You support dragging down workers wages to third world levels. Siding with management, and forcing contracts that devalue worker's rights and the wages and benefits they have fought for, for decades.

What happened to those union worker contributions that you didn't pay in to the AFL-CIO for months before you broke away from them?

STRONG WORDS--TRY ALL CAPS FOR REAL IMPACT.

Can you support your position with citations? I'm not familiar with the details of the SEIU/AFL spat. 

Eliminating the entire electoral college system, while laudable (the nature of the Presidency is such that it never favors given states unduly) would require a rather sweeping constitutional amendment, and is therefore unlikely to actually happen. Still, we should do everything we can.

Election day should definitely be a national holiday. What other reason for a holiday could possibly be more important? This is one of the few election changes that can be implemented at the federal level, and should be implemented immediately.

We should work to get each state to split its electoral votes (as Oregon does presently). That is, each state casts its congress-based electoral votes as each congressional district voted, and then its 2 senate-based electoral votes according to the popular statewide vote. This doesn't entirely mitigate the "per-square-mile, not per-voter" problem, but it would help a great deal. If nothing else, it would throw off the "votes per state" predictive calculus system completely, thereby preventing situations where we all know that one given state or another will end up deciding the election all by itself, well before the votes from other states have come in. This is a change that can be pushed for in your state, even if other states haven't done so yet.

But there's only so much change that can practically be made. The Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that spending money on distributing a political message counts as a form of political speech, and that therefore outlawing such expenditures would constitute a violation of the 1st amendment. Similarly, term limits schemes are of iffy constitutionality. Nevertheless, some restrictions do exist, they've just been created to be too easy to circumvent.

There are a lot of proposed schemes for campaign finance reform out there already - public financing schemes, donation restriction schemes, disclosure schemes. Some combination of the right methods would surely go a long way to making our political process more reflective of democracy in general. However, the real problem is that we always have this conversation just before the election, and for a few grumbling days or weeks after. What's actually needed, more than anything else, is to have a sustained national conversation regarding campaign finance reform outside of an actual election cycle, when something can actually be done about it.

I understand that from the point of view of whatever the current slate of politicians (freshman through senior) who have just won elections, actually following through on campaign finance reform may seem like a doubtful idea. After all, they did just win under the "old" system, so it would seem that it must favor them. However, there's no way to tell which sort of candidate any "new" system would favor. Certainly new campaign tactics would have to be devised, but as far as it's possible to tell, an incumbent still stands as good a chance (or has as much of an advantage) under a reformed campaign finance system as under the present corrupt one.

Looked at from a neutral perspective, all politicians should feel free to swallow their fears regarding election and campaign finance reform, and just go for it. History will thank them.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address