TPMCafe
« Kissinger and Those Peanuts | Home | Of Coups, Their Plotters, and the Next Era of Politics »

It's All The Liberals' Fault. Or Maybe George Soros. Yeah, That's It, George Soros

user-pic

>So far there are two versions of right-wing spin to make the Mark Foley scandal and the cover-up go away. First there’s the complex postmodern pseudo-politically correct spin from the Wall Street Journal, Newt Gingrich and the Family Research Council:

"Senior Republicans might well have decided they had no grounds to doubt Mr. Foley merely because he was gay and a little too friendly in emails. Some of those liberals now shouting the loudest for Mr. Hastert’s head are the same voices who tell us that the larger society must be tolerant of private lifestyle choices...Are these Democratic critics of Mr. Hastert saying that they now have more sympathy for the Boy Scouts’ decision to ban gay scoutmasters?"


As the FRC said, Hastert and his colleagues "probably did not want to appear homophobic" by taking on Foley. A friend commented last night that, "We know the avoidance of homophobia is the guiding principal for the house leadership."


One of the stories that the right likes to tell about itself is that they believe in moral absolutes, that there is such a thing as good and bad, while liberals are all relativists, we have no "foundation" for our views of what’s good and bad. This comes in lots of versions, from the bumper sticker to the erudite, Alisdair MacIntyre-wanna-be’s like Princeton professor Robert P. George, but that one sentence sums up the argument.


But when it comes to Foley, this is a case where it is us liberals who have the absolute moral value: Don’t mess with kids sexually. Adults must not mess with kids, people in positions of authority should not mess with kids. It’s not about the legal line or the age of consent in Florida or DC. It’s morality: Fifty-two year olds must not mess with 16 year olds. Remember that rule and all this complexity falls away. Don’t tolerate people who mess with kids, gay or straight. Not complicated. As Robert George would say, it’s "foundational." If you know that basic rule, and don’t hesitate to take action if people break it, or raise alarms if you suspect them of breaking it (as in, asking for a picture) then guess what?: Life gets a little simpler. Gays can be Scoutmasters because, like any other Scoutmaster, they know that you don’t mess with the kids. Straight men can be high school teachers of girls because they maintain that boundary, they treat it as a moral absolute. And so on.


So what do you call the belief that gay people somehow by their nature cannot respect that rule, that they in fact can’t appreciate moral absolutes? Yep, that’s it.


While that spin on the cover-up is disturbing, the other spin is actually funny. It’s all George Soros’s fault. This is the story behind the "dirty trick" theory being peddled by Katherine Harris, Gingrich again, Hugh Hewitt, and apparently now being peddled on Fox News. Whenever the right runs into trouble, it seems their first move is to play a game of "Six Degrees of George Soros": What’s the fewest number of moves we can make to blame this on George. You can imagine them testing out various theories: How about this one: Soros’s operatives in Eastern Europe starting in the 1980s bred a super-race of sexually irresistible young men, taught them perfect English, had them placed as congressional pages and programmed them to tempt Mark Foley. Hmm, nice try, but a little more Blofeld than Soros.


No, the new line, from Gingrich to Katherine Harris, and the weirder corners of the right-blogosphere, is that it’s all George Soros’s fault because a "Soros-funded organization" had the e-mails and waited until just this critical moment in the election cycle to release them. Meanwhile, kids were put at risk. Someone named Clarice Feldman who writes at The American Thinker (modesty in blog naming has never been the right’s strong suit) seems to have figured this one out. Drat. If it weren’t for Clarice, Scooby and the rest of those meddlesome kids, George would have gotten away with it, too! Unfortunately there’s one loose end to the theory -- the organization, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (which does get a small grant from Soros’s foundation, although the right referred to CREW as "Soros-funded" even when it wasn’t), immediately turned the e-mails over to the FBI, and released them only after ABC News made the story public.


So get back to the drawing board guys: Connect Mark Foley to George Soros in six moves or less!


47 Comments

| Leave a comment

We should resist taking the bait.

Don't even answer this crap. No one condones child abuse, period. So anyone that knew, and did not act, on this issue is culpable. And the only testimony so far is that the GOP leadership knew there was a problem.

Just keep hammering that home, along with Rice blowing off the terror warning in 2001 (twice), the no-plan plan for post-war Iraq, the overuse of troops that have already served, (to avoid pissing off more service families), Katrina, Abramoff, etc.

I don't know - they both made a pile of money illegally in the Great Telecom Scandal of the '90s?

Mark,

Good points. However, the best part of this is that the simple message belongs to the Democratic side - he's a sex predator - while the complicated arguments are coming from the Repugs. And, what's more, the same sort of childish responsibility-dodging-arguments that the Repugs use for complicated things which many people can't or won't follow are being made for this; which people do understand.

BUT - let's not respond to Repug arguments. Let's just label Foley and the leadership what they are in plain and simple words.

If the Democratic party cannot make hay out of this then we really are gonners.

 The party of pedophila is trying to shift the blame.  The pedophile and his supporters, along with the woman-beating adulterer and his supporters (same supporters) reveal the true "family values" of the Grand ole Perverts.  Don't let 'em do it.  Remember who they are.

Bush: Let a thousand brownies bloom.

I am betting (heck, I'm hearing rumors) that there is a desparately serious effort underway to find some sort of Democratic sex scandal so that there can be equivalency on this.

Word has it that O'Reilly checks under his bed every morning to see if Soros is there.

6 moves? Hell, I can do it in one.

Mark Foley took a congressional page out on a date one early summer evening. They drove in the congressmans bimmer, top down, over to Baltimore, where the page was plied with beer after beer after beer as he watched his first ever major league baseball game in person.

After leaving George Soros' stadium, the congressman pulled over on one of the highway underpasses.

The part the Grand Old Perverts can't seem to figure out is that there is a difference between sex and crime. Pedophilia: crime. Rape:crime. Harassment: crime. Consenting adults enjoying each other: sex. It's really not difficult. I'm not sure I want to know what it means that it's so hard for them to figure it out.

(Grand Old Perverts is Very descriptive, by the way, Good 4. I'm using that from now on!)


http://acid-test.blogspot.com/

The repugs are beyond pathetic on this one.  Was this made into an election issue?  You betcha it was, and rightly so!!!  The GOP leadership of the House completely and totally failed on Foley and should not be in charge of the House.  I will go a step further that if Foley had any sexual encounters with minors after they learned about what he was doing they could and should be investigated to see if criminal charges should be filed against them.  George Soros neither had sex with an underage person or was complicit in a possible criminal conspiracy to cover it up.  And to even utter his name in regards to this incident is completely out of line and downright insulting.  Think that would cut it with a prosecutor?  "We should be let off the hook because it was a George Soros conspiracy"?  Gimme a F'ing break!!! 

Someone needs to burn for this.  It is potentially the worst criminal act(s) committed by a government official since Watergate...period, end of story, fini!!!

Don't miss Ben Stein's 10/02/06 "Special Report" in The American Spectator:

The Representative Foley "scandal" is really worthy of a whole book on hypocrisy. On the one hand, we have a poor misguided Republican man who had a romantic thing for young boys. He sent them suggestive e-mail. I agree, that's not great. On the other hand, we have a Democratic party that worships (not likes, WORSHIPS) a man named Bill Clinton who [etc., etc., and]... whose primary constituency, besides the teachers' unions, is homosexual men and lesbian women. I hope it won't come as a surprise to anyone that a big part of male homosexual behavior is interest in young boys. (Take a look at anyone renting Endless Summer next time you are at the video store.)

Don't get me wrong. My very best friend is gay. I have many gay friends and they are great people. But how the Democrats, the party of gays, can be coming down this hard on a MC who's gay is simply beyond belief. One of my top, favorite congressmen, Barney Frank, is openly gay. Might he say a word in defense of his fellow gay MC right about now? Hmm, I thought not.

Newest information is that it was a former staffer for a GOP member who gave the emails to the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics. He is a lifelong Republican who apparently became angry that his party was allowing Foley to continue his predatory behavior and doing nothing about it.

Of course, Soros might have set up sleeper agents as GOP staffer/lifelong Republicans many years ago and just activated one, you know...

Ummm, those of you who are giving eiweino troll ratings, I think that he is quoting Ben Stein. I'm guessing that it's just to give us a laugh at how ridiculous some of the Republican responses are.

He did mention Stein but it was very unclear that what he said in the post was attributed to Stein.

I will remove my comment though and change the rating I gave him based on your observation...

deleted...

After yet another Republican scandal, if the Democrats cannot win convincingly in November, then we all deserve whatever reality the GOP has in mind for us.

On a seperate note, in his post above Mark mentions bumper stickers with slogans.

When I was in Gettysburg, PA this spring I noticed the second funniest bumper sticker I have ever seen: "I will forgive Jane Fonda when the Jews forgive Hitler."

The only bumper sticker that tops that is one that I saw at a remote truckstop in Alabama a few years ago: Union 1
Confederacy 0 HALFTIME

I'm not quite sure that Absolutism is merely a matter of knowing and following a set of rules. Ethics is more than merely following rules. Chess has a set of rules but it is only a game. Ethics is not a game. Wittgenstein famously talks at length about language games and following rules. However, Ethics requires pre-existing intuitions about what is right or wrong. From whence these intuitions originate is a subject of much debate, but it is these common intuitions that we have that allow for us to devise rules and not the other way around. If it were the other way around then the rule formation would be totally arbitrary and we might have invented rules that make child molestation commendable, which is absurd.

Wow! Those bumper stickers are really informative GB ...

Ya' know when I was in West Palm Beach this past summer I kept wondering what the bumper sticker was all about on all the old VW Bugs and Micro-vans that said: "Your Monkey Needs Lotion!"

Now I think I understand...

~OGD~

The Media have put the Wetterling ad all over the place, painting it as an example of Democrats piling on..... problem is they do not take the time to make a critical factual point.

Patty Wetterling became a public figure in Minnesota seventeen years ago out of necessity; her son, nine years old, was abducted off his bike in a very rural area of Central Minnesota when he went to buy something at a highway convenience store. He has never been found.

Patty eventually organized a foundation, called "Jacob's Hope" that does two things. First, when an abduction occurs, it sends to the family professional help for dealing with immediate problems, such as a press spokesperson, someone who can organize volunteer search efforts, help in making and distributing missing posters, help dealing with police, FBI, State Criminal investigators -- Family legal help, assistance in properly banking and accounting for financial donations in a transparent way, and a whole range of counseling services. The Foundation is National. Most families of missing and exploited kids do not naturally have all these skills. In addition, Patty and other Foundation Staff have lobbyied now for about 16 years for a range of things -- legal reforms, training of police for this speciality, mandatory reporting laws -- she has taken on the whole of this area, and she is very well known in Minnesota and around the rest of the country for her advocacy and work.

Until 2004 no one knew whether Patty was a Republican or DFL'er. But in 2004, she was recruited by the DFL to run against Mark Kennedy in the 6th district, and she came within 5 points of winning. She now is polling even in this race for the same seat, and she is running against our star opponent of Gay Marriage (which is already illegal in Minnesota) State Senator Michelle Bachman, for whom Rove and Bush as well as Cheney have made multiple appearances.

For Patty not to have said the obvious with respect to Foleygate would have been absurd. This has been her issue for 17 years, and her passion comes directly from the experience of her son's being abducted and never found. Somehow the media have again fallen into the on this hand and then on that hand trap. Over and over again we see Foley strutting himself around the Hill, showing himself with his broad pink tie, or making a floor speech about Pages where he falls into tears, that almost makes them more importantant than Patton himself, and that film sequence runs over and over. But has anyone gone through the archives of Minnesota TV over the past 17 years -- for every year the supporters of Patty's advocacy hold candlelight vigils and then move on to a conference dealing with the year's agenda for advocacy. The event is always reported on state TV, and there must be miles of film archives. Or someone might tell the story of Patty's helping as a consultant when the Benedictines of Collegeville Minnesota, with 30 lawsuits pending against them for abuse in their two colleges and prep school, needing to negotiate a settlement, sat down with her and actually negotiated that settlement including in it all the child and young adult protection programs necessary to prevention of the problems that got them into such trouble -- and she did it with Jeffrey Anderson, the attorney for many of the Plaintiff's sitting with her. (Anderson has handled over 500 successful suits). Objective Journalism has something to answer for in this case.

eisweino -- blockquotes are your friend...

 

Dissent Protects Democracy.

JohnW1141

A political party "piling on"? I'm shocked, shocked I tell you that politics are being played by politicians!

Of course Wetterling is justified in creating this ad.

I posted this on another thread; probably not the best edicate, but I think it bears repeating:

Time to bring this into some kind of action. One thing I haven't heard in all this news is that, like every other rep, Hastert is up for re-election. His opponent is a vet [John Laesch], and from what I can acertain, a decent guy. How's about the democrats pouring money into this election, bringing the problem home to Hastert? How's about asking VoteVets.org if they know how Hastert voted on their prime issue? Can you imagine the panic that would follow this? If Democrats want to get tough, this is probably the best place to start.

dc

Two distinct issues hammering in his district diffinately has the potential to bring him down.

All of the original comment, except for the first line, was from Stein's article.

As far as I'm concerned, Stein, whose claims to fame were as being a spokesman for Murine eye drops and ran a comedy game show on Comedy Central, is a jackass.

Nonsense.
"Bueller? Bueller?"
That was him.

Ding-a-ling-a-ling-a-ring "Wa? a..a.. Must do Soro's bidding, must do Soro's bidding, must do..."

Ahh, the inscrutable Manchurian Candidate eh?

"After yet another Republican scandal, if the Democrats cannot win convincingly in November, then we all deserve whatever reality the GOP has in mind for us." I agree with Gettysburg, but with two disclaimers. First, "we all" should extend beyond the Democratic party to include a passive, gullible public. Second, we already have that "reality," thanks to cable news and others.

John

http://www.haberarts.com/

Stein should really learn the difference between homosexuality and adults having sex with children.

It is never right, and often illegal for an adult of either gender to have sexual contact with a child of either gender.

What Stein and the other bigots of the Republican Party ought to get over their Gay bashing and admit they are willing to be moral relativistists when their political success is at stake.

Daniel A. Greenbaum

JohnW1141

If the Dems don't pick up at least one House this November
they will be out of power for a generation

After yet another Republican scandal, if the Democrats cannot win convincingly in November, then we all deserve whatever reality the GOP has in mind for us.

So now you're insultng jackasses? They are, after all, animals and can't help it.

You consider that bumper sticker funny?

Lets see in one fell swoop it manages to trivilize the Holocaust and associate Jane Fonda with the death of 12 million people. Wow

Explains a lot about how your twisted little mind works.

EWK

I wasn't implying that I agreed with the notion expressed on the bumper sticker. I was more amused that A)Somebody had the audacity to actually think of that phrase AND print it on a bumper sticker, and B)Someone would make the decision to place it on their rear bumper.

Of course, the irony was increased when it was in Gettysburg, PA where I saw this.

Uh that is a far differen thing than saying it "was the 2nd funniest bumper sticker you ever saw" Which certainly implies you found the "joke" it expressed funny.

I'm thinking the two remaining poles of the Axis of Evil, Iran and North Korea, probably had something to do with it.

I'm getting the distinct impression Dennis Hastert is also a sex pest.

Regs, Shaggy

Nah, I think he is just a blithering idiot who has been in way over his head for years.

You know, the underage sex trade was a big part of what Abramoff and DeLay and their assorted Gross Old Pervert cronies fought to preserve about the Marianas Islands.

Disgustingly, this scandal goes back a decade. The Gross Old Perverts were covering this up when Newt Gingrich was speaker!

I wonder how many Republicans have been serviced by underaged Marianas Island hookers, male and female, over the years.

-- "Politics is not the art of the possible. It consists in choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable." (John Kenneth Galbraith) "I'm getting a little tired of disastrous." (me) --

Here is what the Democratic response to this line of attack should be: We wish that we had known sooner so that we could have been the whistleblowers who stopped a sexual predator praying on children in the halls of Congress. Those brave individuals (who the facts have proven to be mostly Republican staffers and former pages) who came forward with information helping stop Foley from continuing to be a sexual predator should be praised for their bravery. Shame on you Republican Leadership--instead of starting a witch hunt for those people who helped stop a sexual predator, you should have followed up on the obvious red flags waving in front of your faces so that you could have saved more children by being whistleblowers yourselves. If it had been us, we would have been proud to own up to it, because stopping Foley was the right thing to do. And since you have been reluctant to police yourselves on this matter, we are proud of any role we have and will continue to play in helping hold those who were responsible, accountable. That is what leaders with integrity do.

And what's more--you are politicians. If you mess up, your constituents should hold you accountable for messing up at election time. By definition, everything you do in the course of your jobs--including failure to stop a sexual predator--is political. Not only is there nothing wrong with us asking your electorate to hold you accountable, it is your electorates' civic duty to do so.

Thanks. Sorry if I was unclear, but I thought it should be obvious from the context of this thread that I was quoting, not endorsing, what Stein wrote. (Please, note the colon after American Spectator and my editorial [etc., etc.,], which replaces Stein's rantings about Clinton's just shocking, shocking doings with a "barely legal intern.") Actually, I got the link from Altercation, which urged, "Ben Stein should be shunned." You really ought to read Stein's piece in its entirety. He goes on to call criticism of Senator George Allen hypocritical in part because -- I swear I'm not making this up -- Jimmy Carter "was inches away from being a segregationist in his early career." http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=10434

Yeah, like I about passed a couple of gall stones laughing up that one Getty

And Barney Frank shouldn't defend him. Unlike Foley, Frank campaigns as an openly gay man who's not ashamed of what he is, unlike Foley, who's insisted on staying in the closet and was openly hostile to anyone asking him about his 'sexual orientation' for years. And this is what the 'closet' does, perverts and twists what could have been a normal, healthy sex drive. God knows how many murderers and tyrants we've had to endure over millenia because they repressed themselves this way.

As a gay man, I have a bit of sympathy for Foley, a tiny wee little bit.

eisweino

click on "more information about formatting options" to discover the wonderful little tools that you can use to make your post look spectacular

LOL

he first pulls off his falafel mask, then checks under the bed

What bothers me as well is that there is already talk by the GOP heavies in the House that this cover-up for Foley was orchestrated by the 'gay cabal' of closeted republican staffers trying to protect one of their own. Whether it's true or not doesn't matter of course, as it will play well to their base, (with the help of James Dobson, Tony Perkins et al) but I'm concerned that if they're successful in disseminating this story (CBS did a small piece on it already last night) that it will stick, and not only with the GOP's homophobic base.

I have a good rebuttal for it though:

"Are you trying to tell me that all those he-man GOP leaders in the House Leadership were intimidated by a bunch of Republican pansies!?

Start with "enable rich-text editor".

"The past isn't dead; it's not even past" as Faulkner said about his South.

Why can't we accept this nearly universal feature of societies--the winners write history but the losers never forget. It seems so easy to employ military force, if we neglect the long-term consequences.

It is potentially the worst criminal act(s) committed by a government official since Watergate...period, end of story, fini!!!

The Cheney/Bush administration is perpetrating felonies everyday. Granted this is bad but the entire cabal is a bunch of lying crooks.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address