TPMCafe
« Calling Their Bluff: Bolton Will Not Be Confirmed | Home | Gee, Valerie was Undercover »

FCC and ABC

user-pic

I suppose I have to watch the ABC docudrama on 9/11 to be fair in commenting on it. But by then the harm will have been done and the election that it of course is intended to influence will be upon us. If I were in the government, as a regulator, right now, before it is too late, I'd ask these questions:
1. What is the reason ABC is showing this, aside from attracting an audience to advertise to?
2. What remedy exists for those who allege that falsehood is embedded in the show?
3. What methods of making and distributing alternative content, of a different point of view, exist? If there aren't adequate alternatives, how could they be created?
4. Would ABC consider offering, in fairness, a rebuttal opportunity before or after the show? for example, to Richard Clarke or President Clinton?

I'd ask these questions in public. I would put them to the CEO of Disney. He can take it. Certainly the FCC isn't as powerful in Hollywood as, say, Tom Cruise. But what power it has lies in the ability to ask questions, as much as anything else.


46 Comments

| Leave a comment

Reed, they're not running it to attract an audience to advertise to, as they're running it commercial-free and sending it free to 100,000 high school teachers.

Where did you hear this? Its getting harder and harder to believe that we have a free press and not a wholly-owned one. Blogs are great, but Disney/ABC broadcasts in almost all American homes, which makes what they are doing so much more insidious.

Bushco delenda est

Coincidentally, I was watching ABC "Primetime" when I read your post. The topics on this "news" show: swinging, people who claim they are asexual, and strippers.

I blame Rupert Murdoch, for showing that the unholy alliance of support for rightwing politics and sleaze can be a big moneymaker.

Appears that the 9/11 mockudrama is simply a political gift provided to the GOP by ABC/Disney. Its value must run into the many millions of dollars. It dovetails very nicely with all the other terror hype the GOP has been spewing in the past month or so, from the bumbling Miami terror squad that couldn't find its rearend with both hands, to the London affair, to the appease-the-fascists rants more recently. We've just seen the beginning of it, and the 9/11 mockudrama is the latest wave. If you're thinking of taking your family to Disneyland or buyng a Disney video, you might want to think twice. Maybe you might want to let Disney know how you feel and how their actions in rolling out this GOP propaganda are going to affect your purchasing decisions.

Link, with more links within. 

Dissent Protects Democracy.

Thinkprogress.org has info on the commercial-free airing and the free distribution, together with ABC's attempts to get schoolteachers to have their students view this 9/11 mockudrama and discuss it in class.

Wait a minute. That "Primetime" episode wasn't rightwing at all -- unless you consider libertarian social attitudes to be right-wing. It wasn't even particularly sleazy.

This is the same Disney that refused to release Fahrenheit 9/11 as it was considered "too political" and "too close to an election".

Hypocrisy! All this does is further reinforce that the corporate media is part of the right-wing propaganda machine.

Its time to return to the Fairness Doctrine and the old rules of media competition - multiple media outlets in each and every market. The broadcast frequencies which are public assets need to be re-licensed with strict guidelines for fairness and truth in advertising.

If we can elect a Democratic Congress - both houses - in November, we have a chance, however slight, to restore the Fairness Doctrine, and end the consolidation of the news media.  If we elect another Republican Congress, the Republican media will have two years to condition the voters to elect another cretin like Bush as president. 

Hoppy in Sacramento

If you want an alternative, check this free documentary out. It's 90 minutes long and does a fairly solid job, albeit a bit flawed, of exposing how and why the U.S. government orchestrated the 9/11 attacks. It's appropriately titled "Loose Change" and can be found at Google's new 'video' link on the mainpage.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5946593973848835726&q=Loose+Change&hl=en

The FCC has a great deal more authority, than simply the bully pulpit from which to ask reasonable questions.

Republicans now control all media. ALL MEDIA. Republicans control PBS and NPR and the New York Times and the Washington Post, as well as Disney/ABC and Fox and CBS. And, Republicans are using that control of ALL MEDIA to deliver the propaganda of a facsist state in the making. Media consolidation was a triumph for the Republicans, politically, and has created a nearly insurmountable barrier to the long-term continuation of democracy.

This is not a winning campaign issue. But, Democrats had better be prepared to move fast and furious on January 21, 2009, should they find themselves in power. The Media giants are going to have to be sliced and diced, in short order, by fair means and foul, both.

A Democratic Administration and/or a Democratic Congress will not survive a second round of Whitewater, the War against Gore, Swift-boating, and Disney's open partisanship. The institutional consolidation of Media will have to reversed in very short order, and there will have to considerable (figurative) blood in the journalistic water, to make clear Fox, Disney, Clear Channel and Sinclair will pay with their corporate lives, for their institutional misbehavior.

Let's revive the House Unamerican Activities Committee and see if we can get this screenwriter and producer blackballed.

.

Wasn't it Clinton who helped push through the last media consolidation??? Poetic justice it would seem. Democrats never learn to quit trusting and working with Republicans. They will get stabbed in the back. All I can say is one step at a time. Lieberman is first, many more to come. Add in Dean's 50 state strategy electing netroot candidates and, soon, we will take our country back. The Republicans and the DLC Dems have no clue how fed up real middle Americans are. They will find out.

And why is ABC providing the Bush WH with this propaganda gift?

One theory (via digby): to make millions from their Narnia "franchise," they needed Dobson to lift a fundie boycott of Disney movies. This is their quid pro quo.

Where the Hell is Lee Hamilton, while Tom Kean goes around whoring the 9/11 Commission? Kean is only able to get away with this because Democrats like Hamilton have no balls.

I'm sorry, but fighting loony bullshit with amateur loony bullshit is, well, dumb. Loose Change is nothing more than conspiracy speculation in the Who Shot JFK/Faked Apollo category. Not even the physics are accurate.

I suspect the broadcast now indicates that Disney is scared. They've had a good run until now with the easily-bribed GOP, and are afraid of losing Congress.

Indeed!  HR 3302, The Media Ownership and Reform Act of 2005, is still in committee.  The only way to get control of the legislative agenda, and get the Fairness Doctrine back into law, is to remove the Republican domination of Congress on November 7.

Living in my little cocoon with ABC NBC and CBS used as backround noise rather than for actual TV viewing while I read or browse the internet, I can't tell how often ABC advertises this program.
When Michael Jackson had an anti-Semitic line in a song it was rapidly curtailed by a blurb in Variety. Recordings were pulled off the shelves and the wording in the song changed.
The TV movie depicting Reagan as senile was forced to cable.
How sad "Liberals" are so weak that an obviously flawed TV movie cannot be stopped from airing on a major network.
One response post airing would be to point out errors in the mockumentary using news reports from ABC News itself and posting them in full page ads in NYT, WP LA Times, etc. as "What the mockumentary left out".
It would force an ABC response and possible review of info by their MSM news rivals. While less effective than keeping the garbage from a major network airing, it might be somewhat helpful.
If the GOP succeeds in maintaining political control, look forward to a war against Iran, continued assaults on middle class wages, further attacks on Constitutional freedoms and worsening of the depth of poverty.
The final truth is if "Kansas" views the film and is convinced to vote for the status quo based on a mockumentary, then the ability to seriously question government has been lost by a majority of the country and the wingnuts have won the audience.
Hopefully even people who view the film will still wonder if the current GOP isn't inept and ham-handed and that divided government (meaning more opposition = more Dems) is a better alternative providing some check and balance.

I say let ABC run it...after November 7th.  The inaccuracy of it should not be allowed to possibly affect the midterms.  Then there can be a robust debate about the film's credibility...

 

ABC refused to run Fahrenheit 9/11 in the months leading up to the '04 election...they should be consistent and not run this piece of garbage either until after November 7th. 

The final truth is if "Kansas" views the film and is convinced to vote for the status quo based on a mockumentary, then the ability to seriously question government has been lost by a majority of the country and the wingnuts have won the audience.
50% of the country believes that WMD were found in Iraq.

Including Rick Santorum

Jan Knaus

I say let ABC run it...after November 7th. 

 Great Idea!  One question:  Who is going to "make" them wait, or "let" them run it?  Too bad we don't really HAVE a liberal media.

Jan Knaus

And this is why ABC/Disney is floating this turd. It is in their interest to keep at least one branch of congress in control of the R's so that they can continue to consolidate media. Why else run it commerical free and distribute talking points to high schools? It's pure propaganda aimed at enhancing their bottom line.

September 6, 2006 Alive and Well and Living in Pakistan? Filed under: Bush Administration — maha @ 9:19 am

Last night ABC’s Brian Ross reported that Osama bin Laden has been offered sanctuary in Pakistan. This morning ABC and other news sources are denying this report. You can watch the video of Brian Ross’s original report here. You can draw your own conclusions about who got to whom. Whether bin Laden was involved in the deal or not, Pakistan did make a deal with the Taliban that amounts to a one-finger salute at President Bush. Agence France-Presse and The Associated Press report:

Go to Mahablog for the all the links.

"What remedy exists for those who allege that falsehood is embedded in the show?"

From what I've read at thinkprogress.org and in Editor & Publisher, it seems clear that Sandy Berger has grounds to sue. Too bad he won't.

This amounts to a campaign contribution from Disney to the GOP.

If Democrats win congress they should have congressional hearings.

What I want to know is what kind of favors have Disney been getting from the Bush regime. Such as; tax breaks, regulatory favors, FCC sweetheart deals, govt contracts.

There should be a full disclosure of any favors Disney has received from the Bush regime.

I guess the people have the best of the slim chances to get that done.  I posted on a thread at ABC (on the blog for the "docudrama" itself under the name "Give me a break") that they should hold off on airing the "docudrama" because of the possible impact in the elections.  I told them if they did air it before November 7th I would join the boycott of the network and the sponsors of the movie.  Of course my comments didn't see the light of day on the blog they have for the "docudrama". ;-)

And I say if they air it the left side of the blogosphere should organize a boycott of their network and their sponsors.  Hit 'em where it hurts the most...right in the wallet!!!

"How sad "Liberals" are so weak that an obviously flawed TV movie cannot be stopped from airing on a major network."

This is the big problem for Democrats.

The corporate media fears the GOP. They don't fear the Democrats.

Corporate media especially fear the Right Wing Noise Machine. Which is why they treat Rush, Coulter and the rest of the unhinged screamers as legitimate part of political discourse in this country.

Reporters are terrified of being accused of "liberal bias". They don't fear accusations of "conservative bias".

Part of it is due to the fact that corporations are run by republican CEOs and their interest lies with the GOP.

Part of it is due to the Right Wing Noise Machine the GOP has built. Reporters fear being demonized by the Noise Machine. There is no comparable Democratic Noise Machine to exert equal influence.

Part of it is also due to the fact that GOP politicians scream and throw temper tantrums when they perceive any kind of bias or even when they don't. They trash the media as a strategic move.

Democratic politicians on the other hand politely ask "please don't hit me".

So it is not surprising that journalists are terrified of angering the GOP and treat Dems like an abused wife.

Miri11,

What I want to know is what kind of favors have Disney been getting from the Bush regime. Such as; tax breaks, regulatory favors, FCC sweetheart deals, govt contracts.

It isn't as if suspicions haven't colored Disney's executive decisions before.  New York Times, May 5, 2004:

Mr. Moore's agent, Ari Emanuel, said Michael D. Eisner, Disney's chief executive, asked him last spring to pull out of the [Fahrenheit 911 distribution] deal with Miramax. Mr. Emanuel said Mr. Eisner expressed particular concern that it would endanger tax breaks Disney receives for its theme park, hotels and other ventures in Florida, where Mr. Bush's brother, Jeb, is governor.

"Michael Eisner asked me not to sell this movie to Harvey Weinstein; that doesn't mean I listened to him," Mr. Emanuel said. "He definitely indicated there were tax incentives he was getting for the Disney corporation and that's why he didn't want me to sell it to Miramax. He didn't want a Disney company involved."

Disney executives deny that accusation, though they said their displeasure over the deal was made clear to Miramax and Mr. Emanuel.

A senior Disney executive elaborated that the company had the right to quash Miramax's distribution of films if it deemed their distribution to be against the interests of the company. The executive said Mr. Moore's film is deemed to be against Disney's interests not because of the company's business dealings with the government but because Disney caters to families of all political stripes and believes Mr. Moore's film, which does not have a release date, could alienate many.

"It's not in the interest of any major corporation to be dragged into a highly charged partisan political battle," this executive said.

 

I didn't suggest it was. My point was that Murdoch has shown that support of rightwing politics on the one hand and news that appeasl to the lowest common denominator can mean huge bucks.

And if the purpose of the Primetime episode wasn't titillation, then what was it? Serious social commentary?

The corporate media fears the GOP. They don't fear the Democrats.

Miri11 hits the nail on the head.

Progressives/Liberals have to be more aggressive and have talking points ready when confronted with wingnut blather by MSM news reporters. The obvious differences in the approaches taken to the Reagan senility film, Fahrenheit 911 and this mockumentary should be emphasized.
Statements like: "Wow. that point comes fresh of the daily GOP talking points. Are they here in the room?", or some other more politically subtle sentence could be used to counter the GOP favoring stenographic tendencies of MSM.
The lapdog nature of MSM from marching towards Iraq to failure to fight against Constitutional abuses, including threats to jail NYT reporters for merely mentioning phone surveillance programs should also be brought to the forefront.
Asking the MSM "Do I have to fight for YOUR right to speak as well as mine, without being labelled a traitor?" may also be a useful technique.
Sadly, in the end, we are speaking to the converted here. If the general public can't take the time to gain facts independently, then at least for the time being, nothing will change.
Reading some recent comments from MSM reporters from Lehrer to Broder on MediaMatters,there is no feeling on the part of these MSM veterans that pointing out falsehoods (OK LIES) made by GOP politicians is a part of their current job description.
We are in a sad state.

I asked the question.

On the blog for the ABC "docudrama" I asked, in effect, "what is the purpose of this movie if it is not factual?" My comment was sent sent to the moderator for approval and rejected (I assume, since comments submitted since then have appeared). Not to sound righteous, but I think this question is the most dangerous one to this film because it a) does not require viewing the movie to ask it and b) the only answers can be entertainment or propaganda. Either of those answers are unsettling and offensive. I strongly hope sufficient pressure is put on Disney to shelve this movie (like the successful campaign against Sinclair Broadcasting's John Kerry "documentary" two years ago.

On the blog for the ABC "docudrama" I asked, in effect, "what is the purpose of this movie if it is not factual?"

I also visited the "docudrama" blog and asked whether Disney's behavior in the Fahrenheit 9/11 distribution situation and the cavalier attitude in showing this film before an electon wasn't an example of corporate bias. My post also failed to be displayed by the moderator.
The level of corporate arrogance is amazing. ABC/disney will not even allow free flow of discouse on a blog that in the grand scope of things will only be viewed by a handful of people. I do admit to an occasional gulity pleasure watching Grey's Anatomy because of the bizarre medical situations, but if the docudrama airs and is as biased as it appears- goodbye Grey's goodbye Disney products etc.

I found this at Huffington Post, but couldn't get the link to work:

September 6, 2006 House Democrats Demand Accuracy in ABC 9/11 Film

 Representatives John Conyers, Jr., John Dingell, Jane Harman, and Louise Slaughter today called on ABC to fix the inaccuracies in its mini-series The Path to 9/11, before its scheduled airing on September 10th and 11th. Read the letter:

Mr. Robert A. Iger

President and CEO

The Walt Disney Company

 Dear Mr. Iger: We are advised that ABC is scheduled to air a two-part mini-series entitled "The Path to 9/11" on September 10 and September 11. While we have not yet seen this program, news reports raise serious questions about its accuracy. Therefore, we request that the inaccuracies described herein be addressed immediately and that the program be thoroughly reviewed and revised for accuracy before it airs.

 They go on to cite 2 examples which have been directly disproved by testimony and also law.  Didn't want to print the whole letter, but at least this should get some attention.

 Jan Knaus

In fact the number went up from about 36% to 50% after Santorum and Hoekstra's stunt.

Mission accomplished.

Re: Republicans now control all media.

All media. Even Mother Jones, the Nation, the gay media, and the internet? Is Tpmcafe now a GOP blog site?

Key quote from ABC insider via Hewitt:
"the blame on the Clinton team is in the DNA of the project"

So it's a hit job, pure and simple.

"Progressives/Liberals have to be more aggressive and have talking points ready when confronted with wingnut blather by MSM news reporters."

Yes and Democratic politicians have to be more aggressive challenging the corporate media. But that won't be enough. Progressives/Liberals have to build their own Noise Machine. That is what the GOP did and it has been very effective.

Journalists are driven by one force above all else; fear. Sure, they are also driven by a desire for money and power but fear is the #1 motivator. They fear being targeted by the Right Wing Noise Machine. They fear being accused of liberal bias. They fear offending the corporate higher ups. The fear factor like a magnet pushes them to to the right. There is no comparable fear magnet on the Democratic/Liberal side.

Democrats need to inspire fear in journalists. Just like the GOP does now. They can't do it pleading "please don't hit me". Dem politicans need to aggressively challenge the corporate media. They also need to build their own Noise Machine.

Corporate America is driven entirely by money. So, you are right that only a nationwide boycott of ABC and their sponsors, and of Disney, has any chance of success in stopping this telecast. I hope all of the liberal/progressive/Democratic bloggers will get behind a nationwide boycott. This is one way to get started.

Hoppy in Sacramento

Saint Fnordius

"Amateur loony bullshit?"

Maybe. But I would wager you are a fan of Michael Moore's "Professional looney bullshit."

"It isn't as if suspicions haven't colored Disney's executive decisions before."

This is what Liberals and Democrats need to do. Expose the corrupt ties between Disney and the GOP.

It is not enough to scream "bias" or "it's so unfair" or "please don't hit me". They have to launch an all out assault on the financial ties between Disney and the GOP. They have to make it public. They have to scream it from the rooftops. They have to threaten congressional action. In short, they have to "mean business".

Don't kid yourself. This is all about money. More specificially financial interests of Disney. They wouldn't dare do this to a republican president. Not with GOP in control of 3 branches of govt.

Part of it is Democratic politicians mistake. When faced with something like this they all beg "please don't hit me". They have to speak in the language Disney understands. They have to make it clear if they win Congress they are going to make Disney pay. It is the only language Disney understands. It is the only language any corporate CEO understands.

And that worked so well for the Southern Baptists...

Hoppy in Sacramento

Before you get too carried away, I suggest you read this. Unfortunately, for your argument, Michael Moore's movie was based entirely on facts, disqualifying it as any form of bullshit.

I've seen the film you mention, but by your comment history I now realise that you were merely troll-fishing. You were hoping somebody would support that little movie that doesn't even understand the physics behind why the hole in the Pentagon was shaped like it was.

Looking at your comments elsewhere, you seem to be a pretty ardent Bush supporter. One of the "never question our Dear Leader" dittoheads. One of those who want to "win" an argument, and aren't really interested in actual discussion. Therefore I feel pretty foolish for treating you with even a modicum of respect.

I guess I'll just have to mentally killfile you from here on out.

rmrdooo,

I joined here just a few days ago, in the midst of that furious fray in the 'Clinton Letter' thread.

I was certainly one of the people advocating for the film to be pulled from 'broadcast' televsion, (I would have been satisfied to see it go the way of the 'Reagan' mini-series) Looking at my views now, I feel I was putting the cart before the horse. I posted to one of the saner right wingers that was in here Monday morning ('deepintheheart') that I was guilty of being a tad presumptuous and reactionary (and good GAWD do I hate to be reactionary, which is one of my main criticism of right wingers)

Anyhow, it turns out that the public airing might just be a boon to us on the left. (just from the poorer than expected ratings alone) The film turned out to be such a propoganda hit piece that I think it might convince many independent voters in this country (the ones that are gently swaying towards the left) that they too have had enough. Too soon to tell of course, but we'll see.

Again, as a new member, it's great to be in such good company.

but they were found in Iraq!!......it was 1991, wasn't it??

and poor Rick Santorum!!!

yes, and that commie loving, liberty trashing, Bill O'Reilly hating New York Times!!!
you know, the one who sat on the 'Bush-NSA-Wiretap' story til after the 2004 election!!??

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address