Full Court Propaganda Press
If anyone needs to know whether or not we live in an era of biased, and indeed untrustworthy press, the ABC has sealed the deal - having decided to run hard right wing propaganda under the title "The Path to 9/11" which is filled with lies, distortions and fabrications. Clearly the right wing is absolutely desperate in the face of what could be an electoral wipe out in November, as Americans remain unimpressed with the paltry job creation of the present economy.
Equally clearly, the owners of the major networks have so little regard for the American public that they feel they can simply shovel unadulterated extremism and call it a "docu-drama." Even the films director admits it wasn't a documentary - but the network is billing it as one. It is already being heavily promoted by Rush Limbaugh as "zeroing in on the shortcomings of the Clinton Administration."
Some people have started emailing ABC already, using
The reasons for this crass affront to all standards of ethics, decency and news reporting are fairly clear. The American public doesn't buy that Bush is doing a good job fighting terrorism. The mid-August bump that came with the terror plot news from Britain has already faded with the summer heat.
Hence bald faced lying has become the order of the day. AP "economics" writer Jeannine Aversa, in a miracle of mendacity, tried to say that "hiring had perked up" in August. From a revised July of 121,000 to 128,000, in an economy with 135,500,000 payroll positions is statistically insignificant. No detail of the the news seems to be too small, or too checkable, to lie about. The word for Aversa's lede graf is "crassly dishonest", because no one who is that innumerate could operate a telephone, which would be required to work at the AP.
It is no coincidence that this 9/11 smear job comes out at the same time as faked allegations that "war protesters" kidnapped a marine at gun point. Only the hardest of the hard core haters can be motivated at this point, and they are only moved by the most unvarnished of agitprop. Another example of smear is the formation by Republicans of a youtube "Democratic" group which purveys naked attacks on soldiers. The need for the "stabbed in the back" mythology to hold the military shows that even the Republican core is tired, and there is no fact, or even perversion of fact, that will do the job of motivating them.
For those of us who cover the poor state of the economy for people who work for a living, the hate filled nature of the right wing is constantly on display - harrassing phone calls, personal threats and assorted other nonsense from derranged minds are part of the hazard of saying obvious things like "the United States has failed to establish a working state in Iraq" and "real wages are falling."
That the public has caught on that their paychecks are short, that the war is long, and that the Republicans in power are to blame for this is clear from the poll numbers - consumer confidence, disapproval of Bush and the Republican Congress, wrong track sentiments are all pointing to an American public that does not believe that the present ruling party is capable of handling the job.
So when a party's negatives are high, the only thing that they can do is drive the other party's negatives even higher. ABC intends, in effect, to make a massive undeclared contribution to the Republican Congressional campaign and call it "free speech". Well speech it is, but with trillions in tax breaks for the wealthy, it certainly wasn't free.















Mr. Cheney recently said that the increased number of insurgent attacks in Iraq was proof that we were winning. The insurgents, realizing that we are winning are increasing the virulence and frequency of their attacks. (Hitler used to tell the German people, when Germany was clearly losing the war, that the increase in Allied bombing of German cities was a clear indication that Germany was winning the war.) Can we say then, using the same admittedly peculiar rationale, that the increasing virulence and frequency of Republican attacks on all who disagree with their policies is proof that those who disagree are winning?
September 1, 2006 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is this the same network that wouldn't run certain campaign commercials because they were too "controversial?"
Hell, I don't need to watch this trash to know that everything Dear Leader does wrong is Bill Clinton's fault! Do we smell the stench of desperation and fear or is it just the yellow stuff running down their chicken legs?
September 1, 2006 11:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
I guess ABC must have "business reasons" to keep the repugs in power. I am sure I will I will get slammed by the professional pundits here but...the networks are as unbiased as the RNC. This is blatant pro-GOP propaganda months before a midterm election (where the GOP looks like they will take a beating) being passed off as an "unbiased" documentary. Corporate whores!!!!
September 1, 2006 2:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
The relentless attacks drove me off one political board, and I have noticed it here, as well. They make it personal, too. Why are they so angry? Because they backed the most incompoetent, greedy, amoral administration in the history of this country and they can't face up to it?
Big deal. They were wrong, who cares? What does my kid have to do witrh it?
The question is what do we do NOW?CSPAN junkies visit http://spannerbackup.ipbhost.com
September 1, 2006 2:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Imagine you come home from a weekend getaway and find your pool full of floating excrement and beer cans, your landscaping dotted with vomit, fridge empty, dishes broken, panties and condoms littering the floors and a very nervous-looking sheep in the yard.
Stunned, you demand to know what the hell happened, even though the answer's pretty obvious. But your teenage son doesn't want to engage in personal attacks or finger pointing. He looks at you and says,
The answer is pretty simple. You throw his ass out the door, and get to work cleaning up the mess. Maybe 10 years down the road, when your house is back to normal and you've finally paid off the repair bills, you might think about giving him another chance.
--
-- All successful revolutions are the kicking in of a rotten door. (John Kenneth Galbraith) --
September 1, 2006 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
CNN had a similar 9/11 documentary recently that falsified a thread from the Twin Towers to the Iraq War - a misinfommercial for the Repubs in an election year.
September 1, 2006 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe it was CBS that refused to run the incredible moveon ad about the deficit, during the Superbowl. Remember it was the one with kids working in grown-up jobs to pay off the debts their parents left them with?
September 1, 2006 4:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
What I did NOW was send a very heated email to my local ABC station, which has this abomination of a program on the schedule for the 10th and 11th, telling them I will stop watching their station, and send protest emails to the advertisers of that show if they telecast it. I pointed out that it is nothing more than a Republican Party campaign commercial, being broadcast at no cost to that party, a violation of the laws.
Then I sent a copy of my email to about 15 political activist friends, along with links to the local stations website showing that they plan to telecast the show, and to the Think Progress website where the show is deconstructed.
If we all do this, and follow up with emails to the advertisers, we might possibly have some impact.
Hoppy in Sacramento
September 1, 2006 5:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
That was the same Superbowl that had the infamous Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunction.
September 1, 2006 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hoppy, thanks for the push. I just emailed my ABC station and gave them a piece of my mind.
I was so mad that I didn't compose it very well, but here is the text:
Jan Knaus
September 2, 2006 7:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Personally, I know the war is closer to ending each time my student lone interest rates go up
September 2, 2006 8:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Apparently, you do not have any children. My parents didn't kick my brother and I out of the house when we had a party (albeit not as wild or destructive as your scenario, but more the typical high school, alcohol laden, sex filled, affair), and I wouldn't kick out my daughter for doing so. Teenagers being teenagers is hardly an appropriate analogy, IMO.
I think you missed my point. Totally. Which was, the right wing would be better off working on solutions to the considerable problems created by the current administration, rather than pointing fingers and engaging in ad hominem attacks.
That's all I meant.
CSPAN junkies visit http://spannerbackup.ipbhost.com
September 2, 2006 8:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was refering to the mess that is the "war on terror" but perhaps I wasn't clear. Fair enough hoppy. I sent a complaint to ABC.
What I find to be the most distasteful aspect of this "docudrama" is the link to a scholastic "study and discussion guide" for teachers to discuss with students in the classroom. That is completely and totally out of line, and I would suggest people contact the textbook publisher as well, and insist that anything they provide include disclosure of the filmakers point of view.As of now, they seem to be missing that important fact, that would give "students" the tools needed for "critical thinking."
http://content.scholastic.com/browse/lessonplan.jsp?id=415
Here's my email to scholastic:
CSPAN junkies visit http://spannerbackup.ipbhost.com
September 2, 2006 9:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
My email came back "undeliverable." I called and they said it was a "web issue." I hope they are getting too many to handle.
Jan Knaus
September 2, 2006 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I say follow the money.
What regulatory favors, tax breaks, FCC favors have Disney been getting from the Bush regime?
It is inconveivable they would run a smear job against a GOP president.
September 2, 2006 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Via Daily Kos threads, here is the contact info for ABC;
For more information, to RSVP, or for interviews with others connected to the project please contact:
ABC Media Relations:
Patrick Preblick (212) 456-7819, patrick.k.preblick@abc.com
Jonathan Hogan (818) 460-7016, jonathan.hogan@abc.com
mPRm Public Relations:
Tom Chen, Theresa Black or Jennifer McIntosh (323) 933-3399
tchen@mprm.com, tblack@mprm.com or jmcintosh@mprm.com.
September 2, 2006 2:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's the link to the ABC blog about the propaganda movie.
http://blogs.abc.com/thepathto911/
September 2, 2006 4:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Best. Halftime show. Ever.
But... the prudes ruined it.
Okay, it was a sucky halftime show. Still... the prudes ruined it.
thosethingswesay.blogspot.com
September 4, 2006 12:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
They were likely "hacked" the same way Lieberman was (and, of course, he wasn't).
thosethingswesay.blogspot.com
September 4, 2006 12:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
I doubt you'll get flamed for saying that here and... if you are flamed... it'll lower my opinion of this community.
Fact is... the corporate media does have an agenda that trends rightward. It might not be an explicit conspiracy, but the agenda is there and easy to see.
Our news, in pretty much every forum, comes from ad-based media. It's less than indepedent by its very definition.
thosethingswesay.blogspot.com
September 4, 2006 12:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
I really hope you're right that the increase in right wing propoganda and rhetoric is evidence of fear from their side. I kind of suspect you are right about that.
But I've been burned too many times to really believe it. The Republican strategy, even when they're in power, has long been to present themselves as somehow unfairly besieged. You see it when right-wing Christians, who are dominant in America, act like they're oppressed. The right has done a great job of presenting itself as an underdog when it's really in power.
They are getting nastier these days and that might signal panic on the right. But, acting oppressed has long been their successful game.
thosethingswesay.blogspot.com
September 4, 2006 12:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
I couldn't agree more...and I don't think it is a "conspiracy" per se either. It is just more corporations taking care of the "bottom line".
September 5, 2006 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink