TPMCafe
« More Unions | Home | How Not to Degrade Hizbullah »

Slanders

user-pic

Jeez. It's come to this. I need to defend Bush against unfair attacks from Andy McCarthy. At a press conference today, Bush said "Elected leaders cannot have one foot in the camp of democracy and one foot in the camp of terror." McCarthy goes on to slam him on the grounds that it is, in fact, possible for leaders to have one foot in each camp.

Speakers of the English language will, however, have no trouble seeing what the president was saying. I might say, for example, "you can't just go around misconstruing the president's statements." Obviously, though, you can do that just as McCarthy it. Bush was using "can" in a normative sense meaning something like "it's not acceptable for elected leaders to have one foot in the camp of democracy and one foot in the camp of terror."


6 Comments

| Leave a comment

Please allow me to be the very first person to ask why you might even begin to care.

It was not acceptable for President Reagan to have one foot in the terror in Nicaragua and one foot in the "democracy" of America.   It was not acceptable for President Johnson, et al to have one foot in the organized terror in Vietnam and one foot in the "democracy" of America.  Right?   And, of course, it isn't acceptable for President Bush to have one foot in the terror now going on in Iraq, and one foot in the "democracy" of America.  Ho hum. 

Hoppy in Sacramento

If I had to guess, I'd say it has something to do with Matt's previous philosophical training and the attention to linguistic distinctions that results from that.

Ignorant statements by the CinC, warrant just as ignorant responses...especially when simple questions like 'Mr. President, why did we go to Iraq?....do not merit a response.

Matthew is exactly right. Andy McCarthy is usually a pretty bright guy - but not yesterday. If you scroll up from McCarthy's statement, John Podhoretz makes pretty much the same point Matthew makes. (Of course, knowing that, Matthew may want to rethink!)

McCarthy is a pretty scary guy. I used to think he would agree with anything W said or did. Any torture, wiretapping, surveillance, disregard for the judiciary or legislature – anything at all W wants to do – is fine.

I was wrong. In reaction to an innocuous comment by W about democracy and terror, McCarthy pounds the table and froths at the mouth in apoplexy.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address