« Anti-Semitisim Lives! | Home | The Depressing Truth »

Israel Takes A Stupid Pill

user-pic

Apparently not content to let the U.S. do a self-immolation act in the Middle East by itself, Israel decided to set itself on fire by invading Lebanon. Burn baby burn? Like George Bush, Israel's Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, never served in a combat unit and launched military operations without thinking the matter through. In fact, Olmert reportedly never even served in the military. I raise this because there is one simple question Israel cannot answer about the current operations--what is their strategic military objective. Olmert has somehow persuaded the Israeli military to ignore strategy, think tactically, and in the process become really stupid. The events in the next several weeks will expose as myth the canard that you can secure a nation by killing terrorists. No you can't.

Killing "terrorists" has a place in policy but it is not a strategic military obective. It is a tactical objective and may serve political purposes, but achieves little in terms of securing Israel. Israel is attacking targets in Lebanon like a drunken sailor in a bar fight. Flailing about, causing significant damage, hitting innocent bystanders, and generally making a mess of things. This is not the Israeli military that pulled off the brilliant and daring raid at Entebbe.

What about Hamas and Hezbollah?

They are not terrorists. They carry out terrorist attacks, but they are not terrorists. They are something far more dangerous. They are fully functioning political, social, religious, and military organizations that use terrorism tactics, but they are far more formidible than terrorist groups like Al Qaeda or the Basque Terrorist Organization. They do have the resources and the personnel to project force, sustain operations, and cannot be easily defeated. Unlike the Egyptian and Syrian armies in 1973, Hamas and Hezbollah will not easily fold and cannot be defeated in a seven day war. If that is the assumption among some Israeli military planners it is a crazy fantasy.

While most folks in the United States buy into the Hollywood storyline of poor little Israel fighting for it's survival against big, bad Muslims, the reality unfolding on our TV screens shows something else. Exodus, starring Paul Newman, is ancient history. Hamas and Hezbollah attacked military targets--kidnapping soldiers on military patrols may be an act of war and a provocation, but it is not terrorism. (And yes, Hezbollah and Hamas have carried out terrorist attacks in the past against Israeli civilians. I'm not ignoring those acts, I condemn them, but we need to understand what the dynamics are right now.) Israel is not attacking the individuals who hit their soldiers. Israel is engaged in mass punishment.

How did Israel respond? They bombed civilian targets and civilian infrastructure and have killed many civilians. Let's see if I have this right. The Arab "terrorists" attack military units, destroy at least one tank, and are therefore terrorists. Israel retaliates by launching aerial, naval, and artillery bombardments of civilian areas and they are engaging in self-defense. If we are unable to recognize the hypocrisy of this construct then we ourselves are so enveloped by propaganda and emotion that, like the Israelis, Hezbollah, and Hamas, we can't think rationally. We can only think in terms of tribalism and revenge.

Iran, meanwhile, is sitting in the catbird's seat. They have a well-trained and highly competent surrogate force in Hezbollah. Hezbollah's successful attack on Friday on an Israeli naval vessel is a reminder that Hezbollah is not a bunch of crazy kids carrying RPGs and wearing flip flops. I would be willing to wager that at least one Iranian military advisor was helping Hezbollah launch the missile that hit the Israeli ship. But Iran is doing more than simply engage in tit-for-tat. They are thinking strategically.

The events unfolding in Iraq and Lebanon are going Tehran's way. The United States is being portrayed in the world media as someone who tolerates and excuses attacks on civilian populations. The perception becomes the reality and the ability of the United States to rally support among the Russians, the Chinese, and even the French becomes more impaired. We need the international community to deal effectively with nuclear proliferation in North Korea and Iran. Now, we will be bogged down trying to defend Israel from an angry international community.

In the past, the United States had enough credibility on both sides and kept enough of a distance during these blood fueds so that we could intervene and prevent the fighting from escalating into a gigantic war. It appears that there is no one in the Bush Administration who can step up and intervene to calm the situation. Hell, with John Bolton and Elliot Abrams leading the charge, we are Israel's enablers.

Former Senator Fred Thompson played a U.S. Navy Admiral in the Hunt for Red October. While speaking about escalating tensions as the United States and the Soviet Union chased a renegade submarine, he said:

This business will get out of control. It will get out of control and we'll be lucky to live through it.

Those words are relevant today. Let's hope and pray they don't come to pass.


196 Comments

| Leave a comment

I, for one, welcome a region wide Middle Eastern war. It only serves to help the United States.

Carefull Larry if you criticize Isreal Rosenberg will show up to call you ant anti semite who should join the Aryan Nations.

Good post, Larry
How about another one recommending a sane Israeli strategy?

I think there is actually some strategic thinking going on here, but it is not necessarily deep and grounded

Hezbollah is problematic to Israeli planners; they would like to see it removed from the border area and delegitimized as a political force in Lebanon; being to tight with Syria and Iran and too hostile.

Since the anti-Hezbollah political factions in Lebanon are weak and weary, Israel seeks to coerce them and also bolster them, into taking transformative action.
For example, a settlement could include a taking over of the border area by Lebanese govt forces, which means withdrawal of Hezbollah, and guarantees (carrot & stick) by Israel dissuading potential attackers of those govt forces.

Along the way to this sort of solution, if Syria and/or Iran get an enhanced bad-guy public image, then that also would please Israeli planners.

This parallels roughly the strategy in Gaza and West-Bank
Which is to promote an outcome where Hamas has been delegitimized politically, and the nexus of military/police force for Palestinians has moved back towards Fatah, PLO, etc.

What these strategies miss are 2 things.

For one, such transformations of power structures require a massive, long-term investment and are not accomplished by week-long mini-wars, unless all the tides of history are with you at that moment (which they are not).

Second, they are vying against a different model of power which is more nationalistic and national-community-based than factional.

Most Palestinians are not hard-core militants and activists of any faction; neither are most Lebanese.
They follow the leadership of factions in order to secure better outcomes for themselves; like strength, prosperity, security, services, connectivity, a future.

When you attempt to destroy the faction in these marginally developed areas, you are attacking the infrastructure of peoples' lives, with nothing left to replace the loss.
The UN can be called upon to ship in supplies, but that is different than the web of life provided by these social (and militant) movements.
It can take years to build an alternative.

So, again this type of transformation is not really viable unless history has brought some alternative movement and network close to the surface. One which embraces the ethnic and religious groups in question, that is a 'safe' choice for people.

Because of the history of Fatah/PLO leadership, people in Palestine wanted a change, they are weary of the past.
So, although they technically exist as an option, they would need to be reborn as something new.
Sadly, the agreement to join with Hamas in supporting documents pertaining to peace was perhaps the early point of such a birth.

Similarly in Lebanon; a replacement for Hezbollah must grow organically, and including them in the political process more and more tightly is probably the best way to grow that.

Strangely, and counter-intuitively, these types of attacks may bring greater unity of a sort in Palestine and Lebanon, which though being problematic in being anti-Israel, may be useful in eliciting more coherent national visions for those areas, and thus ultimately help produce neighbors which are more predictable and easier to relate with.
Still, it would be better to walk forward, open-eyed into the future, rather than being dragged forwards in a crazy fashion.

Sorry, but I have to call you an idiot. You obviouslly know nothing and from what I gather you dont care much for Jews. Let me go further and maybe you need and example: If Mexicans crossed the border and killed and kidnaped Texas police officers and demanded the release of Mexicans in US jails and the Mexican Goverment approved the action.....

If Mexico launched missles daily into the USA....

Please think before you write

First of all...you are all morons...and the idiot who wrote this article never lived in Israel so dont write anything about Olmert!! and i bet if your family was killed by a suicide bomber you would then change your view that Hamas is actually a terrorist group!!

Ruso you are the only smart guy here so thanks...the rest of you can just go to hell.

Part of Israel's overreaction might be to make people forget about the IDF's spectacular screwups of the last few days:

o The capture of Gilad Shalit

o The capture of two soldiers by Hezbollah plus the deaths of 3 others in the same operation. (Something Hezbollah had warned it would do for months.)

o Falling into a trap that led to the destruction of a tank and the deaths of all 4 of its occupants.

o "Forgetting" to turn on the detection/deflection system on one of its most advanced warships.

Is "heck of a job" Brownie running the IDF?

Ruso,
You will need to contact the Holocaust Museum and tell them to remove my name as a lifetime contributor. C'mon, waving the "anti-semite" flag is complete bullshit. Deal with the substance of the piece. A careful, intelligence reader would come to the conclusion that I'm saying Israel is shooting itself in the foot. This has nothing to do with Judaism. Grow up.

Then you're an idiot=)

For one who makes such sweeping statements, after less than 30 minutes as a member, you aren't getting off to a great start in reasoned conversation. Idiots, by psychological definition, can't write, so claiming a writer, misguided or not, is an idiot is a contradiction in terms.

You obviouslly don't spell well, and your grammar could use a bit of work. Let me go further and maybe you need and example...whoops, that was an example!

It might help to learn the difference of capabilities between missiles and light to medium artillery rockets, starting with the recognition that missles is an...interesting spelling.

--
Howard

*equal opportunity offense to both extremes*

Thanks israeili-girl for making my point. Your hysterical, emotional, over reaction and misrepresentation of my piece is exactly why Israel is bombing a civilian airport in Beirut rather than hitting the Hezbollah military forces who captured an Israelie soldier.

who the hell are you?!?
Israel has one of the best armies in the world and how the hell were they suppose to prevent gilad's and the other 2 kidnappings?

I'm really shocked that you would even attempt to write something like this and try to pass it off as something a sane person would write about.

Israel doing terrorist acts?

Lets see; Who has killed thousands of people in bus, car, and suicide bombings? Who kidnaps soldiers and says "Let 400 of our prisoners out" Who turns kids into suicide bombing machines? Hamas, Hezbollah, Hamas, Hezbollah, Hamas, Hamas, Hezbollah, Hezbollah. So, please refrain from even TRYING to say Israel is committing terrorist acts. They're blowing up key places that either house weapons, strategic commanders, bridges which bring in terrorists or weapons and areas at which Hezbollah house their weapons/ammunition/leaders. Those need to be destroyed or Israel will face more kidnappings, car bombings and bus bombings. They need to stand up and destroy these idiots. Hamas and Hezbollah have been in power for way too long.

and Iran thinking strategically? I have nothing but laughter to respond to that. Let's wait until they make their weapons and annihilate that region, okay? I think that would be best. Let's give Iran more time to construct a massive weapon onto a rocket and use it again Israel(most likely) Come on, Let's wait.

I'll be frank and honest. Israel was going to do this sooner or later. They've been raped by the Arabic community by their bombings and kidnappings. How much more suffering does Israel need to take in order to gain their respect? Seriously, Israel has never started fightings unless provoked. Would you let American families be taken over by Mexican immigrants, held captive and ransom? I just don't see what you're saying.

who the hell are you?!?
Israel has one of the best armies in the world and dumb ass, how the hell were they suppose to prevent gilad's and the other 2 kidnappings?

Well there are two hypotheses to entertain here.

The first takes some of today's Israeli statements at face value. This is an operation that has been planned for five years. Its aim is to (i) separate Hizbollah from the Lebanese government and population, by holding all of Lebanon collectively responsible for Hizbollah's actions, (ii) cut off Lebanon, and particularly Hizbollah from the possibility of resupply and re-arming by destroying ports, bridges and infrastructure and (iii) by these steps bring Hizbollah to its knees and force its disarmament, or destroy it utterly.

Israel claims that Hizbollah is a terrorist organization. Critics counter that Hizbollah is a legitimate political party in Lebanon that participates in the democratic Lebanese political process and Lebanese government. "Fine," says Israel, "then all of Lebanon is responsible for Hizbollah astrikes against Israel."

However, taking these aims at face value, this seems a bad strategy. Hizbollah's main claim to whatever support it enjoys outside its own Shiite community is its success in forcing Israel to withdraw from the last Israeli-Lebanese war. Invading Lebanon only seems to reinfoce Hizbollah's claim to a reason for existence. Also, israel will not be able to cut Hizbollah off entirely, and others will intervene on its behalf in various ways. It is unlikely to defeat Hizbollah through this operation - just as they were unable to defeat them before.

So, rather than assume Israel has just taken a stupid pill - or at least not this particular kind of stupid pill - I think we should entertain a hypothesis that is more depressing to contemplate, but assumes Israel knows exactly what it is doing:

The US and Israel seek to provoke Syrian and Iranian intervention in the Israel-Hizbollah conflict, to provide a causus belli for expanding the Middle East war from Iraq to at least those two countries. Israel is helping Bush with his political problems, and his Iran problem, and is executing the first stages of a coordinated political-military strategy that will lead ultmately to major US military operations against Iran and Syria, a rather large-scale war in the region, and a geopolitical realignment and settling of scores that will be in the end to the advantage Israel and the US - or so they hope - after much loss of life of course.

This is the start of the big one.

Ah yes. Not even to the 16 minute membership mark, and condemning all. It's
interesting that you make the same sort of spelling and grammatical errors as
your fellow new poster, Ruso.

The concept of hell isn't terribly threatening, if one doesn't believe it.
Hell is much more a Christian than a Jewish concept, anyway, so isn't that an
inappropriate metaphor given your suggested origin?

As far as not having lived in Israel, should all oncologists have cancer
before they diagnose others?

--
Howard

*equal opportunity offense to both extremes*

Killing hundreds, if not thousands, of human beings serves no ones interest, including ours.

I shall return the gentle greeting: who the hell are you?

How were they supposed to prevent kidnappings? I don't expect that they could; such things happen in war. There are reports that a couple of scout Humvees went into hostile territory without appropriate support -- in other words, their commander screwed up. That happens; it doesn't even mean that the commander shouldn't stay in his jobs.

Are you familiar with Just War theory? It contains a doctrine of proportional response. I hesitate before I will call destroying civil infrastructure, such as a power plant, a proportional response to kidnapping soldiers. Professional soldiers recognize that Bad Things can happen to them. There have been kidnapping of US troops in Iraq. Was the response by air and artillery equivalent to that of Israel? How is that response going to prevent further kidnappings in equivalent tactical situations?

--
Howard

*equal opportunity offense to both extremes*

Excuse me..
You Pro Palestinian, Anti-Semitic NAZI Son of a bitch!

So Israel is supposed to sit back and let the Arabs shit on them? The ONLY thing I critisize Israel for is for letting the US/UN tie it's hands in the past. This is Long over due.

They gave up the Gaza, and the Palistinians used it to attack them. (Within 30 days) Lebanon is little more than a front for Syria. Critizize Israel for kicking Palastine and Lebanon? Look at what the US did under the Guise of 9/11 and fighting terrorism - we are still fighting and killing the innocent (yes, along with the not so innocent). If Israel wanted to punish the civilan populations of Lebanon and or Palastine They'd Nuke 'em.

(Wasn't it Palastine And Lebanon that Cheered 9/11?!)

These people have been fighting for a LONG time. Just grab a bucket of popcorn and watch the show. A few civilian casulties are to be expected, Be happy Israel is being as careful as they have been. Wars are not nice clean operations - people die, Good and innocent people die.


"They are not terrorists. They carry out terrorist attacks, but they are not terrorists."

That is among the most ignorant statements it has ever been my misfortune to read. Especially comming from an Anti-Terrorism expert such as yourself.

With you being an ex-spook (CIA) I would have figured that You'd know better. Or perhaps it's because of jackasses like you that the world is in the lousy shape it is in now. Man, we gotta get rid of these Autonomons in our government and replace them with something more human posessing something more capable of unique thought. Prison is a club for Criminals, they don't fear it, they fear Physical retribution. (Of Cource leave it to the US to Ignore the GENEVA CONVENTION - Ref. Guitanamo)

Am I detecting a slight trace of defensiveness in your comment?

Calm down babydoll. Of course, you're right. It's perfectly OK for an army to get its soldiers kidnapped and for its tanks to fall into traps. I call it fine soldiering. Maybe a promotion for the unit's commander? What do you think?

Carl,
What an anti-mensch you are. Try dealing with substance rather than overreact and misstate what I wrote. I said, if you would take time to read, that Hezbollah and Hamas were something more dangerous than just being simple terrorists. Do you understand that or is it an intellectual point too complicated for you?

Be sure to contact the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum and inform them that Larry C Johnson, Member since Ocotber 8, 1993 is actually a Nazi anti-semite. Bet you I'm the first one of them to send the Museum money every year for the last 13 years.

Ah, another poster with less than one hour's tenure in TPMcafe, clearly equipping him to judge local customs of expression and civility. Now, out on the deck, there are three sons of bitches and one daughter of a bitch. Other than barking a bit much, and the 90 pound puppy not knowing his own strength, they are loyal, ethical, and affectionate.

Your grammar and spelling mirror those of several other recently joined posters. Could it be that all are avatars of one being?

Would you care to cite the particular sections of the Hague and Geneva Conventions with which Guantanamo is in conflict -- and there are some? Of course, that would open up discussion of Israeli compliance with the customary rules of war. See, in particular, Fourth Geneva Convention, Parts II and III.

--
Howard

*equal opportunity offense to both extremes*

Sorry for troll-rating your comment but the name calling is intolerable. Calling Larry or any other posters or commenters Nazis or morons is simply unacceptable.

I've been on this blog from the start and I've always appreciated the fact that people express their opinions very strongly but always in a civil manner. Please do likewise or go vent your frustrations somewhere else.

hcberkowitz - yes, next time I will use spell check before I post, sorry I suffer from Dyslexia.

I might add that your statement that I should learn the difference between missiles and artillery rockets is quite riduculous. They are both missiles PERIOD. A missile in you sense might miss and the small rockets might hit and kill dozens!!! You sound like a anal retentive attorney, Ok lets call them all projectiles. They are aimed, shot and fly thru the air and are designed to kill.

That example probably made sense to the writer who fails to understand the situation. I ask you simple questions. Why are there bomb shelters all over north Israel and why has Hezbollah been loading up with arms for the last 10 years right on the Israeli border?

These insanely abrasive negative comments actually do an excellent job of highlighting Josh's general point on the front page and here. The point being that the conservative elements of American Jewish community will simply not tolerate 1 iota of dissent on the topic of Israel.

This is irrelevent to the discussion, but for the record, I am a Jew, I have lived in Israel, and members of my extended family were killed in the holocaust. I will not be bullied into silence over Israel, and no one has the right or the moral authority to tell me to be quiet.

The offensive in Lebanon is stupid, wasteful, ineffective, and quite frankly cowardly. The poster has every right to point this out. The Israelis are in a literal sense trading civilian lives to minimize their own military casualties, because they are unwilling to take the casualties it would require to dislodge Hezbollah.

For all the flack Israel took for Jenin, most honest observers including many Arabs had to concede that Israel struck a military target, engaged the enemy on the ground, fought hard, took casualties, and won. That is how you fight a war and win respect. You demonstrate that your goals are important enough to warrant your casualties. If there are military threats that are unacceptable, you commit your men to the task, you attack the threat direcdtly and you eliminate it.

Call the substitution of collective punishment for the dirty, messy, dangerous but dignified job warfare what it is; cowardice.

Sharon would understand that Israel is demonstrating its weakness to Hezbollah, not its strength. Hezbollah will lbe emboldened and delighted to realize that the IDF is afraid to engage them on the battlefield. Isn't that what Hezbollah has been saying about the IDF for years?

Israel has a well trained and effective army, Hezbollah is a real threat and the goal to eliminate them is worthy. I’d advise Israel to stop killing civilians get to work fighting their enemy.

Not sure I follow you. I think that behind the public acquiescence Condi and Co must be fit to be tied. There goes the ONLY success story of this administration in the region, ie, the desyrianization/democratization of Lebanon.

Ah. More lectures who have joined the thread with about an hour's familiarity with the discussion. Complete with ad hominems about anal-retentive lawyers. Sir, I enjoy eating shark fin; don't confuse me with a cannabalistic lawyer.

Since you apparently don't understand the difference between unguided artillery rockets used in single launches, and precision guided missiles, how do you know if the difference is important or not? Your words A missile in you sense might miss and the small rockets might hit and kill dozens!!! are incomprehensible, so I can't really comment.

While I am an associate member of the American Bar Association, I've never been an attorney, and my bowels are just fine, thank you. My ABA involvement tends to be in information security, privacy, and medical law.

Attorneys, indeed, might not know the difference between the AGM-114 Hellfire II, precision guided bombs, and 82 or 132mm Katyushas. Use of the latter, which hit randomly in two-kilometer circles, is a war crime when used against residential. Use of precision guided weapons against civilian infrastructure is also a war crime. See Parts II and III of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Why are there bomb shelters all over north Israel? Because it is being shelled and bombed. Why has Hezbollah been loading up with arms? To attack Israel for the purpose of affecting Israeli policies, just as Israel attacks Hamas and Hezbollah areas in an attempt to affect their policies. Neither approach works very well, does it?

--
Howard

*equal opportunity offense to both extremes*

I never know entirely what to think about these stories of good, diplomatic Condi vs. the crazy hawks. But in any case, I think Cheney is still in charge of foreign in this administration.

And I think the whole "Olmert told Condi to back off" story might be just for show.

Good point.

Haaretz keeps highlighting the "lessons" of the confrontation, i.e., that Hezbollah has even more sophisticated weaponry than previously thought. Oy...

I wish Hezbollah would go away, but the reality is that no one, not even Israel, can destroy it.
(Which is why I thought Rosenberg's post was well meaning but naive.)

So here's my prediction: in a few days/weeks, Israel will negotiate a release of prisoners with the usual 1 to 100 ratio.

That's the best case scenario. The worst case being... well, let's not go there.

PS That will give a few days for Bush and Olmert to explain why we don't negotiate with terrorists while we... negotiate with terrorists.

Being goymin I haven't heard the word mensch in a while...

Seems I Owe you some what of an appologe.

In Skimming your article I saw:

They are not terrorists. They carry out terrorist attacks, but they are not terrorists.
Unfortunately I didn't see the Rest of the paragraph - It seemed rather obvious where it was going.

Then I see:


How did Israel respond? They bombed civilian targets and civilian infrastructure and have killed many civilians.

After reading those lovely Quips There didn't seem to be a lot of reason of read the rest. It seemed quite apparent that you were rather anti-sematic.

noblesseoblige: Troll rating may be deserved - and I was biting my tounge as I know there are young'uns that may visit here.
hcberkowitz: I never could speal (spell?)... Took me a while to discern between fruition and fruiton. (English teachers always loved me) One of the reasons I never went into Law.

Geneva Convention Link
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/15016260.htm

I guess, against all reason, I am trying to stay optimistic... :-)

I absolutely agree. I just can't understand the military strategy on the part of Israel. If the agenda is to get their kidnapped soldiers back, I can't think of a worse possible route to accomplish that. It's amazing to me that a nation that was able to hunt down Eichmann from a world away is unable to strategically target and destroy Hezbollah. I do know that destroying Lebanon isn't going to do it.

Larry

I meant economically it will help the United States. A devastated Middle East will come to rely on the suddenly emergent American companies that sprout-up like dandilions in the springtime. What's more, a wrecked oil supply would allow us a reason to shift away from this barbaric petrolium paradigm that we're stuck in. Even Al Gore can appreciate that.

As I figure you know, The "Kidnaping" bit is nothing more than an excuse. They can't say that they ar POW's as there was no "Official" declaration of War.

It's simply a matter of Israel getting fed up with the Bull they are getting from Hezbollah sponsored Palastine.

Personally I think Sharon should be Stoned for selling out Israel in the first place.


___
Rude, Crude, And Socially Unacceptable
(Until Atleast 5pm)

The term is "GOYIM" I think.

So my Jewish friend who e-mailed me awhile ago making some of the same points Larry is making is also a "Pro-Palestinian, Anti-Semitic Nazi Son of a Bitch"? I think not. I think she is a person who thinks that Israel is making a mistake in the tactics it is using.

Tom

Thanks, yes you're right. Scenario 1. They will negotiate, there will be an exchange and this will end. The point of this Israel will say was to show Hezbollah the consequences of aggresive action . . . by killing secular civilians in Beirut of course.

Scenario 2. They really mean it, they want the war with Iran now, and they ar preparing for it. Horrfying I know, but its hard not to think about it. If my objective was to prevent someone from moving an army through Syria and into northern Israel, I might blow up some bridges and target power stations too.

Was it you who wrote down below something like its bad if Israel doesn't know what it's doing but its even worse if they know exactly what they're doing. That's exactly right.

No, Sharon was right. Real separation, a barrier, and the ability to respond to attacks by going after states, not organizations is pretty much the only game plan to real long term security. Its just it takes a pretty shrewd and tough manipulator to pull it off. Sharon could have done it. Olmert does not appear to have the same set of skills.

My understanding, and I'm no expert certainly, is that it's Hamas in Gaza and the West Bank. Hezbollah is Lebanon, Syria and Iran. It seems to me that the approach being used by Israel only serves to embolden these groups. Hezbollah, in particular, has lost a lot of power since Israel left Lebanon. Their recent actions seem to be a concerted effort to provoke Israel into doing exactly what their doing which enhances Hezbollah's prestige in a good part of the Arab world. I don't condone what Hamas and Hezbollah have done but I do question the strategic thinking of the Israeli government.