"This Silence is Hurting People": Who are the Real Abusers of Bankruptcy Law and how are they Getting Away with it?
Much has been written on The Warren Reports about bankruptcy legislation that has been passed under the guise of curbing purported abuse by consumers. As stories of unkept pension promises are splashed across the daily newspapers, one sadly realizes that the most disturbing abuses of the bankruptcy system have been left unaddressed and that the reforms that truly matter to middle class Americans have not yet been made.
Journalist Mark Reutter is an expert on corporate abuse of bankruptcy law. I asked him whether he would be willing to share his views on the flaws of Chapter 11 with The Warren Reports. He kindly submitted the thoughtful text below for our consideration.
In his October editorial editorial, Mr. Reutter used the Delphi bankruptcy hearings to illustrate his view that federal bankruptcy court, which was "once shunned by respectable companies and ignored by Wall Street...has become the venue of choice for sophisticated financiers and corporate managers seeking to pull apart labor contracts and roll back health and welfare programs at troubled companies." It was after reading that editorial that I first contacted Mr. Reutter. He recently responded with these insights:
"Remember, when a company files under Chapter 11, it is legally protected from creditors as it devises a plan to restructure its capital structure and rehabilitate its operations. The idea is that an otherwise viable company, faced with terrible bad luck or an unexpected external event, is given breathing space by the law to start anew. But what has happened is that some companies and investors are using bankruptcy procedures to slash jobs, wages, and benefits and dumping underfunded corporate pensions into the lap of the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.
"This trend began in 2001 in the steel industry, then jumped to the airline industry – where today, three of the seven major carriers are in Chapter 11 – and is now spreading to the auto-parts industry. The bankruptcy filing of auto-parts maker Delphi Corp. [on October 8, 2005] is the latest example...
"[While Chapter 11 is a product of the New Deal,]the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 was the watershed event. It expanded management’s right to file an exclusive plan for Chapter 11 reorganization with no practical input from other stakeholders. Creditors and employees were essentially frozen out of the process.
"On the other hand, corporate lawyers and top accounting firms set up thriving bankruptcy and restructuring practices. They were delighted to advise management on how to 'mop up' all sorts of pre-bankruptcy claims and problems as part of the reorganization plan. Chapter 11 proceedings became highly complex and drawn out, and the fees for advice – $100-$200 million in a major case – were conveniently charged back to the bankrupt company’s estate...
"Meanwhile, fair-minded people might think [that employee pensions should be considered as future benefits rather than the past debts from which bankrupt companies can be protected], but bankruptcy case law doesn’t think so. Today, a company can use the court reorganization process not only to circumvent collective bargaining, but to sidestep environmental consent decrees and force the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp. to take over underfunded company pensions. The PBGC, for example, was forced to cover $4.3 billion in net losses from Beth Steel. And the United Airlines bankruptcy left it with about $6-$7 billion to cover...
"Congress should hold hearings on the misuse of Chapter 11 bankruptcy to void employee contracts and retiree obligations, while lining the pockets of a few insiders. But both political parties don’t want to talk about it. In Maryland, where Bethlehem Steel used to be the largest private employer, the two Democratic Senators – Paul Sarbanes and Barbara Mikulski – have ducked the issue as vigorously as has Republican Gov. Bob Ehrlich, whose prior day job was representing the communities surrounding the Beth Steel mill in Congress.
"In my book 'Making Steel,' I refer to this phenomenon as a 'bipartisan show of silence.' This silence is hurting people. In Maryland alone, 20,000 retired steelworkers and widows lost substantial employer-based health benefits as a result of Beth’s Chapter 11 proceeding. Many of them are sick. Many of them suffer from heart disease. Some are on respirators. They are now forced to pay $10,000-$20,000 a year in premiums and co-payments for private health insurance, or to rely on Medicare, or are simply left to die from lack of medical attention...
"Regarding infrastructure, any move in that direction is beneficial. There is this shortsighted mindset among mainstream 'talking heads' that we needn’t care about such unsexy subjects as infrastructure and industry. China is spending hundreds of billions of dollars on new railroad lines and highways. Steelmaking capacity has been greatly enlarged and modernized. While China builds up her basic industries, we bankrupt ours."
(Mr. Reutter issued an original variation of the above statements in a November interview with Executive Intelligence Review. He thoroughly updated that transcript and provided it to us to post here. The complete version is available here.)















See this post, on Moore and nukes
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/4/16/05244/7609
April 17, 2006 7:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't see how that link has any relevance whatsoever to what I posted.
April 17, 2006 9:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
The sad thing is that no one outside a very few seems concerned at all about Chapter 11 abuse. Employees, and retirees are the primary targets. Except for a few academics and even fewer labor leaders nobody cares at all about retirees. Members of Congress sure don't. Why should they, retirees abused by abusive Chapter 11 plans don't pay to play.
This is all very new. A generation ago executives would have sooner committed suicide than betrayed the trust of their retired employees. Maybe if executive pay and retirement packages were under the axe along with the pay and pension of the secretary or assembly line worker there would be less incentive for such abuse.
Ron Byers
April 17, 2006 6:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm with you Ron. If these CEOs with the platinum salarys and parachutes had a oz. of Honor left this would not be happening. The other problem is the Unions, once the protector of the worker turned into a giant ins. scram, where they charged dues for protection they quit providing. If the Unions had done their jobs this Bankrupty Law wouls have never been passed. Hell, the Unions them selves may use this same law to get out of it's pension fund costs. Look at the latest Airline deal in the news lately. In the last 2 Union deals for the Pilots, the Unions lost them Half of thier wages ! Doin a heck of a job wouldn't you say ? Colgate has decided to close a plant and move it to Mex. to save money, But the CEO had a package deal/bonus of over 420 mill. dollars. They could of kept that plant in the State, given everyone a raise, full health and a pension for probably 20 yrs on that same money.
April 18, 2006 3:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
This post does not even get into the issue of Executives who take large payments just before filing bankruptcy. If a consumer bankruptcy had done something similar, they would be cited for abuse and possibly prosecuted.
As for Mr. Byers comment about CEOs not letting their workers lose everything, that is not completely true. But I get the point. There does seem to have been a loss of values in this country -- and it is not the kind that the Christian Right has been talking about. There used to be a greater sense of community and obligation for your fellow man back in my parent's day; at least, that is the impression I get.
Back on the bankruptcy topic, a lot of companies are now using chapter 11 bankruptcy as a financial planning tool to maximize profit. Long term financial planning would have told the executives of any company that retirement funds are a labor cost that is a cost of doing business. In a chapter 7 or 13 bankruptcy, wages owed to employees are "priority" debts that must be paid in full. If we were going to do Justice, we should require that retirement pensions be treated the same. If we had a national health care system, the cost of providing care would be spread to all members of the workforce and tax base. The amount of money saved from people not having to file bankruptcy would probably save the country trillions of dollars.
By the way, most major chapter 11 bankruptcies are filed in a particular district in New York. I forget what the reason is, but it somehow gives them a distinct advantage; this is another planning tool that is not available to consumer debtors in chapter 7 or 13 cases.
Find the Truth. Do Justice.
April 18, 2006 4:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Re: In a chapter 7 or 13 bankruptcy, wages owed to employees are "priority" debts that must be paid in full.
This is also true in a chapter 11 (my former employer is going through chapter 11 right now so I have occasion to know the details of these things). Any unpaid wages, benefits, vacation time etc. going back 180 days from the date of filing is a priority debt; in fact it is third on the list after filing and attorney fees and unpaid taxes.
Of course this does not apply to FUTURE obligations like pensions and healthcare promises to workers not yet retired.
April 18, 2006 6:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I went through the loss of a small business with 21 employees and $6 mil. in annual sales. What I found is that the small business owner gets hit the hardest with corporate regulations. The only opportunity to recoup personal losses is before the poop hits the fan, at least 90 days before you file bankruptcy. With some situations it is 6 months. Anything within that time frame can be recalled by the bankruptcy court. They can also recall payments you made to vendors in that time period if the court believes you gave preferential treatment. So if you are a small business with a large corporate customer that goes bankrupt, you could be driven into great financial distress by their recall of payments, punished for having tighter collection policies than their other vendors.
The large corporations know all these loopholes and use them for great personal profit, because they see things happening 6 months out. We could make the regulations tighter, but the ones who would suffer the most are the small business owners. There is less money involved in a small business, and greater personal sacrifice and risk with the small business owner.
What needs to change is that we need to start using a little common sense. Executives of large corporations (corporate officers particularly) need to be reprimanded when they run a company in the ground by reducing their compensation to a reasonable amount (no more than $200,000 for the past year, for example, or for the past 5 years when the executive's compensation is above $500K a year) and recall the difference from the executive themselves. These million dollar compensation packages in companies going through bankruptcy should be illegal. That way small business owners aren't driven to personal bankruptcy for the corporation they own, just because the same rules apply to them as to large corporations, and it allows larger corporations to be more closely regulated so that no few executives creatively loot before a company's failure. However, small business owners are proving to be just as unethical in failing companies. Judges need to pay closer attention to the intentions demonstrated by the executive.
Chapter 11 can save jobs, but when it is abused it does more harm than good. However, it has become very apparent to me that congress is more concerned about the almost non-existent abuse by private individuals than by corporate executives. Only congress can label a new law as a consumer protection, while it actually rapes the consumer. What a great country, huh?
Jim Anderson
www.lighthouseonline.net
April 18, 2006 7:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
The amount of money extracted by the lawyers and financiers as they circle the corporate corpse is a disgrace. Worse yet are the bankrupt company's grasping executives who, having destroyed the company, are now permitted to stay in charge and to bring it out of bankruptcy with large pay packages.
That said, Chapter 11 does not seem to harm the company's employees more than would strict bankruptcy. In both cases the PBGC takes over the pension plan's funds. And in both cases the employees' future benefits are wiped out.
The more important consideration is Chapter 11's effect on the workers of other companies. By permitting the bankrupt company to discharge its future obligations but still stay in business, the law makes the out-of-bankruptcy company highly competitive and compels its competitors to cut wages and benefits, also, if those companies expect to be able to survive. Jobs are saved but at what cost.
April 18, 2006 8:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, and that is exactly my point. As future pension benefits represent a kind of promise of future wages to be paid to the worker in retirement, such funds should all be turned over to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation for the benefit of the workers. It should not be available for other unsecured creditors.
Also, there is a rule in corporate law that the corporate veil can be pierced where a corporation is "undercapitalized" as well as for other reasons. What this means is that under the right circumstances, the officers, directors and trustees can be held personally responsible for the debts of the corporation. When there is willful or reckless malfeasance or mismanagement that leads a company into bankruptcy, a rule needs to be developed that allows for those responsible to be forced into personal bankruptcy themselves. I am certain that if we implented such a rule in many of these large corporate bankruptcies, then there would be fewer of them and corporate officers would be less enthusiastic of using the bankruptcy code to strip workers of their pensions and health benefits.
Find the Truth. Do Justice.
April 18, 2006 10:29 PM | Reply | Permalink