The Salah Gosh Test
Yesterday, the American Prospect, where I work, exclusively obtained a confidential UN document that identifies the 17 individuals most responsible for war crimes in Darfur. One man named is Salah Gosh, who is the head of Sudan's National Security and Intelligence Service and often credited with devising Khartoum's strategy of counterinsurgenc y-by-genocide in Darfur.
Gosh is also a known intelleigence asset to the CIA. (Ken Silverstein of the LA Times broke that story last April.) And now that he has been officially identified as violating a prior UN security council resolution ordering him to cease committing war crimes, he is liable to be subjected to targeted sanctions and a travel ban. Which, for one, might make it harder for the CIA to fly him down to Langley as Silverstein reported.
Here are the first few grafs of my prospect piece on the subject. Below the fold are a few more excerpted paragraphs, but you have to click over to the Prospect to read the article in full:
How important is a war-on-terror intelligence asset—important enough that his clear complicity in genocide should be overlooked? That’s the question raised by the presence of a name on some United Nations documents just obtained exclusively by the Prospect .
Here’s the story. After many long months of international paralysis on Darfur, the first two weeks of February have seen a flurry of activity that may presage a new global effort to confront the ongoing genocide there. U.S. Ambassador to the UN John Bolton pledged to use the month of February, when America has the presidency of the Security Council, to move “fast” and “far” on Darfur.
And on February 6, the 15-member council unanimously supported a U.S. decision to start planning for a possible UN peace-keeping force in the region. A week later, Kofi Annan traveled to the White House to discuss Darfur with President George W. Bush. Three days after that, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that she wanted the Security Council to vote to send peace-keepers to the region in the near future. So it would seem that backed by American leadership, the UN is finally pressing ahead on Darfur.
But before we heap hosannas on the Bush administration for its newfound resolve, let’s wait until the Security Council comes out with a list of names of Sudanese individuals to be placed under sanction for their role in the genocide. For that moment will be the real test of the Bush administration’s determination to prevent the further destruction of Darfur and to hold accountable those guilty of plotting and carrying out the genocide.
To see the article in full, click over to the article here or visit the home-page: www.prospect.org

















How valuable can he be as a CIA "asset" if the whole world knows he is one? It boggles the mind how incompetent every branch of the U.S. government is, including the CIA. I mean, is there any possibility they're getting their money's worth with this war criminal?
Not that being taken for a ride -- make that about a dozen round-the-world road trips -- by Chalabi ever stopped these intelligence "pros" from writing another check.
February 19, 2006 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is a smart blog. I mean it. You have so much knowledge about this issue, and so much passion. You also know how to make people rally behind it, obviously from the responses. Youve got a design here thats not too flashy, but makes a statement as big as what youre saying. Great job,children health indeed.
January 14, 2011 11:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder how do you in US define crimes and criminals?? How Salah Gosh is oneday a Criminal and another day an ally ?? For millions of my country folks -Sudan- he is a criminal from day one while for you and your institutions that is not the case ..Gosh is not the first test or the last ..Earlier US has allies who are now enemies for which your troops have been mobilzed to fight in thousands and billions of US money is being spent accordingly??I do assume that the only SuperPower institutions shouldn't be subject to partisan differences and who is there at the Oval Office ..If that's not the case then it is a real crisis!!!!! and you shall be dragging all the world to a chaotic situation if not already!!
February 24, 2006 9:19 PM | Reply | Permalink