« Statement from Paul Hackett | Home | Fatah's Counting Problem »

Who's In Charge?

user-pic

There are many intriguing aspects concerning the story about the Veep who couldn’t shoot straight, but one that caught my attention was this from today’s WaPo:

… the White House rarely imposes its practices, especially on press matters, on Cheney. The vice president's office often operates autonomously in a manner that many top White House officials are reluctant to challenge. 

Doesn’t the White House realize that Cheney’s office is part of the Executive Office of the President? Yet somehow the Veep’s office can “operate autonomously” within the same White House of which it is an integral part.

So rather than focusing on the timing and manner of when the shooting incident was made public (which seems to have riled up much the mainstream media), the real question to ask is: Why does the president continue to allow a rogue operation within his own White House?  And it isn’t just press matters we’re talking about. It also involves the politicization of intelligence, the leaking of classified information, energy policy and other serious matters of state. Or, perhaps, the president is somehow in on Cheney’s shenanigans and we’re just not supposed to know?


11 Comments

| Leave a comment

Wait....there are people that don't know...?

J. McCutchen "JmacSF"

San Francisco. CA

 

 

Cheney knows where all the bodies are buried. He buried them.  Bush better let him do whatever in the hell he wants or else Democrats might start asking questions....no?

 

Why U.S. Intelligence Failed, Redux
By Robert Parry
By Robert Parry


Paul Pillar, the CIA's senior intelligence analyst for the Middle East from 2000 to 2005, has written a critique of the Bush administration's handling of pre-war intelligence on Iraq that, in effect, corroborates the British “Downing Street Memo” in accusing the Bush administration of rigging the evidence to justify the invasion.
....

Unlike the fictional president in Tom Clancy's “Sum of All Fears” – who was tricked into that “really bad information” – Bush and his team have actively sought out the bad information and assembled it as justification for going to war. This administration, which can sometimes act in a manner stranger-than-fiction, didn't just peer into the fog of war. It set up the fog machine.
 




Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek.


Are the any who wonder why Pat Roberts tried to kill the Senate's investigation into Bush's use of intelligence - until the Democrats stopped the coverup, he almost suceeded.

I am not sure CheneyBush still won't. RU?  With oppositon like this, do they need friends like Pat Roberts?

If they're trying to hide something, they've something to hide

 

 

 

 

Is there any doubt that Cheney runs the White House? Is it even a surprise?  He ordered the planes shot down on 9/11, no? He worked up the WMD intel.

 

Bush's defining moment was reading "Pet Goat" while the towers burned.

 

I"m assuming you're asking these questions rhetorically, but I'm not even sure these are good questions for Dems to ask in a political context. We all know the answer.

 

Dissent Protects Democracy

I want to know why it is acceptable for Cheney and Whittington to be able to run around on unofficial business at a ranch in Texas for weekends with two younger women who were not their wives? Different set of values I guess. Where was Mrs. Cheney? What were these geezers doing with these two women? Something isn't right with this picture.

The real question is why Cheney tolerates a rougue element in his administration, one that often embarrasses him with public goofs, often doesnt seem aware of current events, and has trouble remembering the talking points. He should just fire Bush and appoint a new figure-head...

Someone said a fool is someone who doesn't suspect himself.  Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld are fools.  They run all over the place creating havoc and destruction, devastation, disaster, catastrophe, and shambles and wonder what happen.  A fool is someone who doesn't suspect himself.

Have the Democrats really stopped the coverup?  Last thing I heard about the investigation was when Harry Ried closed the Senate to get the hearing back on track.  I'm not convinced that Reid's stunt was anything more than political theater.

It will be interesting to see how Bush and Cheney respond now that the hunting accident has gotten serious--or now that the seriousness of the event has emerged.  Will Bush force Cheney to make a public "mea culpa"?  Cheney's behavior up to now suggests not, but perhaps his hangover will lift enough for him to see the incredible damage he's doing to their operation. 

 

The presidency has always seemd more like a triumvirate (Cheney-Rove-Bush) rather than a traditional presidency.  Bush seems happy just to have credit for being the president, while the other two enjoy wielding power behind the scenes. 

 

Both Cheney and Rove have gotten carried away with their power, but it's probably be too late for Bush to effectively assert dominance even if he wants to.  The White House is filled with blindered flunkies who can't really help him.  As JmacSF says, Cheney knows too much--they're all afraid to anger him.  Why, he could probably tell us the real story of Bush's astonishing pretzel incident.

Indeed. Where is "Phase II," and what are the odds of it ever seeing the light of day, if it is ever completed?

Type <failure> into Google, and then press 'I feel Lucky' and see what you get.

 

Bush is a failure and just a carnival barker for a bunch of very sick people, neo-cons, Cheney et.al. Vonnegut calls them psychopathic personalities. They care not how many they kill or ruin, including the 78 year old in Texas or the charnel house of Iraq. Vonnegut compares them to Kenny Boy Lay, a man who can ruin a huge company and the livelihoods of tens of thousands of workers and investors, and show no remorse.

J. McCutchen "JmacSF"

San Francisco. CA

Have the Democrats really stopped the coverup?

I have my doubts too. Seeing is believing. I don't trust em. Too much vested interest in Preemptive Wars and the lies that led to this one. On the other hand, if they know what's good for em, they'd get right with God and that right soon

 

The Democratic party is one Iranian smart bomb target away from the dustbin of history.

Note to Usual Suspects- Bring on the One's

Leave a comment

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »

Inside Cafe



Cafe Features


January 5-9

Book Cover

January 12-16

Book Cover

January 19-23

Book Cover

January 26-30

Book Cover

February 2-6

Book Cover

February 9-13

The Great Depression

February 16-20

Tear Down This Myth

February 23-27

Demagogue

March 16-20

Engaging The Muslim World




Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Claire Wilcox



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address