Three quick thoughts about the Hamas victory
1) With the emergence of a democratically elected terrorist government, Bush will probably have a delicate paragraph to write in his State of the Union speech next week.
2) Actually, the President must also be breathing a bit easier: now he has an excuse not to get involved in any Middle East peace negotiations until the end of his mandate, something that he has already been avoiding for the past 5 years.
3) In the short term, the election of Hamas is more puzzling for Europe than for the United States: since Europeans finance the Palestinian Authority, they are on the front line for coping with the new mess.












Besides, even if Hamas leadership were to instigate a renewed orgy of violence, how much would it change the reality on the ground if we didn't denounce them until after it actually occured?
http://abuaardvark.typepad.com/abuaardvark/2006/01/hamas_tests_ac o.html
January 26, 2006 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Even if democracy were achieved in the Middle East, what kind of governments would it produce? Would they cooperate with the United States on important policy objectives besides curbing terrorism, such as advancing the Arab-Israeli peace process, maintaining security in the Persian Gulf, and ensuring steady supplies of oil? No one can predict the course a new democracy will take, but based on public opinion surveys and recent elections in the Arab world, the advent of democracy there seems likely to produce new Islamist governments that would be much less willing to cooperate with the United States than are the current authoritarian rulers."
F. Gregory Gause, Foreign Affairs, September/October 2005
He sounds rather prescient today, eh?
January 26, 2006 2:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I found myself with two quick -questions about the Hamas victory.
If our intelligence agencies are, thanks to our glorious leader, so efficient now, why didn't they anticipate Hamas' win?
Aren't we a little jealous of Palestinians who just soundly and democratically defeated a corrupt party? Don't we wish we could?
January 26, 2006 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let me be the first to be damned for saying: good for Hamas. This victory was a great step forward for Palestine.
Fatah was a disaster for Palestine, it had become incredibly corrupt.
Fatah was a disaster for both Palestine and Israel, it could not excercise power in Palestine and could not offer any meaningful concessions to Israel anyway, since it did not control the Palestinian streets.
Fatah was a disaster for international relations with Palestine. The US and Europe were dumping money and resources down the bottomless well of supporting a corrupt party (the US spent $2 million oh Fatah propaganda in this election). Now, perhaps that money can go to improving life in Palestine, and thus reduce the extremism that hopelessness breeds.
Fatah was a disaster for Fatah. Now, without any power left to cling to (and perhaps no place in government at all), it can abandon its corrupt ways. Fatah must reform itself and offer Palestine a secular way forward, or it will wither and die.
Predictions:
1) The US and Israel will claim there is "no partner for peace." Big Change.
2) Israel will respond to any Hamas offers of truce or talks with assassinations. Big Change.
3) The US will use extremism in Palestine to back off from any deal that Israel doesn't fully support. Big Change.
4) Instead of using Hamas to undermine Fatah, Israel will use Fatah to undermine Hamas. This actually is a big change. And so, let me be the first to congratulate Marwan Barghouti on his upcoming freedom.
January 26, 2006 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bush states that he won't deal with a party that espouses terrorism. But isn't the Al-Aqsa Martyr Brigade - certainly the highest-profile terrorist organization in Palestine currently - a faction of the Fatah movement?
January 26, 2006 4:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'll start by saying I am totally stunned by the result. I think I agree, though - it's really important for everyone to calm down and force Hamas to deal with the fact that they are no longer in the luxurious position of heckling from the outside. Anything that helps Hamas out with that dilemma right now is probably a bad thing (i.e., don't help them decide what to do themselves by declaring full-blown opposition, and on the other hand don't help them decide what to do by saying for certain that funds to the PA will be kept going no matter what).
Sometimes to achieve dramatic breakthroughs, it is necessary for everything to balance on a knife's edge. I have no real reason to believe this, but I actually think there's a small chance that this will be just the kind of shake-up needed to force the two sides of the Arab-Israeli conflict to final settlements...
January 26, 2006 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
The most suprising thing about this Hamas victory is hearing all our Middle East pundits say how surprised they were by it. Shows how little our so-called pundits really know. Maybe this is why our policies in the Middle East have been so ineffective?
January 26, 2006 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
You don't have to be a writer in Foreign Affairs to know this stuff.
You just have to be well-informed.
January 26, 2006 5:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
So are they phonies, on the take, or what?
Why would any Arab population not vote against anyone they perceive as being catspaws of the USA?
You can pretty much count on this for the next generation.
January 26, 2006 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
With our blessing, Israel turn the lives of the Palestinians to hell and now -- SURPRISE!
I would comment more, but I am in 100% agreement with weasel.
By the way, Palestinians counted their votes in one day, Iraqis needed more than a month. USA seems a tab deficient as a midwife of democracy. (Related news: NYT describes some details how Kurdistan is run as a police state, cmplete with its own secret police. This is the most democratic part of Iraq. Hmph.)
January 26, 2006 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Two cheers for Sharon
January 26, 2006 6:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have a Christian PAL friend, several in fact, but this one fella I spoke with on Sunday about the WaPo article on USAID funding Fatah's campaign. Not news to him. "Did you know that the concrete supplier for the Wall is Fatah, receiving bonus monies to furnish redi-mix to the Israelis"
Whne Bush blustered, Hamas's response was classic:
Hamas's rejoinder is great.
We don't have time to negotiate and why should we? We just get screwed. If Israel concedes something up front, maybe we will talk ...Until then, we're cleaning up corruption
Just like Bush wanted!
Better be careful what you pray for..Allah might just give it to you
January 26, 2006 6:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ain't democracy great!
Maybe Bush should try Rand-McNally next time he's in the market for a roadmap
January 26, 2006 6:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wait, bullshit, what evidence could you possibly have indicating something nefarious about European funding? Are you saying all the money they"re putting forth to develop civil society organizations is insufficitn? Or how about the Germans digging wells in Afghanistan for thirsty villages? I mean I sound like a rightwing drone. But this is ridiculous. I've not seen any evidence at all indicating that Europeans of any kind were paying to have Jews blown up. They may have been directing money to the Territories, but I would give you one thousand dollars if you could prove in court that any European was giving money with anything other than the intentionof supporting life in a very hard-up place. Funny how the idea of giving money to a bankrupt people counts as a heinous offense.
January 26, 2006 6:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
To be fair here you are talking apples and oranges. The Palestinains occupy a fairly compact geographical region, with an advanced infrastructure. Iraq is a larger country whose infrastructure wasn't very relaible to start with, before being heavily damaged in the war.
January 26, 2006 6:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Beyondo98,
I didn't mean that at all. I was just pointing out that European Union, more than the US, has to face today a very difficult dilemma : Hamas is on the EU list of terrorist organisations, and EU is the largest aid donor to the Palestinian Authority. So I guess EU will have to work out how to maintain this funding while avoiding any contact with a banned terrorist organization.
January 26, 2006 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
He sounds rather prescient today, eh?
Well, that's long been the justification for support of strong men like Saddam Hussein. It does wind up being something of a self fulfilling prophecy, as people will obviously revolt against any dominant power of Western immigrants (like Israel or the US) that only reluctantly "grants" autonomy to the indigenous Arab people.
One of the most ironic things about all of this: Arafat was hated by Israel and the US who did everything possible to erode his power; always claiming that once he was “out of the way” things would be better. You know the old dominos argument, flowers and baklava.
What happened? Did the Vietnam planners open a FP school in the 80’s specializing in the ME? How many Kissinger clones are there? The Israel/Palestine FUBAR and the Iraq FUBAR bear striking similarities. The rule seems to be unintended consequences, ideological F-ups, and basically nothing going according to plan and every outcome being undesirable.
January 26, 2006 8:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
So...
Given the opportunity to overthrow a corrupt, incompetent and hypocritical regime, John Kerry's electoral appeal ranked well below that of suicide bombers.
Yeah, that's about right.
January 26, 2006 8:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lawrence Eagleburger,normally the bag of gas a schill for anything Republican, almost called it "a disaster" and then said "it was a helluva mess"
Bush's Middle East Policy is truly as Gen Odom said it is "The Greatest Strategic Disaster in US History"
ANd we're just beginning to learn what that means
January 26, 2006 8:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just like Pooty Poot!
Palestine - Hamas
Egypt - Muslim Brotherhood
IraQ - SCIRI/Dawa/Mahdi Army
Doin a heck of a job Georgie.
January 26, 2006 8:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think Hamas is too worried about losing EU funds. They have benefactors in Saudi Arabia and Iran ready to fill the void.
January 26, 2006 8:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
How do you like your democracy now, Mr. Bush?
Hamas' stunning victory underlines the contradictions and hypocrisies in Bush's Mideast policies.
By Juan Cole
January 27, 2006 12:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
History News Nwtwork Podcast
January 27, 2006 2:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Can it be terrorism now that it is the will of the people and an instrument of state power?
If so what is shock and awe?
January 27, 2006 2:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Al Gore speaks out and expresses concern about the newly elected government. He's just concerned about the wrong government.
January 27, 2006 2:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
And guess who'll be blamed by the public opinions in the European nations!
January 27, 2006 4:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
The message from all this is: If you are coming up for election any where in the world, don't allow yourself to be photographed with the president of the United States.
January 27, 2006 5:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not only the EU (and neither is the EU really on the "front line"). Ha'aretz reports,
January 27, 2006 7:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is a most intrigueing set of advice. While Hamas has proven capable of maintaining a social service infrastructure, its military wing (Izzadin al-Qassam Brigades) has repeatedly and literally shot the Palestinian national cause in the foot by challenging the emergence of any civil infrastructure with its rival militancy with the Palestinan Authority. But now that they are, in essence, the legislature of the Palestinian Authority, perhaps it's possible to pull off the proverbial "Nixon trip to China."
On the other hand, it is foolish to ignore the reality of Hamas' noxious vision thing, as it is clearly stated in their charter:
January 27, 2006 7:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately, HAMA will not have to follow the checks and balances of a constitutional republic.....wait.....neither does Bush and the right wing.
January 27, 2006 8:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
January 27, 2006 8:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
The amusing thing is I just read an article last night about how the Israelis SUPPORTED Hamas in the early days of its formation because they thought it would drive a wedge against Fatah,
Can you say, "BLOWBACK?"
I knew you could. But it's worse than that. The term "blowback" is itself a cover for the reality.
This is perfectly comparable with the US's support of the Islamists in Afghanistan and our support of Saddam Hussein against the Iranians in the 1980's.
As well as comparable to the CIA's handing the plans for a nuclear weapons trigger to the Iranians under the cover story that "well, it has a flaw in it to set back their program."
The essence of the state is ALWAYS: You do exactly what we tell you and give us everything you have, and we'll protect you from the bad people inside and outside our borders - and if there aren't any bad people, we'll make some."
Now Israel is crying crocodile tears about Hamas. They LOVE Hamas! It's their perfect excuse to engage in ethnic cleansing!
9/11 was a GOD-SEND to Bush and the neocons - which is the number one reason to believe it was not as simple a terrorist act as they want to make it appear.
January 27, 2006 9:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Hamas can't be part of the peace process - who will negotiatee with them"
One had the presence of mind to add to her rant "Of course, there aren't any negotiations anyway"
January 27, 2006 9:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't be so alarmist! :-)
We do not at all know what Hamas will achieve when in political power, but their record with regard to social issues is good. The election results seem fair and representative of the opinions among the Palestinians. Israel, as well as other states on both sides of the Atlantic, will finally have to give up their rosy dreams of Arafat's successors being easier to control - they were never more founded in reality than for instance American dreams of post-Sadam transformations in Iraq anyway.
We'll have to wait and see. First must the Israelis conclude their election in March, then it may get clearer if there is any progress for Palestinians and Israelis to expect in the next years or not.
My personal take is that the best thing that could happen is if Likud manage to stay in power in Israel, since they are the most beligerent of the larger parties there, so any progress towards improved conditions for the Palestinians (and subsequently improved security for the Israelis) that's made with Likud's contribution will have a lot more legitimacy in the eyes of the Israeli electorate and citizens than if it were made by more moderate or leftist cabinets.
Accords opposed by Likud have not the same chances of longterm implementation or survival.
Maybe the same could be said with regard to Hamas?
January 27, 2006 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink