« The Daily Muck | Home | Mayfield's mishaps »

Progressive Prescription for Change

user-pic

I want to thank Josh Marshall and Kate Cambor for the opportunity to speak with TPM Café readers at Table for One. I look forward to a week of lively and thoughtful conversation with all of you.


For those who don't know me, I'm a Congressman from the 13th District of Ohio, an area of northeastern Ohio that runs from the suburbs west of Cleveland to Lorain County, and then south into Summit County. In my 12 years in Congress, I've fought to provide progressive solutions for job creation and trade, health care, education, the environment, and energy. I am running for the United States Senate this year, against Republican Mike DeWine, so I can take my fight for our progressive values to the Senate.


If Ohioans vote for change, through my race and the many other crucial Ohio races this year, they will send a strong signal that Americans are shifting away from the radical conservatives who have dominated - and corrupted -- our government. My election would also have an immediate practical effect, strengthening opposition to Bush policies that have devastated so many lives in this country.


Ohio is a bell weather state, with a large swing-vote population. That makes us a battleground state, and we know the typical Republican tactics only too well in Ohio. Once again, they will try to focus on issues such as gay marriage in an attempt to distract voters from what actually matters to most Ohioans - good paying jobs, affordable tuitions so they can send their children to college, reasonably priced prescription drugs so our seniors don't have to choose between heating their homes and buying the medicine that, in many cases, keeps them alive. The Republicans will try to distract voters from these crucial issues in their lives, but this year, their strategy won't work. I am just one of a growing number of strong progressives in Ohio - and across the nation - who are willing to stand up proudly for the values that champion families from all walks of life. We will change who represents the people of Ohio, and that will change the future of Democratic politics across the nation.

Progressives are successful because our priorities speak to a broad spectrum of the electorate. Farmers care just as much about education as suburban mothers. Small businesses care just as much about energy prices as families counting their every penny. And they are looking for leaders who will stand up to large special interests like the pharmaceutical industry and big oil companies that see government as just one big profit center.


In Ohio, we've lost more than 200,000 good-paying manufacturing jobs since 2001. Companies like Wal-Mart increasingly outsource their manufacturing to China, and its cheap labor force, without reinvesting in our communities.  A few low-wage jobs are created, but local factories and Main Street merchants are driven out of business.


Fair trade agreements with our trading partners are a progressive solution to this problem. They ensure enforceable labor standards for workers and decent wages with benefits. Trade works when it lifts up workers in developing nations while building economic security at home. Trade works when workers in the poorest nations cannot only make American products, but buy them.


The Bush economy has forced more Americans to lose their healthcare coverage.  Conservatives continue their billion dollar giveaways to corporate donors, instead of living up to their duty as public servants.  As companies shed jobs, workers lose their health benefits. At the same time, other companies have refused to cover many of their workers. Thirteen years ago, in my first campaign for Congress, I promised not to take the Congressional health plan until we passed universal coverage guaranteeing healthcare for all Americans. I have kept my promise, but I must admit I never imagined that the problem would be even worse today.


The most cynical, corrupt action of a cynical, corrupt Congress was the passing of the federal budget - where, for example, loans and grants to college students were cut to pay for tax breaks for the wealthiest one percent in our country. This is not the America I know, and it is not the America we ought to be. A budget is a moral document and should reflect the values of America's working families.


For America to thrive, we must have a trained and skilled work force; we must reduce our dependency on foreign oil; and we must only send our troops to battle when we have exhausted all other courses of action, and then only when properly armed.


Progressive policy is both the best solution for our nation's problems and our best chance for electoral success this year.


Please share your thoughts in the coming days.  I look forward to reading and responding to your comments.


60 Comments

| Leave a comment

Interesting.  Not a single mention of Iraq or terrorism.

Is Shrum advising this campaign? 

Thank you for joining us Rep. Brown! I certainly hope that come November we have a Democrat sitting in DeWine's seat.


I am very interested in hearing any ideas you have for election reform. After the 2004 debacle in Ohio and the 2000 nightmare in Florida, I would like to see some sort of integrity restored to our elections. If people cannot have confidence that their vote will be accurately recorded, they will not participate in elections. Do you have any thoughts on solving this problem?

"I certainly hope that come November we have a Democrat sitting in DeWine's seat."


Damn straight.  It'd feel very good to see Paul Hackett in the Senate.

Thanks for joining the fray. 

I note the emphasis on economy and taxes. Good points but I'll plug for a couple of missing ones: The poor execution of national-security efforts, both here and abroad, and what I think is the biggest issue of all--energy and the climate.

These points are detailed in my post on the subject , so I'll summarize by saying innovations in incentives could shift us away from fossil fuels beginning immediately and the payoff would be more jobs, lower costs for energy, more export business, and reduced risk of future terrorism. The economy depends on the climate, and the main issue, greenhouse effects from CO2, offers rewards instead of costs since investment in non-oil (coal, gas) energy means dropping energy costs instead of rising costs.

Unlike fossil fuels or nuclear energy, wind and sun become free when the equipment is bought. Heat and cooling from groundwater is equivalently free. Since fuel is needed for agriculture, it underlies every economic activity.

All jobs and social services depend on the energy equation. Nearly all foreign policy concerns "state interests" which means commerce and reliable supply of essential resources, so energy underlies that, too.

And since energy that releases CO2 now means possible extreme weather which undercuts economic activity in the manner of Katrina, or possible disruption in agricultural output, it is at the root of all other issues.

"Power For the People, By the People." 

Rep. Brown,

As a former Ohioan (still in my heart), I am incredibly distressed to see talented and reform-minded individuals like you wanting to leave the mess the Republicans have made of Ohio state government unchecked.  The very fact that you mention Ohio as a "bellwether" begs the question: How can you leave the corruption in place?

With Taft's numbers just short of Jack the Ripper, and Blackwell getting ready to cash in the IOU's from his blind eyed supervision of the election, don't you think that Ohio needs to put it's house in order first?  I agree that fair trade agreements are important....but so are fair elections.

I realize that it would be a "been there, done that" sort of experience for you, but that is the point.  You did it well, and without the sleaze of the current bunch.

Ohio voters deserve way better than Coingate in Columbus and corrupt voting machines from Canton, just as here in Virginia, Mark Warner needs to take one for the team, put off the Prez dream for a few cycles and kick that gibbering fool George Allen out of the box.

Just my $.02

Notrol 

Welcome Congressman Brown


I am sorry to see you endorse the fake concept of "fairtrade" which is just a code word for being anti-trade.  While that view is very popular here at the CAFE is an act of self-deception.  It will not slow China and India's growth and it won't stop jobs from leaving Ohio.


It should be well past time for Democrats who really came to power as a result to the Depression whic was exacerbated by "beggar thy neighborh trade policies" develope real policies that will help unkilled and semi-skilled workers both get more skills and more jobs in the real world.

I'm going to call it right now:  Continued bleating about tax cuts for the wealthy and universal health coverage aren't going to get you elected to the Senate.  


Progressives have run that playbook.  It's not working out for us.  


If you truly want to get elected, then come up with some new ideas and run on those.  Tell people what you think is right to do with the tax system, not just that it is wrong to cut taxes.  Tell people what is right to do to Social Security, and not just what is wrong with privatization plans.


Here's the playbook I would run:  Reform.  Reform of everything, including:


Taxes, farm and corporate subsidies, welfare, Social Security, incentivizing state reforms to primary and secondary education, and progressive decentralization, especially for job creation/worker training programs.  


Energy policy reform emphasizing public transportation.  I've never been to Ohio, but does Cleveland or Columbus or Cinncinati have a functional metro system?  Why not?  It would reduce energy costs, allow more people to get to work without a car, and (I'm guessing) probably help maintain property values within and around the city.  


The point is simply that there are tons of things that Democrats (or other progressives) can set for their agenda--goals that will improve the US, free up our economy, increase prosperity, and still create a more just society for the people at the margins.  


A lot of the programs the federal government maintains were designed in other periods in our history--the '30s and the '60s--and are not tailored to addressing the problems facing Americans right now.  We need to reform those programs to ensure that they are doing what we want them to do.


That's a progressive agenda.  Find the problems, find the best solutions, fix the problems.  

Welcome to the Table for One, I wish you the best in your campaign.

Please respond to Noah Feldman's article Who Can Check the President?

It contents that congress should be asserting their powers. If Democrats remain a minority, what could you still do to check the imperial presidency? Is there another Senator you might see as a model, or do you have a new tack?

Thanks in advance for discussing this here...

Sheryl Coe
"TimeTogether"

Sorry I meant it contends not contents, preview is your friend, I know...

Mr. Brown,


Welcome to the political free fire zone, I hope you have better political body armour than what our government sees fit to provide our troops.


While I think that a "progressive" agenda will move America forward, I have to ask, to what?


I don't think somehow, that you cats up on the hill are getting the message from out here outside the beltway. We don't trust you guys anymore. How can the House, and the Senate pass crap like this and expect any other reaction than disbelief?


 

Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime.


It's no joke. Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity.

...

To grease the rails for this idea, Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, and the section's other sponsors slipped it into an unrelated, must-pass bill to fund the Department of Justice. The plan: to make it politically infeasible for politicians to oppose the measure.


The tactic worked. The bill cleared the House of Representatives by voice vote, and the Senate unanimously approved it Dec. 16.


I think that a larger number of Americans vote with their feet on election day than vote with their ballots because of garbage like this.


Then you guys come to the grass roots and astro turf the hell out of us? Blow it out your ass, comes to mind, sir.


Free trade means exporting jobs to India so that we may support a culture that aborts half a million fetuses for the temerity of being female? Somewhere along the line you Congress critters will have to learn the difference between value and worth.

How do Democrats address national security issues and persuasively argue that they are compatible with civil rights?  Address Iraq, address terrorism, address the fact that Iranian Nukes and North Korean nukes should be scaring us, and not the made up stuff of the Bush administration.

 Tell the public that only the Democrats can fix bills like the Medicare bill because Democrats are the party that believes government can work.  If you want good government programs, you want Democrats. 

Reform and security Congressman, that's what Americans want.   National security, security from risk, and trust in the fact that Congress is working well.  Make the case that Democrats can provide it better, and that the party that thinks government can be good will make government better.     

I'm quite partial to Mid western types, especially Ohions, Wisconsinites, and Illinoians. They seem to be very good looking.
I hope to make a few recommendations this week. Being an independent thinker in DC has been a challenge with a slew of mindguards chasing my tail. 

Noah Feldman?====
Geeze where the heck has he been? 

I don't know Ohio. But this campaign message struck me as being pretty thin stuff.


The best line was: "A budget is a moral document." This is a strong line.


It might also be nice to bring up themes like competence (vs. incompetence and cronyism) and integrity (vs. corruption). Your reference to "helping seniors get the drugs they need" fails to make the point clear enough: the Bush administration designed an utterly failed monster of a bureaucratic-nightmare Medicare drug plan, because the Bush administration is incompetent at governing; and they are incompetent at governing because they don't believe in government. They don't think government can be good, and as a result, they have delivered us a lousy government.


Follow THAT up with your plan for fixing the Medicare prescription drug benefit, and it'll sound like something real.

They're 17th and 23rd on this list of highest proportional transit use in large cities nationwide. Columbus does rather less well, but has the biggest percentage of bicycle commuters in Ohio's large cities, which takes a certain dedicated progressiveness in government.

Rep. Brown has listed some great issues and where he stands on them which arguably many of us here would agree with, but the overall message problem sticks out like a sore thumb.  Where's the narrative?  Where's the heartfelt message of things are bad and need to be reformed?  I agree with the Schrum reference above, because the message sounds a bit like a Kerry-ad: a laundry list of issues and problems stemming from Republican governance, but no real gripping message to rally the base and change the minds of the "swing" voters of Ohio. 

As a fairly staunch liberal ("progressive"), I come away from this message feeling like I just read a washed, dried, and pressed campaign ad.  But I don't feel an urgency to get up and change the government, which is what Rep. Brown needs to do.  If we want these voters, these "rust belt" independents (and former Republicans) to oust an incumbent and vote for a Democrat, then the white-washed statements that list cold facts like an Oncologist describing the symptoms and causes of the cancer that afflicts us.  The Democratic party should be advocates of the people--think Clinton: "I feel your pain"--not some grand parental figure claiming that they'll make it right.  An advocate fights with and for the people.  The change in Republican "framing" has been to throw out the old "responsible parent" mantra that they had, and to take on the banner of fighting for "our" values.   The Democratic party has lost their place as the peoples party and needs to understand how to reclaim that. 

Its not just about facts, its about advocacy! We are losing jobs, we are losing pace with capturing the "American Dream".  We are losing our esteem and status as the Champions of Freedom and we are losing our men and women in a battle in Iraq with no effective leadership or strategy of winning. 

Thanks for the question, Sheryl. Tomorrow I'll discuss how I worked expose questionable tactics used by the Republican leadership and the administration to pass bills in the House I'll do the same thing in the Senate.


Even in the minority, we have the power to hold the administration accountable by speaking out against corruption and forcing debate on important issues.


As for your second question, let's just say that I'm running for the Howard Metzenbaum seat that is temporarily held by Mike Dewine.

Ohio isn't a "bell weather" state; it's a bellwether state.

Before we went to war in Iraq, I demanded answers from President Bush and his administration.  We still haven't gotten those answers.


During this campaign, I'll continue to demand answers for our failed policy in Iraq and make sharp distinctions with the Republicans.

Notrol,


We've got a great crop of Democratic candidates this year at the state and local level.


Besides working on my race, I'm doing all that I can to elect Ted Strickland the next governor of Ohio and Jennifer Brunner the next Secretary of State.


We need a change in Columbus and Washington.

Sherrod.

The War in Iraq is sapping our nation's strength and not only abroad, not only our military strength, not only our geopolitical influence but here at home as well. Economically, Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel laureate, estimates that this war will cost the US at least one trillion dollars.  Meanwhile, domestic programs, including prominently Katrina relief, go begging as Bush continues to lavish tax expenditures on the wealthy.

As disturbing if not more so, the Bush administration is determined to use its wars to violate Congressionally enacted laws and undermine our constitutional rights in what amounts to nothing less than a brazen power grab for Bush and his cronies.

I wish you all the best in your race.  I am ever awed by those who run for public office. I am not from Ohio, so I do not know how this will play, but  I hope that you will make these connections in your campaign


Are the Democrats going to do anything more than "demand answers?" Not to be sarcastic, but that hasn't worked well so far. We need something more concrete.


I got a call last week from the Democratic party asking me to give them money. I'm withholding any donation though till I hear something more effective than "we will demand answers."


Right now, I have to say I am more impressed with McCain, Specter, Snowe, Collins, Hagel and other "moderate" Republicans than I am with most Democrats (Feingold, Kennedy, and Byrd excepted). This is not to say I am satisfied with those Republicans (far from it), but they seem to be doing more than folks like Kerry, Biden, and Clinton.

Rep. Brown,

I want to first thank you for doing this.  I second want to make the point that whatever you do, you need to have a forward-looking plan in Iraq, and one that doesn't sound defeatist. 
The problem with the current political dynamic is that the President refuses to identify what victory in Iraq is.  Thus when democrats criticize him, they have no way to hold him accountable.  You therefore need to define victory for him.

I would define victory as "no WMDs in Iraq, and Sadaam not in power."  These two objetcives--and not building democracy--were the reasons most Americans supported the war.  Since we have already fulfilled those objectives, we should leave.  This would allow you to advocate withdrawal without facing the charge that you are defeatist--basically by saying that we have already won.

Anyway, thanks again.  You are one the (rare) good guys.  

Hear hear! It's disheartening to see these kinds of errors from people who should know better, or should at least have staff who know better. (There was that recent "should of" posting too.)

With all due respect, we won't get out of Iraq by "demanding answers."


Bush and the Republicans don't think they need to answer to you. Or anyone.


John Murtha's got the right idea.

If you're looking for the issue that will put you in front of the pack, irregardless of party, jobs creation is it. Other than the war, more people are more concerned about thier financial future than anything else. One reason the democrats do not seem to be benefiting much from the Presidents unpopularity is because of a perception that overall, the economy is doing well. Certain sectors are indeed doing well, and the unemployment rate is not as high as it has been, but- the issue isnt numbers or averages, the issue is the sense of insecurity that so many ordinary people feel, a sense of insecurity grounded in the fact that jobs and companies are able to move around so easily, especially across borders. Not just national borders, although the outsourcing of jobs overseas is contributing to the insecurity, but across state and municiple boundaries as well. A job moved a mere 200 miles away might as well be on the moon if you cant move to follow it. Our economy is undergoing a long-term phase of rapid turbulence and change, which interferes with the ability of middle class families to plan ahead financially. Should you put your savings in a pension, buy a new home, or a college fund for your children (or pay off your debt? or improve your health insurance? or... but you get the picture). With rapid change the norm, there is no way for an ordinary family to know. And all the Democrats seem to be able to propose are old solutions- tariffs, public works projects, and the like.

Here's a new idea for you- propose policy to support locally-based employers. These are employers who own a majority of their assets within a given region (a district if you remain a Representatitive, a State if you become a Senator). The idea is that they cannot shut down their local operations without going entirely out of business. A robust local employer pool injects capital into their community, and provides a buffer against competition from global and national-level competitors. It's a hedge against globalization.

It should also be popular because of the chaos that can ensue when a large employer downsizes a plant in small town, or when Wal-Mart or other large retailer enters into the local economy. And yet it really isnt that radical either, since it involves promoting a type of small business, something Republicans usually try to take credit for. If appropriate, it would easily be possible to target certain industries, or types of geographical areas (like inner-ring suburbs for example). It would seem to be a perfect strategy for a moderate, pragmatic Democrat.

There are a wide range of policy options that could fit this strategy. Perhaps long-term, low interest loans for new or small businesses that fit the right criteria. Invite first time entreprenuers to submit proposals for businesses in regions in Ohio that demonstrate untapped economic potential. Support local zoning that promotes businesses that prinarily support local residents, like grocery and hardware stores, and other small retail. Once you start brainstorming in this direction, all sorts of possibilities present themselves.

Good luck with your campaign, and give 'em heck.

"Farmers care just as much about education as suburban mothers."


This may fly with the blog crowd, but doesn't fly with real farmers, who take a disproportional hit in a property tax based school funding system.


Get past the platitudes, and on to real, detailed, policy proposals.

Thank you for running.  I'm a lifelong resident of Ashland County, in the 16th District under Ralph Regula.  We are a small county in the scheme of North East and North Central Ohio, being largely a rural area thats main benefit is the fact we lie pretty much smackdab between Cleveland and Columbus.  We used to have several large employers in this town, mainly focused around the latex business, but those have all been closed now and the production centers relocated to Mexico and China.  Our main private employers now are Hospira, WIL Research, and Ashland University. 

 

Now for a couple questions. What do you plan to do to promote job growth in smaller blue collar towns in Ohio?  What is your stance on allowing negotiation of unions and employers with multiple health insurance companies to receive the best rates for coverage, including companies that are located outside of the traditional insurance agencies for the state?  Whats your take on gun issues?  I'm a gun owner, its not my most important issue, but for many people around here it is.

 

Thanks for your time, and willingness to promote your views on a site where normal Ohioans can ask questions. 

Last June, Texas Republican Ron Paul introduced the Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2005 (HR 3037) to allow American farmers to participate in the growing market for this currently outlawed crop for fiber, food, and seed oil. Currently, such manufacturers as General Motors are forced to import their hemp supplies, in a scheme that amounts to protectionism in reverse.

8 House Democrats have signed on as cosponsors to HR 3037, but I note that you are not among them. Do you oppose this legislation, or am I just the first to call it to your attention?

Ben,

When did you quit the Libertarian Party?  Why? 

I'll open my reader blog here, and get you a reply. I don't want to clutter Rep. Brown's table. Give me a couple hours.

  • Money should not talk louder than words... It is not "free speech".
  • Corporations (things) have no constitutional rights.  To quote Randi Rhodes:  "If it can't have a colonoscopy, it has no rights!"
  • Count every vote - what are Dems doing about Diebold?
  • Trade deficits tell you anything???  Globalization is a a race to the bottom for US workers.
  • Publicly funded elections - get the money out of politics.  Tired of politicians hustling for money instead of doing the publics work.
  • Impeach, impeach!  Bush and crew are felons!  Why so many black people in jail and this crew keeps breaking the law with impunity?   Double standard!
  • Dems need to follow Murtha, Dean, Feingold, and Boxer then put Hillary and Biden out to pasture.  Joe L. is going to get a primary challenger who is going to take him down - go grass roots.
  • Want to know what's really wrong with this party, read this from the DLC and see what they really think of their base. http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?kaid=127&subid=173&content id=253656
Gov. Dean speaks for me.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hear, hear. Democrats need to start doing better in Ohio's small towns. There's no reason it can't happen, but the Dems have let the base trickle away. People like my grandfather, a union coal miner and lifelong Democrat (who hailed from Shadyside, OH, by the way), have been replaced by beaten-down minimum-wage-slaves who will work for peanuts because the threat is no more peanuts. 

My grandfather was able to support a family on his salary, in dignity; now, families in his region scrape to get by and instead of organizing, are encouraged to put their faith in a Republican god who will reward them in the afterlife as long as they consent to being screwed in this one. No more!

Conversely, Ohio Democrats need to take their message to the grassroots in the suburbs. My mom has done a lot of outreach for the Democratic party in Delaware County, but it's tough going and the statewide party could do more to support its troops. Also, much of the southeastern Ohio region is currently being "represented" by that sack-o'-crap Bob Ney. That's an embarrassment to Ohio that must be rectified.

On the subject of Paul Hackett: great for him that he wants to be in office. I think he should be. But Rep. Brown has been toiling in the vineyards for a long time, and has earned his shot. Let Mr. Hackett win his spurs in another race. His former opponent is looking pretty vulnerable these days. Surely we can field decent Democrats in more than one race simultaneously?

And finally, nothing's going to happen for the Democrats in Ohio as long as the election process is completely, corruptly compromised, as it appears to be. You might win, Rep. Brown, but how will you know?
oakland say's
Gov. Dean speaks for me.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are you for real Oakland. Howard Dean? There’s a reason he didn’t get the nomination and Kerry did , he did not appeal to the largest percentage of the base.  
The link you sent was right on message you have got to reach for the center that’s where the numbers are.
I for one am tired,  of fighting every issue,  prior to the election.
 
The Sierra Club, Green Peace, The gay rights movement and the list could go on and on. Each group wanting their pet concern or (PORK) Why is it we can’t do incremental change like maybe this next year or election cycle we focus on Medicare,  Social Security and health Care  SAFETY NET ISSUES  whether we win or lose we defined the issue. We don’t  get drawn in to the issues they want to talk about, our weaknesses as a party   
 
HOLDING Mr. Brown and any Democrats accountable and withholding your vote because they didn’t address some hot button issue that you and maybe a handful care about.
 
Then look at the Republicans they just prod along with 30 second sound bites reminding people of the simple life without all this special interest attacking your moral values. They  stay focused on one or two points. Driving home the point,  look at all the ideas liberals have to change things. What are you doing, destroying everything, because you want to change everything?
 
We are not in power we need to gain the peoples trust.
 
Think about the fear the elderly have with this new prescription bill(FEAR) Why did the government have to change things? 
Incremental change, not to fast. Remember people are afraid of change   
 
But where is the Democratic leadership? Clinton, Gore, Carter and any number of qualified and bright stars. They could have been the government in exile. While America was held hostage to Right wing extremists. They could have commanded air time with alternatives prior to electioneering BS
Being the trendiest technocrat isn't a replacement for a core philosophy.  Sheesh,. we've got a large number of Americans who don't even appreciate the value of the rule of law.  I expect people wanting to junk programs from the 30's or 60's may still be young enough that they don't themselves see the value in those programs.  Support an aging parent through hip replacements, heart disease and cancer and you'll learn the value of Medicare - for them, for their spouse and frankly, for you.  We've become a party disconnected from the vulnerable in our society be they displaced workers, bankrupt farmers, minorities or the aging.  The other party is ruthlessly lined up against them, and our party no longer cares. 

I don't want a beancounting problem solver.  I want a candidate with vision of a better future.   Sure, our problem is a lack of tons of ideas but more fundamental it's a lack of any vision to make sense of ideas.

I suggest looking at Sen. Bob Graham's economic plan from the last cycle. Have Philip drop me a line (at wampum) if you don't have a copy. It and JRE's Two Americas were the non-testosterone examplars.

 My two beads worth.