« The Mantle of Reform | Home | Family Photos »

The Daily Muck

user-pic

A bastion of corruption in uncertain times, Rep. Doolittle (R-Cal.) has decided to take a stand: he is keeping Abramoff's money. According to his spokeswoman, here is one politician who will not bow to "political expediency."

The Post leads on "the internal battle ... underway among House Republicans to permanently replace Rep. Tom DeLay (Tex.) as majority leader and put in place a new leadership lineup that is better equipped to deal with the growing corruption scandal."


But there's one difficulty there: it's not easy finding a candidate who's untouched by Abramoff. The Post predicts a struggle between Acting Majority Leader Rep. Roy Blunt (Mo.), House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (Ill.), and Rep. John A. Boehner (Ohio), all of whom have Abramoff connections. Because of that, other candidates may come to the fore.


DeLay's deadline for clearing his name seems to be early February. A House Republican retreat is planned for Feb. 9, and the Post reports that Blunt "will ask House Republicans to make his temporary tenure permanent" around that time.


In the wake of Abramoff's plea, there's a general scramble by Democrats and Republicans to pass a lobbying reform package. The Dems already have a number on the table, but yesterday Sen. Lieberman (D-Conn.) signed on as the Democratic cosponsor to Sen. McCain's (R-Ariz.) bill, making it the leading contender. Sen. Conrad Burns (R-Mon.), frequently reported as one of the main possible targets in the Abramoff investigation, is also a cosponsor.


Sen. Frist (R-Tenn.) has tapped Sen. Santorum (R-Penn.) to lead the effort on drawing up the Republican reform package. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington has some issues with that, like the fact that "Sen. Santorum runs the K Street project, created by conservative activist Grover Norquist and former Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX), in which he ensures that all top lobbying and trade association jobs are filled by Republicans." And there's also Santorum's egregious shilling for AccuWeather, Inc.


The Washington Times quotes "a senior House Republican official" as saying: "It is becoming conventional wisdom that a significant lobbying reform package will occur sometime early this year."


In other muck:


DA Ronnie Earle, who is prosecuting DeLay on money laundering charges in Texas, is investigating DeLay's ties to Abramoff. He issued four subpoenas yesterday related to the U.S. Family Network, a GOP slush fund managed by Abramoff and former Delay aide Ed Buckham (read the Post's piece on it from last week). These subpoenas are in addition to ones issued Wednesday to Abramoff's employers and two of his tribal clients.


21 Comments

| Leave a comment

As always, it's really uncertain that the Democrats will be able to capitalize on this. My left friends believe that the two parties are equally bad, and the Republicans are happy to agree. ("No worse than our opponents!" is their stirring motto.)


Besides the Democrats' implication in the same kind of thing, there's the historical unwillingness of the Democrats to go on the offensive on any issue.


Joe Lieberman and Conrad Burns -- yeah, those are the guys to clean up this mess.

I used to vote Democratic just to fight the wrong minded, misguided Republicans, every last malignant one of them. But.When I saw how much money Hillary Clinton and Harry Reid got from Abramoff, and only returned after his admission of guilt, that was the last straw for me and the Democrats. Ever since the Judicial Fiat of 2000, when the Bush family pulled off its coup, I have been waiting for the Democrats to oppose the Republicans and stand up for MY rights, and the rights of all us 'citizens'. But they haven't. And that has always been a great mystery. I think a lot of people speculated that the Democrats were cringing, weak kneed, or couldn't recover from caving in over the Invasion of Iraq--but it is now clear that a significant portion of the parties leadership seems absolutely in the bag.

I don't know where the hope will come from, that a champion will emerge who does not belive that the idea of a 'public interest' is a myth, who will take on all the special business interests and reign them in--but I see nobody in the Democratic camp with the right stuff for the job.

Are We are all freaking doomed? We're past the point of no return on Global Warming anyway, Iran is ruled by a guy who wants to bring about the 'final' battle--and there's more than one so called American 'leader' who is itching for the same. Is there any hope for reason to prevail, and wisdom, and hope, anywhere in these times?
some stories write themselves

anyone care to see how much levee money was laundered elsewhere to abramoff groups?

ohhhhh, maybe in the religious initiatives?

You know Ahnold got his paws on the levee money right there with Abramoff...

I recieved a request for a donation to the DCC in the mail last night. First of all, even though I am from Missouri and Clair stands to benefit from the DCC "Six Hot Races" strategy, I disagree with it. We need to fight the Republicans in all fifity states  and every possible race. This strategy has not worked in the past and I do not believe it will work again. We need to fight in evey possible race - win or lose.

Additionally, the lack of leadership I see on the Abrahmoff story is obscene. Where is the democratic party? Why are they not standing up and fighting? This is just shameful. When the Republicans said that Democrats don't stand for anything I used get insensed: now I'm starting to agree.

I am a life long Democrat. I will likely vote for the democratic ticket. But I will not give another penny to anyone until I see the leadership necessary to run our country at this critical point in history.

Whoa, whoa, whoa!!


Hold up a second here - first of all let's be clear about one thing: the Abramoff scandal is a Republican Scandal.


There is no need to go amplifying Republican talking points by repeating them.


Reid did not get a dime from Abramoff and he is not returning any money - nor should he. The money the Repubs keep citing came from Abramoff clients - Indian tribes who had gambling interests.


Now think about it: Reid is senator from Nevada. Can you think of any reason a gambling interest would have for donating to a senator from Nevada? Maybe because gambling is big business in Nevada? If you look at Reids donors, virtually every gambling interest in the nation has donated to him.


Let's get this straight right here: There Are ZERO Democrats who took Abramoff money.


ZERO.


This is all part of an attempt by Republicans to create a false equivalency, to make it seem like this is a "politics-as-usual" type scandal and that is flat out false. Don't believe me: look at the lists of Abramoff donations here and here and please stop repeating the GOP talking points.


Thank you.

Yeah, I am starting to hate Joe Lieberman. It sounds extreme, but for christsake (what an inappropriate phrase!) he is doing more harm to the Democratic party than Karl Rove.


Hello - why give any Republican plan a boost?? What a jackass.

If we were actually counting on current Democratic leadership to do anything. But without any noticeable contribution from them I think we can say that the quartet of Rove, Abramoff, Norquist and Reed, all out of the most noxious and abnoxious group ever brought into one place at one time: the Young Republicans of the mid 70's era, are going down. Or at least out.


Remember all these guys signed up as Republican activists at the height of Nixon's excesses, which in retrospect they adopted as a gameplan and playbook. Thirty years latter they were this close to controlling the whole country. I am the same age as these guys and I am telling you that thirty years later seeing some despicable pricks get their comeupance feels pretty good.


(BTW in 'researching' this post (er, putting three words into Google) I pulled up an interesting article by Max Blumenthal on modern day Young Republicans, sure enough the same privileged assholes they were during my college days three decades ago, and still dodging the draft: Generation Chickenhawk


Democrats are going to win on 2006 on Iraq and the Social Security charade. What Jackoff-gate is going to do is blow a huge whole through the K Street Project and hence through Republican fundraising. It doesn't matter that Tom Delay had a 30% name recognition as late as October or that 99 out of a hundred people couldn't tell you who Bob Ney was. Taking them out of the game is huge.


Jackoff will be the gift that keeps giving. Maybe no one element will be explosive and actually capture public attention, but just about everyone ever associated with the K Street Project is going to die the Death of a Thousand Cuts, and a number are pretty likely to end up in jail or turning in their boss. Or both.

Did Reid and Clinton get? And what exactly was the direct connection to Abramoff?


Correlation is not causation. Taking money from Abramoff's clients doesn't make you guilty of anything. Democrats who stood up for tribal interests and happened to take money from the same tribes that Abramoff was defrauding did nothing wrong.


The tribes are the victims here, and Republicans are trying to blur that line. And baseless "everybody was doing it" claims are not helpful. Everyone was not pulling a Jackoff.


Doom and gloomers have infested the Left Blogosphere since it started. They don't add value. Look if you want to put on a black bandana, hit the streets, break plate glass and paint Red 'A's and think of yourself as a Revolutionary then okay. But quit whining.

In this instance, living up to his name:  Do Little!

Democrats will get a lot more mileage out of this by holding their fire until the bombshells stop dropping.


Republicans are desperate to sell one of two messages: Democrats do it too OR Partisan witchhunt. They don't get to do that when the evidence is tumbling out from a Republican controlled Justice Department.


It's January, we need to let the corruption message sink in first, then have people realize that every indictment coming out has an 'R' after it. The last thing we need is our Democratic leadership to become the public face of Jackoff-gate and so let Republicans simply turn off their eyes and ears.


If you had told me a year ago that Scooter Libby and Tom Delay were underindictment and that Jack Abramoff and two of his partners had already entered guilty pleas I would have been ecstatic - but worried the effects might wear off by the mid-terms. The timing here is perfect and has no Democratic fingerprints on it.

What money did the Demos get and what correlation is there between funding and Demo votes? Great question you've asked (thank you!). It's distressing to see Drudge and others crow about how "Democrats got payments from Abramoff too!" as if the amounts and actions of Democrats and Republicans were all the same.

 

I hope that the Dems will answer this question clearly -- and (as Newt Gingrich apparently did a decade ago), let the guys who are polluted take care of themselves. Let the Democratic Party stand for Political and Financial Reform. 

My suggestion is to make it illegal for lobbyists to give or Congress/staff to accept ANYTHING of value beyond a limit of say $1000 for a campaign contribution. No free meals, rides, golf outings,etc.

Then there would be no need to interpret arcane rules. And it's very easy to understand. 

The Democrats should start keeping an eye on the DOJ and make sure that the prosecutions are being persued.  They should start tagging the Republicans as the party of corruption and hypocrisy. If they get too loud about Abramoff and the Congressman on their way to jail it will both look like piling on and they can be accused on interfering with the Bush Administrations prosecutions.  


 

Rawls,
A year ago, I would have said I agree with your complaint about the national party focusing only on "Hot Races", but that is less true now than it used to be. The DCCC and the DSCC are working more with the states than they used to. And the DNC is doing a bang-up job with their 50-state strategy. If you want a little reassurance, please see this Hotline story, which Markos posted in full with that publication's permission (since they are subscription only):
DNC: Spreading The Word. And The Boots.

I'm really surprised no one else has been bringing this up. I for one don't trust the political appointees at Justice at all - I think they're going to let Bob Ney, his chief of staff, and Tom DeLay's chief of staff out to dry and bury the rest. It'll cause an outrage, but the outrage will come only from the Democrats (i.e., the Republicans and the media will do nothing) so the story won't be the crime itself but the partisan back and forth about the (lack of) prosecution of the crime.

Churchill said words to the effect "Never give up! Never, ever, ever, ever give up". Joe Hill said, "Don't mourn - organize!" Hang in there baby. There a billions of people worldwide who agree with you!!!

I don't think the two parties are equally bad - many Republican leaders are anti-choice imperialists and that is really, really bad. Many Democratic leaders are pro-choice imperialists and that is merely really bad.

In all of the coverage of Abramoff scandal, I haven't seen any one ask the question "Just why would certain Indian tribes pay such outrageous sums to various organizations at Abramoff's bidding?" Were the tribes so financially naive that they didn't see anything amiss?
Color me skeptical about the Abramoff attempts at building a gambling empire. Why the interest in SunCruz and Indian gaming? Why has the mafia always been so interested in gambling? Because it's the perfect vehicle for money laundering.

Has anyone ever considered the possibility that Abramoff was laundering money through the Indian tribes? It wouldn't be the first time that Indian tribes have been used as a conduit for illicit activities. Does anyone remember the admittedly bizarre stories about the Cabachons?

Read this comment carefully, folks. 

It's got Rove shill written all over it.

The reference to Hillary is the clue.  The trolls just can't help themselves. 

手机铃声 铃声下载 免费铃声 免费铃声下载 免费手机铃声下载 和弦铃声 三星铃声 三星手机铃声下载 MP3铃声 手机铃声下载 手机自编铃声 MP3手机铃声 诺基亚铃声下载 NOKIA铃声下载 小灵通铃声下载 真人铃声 MP3铃声下载 自编铃声 联通铃声下载 移动手机铃声下载 联通手机铃声免费下载 TCL铃声 飞利浦铃声下载 特效铃声 搞笑铃声 MIDI铃声 铃声图片 MMF铃声下载 免费手机图片下载 免费手机点歌 手机短信 手机彩信 手机彩铃 康佳手机铃声下载 TCL手机铃声下载 迪比特手机铃声下载 手机和旋铃声 三星手机铃声 三星手机和弦铃声下载 波导手机铃声下载 熊猫手机铃声下载 免费手机铃声 科健手机铃声下载 海尔手机铃声下载 诺基亚手机铃声下载 手机和弦铃声 手机铃声图片下载 飞利浦手机铃声下载 手机自编铃声曲谱 小灵通手机铃声下载 手机铃声编辑 CDMA手机铃声下载 摩托罗拉手机铃声下载 联通CDMA手机铃声下载 松下手机铃声下载 东信手机铃声下载 联想手机铃声下载 中兴手机铃声下载 大显手机铃声下载 首信手机铃声下载 三星手机自编铃声 三星CDMA手机铃声 康佳手机和弦铃声 MP3手机铃声下载 索尼爱立信手机铃声 手机铃声大全 三星手机铃声图片下载 手机特效铃声 手机铃声制作 三星手机铃声免费下载 TCL手机自编铃声 松下手机自编铃声 飞利浦手机自编铃声 诺基亚手机自编铃声 摩托罗拉自编铃声 三星手机MP3铃声 手机MP3铃声制作软件 免费MP3铃声下载 摩托罗拉MP3铃声 三星MP3铃声下载 联通MP3铃声下载 中国移动铃声下载 中国联通手机铃声下载 免费联通手机铃声 联通铃声 联通用户手机铃声下载 联通手机和弦铃声下载 联通手机铃声图片下载 小灵通铃声免费下载 和弦铃声免费下载
免费下载三星铃声 诺基亚免费铃声下载 联通免费铃声下载 免费铃声图片下载 MMF铃声免费下载 TCL免费铃声下载 免费下载铃声 手机铃声免费下载 松下免费铃声下载 NOKIA免费铃声下载 MIDI铃声免费下载 和弦铃声下载 TCL免费手机铃声下载 免费手机铃声图片下载 免费手机铃声下载网站 小灵通手机铃声免费下载 诺基亚手机铃声免费下载 摩托罗拉手机铃声免费下载 三星和弦铃声 CECT和弦铃声下载 三星T108和弦铃声 NOKIA和弦铃声下载 康佳和弦铃声下载 迪比特和弦铃声下载 阿尔卡特和弦铃声 CDMA和弦铃声下载 夏新和弦铃声下载 西门子和弦铃声 诺基亚和弦铃声 联通和弦铃声 三星铃声下载 三星和旋铃声 三星T108铃声下载 三星手机铃声乐园 三星CDMA铃声下载 三星免费铃声 三星真人铃声 诺基亚3100铃声下载 NOKIA手机铃声下载 怎样下载小灵通铃声 真人铃声下载 真人真唱手机铃声下载 联通用户铃声下载 联通CDMA铃声下载 TCL手机铃声图片下载 TCL手机和弦铃声下载 飞利浦630铃声下载 三星特效铃声 手机特效铃声下载 搞笑短信 MMF手机铃声 MMF格式铃声 免费短信 短信笑话 幽默短信 经典短信 谜语短信 短信祝福 爆笑短信 生日短信 爱情短信 精彩短信 情人节短信 短信传情 节日短信 彩信图片 彩信动画 彩信相册 免费彩信下载 三星彩信 联通彩信 移动彩信 彩信铃声 免费彩铃下载 移动彩铃 联通彩铃 12530彩铃 小灵通彩铃 免费三星手机铃声 免费和弦铃声 手机图铃下载 免费图铃下载 待机彩图 三星手机待机彩图 丰胸铃声
网络游戏 免费游戏下载 小游戏 在线游戏 游戏外挂 游戏论坛 游戏点卡 联众游戏 泡泡堂游戏 游戏攻略 FLASH游戏 单机游戏下载 美女 美女图片 美女写真 美女论坛 性感美女 美女走光 街头走光 走光照片 免费电影下载 免费在线电影 免费电影在线观看 小电影 免费成人电影 免费激情电影 电影论坛 PP点点通电影下载 BT电影下载 免费三级电影 爱情电影 舒淇电影 韩国电影 周星驰电影 流行音乐 免费音乐下载 音乐在线 在线音乐 古典音乐 音乐试听 MP3音乐 MP3下载 MP3播放器 MP3随身听 免费MP3歌曲下载 QQ下载 申请QQ QQ幻想外挂 QQ表情 QQ挂机 珊瑚虫QQ QQ头像 QQ游戏 QQ空间代码 QQ个性签名 网络小说 玄幻小说 成人小说 爱情小说 小说下载 金庸小说 武侠小说 聊天室 语音聊天室 列车时刻表

Leave a comment

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »

Inside Cafe



Cafe Features


January 5-9

Book Cover

January 12-16

Book Cover

January 19-23

Book Cover

January 26-30

Book Cover

February 2-6

Book Cover

February 9-13

The Great Depression

February 16-20

Tear Down This Myth

February 23-27

Demagogue

March 16-20

Engaging The Muslim World




Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Claire Wilcox



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address