TPMCafe
« Truth | Home | GM Job Cuts Demonstrate The Business Case for Health Care Reform »

Failing Grades

user-pic

In case you worry about getting blown up or whatever, the 9/11 Commission says our policies are still terrible, which isn't all that reassuring. People probably don't focus all that much on this, because we haven't been attacked again, raising the question of why. The biggest factor, or so it seems, is that American Muslims simply don't have much interest in becoming radicalized, suicide-bombing jihadis which has a huge security value. But why is that? Spencer Ackerman takes a look, and to oversimply a bit the answer is that Americans are very religious and pretty tolerant. And there are risks:

But the protections of American liberalism and American religiosity are not impenetrable. Obviously, Al Qaeda could once again place operatives in the U.S. homeland. But, more substantially, the greatest danger to the present U.S.-Muslim compact is the increasing suspicion of American Muslims. This suspicion has been fanned by opportunistic politicians like Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney--a 2008 presidential hopeful who, in a September speech, suggested widespread surveillance of U.S. mosques--and by hysterical pop culture offerings like "Sleeper Cell," a Showtime TV thriller premiering this week about a Muslim enemy within. An October 2004 Zogby poll found that a plurality of American Muslims believe "constitutional issues"--a proxy for the Patriot Act and immigration enforcement--are the most important challenge facing their community, with "bias/racism" coming a very close second. (The third, tellingly, was "becoming mainstream.") Post-September 11 suspicion of American Muslims may have been inevitable, but it's also "remarkably insulting and a moral disappointment," says Khaled Abou El Fadl, a law professor at UCLA and a prominent liberal voice among American Muslims. Abou El Fadl is an excellent case in point: He has endured death threats for his supposed Islamic heterodoxies and has helped the FBI create profiles of terrorist cells. But even an unapologetically American and pious Muslim like himself is unable to escape innuendo about his membership in a fifth column: He was termed a "stealth Islamist" by a 2004 Middle East Quarterly article.

So that's more stuff to worry about.


7 Comments

| Leave a comment

The biggest factor, or so it seems, is that American Muslims simply don't have much interest in becoming radicalized, suicide-bombing jihadis which has a huge security value.  yglesias

Not really.  Worldwide, 99.9% of all one billion Muslims have no interest "in becoming radicalized, suicide-bombing jihadis."  That leaves -- what? -- about a million who do?

 

I'm betting that at almost every point in our history there have been vast numbers of people world wide who hate us and would like to destroy us. Fortunately this is a big world, and those folks have a pretty hard time finding a way to actually do the destructive act. Plus, the percentage of those who have the single mindedness, the drive, the total lack of conscience required to do a major terrorist act is very small. I keep wondering who benefits from keeping us in a constant state of fear about such a tiny percentage of the world. Hmmm.....now who could benefit????

And what becomes of those of us who aren't especially afraid of being blown up? I propose we divide North America into two spacious zones, inviting everyone unafraid of being blown up to live in one, and everyone else to live in the other one. They would be governed accordingly.

"...and those folks have a pretty hard time finding a way to actually do the destructive act."

I have long said that three guys with AK-47s at a grade school in Indiana could make this country crazy, the way two snipers in DC made the country a little crazy.. I do not understand why we have not seen major or minor attacks.

However, tho of course it would be tragic, I was for the last few years worried more about how the Bush administration would take advantage of another attack. They have been sufficiently weakened and discredited that I am less worried.

Of course, it would depend on the scale. I could not predict the reaction to a tragedy larger than 9/11. I simply no longer know.

to oversimply a bit the answer is that Americans are very religious and pretty tolerant.


I can see how tolerance helps.  But religiosity?  How does that help, if Americans are of a different religion?  If radical Islam has a significant preference for fervent Christians over atheists and wishy-washy secular types, this is the first I've heard of it.  

"I can see how tolerance helps.  But religiosity?"

My guess is that compared to say Europe, religion as a concept is not seen as ridiculous.  In the US, Muslims might get hit by anti-Muslim sentiment.  They wouldn't also constantly be hit by anti-religious sentiment as an additional irritant. 

Ackerman's observations strike me as based on the most unfortunate, erroneous and seemingly widely-held of assumptions, that 9/11 was essentially a political act rather than  a criminal one. Indeed, it is has become my feeling that to think otherwise has virtually taken on the aura of "thought crime." Notice however, in understanding it as a crime (of unparalleled and historic proportion, certainly) how meaningless the question of why "they" haven't attacked us again becomes. Ackerman's passing suggestion that some kind of putative "compact" between the U.S. and Muslims exists only as a pure fabrication
cut from the polarization created by the GWOT. It seems to me that there is as little reason to wonder why terrorists haven't  struck as to wonder why someone hasn't tried to perpetrate almost any other kind of crime one can imagine. 

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address