TPMCafe
« Scanlon: "Guilty, Your Honor" | Home | Another Shoe Drops On Rep. Ney »

Union Busting at NYC Charter Schools?

user-pic

One reason unions are more successful in pubic sector organizing is that governments generally refrain from the union busting tactics of the private sectors.  Teachers and other public employees have the chance to vote on whether to unionize without the illegal threats and management intimidation that is the staple of private sector organizing campaigns.


But that may be about to change in New York City charter schools, where rightwing foundations are teaming up to bring modern union busting to attack teachers unions in the expanding charter schools around the city.


This EdWize post has the details, but here's the money quotes about the rightwing Atlantic Legal Foundation (ALF) efforts to promote anti-union attacks:

In its Charter School Advocacy Program, the ALF relies almost totally upon the work of the anti-union, management law firm, Jackson, Lewis, Schnitzler & Krupman...The conference unveiled the ALF's "legal guide" to preventing unionization in New York Charter Schools, which was published under the same title as the conference. It was written by Jackson Lewis LLP, with Kaplan and Walsh functioning as the main co-authors.
Most disturbing, many mainstream leaders of the charter school movement, strongly tied to Mayor Bloomberg and the administration, participated in the ALF-sponsored conference and publicly proclaimed themselves dedicated to undermining teachers rights to unionize:
The consensus of this panel was, in the words of Norman Atkins, "good charter schools organize themselves in ways that keep unions out." Only slightly more circumspect than the Jackson Lewis panel, this group declared as non-negotiable an "at will" employment process, with the right to hire and fire without any due process, the elimination of tenure, and a lengthy school day, week and year.
Read the rest of the piece.  What is highlights is that privatization of schools is opening the door to the rightwing bringing in its corporate money to gut labor rights in the public sector.  

5 Comments

| Leave a comment

The principal function of charter schools is to provide the middle class with a method of escaping failing low income schools -- sort of an "internal" white flight.

Teachers' unions will find that many of their members will give up the benefits of unionization for the opportunity to teach in a charter school environment.

If the unions can't stop the charter school movement itself, looking to labor law rights to hold onto union membership will be a losing proposition.

Ellen-  That seems like a pretty bad choice to lay out, that charter schools inevitably will lead to illegal union busting?


To me, while I have questions about charter schools, it seems quite reasonable to allow some schools to experiment with alternative curriculum and other forms of flexibility, without allowing them to exploit teachers and deny those teachers a basic voice at work.


So it should be precisely supporters of charter schools who should have the most revulsion at folks like Jackson Lewis getting involved here.   Because I'm someone who might support some aspects of charter schools, but if they force me to buy Jackson Lewis union busting as part of the package, then they are creating sworn enemies of the whole movement.

"Teachers' unions will find that many of their members will give up the benefits of unionization for the opportunity to teach in a charter school environment."

That's sadly probably true. Not having to deal with "problem" children is the reason some people are willing to earn less teaching at private schools.

Charter schools are exactly that, aren't they, chartered? In a city like New York, with relatively powerful unions and a pretty liberal political establishment, couldn't they just push to require that charter schools can only be chartered if they are unionized or at least sign agreements of union-neutrality? They can lose their charters as well, and unions and progressives could pressure the school board to revoke the charters of schools that refuse to sign union-neutrality agreements.

Would that work? 

The intention and the promise of charter schools from the very beginning was to bust the teachers unions. They haven't proven to be any more effective at teaching considering they can pick and choose students, oh are they saving any taxpayer money?? anybody?? Its a profit making non-unionized school system thats been the purpose of the charter school system from day one. Take my tax money and give it to the share holders, god forbid we put anything in their way toward maximizing profits like requiring techer certification or that they adhere to labor laws. Its almost as bad as vouchers where the intent from day one was to funnel taxpayer money into the churches and allow them to discriminae in hiring based on their "beliefs". What has happened to our country.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »



Book Club Calendar


Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Kyle Krahel-Frolander



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address