« Ballot Initiatives Lose (And the News Is??) | Home | The Cure Might Be Different From the Diagnosis »

Page 108

user-pic

At AEI today, Ahmed Chalabi naturally took some questions about the bogus intelligence question. He replied, to the geneal applause of the non-media folks in the room, that we should check out "the reports" on the matter conducted by the Robb-Silberman Commission and the Senate Intelligence Committee. Specifically, he suggested that page 108 of the Robb-Silberman report exonerated him. In fact, page 108 of the report states:

In fact, over all, CIA's post-war investigations revealed that INC-related sources had a minimal impact on pre-war assessments. 405 The October 2002 NIE relied on reporting from two INC sources, both of whom were later deemed to be fabricators. One source-- the INC source --provided fabricated reporting on the existence of mobile BW facilities in Iraq. The other source, whose information was provided in a text box in the NIE and sourced to a "defector," reported on the possible construction of a new nuclear facility in Iraq. The CIA concluded that this source was being "directed" by the INC to provide information to the U.S. Intelligence Community. 406 Reporting from these two INC sources had a "negligible" impact on the overall assessments, however. 407

Another serious flaw affecting the Intelligence Community's pre-war assessments was its inability to keep reporting from a known fabricator out of finished intelligence. Specifically, the INC source, handled by DIA's Defense HUMINT Service, provided information on Iraqi mobile BW facilities that was initially thought to corroborate Curveball's reporting. The INC source was quickly deemed a fabricator in May 2002, however, and Defense HUMINT issued a fabrication notice but did not recall the reporting on mobile BW facilities in Iraq. Despite the fabrication notice, reporting from the INC source regarding Iraqi mobile BW facilities started to be used again several months later in finished intelligence--eventually ending up in the October 2002 NIE and in Secretary Powell's February 2003 speech to the United Nations Security Council. 408

That's a very strange concept of exoneration Chalabi seems to be working with. Page 108 states that the INC provided information to the Intelligence Community that was inaccurate. It states that the INC sources were deliberately fabricating their reports. And it states that the sources were being "directed" to do so by the INC.


17 Comments

| Leave a comment

it's no stranger than the notion, shared by many at the AEI and in the bush administration, that chalabai was george washington and abraham lincoln (and george bush!) rolled into one!

and certainly no stranger than the notion that the AEI applauded him.

denial, as i'm fond of noting, is a very powerful force, but we are edging into a psychotic level of denial here.

Chalabi has studied at the Karl Rove school of politics.


If you speak a falsehood with conviction in front of an audience predisposed to support you, and you cite plausible false evidence, most observers will walk away convinced not only that you are telling the truth, but that you are well-informed and sincere.  Few will bother to check your sources.  Many will quote you favorably and pass your argument along until it achieves the status of conventional wisdom.


If the major media pick up on the controversy, they will present it as a partisan disagreement between you and your critics, and those few who have the guts to call you a liar will subsequently be denounced by all the usual suspects for displaying the dreaded liberal bias.


Wash, rinse, and repeat if necessary.

What is Matthew talking about?  Is he deliberately lying, or just obtuse?

From the Robb-Silberman report (immediately prior to the quotes Matthew used):

"Despite speculation that Curveball was encouraged to lie by the Iraqi National Congress (INC), the CIA's post-war investigations were unable to uncover any evidence that the INC or any other organization was directing Curveball to feed misleading information to the Intelligence Community. 403 Instead, the post-war investigations concluded that Curveball's reporting was not influenced by, controlled by, or connected to, the INC. 404 "

(emphasis added)

Can the exoneration be any clearer?

As Kevin Drum might say: ALWAYS CLICK THE LINK.

We are truly inhabitants of the bizarro world when Chalabi, of the nine lives, is received by the Secretary of State and will apparently meet with the Vice-President during his stay.


This man who helped get us into a war with his fabrications, an alleged embezzler, a possible spy, a man who never acounted for the millions the US gave him, this man is still welcomed at the highest levels of government.  Amazing!  

"Can the exoneration be any clearer?"

So, in other words, he wasn't responsible for ALL fabricated evidence--just a lot of it.  This is exoneration?

LaFollette Progressive - Thanks, that's one of the best concise descriptions of the neocon/RW propaganda m.o. I've read. Good work!

Helpme,

Now it's my turn to tell you: you're obtuse.  Sure, the Republican-led investigation concluded that there was no evidence linking "Curveball" to the INC. 

Matt's post wasn't about "Curveball."  It was about two INC-linked liars, one of whom "confirmed" Curveball's fabrications, while the other lied about mobile bioweapons labs. 

Now do you see the problem with Chalabi and the INC?  How many lying sources do they have to provide us with before you start to wonder whether they're actually scumbags, not allies?

 

Nominee for the most pith for least words award.  Nicely put.

Sure, the Republican-led investigation concluded

What party is Chuck Robb in again?

It was about two INC-linked liars, one of whom "confirmed" Curveball's fabrications, while the other lied about mobile bioweapons labs. 
Now do you see the problem with Chalabi and the INC? 

No, I see a problem with the two fabricators.  I don't see a problem with Chalabi or the INC.  The report says that the INC directed one of the fabricators to provide information - the report DID NOT say that the INC directed the fabricator to lie.  And it is clear from the excerpt I posted above that the authors of the report know the difference.

So, to sum up, the Robb-Silberman report CLEARLY exonerated Chalabi with respect to the most famous fabricator: Curveball.  And the Robb-Silberman report doesn't implicate Chalabi at all with respect to two other minor sources that had a "negligible" effect on policy.

I think Chalabi's statement holds up pretty well, and Matthew's post doesn't hold up well at all.

No evidence? Curveball was connected to the INC by blood. Specifically, he was the brother of an INC officer.

That would seem a pretty direct connection.

Kind of like Silberman's direct connection to the October Surprise -- aiding/abetting those holding Americans hostage in Iran just to win an election.

(You didn't really think Rikki's wackjob husband could have found his way to a federal judgeship without having a pretty big chit to call in, did you?)

Chalabi is a carpet salesman. Dick Cheney is a used car salesman. Of course they got along.

I'll agree that Matt should have included the paragraph you cited.


But to call this a "clear exoneration" of Chalabi is a grotesque misreading of the report.


The CIA concluded that there was no evidence to support the allegations that the INC directed Curveball to lie.  It also points out that the impact of the INC-linked defectors on the official National Intelligence Estimate was minimal.


On the other hand, the report confirms that two of the defectors who were directed by the INC to speak with the CIA were, in fact, fabricators.  And they were fabricating stories about 2 of the most alarming WMD tales-- the mobile bioweapons facilities and the reconstituted nuclear weapons program.


That's a very hollow "exoneration," to say the least.  These two claims played a large role in the public imagination, regardless of their importance in the NIE.


But more importantly, this report doesn't even address the main accusations against Chalabi.  It has been reported on countless occasions that the CIA distrusted the intelligence supplied by the INC.  The key accusation against Chalabi has always been that he was responsible for channeling intelligence to the White House and the US media (e.g. Judy Miller.)  He is at the center of claims that the Bush Administration exaggerated the case for war, not the concerns about the CIA's handling of intelligence.

Maybe the follow-up should have been something along the lines of "You passed false information along to Times reporter Judith Miller which resulted in her writing the first in a series of articles which were later discredited, and which have recently lead to her being kicked out of her nearly thirty year career. Do you think you owe her, the Times or their readers an apology for lying to them?"

Hello, Scaifebot.  I see you (and Chalabi) subscribe to the George W. Bush theory of accountability: if someone in the organization I lead does something bad, it's not my responsbility, cause hey, I didn't do it and I didn't know about it.

Other than that, I'll just note that your post is flatly contradicted by the text block-quoted in Matt's original post.  The quality of the VWRC's henchbots has really declined recently.  I should write them a letter about that.

There seems to be some confusion here, between the "reality of the courtroom" and the reality of... well... reality. A confusion between "not guilty" and "didn't do it"

To coin a cliche... "Lack of evidence is not evidence of lack." They "failed to turn up evidence that..." doesn't mean that there was no evidence to turn up. Just that they failed to turn it up.

 The only connection between "real reality" and the courtroom lies in the "double jeapardy" area. If you're tried-by-media, and can stave off a "guilty" verdict until they lose interest, it's highly unusual that the story can be brought back to the front page even a short time later; it's "old news".

 Trial by media, judicial investigation, investigation by the CIA... let's not forget that "not guilty" and "getting away with it through lack of evidence, bribing the jury, membership of the same club as the TV station's owner, or blackmailing the judge" have no real link with reality.

Chalabi used the same "exoneration" on Morning Edition this morning.

user-pic

手机铃声 铃声下载 免费铃声 免费铃声下载 免费手机铃声下载 和弦铃声 三星铃声 三星手机铃声下载 MP3铃声 手机铃声下载 手机自编铃声 MP3手机铃声 诺基亚铃声下载 NOKIA铃声下载 小灵通铃声下载 真人铃声 MP3铃声下载 自编铃声 联通铃声下载 移动手机铃声下载 联通手机铃声免费下载 TCL铃声 飞利浦铃声下载 特效铃声 搞笑铃声 MIDI铃声 铃声图片 MMF铃声下载 免费手机图片下载 免费手机点歌 手机短信 手机彩信 手机彩铃 康佳手机铃声下载 TCL手机铃声下载 迪比特手机铃声下载 手机和旋铃声 三星手机铃声 三星手机和弦铃声下载 波导手机铃声下载 熊猫手机铃声下载 免费手机铃声 科健手机铃声下载 海尔手机铃声下载 诺基亚手机铃声下载 手机和弦铃声 手机铃声图片下载 飞利浦手机铃声下载 手机自编铃声曲谱 小灵通手机铃声下载 手机铃声编辑 CDMA手机铃声下载 摩托罗拉手机铃声下载 联通CDMA手机铃声下载 松下手机铃声下载 东信手机铃声下载 联想手机铃声下载 中兴手机铃声下载 大显手机铃声下载 首信手机铃声下载 三星手机自编铃声 三星CDMA手机铃声 康佳手机和弦铃声 MP3手机铃声下载 索尼爱立信手机铃声 手机铃声大全 三星手机铃声图片下载 手机特效铃声 手机铃声制作 三星手机铃声免费下载 TCL手机自编铃声 松下手机自编铃声 飞利浦手机自编铃声 诺基亚手机自编铃声 摩托罗拉自编铃声 三星手机MP3铃声 手机MP3铃声制作软件 免费MP3铃声下载 摩托罗拉MP3铃声 三星MP3铃声下载 联通MP3铃声下载 中国移动铃声下载 中国联通手机铃声下载 免费联通手机铃声 联通铃声 联通用户手机铃声下载 联通手机和弦铃声下载 联通手机铃声图片下载 小灵通铃声免费下载 和弦铃声免费下载
免费下载三星铃声 诺基亚免费铃声下载 联通免费铃声下载 免费铃声图片下载 MMF铃声免费下载 TCL免费铃声下载 免费下载铃声 手机铃声免费下载 松下免费铃声下载 NOKIA免费铃声下载 MIDI铃声免费下载 和弦铃声下载 TCL免费手机铃声下载 免费手机铃声图片下载 免费手机铃声下载网站 小灵通手机铃声免费下载 诺基亚手机铃声免费下载 摩托罗拉手机铃声免费下载 三星和弦铃声 CECT和弦铃声下载 三星T108和弦铃声 NOKIA和弦铃声下载 康佳和弦铃声下载 迪比特和弦铃声下载 阿尔卡特和弦铃声 CDMA和弦铃声下载 夏新和弦铃声下载 西门子和弦铃声 诺基亚和弦铃声 联通和弦铃声 三星铃声下载 三星和旋铃声 三星T108铃声下载 三星手机铃声乐园 三星CDMA铃声下载 三星免费铃声 三星真人铃声 诺基亚3100铃声下载 NOKIA手机铃声下载 怎样下载小灵通铃声 真人铃声下载 真人真唱手机铃声下载 联通用户铃声下载 联通CDMA铃声下载 TCL手机铃声图片下载 TCL手机和弦铃声下载 飞利浦630铃声下载 三星特效铃声 手机特效铃声下载 搞笑短信 MMF手机铃声 MMF格式铃声 免费短信 短信笑话 幽默短信 经典短信 谜语短信 短信祝福 爆笑短信 生日短信 爱情短信 精彩短信 情人节短信 短信传情 节日短信 彩信图片 彩信动画 彩信相册 免费彩信下载 三星彩信 联通彩信 移动彩信 彩信铃声 免费彩铃下载 移动彩铃 联通彩铃 12530彩铃 小灵通彩铃 免费三星手机铃声 免费和弦铃声 手机图铃下载 免费图铃下载 待机彩图 三星手机待机彩图 丰胸铃声
网络游戏 免费游戏下载 小游戏 在线游戏 游戏外挂 游戏论坛 游戏点卡 联众游戏 泡泡堂游戏 游戏攻略 FLASH游戏 单机游戏下载 美女 美女图片 美女写真 美女论坛 性感美女 美女走光 街头走光 走光照片 免费电影下载 免费在线电影 免费电影在线观看 小电影 免费成人电影 免费激情电影 电影论坛 PP点点通电影下载 BT电影下载 免费三级电影 爱情电影 舒淇电影 韩国电影 周星驰电影 流行音乐 免费音乐下载 音乐在线 在线音乐 古典音乐 音乐试听 MP3音乐 MP3下载 MP3播放器 MP3随身听 免费MP3歌曲下载 QQ下载 申请QQ QQ幻想外挂 QQ表情 QQ挂机 珊瑚虫QQ QQ头像 QQ游戏 QQ空间代码 QQ个性签名 网络小说 玄幻小说 成人小说 爱情小说 小说下载 金庸小说 武侠小说 聊天室 语音聊天室 列车时刻表

手机铃声 铃声下载 免费铃声 免费铃声下载 免费手机铃声下载 和弦铃声 三星铃声 三星手机铃声下载 MP3铃声 手机铃声下载 手机自编铃声 MP3手机铃声 诺基亚铃声下载 NOKIA铃声下载 小灵通铃声下载 真人铃声 MP3铃声下载 自编铃声 联通铃声下载 移动手机铃声下载 联通手机铃声免费下载 TCL铃声 飞利浦铃声下载 特效铃声 搞笑铃声 MIDI铃声 铃声图片 MMF铃声下载 免费手机图片下载 免费手机点歌 手机短信 手机彩信 手机彩铃 康佳手机铃声下载 TCL手机铃声下载 迪比特手机铃声下载 手机和旋铃声 三星手机铃声 三星手机和弦铃声下载 波导手机铃声下载 熊猫手机铃声下载 免费手机铃声 科健手机铃声下载 海尔手机铃声下载 诺基亚手机铃声下载 手机和弦铃声 手机铃声图片下载 飞利浦手机铃声下载 手机自编铃声曲谱 小灵通手机铃声下载 手机铃声编辑 CDMA手机铃声下载 摩托罗拉手机铃声下载 联通CDMA手机铃声下载 松下手机铃声下载 东信手机铃声下载 联想手机铃声下载 中兴手机铃声下载 大显手机铃声下载 首信手机铃声下载 三星手机自编铃声 三星CDMA手机铃声 康佳手机和弦铃声 MP3手机铃声下载 索尼爱立信手机铃声 手机铃声大全 三星手机铃声图片下载 手机特效铃声 手机铃声制作 三星手机铃声免费下载 TCL手机自编铃声 松下手机自编铃声 飞利浦手机自编铃声 诺基亚手机自编铃声 摩托罗拉自编铃声 三星手机MP3铃声 手机MP3铃声制作软件 免费MP3铃声下载 摩托罗拉MP3铃声 三星MP3铃声下载 联通MP3铃声下载 中国移动铃声下载 中国联通手机铃声下载 免费联通手机铃声 联通铃声 联通用户手机铃声下载 联通手机和弦铃声下载 联通手机铃声图片下载 小灵通铃声免费下载 和弦铃声免费下载
免费下载三星铃声 诺基亚免费铃声下载 联通免费铃声下载 免费铃声图片下载 MMF铃声免费下载 TCL免费铃声下载 免费下载铃声 手机铃声免费下载 松下免费铃声下载 NOKIA免费铃声下载 MIDI铃声免费下载 和弦铃声下载 TCL免费手机铃声下载 免费手机铃声图片下载 免费手机铃声下载网站 小灵通手机铃声免费下载 诺基亚手机铃声免费下载 摩托罗拉手机铃声免费下载 三星和弦铃声 CECT和弦铃声下载 三星T108和弦铃声 NOKIA和弦铃声下载 康佳和弦铃声下载 迪比特和弦铃声下载 阿尔卡特和弦铃声 CDMA和弦铃声下载 夏新和弦铃声下载 西门子和弦铃声 诺基亚和弦铃声 联通和弦铃声 三星铃声下载 三星和旋铃声 三星T108铃声下载 三星手机铃声乐园 三星CDMA铃声下载 三星免费铃声 三星真人铃声 诺基亚3100铃声下载 NOKIA手机铃声下载 怎样下载小灵通铃声 真人铃声下载 真人真唱手机铃声下载 联通用户铃声下载 联通CDMA铃声下载 TCL手机铃声图片下载 TCL手机和弦铃声下载 飞利浦630铃声下载 三星特效铃声 手机特效铃声下载 搞笑短信 MMF手机铃声 MMF格式铃声 免费短信 短信笑话 幽默短信 经典短信 谜语短信 短信祝福 爆笑短信 生日短信 爱情短信 精彩短信 情人节短信 短信传情 节日短信 彩信图片 彩信动画 彩信相册 免费彩信下载 三星彩信 联通彩信 移动彩信 彩信铃声 免费彩铃下载 移动彩铃 联通彩铃 12530彩铃 小灵通彩铃 免费三星手机铃声 免费和弦铃声 手机图铃下载 免费图铃下载 待机彩图 三星手机待机彩图 丰胸铃声
网络游戏 免费游戏下载 小游戏 在线游戏 游戏外挂 游戏论坛 游戏点卡 联众游戏 泡泡堂游戏 游戏攻略 FLASH游戏 单机游戏下载 美女 美女图片 美女写真 美女论坛 性感美女 美女走光 街头走光 走光照片 免费电影下载 免费在线电影 免费电影在线观看 小电影 免费成人电影 免费激情电影 电影论坛 PP点点通电影下载 BT电影下载 免费三级电影 爱情电影 舒淇电影 韩国电影 周星驰电影 流行音乐 免费音乐下载 音乐在线 在线音乐 古典音乐 音乐试听 MP3音乐 MP3下载 MP3播放器 MP3随身听 免费MP3歌曲下载 QQ下载 申请QQ QQ幻想外挂 QQ表情 QQ挂机 珊瑚虫QQ QQ头像 QQ游戏 QQ空间代码 QQ个性签名 网络小说 玄幻小说 成人小说 爱情小说 小说下载 金庸小说 武侠小说 聊天室 语音聊天室 列车时刻表

Leave a comment

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »

Inside Cafe



Cafe Features


January 5-9

Book Cover

January 12-16