TPMCafe
« Full Speed Ahead on DeLay | Home | Dog Bites Man Stories »

The Spoils

user-pic

Texas sent seven new representatives to Congress this session:


Louie Gohmert (R-1st)

Ted Poe (R-2nd)

Al Green (D-9th)

Michael McCaul (R-10th)

Mike Conaway (R-11th)

Kenny Marchant (R-24th)

Henry Cuellar (D-28th)


Of them, all five Republicans joined the delegation thanks to the DeLay fundraising/redistricting conspiracy.

Gohmert and Poe beat Chief Deputy Whip Max Sandlin and Rep. Nick Lampson, respectively, in closely contested races.


The other three Republican seats were picked up in newly created districts where the incumbent did not run.


In its election projections, CNN called DeLay redistricting's "primary architect" and declared  Texas a "huge win for the GOP."


20 Comments

| Leave a comment

Henry Cuellar is the worst grinder monkey pretending to be a Democrat. He has voted for every major bill over the past couple of years and is yet to be called to account. There are about 15 of these in different parts of the country Southern states, but Cuellar is among the worst of them. It would not surprise me if he runs unopposed in the primary, which should tell you a lot about the state of the Democratic Party.

It would not surprise me if he runs unopposed in the primary, which should tell you a lot about the state of the Democratic Party.


Or the state of Texas.  

I asked this in another post, but I really wonder:  since the redistricting was done as a result of illegality, if they are found guilty will the district lines revert to their previous ones?  To me, that is more important than jail time for the perpetrators, but WTF, why can't we have both?

Jan Knaus
The honorable representative from Midland is Mike Conaway (not Conway). He was the accounting brains behind Bush's oil exploits in Midland, and that was his entire campaign strategy.

Under the 2000 districting map, Midland and Lubbock were in the same congressional district. In fact, for as far back as I can remember, Midland and Lubbock have been in the same congressional district. The two cities have a lot in common, so that arrangement has usually made quite a bit of sense. The big problem, though, is that Lubbock has its own political machine which is entirely wrapped up by the local real estate establishment (*). Lubbock has been the traditional home of the region's Congresscritter, and it wasn't about to let go of that mantle. So even though Lubbock is as right-leaning as cities come, and even though Conaway ran in the primary as "Bush's best bud from the Arbusto days," it wasn't enough....Naugebauer (who--can you believe it?!--is a Lubbock real estate man) got the primary nod and the seat vacated by retiring Congresscritter Larry Combest, who retired the spring following the 2002 midterms.

Meanwhile, the state Reps take the statehouse; the ever-admirable Pete Laney (D) is ousted as House Speaker; Midland's Craddick (R) strong-arms into the power seat; redistricting happens; and Bush's money man gets that seat he was promised.

Don't know specifically what ties Craddick has in other shady Bush family financial dealings, but I for one am comforted by the fact that it wasn't cronyism but rather Conaway's expert and knowledgable managing of Arbusto's books which qualifies him to sit in the Congress. At least he wasn't made Treasury Secretary.

(*) Lubbock's current mayor is the scion of the city's largest and best-known residential development firm. Naturally, the city has planted economic development zones right on top of said scion's family's interests and even used some eminent domain leverage to vacate an entire neighborhood (admitedly a slum, and no one cried much) which will now be redeveloped (by said scion's said family's business) into some nicer and pricier properties. And this isn't a scandal in Lubbock because (a) that's just how it's always been done, and how they always will be done while the land oligopoly holds the reins, and (b) in all fairness, the obligatory recusals were in place and the changes really are to the betterment of the city.

I don't think that's likely, Jan.  You're talking about a court overturning an otherwise duly enacted law on the ground that certain of the legislators shouldn't have been there voting for it.  The federal courts would (I think) consider that a nonjusticiable political question; I assume the Texas state courts would do likewise.

Another aspect of Henry Cuellar's election is that traditionally San Antonio which is where his district is, is mostly Hispanic. And southwest Texas is almost all Democrat because of that fact. The man Cuellar replaced was a mentor and freind of Cuellar. He even helped Cuellar when he sought State office and lost. But after he lost the State race, Cuellar turns around and stabs his freind in the back and beats him in the primary for the congressional seat. He is a sleaze.

But don't forget Henry Bonilla, a Republican "Hispanic", His District is the perfect example of political gerrymandering which totally dilutes the democrat vote, but because he is hispanic people believe that the rural areas of his district ar well represented. He is strictly party line, never goes against the GOP agenda even at the cost of his minority constituents.

From an African-American perspective, this only the first step in the first step toward justice.

As Austin points out, five Republicans benefited form DeLay's scheme, which was in essence packing black and Latino voters in fewer distrcits so they would have influence over the election of fewer congressmen. As this was a direct attack on minority voting power, the federal courts should invalidate the new districts as violations of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

http://intelligencesquad.blogspot.com/2005/09/indicted.html

You guys are all wrong.  First off, buck and Vampa, Cuellar is being challenged by not one, but two other Democrats.  Ciro Rodriguez, who lost to Cuellar in the '04 primary, and State Rep. Richard Raymond, who represents Cuellar's old State Rep. district.  If you followed Cuellar's '04 House race, you'd know that Ciro had actually won by a couple of hundreds votes when several ballot boxes were 'found' a few days after the election, giving Cuellar a couple hundred vote lead.  The courts threw out the subsequent lawsuit and, bam, Cuellar's a Congressman.

 

So thanks for your ripping of Texas and the Democratic Party, but here, you can have it back.

 

Txexspeedy, Cuellar's district is split between Laredo (Texas bordertown of about 250,000) and Southern San Antonio.  So it's not mostly Hispanic, it's overwhelmingly Hispanic.  Another reason for Cuellar's victory is that since TX CD-28 has been around in some version of its current state, it's been represented by a congressman from San Antonio.  Cuellar is Laredo's first hometown Congressman.  This led to higher than expected turnout in Laredo, offsetting the larger population San Antonio portion.

 

Finally, Cuellar's district was another, intended consequence of DeLay's redistricting.  Cuellar took on Henry Bonnilla in '02, losing 52-48.  Bonilla's '02 district encompassed North San Antonio, primarily white, Republican territory, and all of Laredo, with some rural counties inbetween.  Bonilla overwhelmingly won San Antonio, Cuellar overwhlemingly won Laredo, and because there's more people in Northern San Antonio than in Laredo, Bonilla came away with a victory.  DeLay, and Texas Republicans went to great pain to protect Bonilla, keeping his Northern San Antonio base intact while splitting Laredo in half , into what is now Bonilla's and Cuellar's districts.  Cuellar's victory over Rodriguez can be directly linked to DeLay's redistricting too.  As can Al Green's.

 

Yes, Bonilla represents a good chunk of minorities, even in his new district, but that's not who he's trying to represent, or who he's looking to get his votes from.  His northern SA base gets him nearly all the votes he needs, and so long as he can just pull the baseline 30-35% Republican vote everwhere else, he can win his district again and again.

Henry will have at least one opponent, and probably two:  1) the predecessor Congressman from the District, Ciro Rodriguez, whom Cuellar beat in an election that was so tight it took about three court ordered recounts to finally call it; and 2) State Representative Richard Raymond from Laredo, who has served in the Legislature from two different districts for a total of four terms, and ran a credible, if unsuccessful statewide race for Agriculture Commissioner two elections ago. 

The deal is that, rather than hinging on having no primary opponent, Cuellar's chances hang on having too many primary opponents, splitting the vote three ways and maybe allowing him to slip in without a runoff.  Either way, though, he's going to have to run hard.

You forgot:


Pete Sessions vs. Martin Frost.  Both were incumbents and were redistricted into a blood red district with the intent that Sessions(R) would knock off Frost(D).


It worked, Rep. Sessions is in Congress, Martin Frost is out of work.

If playing the ethnicity card will work, then go for it. But with all due respect, the attention given to the disenfranchisement of african-americans and hispanics by Delay's gerrymandering scheme is misplaced. Anyone who isn't, or wasn't a part of this coup d'etat was disenfranchised. The congressional district serving the capital of Texas was carved up like a pie, and Austin lost the representation of its congressman of 10 years, Lloyd Doggett. There are a great many people in Austin from all walks of life who were disenfranchised. I for one love to hear the sound of Delay's whining and bleating that Ronnie Earle's prosecution is "partisan". Hot Tub Tom may finally get his comeuppance. I'll raise a toast to that!

DeLay's folks used a lot of pack-and-crack redistricting of Latinos, AAs (and also paying attention to the alliances of these groups to liberal white sections of the district)  --- to achieve a partisan end.

The dissenting judge on the Appeals Court, T. John Ward, wrote that the new Texas map lines would "crush these minority voters' participation in the political process."   [January 2004]

The DoJ's preclearance of the map was a travesty of justice by political appointees.

You're probably right.  Too bad, though.

Cuellar's win was in the cards because DeLay redrew that district with the aim of unseating liberal Ciro Rodriguez.  That was a big prize for DeLay.

Cuellar, a "DINO." has been a long-time Bush supporter.  His top contributor was <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/races/contrib.asp?ID=TX28&a mp;cycle=2004&special=N">a bank that</a> favors Republican candidates, International Bank of Commerce ("International Bancshares Corp") also was the vault where the disputed ballots were held in the race.  Get it?

The comment by "gracchusrex" that Austin lost the representation of Lloyd Doggett is not entirely correct.  Although Doggett was specifically targeted for extinction by the carve-up of Austin's 10th Congressional District, he once again demonstrated the voter-appeal of unimpeachable integrity and won election in the 25th District, which meanders from Austin to McAllen, a distance of some 300 miles.

Of the fruits two are already members of the Taiwan Congressional Caucus, Al Green and Kenny Marchant.  This so-called bi-partisan group is nothing more than the lobbying arm of the pro-independece Formosan Association for Public Affairs.Delay's Taiwan connections run deep and counter to stated US policy toward both mainland China and Taiwan.I wrote it about here:http://www.sinomania.com/CHINANEWS/Is_Tom_Delay_A_Patsy_For_Taiwa n.html

The redistricting of Lubbock and Midland into seperate districts was also done in a manner that forced Charlie Stenholm (a long-term Democrat Representative in the old 17th) to chose whether to run against Republicans Neugebauer or Mac Thornberry.


The end result? Stenholm did not get a return trip to DC for the first time in 26 years.


Stenholm was one of Rove and DeLay's targets.

One of the things Republicans have done that is very cleaver in districting is creating "tortured" districts which virtually guarantee a minority victory for Congress.  However, it takes blacks out of lots of other districts thereby assuring more Republicans getting elected to state legislatures and the House.  So far this has passed Constitutional muster.

Its been endorsed by the Supreme Court with respect to Georgia redistricting.

Also remember that Al Green beat an incumbent in the Dem primary (Chris Bell) in a district that was heavily African American due to the redistricting.  And that was much of the MO - shunt the minorities into essentially segregated districts to get pre-clearence from Justice.  Rep. Green won his seat in a nominally contested race by a greater margin than ALL the Texas Republicans in contested races won their races (72% - 27%).

Even bugman Delay beat a relatively unknown challanger by only 55% - 41%.

Marc

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address