Two Americas

avatar

During the campaign of 2004, I spoke often of the two Americas: the America of the privileged and the wealthy, and the America of those who lived from paycheck to paycheck.  I spoke of the difference in the schools, the difference in the loan rates, the difference in opportunity.  All of that pales today.  Today - and for many days and weeks and months to follow - we see a harsher example of two Americas.  We see the poor and working class of New Orleans who don't own a car and couldn't evacuate to hotels or families far from the target of Katrina.  We see the suffering of families who lived from paycheck to paycheck and who followed the advice of officials and went to shelters at the Civic Center or the Superdome or stayed home to protect their possessions.

Now every single resident of New Orleans, regardless of their wealth or status, will have terrible losses and life-altering experiences.  Every single resident will know and care about someone who was lost to this hurricane.    But some, ranging from the very poorest to the working class unable to accumulate a cushion of assets to rely upon on a very, very rainy day, will suffer the most because they simply didn't have the means to evacuate.  They suffered the most from Katrina because they always suffer the most.  


These are Americans some of whom who left everything they possessed behind in order to save those they loved.  These are Americans huddled with their children or pushing a wheelchair between rows of those too beaten or weak to stand.  In this moment, we have to remember they are part of us, Americans who love their country and are part of our national community.  In this moment, it is hard because our hair is clean and our clothes are washed and our eyes are not glazed with hopelessness. But these are our brothers and sisters, and we have to remember this not just for them, but for us.  We must finally recognize that when any of us suffer, we are all weaker; it affects us all.


Commentators on television have expressed surprise, saying they think that most people didn't know there was such poverty in America.  Thirty-seven million Americans live in poverty, most of them are the working poor, but it is clear that they have been invisible.  But if these commentators are right, this tragedy can have a great influence, if we listen to its message.

The people most devastated have always lived on a razor blade, afraid of any setback, any illness, any job loss that could disrupt the fragile balance they achieved paycheck to paycheck.  They didn't leave New Orleans because they couldn't leave.  Some didn't leave their homes because they wanted to protect the hard-won possessions that made their lives a little easier.  


The government released new poverty statistics this week.  The number of Americans living in poverty rose again last year.   Thirteen million children -- nearly one in every five -- lives in poverty.  Close to 25 percent of all African Americans live in poverty.   Twenty-three percent of the population in New Orleans lives in poverty.    Those are chilling numbers.  Because of Katrina, we have now seen many of the faces behind those numbers.  


Poverty exists everywhere in America.  It is in Detroit and El Paso.  It is in Omaha, Nebraska and Stockton, California.  It is in rural towns like Chillicothe, Ohio and Pine Bluff, Arkansas.  Nearly half of the children in Detroit, Atlanta and Long Beach, California live in poverty.  It doesn't have to be this way.  We can begin embracing policies that offer opportunity, reward responsibility, and assume the dignity of each American.  


There are immediate needs in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast, and the first priority is meeting those, but after that, we need to think about the American community, about the one America we think we are, the one we talk about. We need people to feel more than sympathy with the victims, we need them to feel empathy with our national community that includes the poor.  We have missed opportunities to make certain that all Americans would be more than huddled masses.  We have been too slow to act in the face in the misery of our brothers and sisters.  This is an ugly and horrifying wake-up call to America.  Let us pray we answer this call. Now is the time to act.


Comments (82)

avatar

We also need to loudly and clearly denounce the blame-the-victim tactics of this administration as they insist that the people who stayed are responsible for what happened to them.  It is sickening to hear this from the head of FEMA and listen as the head of the Department of Homeland Security backs him up. That is unacceptable and unamerican. They are trying to shift the responsibility for those hit hardest onto the backs of those hit hardest and it is hard for me to imagine anything more shameful than that.


We are all in this together. We cannot afford to let the monsters in this administration to frame this tragedy so that it divides America yet again.

avatar

Thirteen million children -- nearly one in every five -- lives in poverty.  Close to 25 percent of all African Americans live in poverty.   Twenty-three percent of the population in New Orleans lives in poverty.


It's unconscionable. I don't know what else to say.


If there is any good to come from this disaster, it's to remind people we really do have Two Americas, and we can take steps to making them one.

avatar

Sen. Edwards, thank you for continuing to highlight this discrepancy in America, and I urge you to continue to do so. The insensitive and largely clueless response of this administration composed of largely wealthy individuals is simply infuriating.  The strongest message Bush delivered seemed to be about the continuation of oil supply, and this dovetails with the obvious concern his administration had with the rush to get Wall Street up and running after 9/11.  Mike Brown's efforts to place blame on those poor New Orleans residents who could not get out will go up there with ``let them eat cake'' in my opinion.

 

Keep up your focus on this important issue Senator.  Yours is the most public face speaking of it since JFK.  

avatar

JRE,


I've been waiting to see some post, message, or other such word from you.


I have been a big fan of yours.  I believe you are absolutely right about the poverty situation in New Orleans and how that contributes so heavily to this disaster.


Your tone is sincere and somber, but my heart and mind are racing in anger.  I believe that many individuals in power NEVER saw these poor people... they NEVER think about them.  The powers that be (bush) don't know poor people.  Our leaders, all too many of them, believe people choose to be poor or are "content" to live as they are.


These are the same leaders who like Condi Rice decided to go shopping, and see a play on broadway before getting back to work 3 days after the hurricane hit.


Who is this FEMA director?  And how many crimes can we charge him with?  I've read reports that say he is an incompetent bumbler.  We need to be asking questions.  We need to hold our leaders accountable for their disgraceful responses to this tragedy.


While helping our fellow citizens, we must also embrace our passion and anger and focus ourselves on what truly matters.

  1.  Helping those victims who are still in danger.
  2.  Helping all the citizens of New Orleans
  3.  Helping the poor.

But also

4.  REMOVING FROM OFFICE those individuals who standby and turn a blind eye when they see people living in poverty.  REMOVE FROM OFFICE those individuals who believe that oil and gas companies deserve 1-2 billion dollars in tax credits.----

  AND IF ANYONE MENTIONS SOME SORT OF OIL COMPANY BAIL OUT BECAUSE OF THIS EVENT...

Or, maybe they'll offer a no-bid contract to some company to rebuild/repair parts of New Orleans.

---now I'm just angry.  However, using this tragedy as an example of incompetence is NOT politics.  This is the perfect example of what happens when you vote for leaders who are so out of touch with the true needs of the American people.

-Zen Blade

avatar

I think you mean RFK.


Robert F. Kennedy.  He was a huge advocate of the war on poverty.


-Zen Blade

avatar

Although that is a very important subplot here, the big story is LACK OF FEDERAL PREPARATION. National Guard troops are in Iraq instead of at home protecting America. Money that should have gone to preventive measures instead went to Iraq and tax cuts. Wetlands that should have been preserved were instead handed over to developers. The chain of command has broken down, the Bush administration doesn't know what it is doing, and at this rate New Orleans and its citizens may never recover.
The Kerry/Edwards administration would have had smart, capable people in charge rather than incompetent lackeys like Brown and Chertoff -- and yet even an efficient administration would have had its hands full dealing with this crisis.  
I understand that this may be a good opportunity to understand the poverty crisis across the country. But that's not the top priority right now. This crisis shows the value of good, smart governance to prevent problems and deal with them when they occur. Democrats need to explain that this is what incompetence and cronyism and corruption looks like in a crisis. And America deserves better.

As a person of poverty (handicapped, fixed income) what outrages me the most is all the back-slapping congratulations that Bush and other entrenched politicians are giving themselves for finally getting off their asses and acting - too little, too late!

They knew this hurricane was coming. Every resource should have been in a pre-staged position, waiting to immediately enter the disaster zones as soon as the wind stopped. What does our fearful leader do? Tells the people of Biloxi that we "must still fight this war on terror in Iraq". despite the need for the National Guard at home!

Mr. Edwards, if you want to do some good then act like a leader - if that's where your heading. We don't have any more time for political posturings. It's shit or get off the pot time. You happen to have the (sad, isn't it) financial resource to effectuate leadership. Use it or move aside for somebody who DOES want to lead.

And I'll say that to Gen. Clark and anyone else who proposes to politicize this horror. Forget the politics and take the lead! Our President is incapable of doing so.

ds 

Welcome back Mr. Edwards.


Priorities need to be re-examined in America.  We had a president, who new as early as Saturday, that a MAJOR hurricane was going to hit somewhere in the Gulf, and refused to end his vacation.  He needed to be back in DC to lead the efforts, instead his vacation was more important.


I have heard some from the right blaming victims who had no where to go, nor the wherewithall even if they had a destination, for their own plight.  Some people don't heed evacuation orders because they are foolhardy but the vast majority have no choice but to stay.  


You are no stranger to these storms, being from North Carolina.  We have seen a couple up here in Connecticut.  These storms are cataclysmic events which should be prepared for.  And how did this president prepare?  By cutting funding for levee improvements for NOLA.


The outrage over Katrina is that the full weight of our government was not brought to bear in assistance even before the last rain drop fell.  When we needed leadership we got a president who didn't want to come back from vacation...

avatar "We must finally recognize that when any of us suffer, we are all weaker; it affects us all."

So eloguent and so true.
Only if those of us who believe in the dream continue to keep it alive will it ever be realized. This has to be a wake-up call to all of Americans who know what is morally and humanly right, to continue to talk loudly and proudly about what has to change. Waiting for an election cycle, or someone else to start the dialogue, is not the true character of who we are as people. For many of us, we do not have to reach inside to find the passion this week, we must have the same passion every week and simply strive for what is right.

We have become two America's. My parents generation raised this country to new levels through their sacrifice and sense of community. My generation has blown it with the value of self over everything else. I am disgusted and angry, but I do not give up hope. Sometimes things have to get as bad as they can before they start to get better.

Senator, let us know how we can get involved, not just today, but for the years ahead. We need leaders like you to bring us together and make America the shining example once again.

Now is the time to act.


Now is the time to act.  Let's hear some Congressional voices calling the bankruptcy bill onto the carpet - not just postponing implementation but standing up against the whole damn wretched thing.  

avatar

Hey John, if you were VP right now, what would you be doing today?

Would you maintain your vacation schedule? 

avatar

<span>Dear Senator ,</span&gt

<span>First, let me state my admiration for you.  I am an active lifelong Democrat and worked some on the local part of your Vice Presidential campaign.</span&gt

<span>I am worried that we will forsake or give  shortshrift to the poor and helpless in New Orleans while continuing to spend our treasure in the sands of Iraq.</span&gt

 

<span>My question is, “Why was the President so seemingly disengaged, until the last 2 days, on this national tragedy unfolding, especially in the city of New Orleans with the complete breakdown in law and order?”  The tragedy is made worse by the lack of communications capabilities.  </span&gt

<span>
Thus, the following proposal:</span&gt

 

<span>Why does not the President fly Air Force One to an airport in Louisiana and set up a mobile White House there?
 </span&gt

<span>Once done, call a meeting of the Govs. of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, their respective Commanders of the State Police, the respective Generals of the State National Guard units, heads of the American Red Cross, Salvation Army, the head of Homeland Security, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.</span&gt

<span>
At that meeting, commit mobilization of a JSTARS plane, a mobile military command post, a battalion of military personnel from bases in the US, a regiment from the Sea Bees and from the Corps of Engineers.</span&gt

<span>The troops would be deployed for two purposes:  security and communication liaison with civilian authorities in the field. To do this, set up a battlefield military communications network and attach military personnel with communications gear and specialists to travel with local police and search and rescue teams.  Using JSTARS and, if appropriate, AWACS capabilities to manage the deployed personnel, civilian and military and to target protection of the public / private health systems, securing any gun shops (look them up in the yellow pages), armories, shelters and other appropriate targets.  </span&gt

<span>Some will be worried about military intervention on US soil.  We seemed to handle that with discretion in Indonesia after the tsunami.  So I would not sweat it.</span&gt

 

avatar

I am however, heartened to note that , finally,Finally, those voices in the mainstream Media, seem to have been smacked in the head by a big enough 2x4 that they are speaking out. I saw several interviews with Joe Brown , FEMA on all the cable news and everytime he started down this road, the interviewers were jumpin' his bones.  Paula Zahn, Anderson Cooper on CNN.  Joe Scarborough,( of all people,) on MSNBC, Ted Koppel on ABC Nightline were all simply livid, and all of them refused to let this guy try and weasel out of the fact that they have all known what the scenario was going to be in New Orleans when this event occurred, and in spite of all their ,"tabletop excercises," had no plan in place to evacuate all these people before the event. 

As we watch this debacle play out, let us be reminded of all of our troops in Iraq who have been begging for the things they need to protect themselves over there. Armor for Hum vees, vests etc.  Whatever made Americans think that the rest of us would fare any better if we found ourselves in such dire need?

avatar



It is disheartening to witness the engineering of pat self-serving narratives ("it was their choice to remain") to deflect criticism of the authorities and, I suspect, also to relieve peoples' nascent sense of guilt at not being able to better help people in need. 

While this tact is entirely in keeping with the "white backlash" take on a range of issues, from welfare to inner city riots, I have to believe that it simply won't wash in this case.  Peoples' instincts to provide relief to the afflicted and the singular scale and seriousness of this disaster ought to over-ride attempts at cynical spin.  Not to mention the fact that something actually has to be done here.  Its not one of those issues that can simply be pushed to the back of your mind if you just keep ignoring it. 

I have to believe that there will be no way to prevent the incompetent handling of this epochal event from having the most serious consequences for those responsible (or irresponsible).

avatar

Use military aircraft and vehicles and supply systems to support security, shelter, provisioning and search and rescue missions.


Civilian commanders would be in the mobile military command base working with military personnel to communicate with the field to organize and control the field operations to end the looting and overlay a temporary military communications network over the region until order and stability is firmly established, at which time the military operation stands down.

avatar

What I am recalling is that JFK initiated the war on poverty after reading The Other America by Michael Harrington.  What I guess you are correcting me on is that RFK campaigned in 68 and did passionately address the subject.  Fair enough. 

avatar

You've mentioned the "American community" and the "national community" in your last paragraph.  In some of my dreams I can believe that we have it in us to be "one nation," but I can't remember the last time I felt such a unity when I was awake.  The real problem, and I have not solution, is that we no longer have a "national community" or an "American community."  We all live in our own separate communities, separated by race, or religion, or economics, or geographic location.  How many people, even those who have willingly and generously opened their wallets think "there but for the Grace of G-d, go I."  Way too many Americans can just say, "I would have left on Saturday."  They can't and won't admit the humanity of the people who were trapped because of their economic and social circumstances, because that would be to admit that it could happen to anyone in the "American community."  When our leadership marginalizes those who they don't want to see, too many Americans find it too easy to leave these people out of their thoughts of community.  Breaks my heart.

In his 1964 State of the Union address, Lyndon Johnson announced, "This administration today, here and now, declares unconditional war on poverty in America."
avatar

Your tax cuts at work. The federal government has finally been drowned in the bathtub of New Orleans.

Senator, keep at it. I sincerely hope that you believe in this cause even if you never get a nomination out of it. Now is the time to act, especially since you - unfortunately - don't have an elected office.

 Just please don't call it a War on Poverty. We don't need that metaphor any more.

avatar

I'm not a religous person but I say to Mr. Edwards, God bless you. Bless you for speaking for the poor and forgotten, the people who those in power would sweep under the rug. When, oh when, will we again have a government that cares for people not profits? I think of the last election and I despair for American humanity. When we will wake up?

avatar

This is right. Why is N.O. so poor? Why has the private economy failed those people? If they were richer, maybe more of them could have left.

This is a worthy goal, to get poor people up to the level where they can cope with something like this.

But John Edwards, you're not going to get it done with your "Two Americas" approach. The reason is that the people in the poor America need the capital of the people in the rich America to make more money.

If you're an hourly worker, your wage will benefit by your employer applying capital to your job. Buying you better equipment etc. So the hourly worker benefits even if he never invests and never sees a capital gain.

John Edwards you favored the hourly worker, and it didn't get you a single vote I'd bet. Because if you favor the hourly, then if I want to make more money, all I can do is work more hours, away from fun and family. I would rather get capital to make my hours more productive.

I know it doesn't fit into Rosie the Riveter and God Bless America, but WHO WANTS TO WORK MORE HOURS? Nobody. 

 

avatar

Really, nobody wants to work more hours? At any price? How about the unemployed? the person who can only find part-time work? The person who would make 1.5x his hourly wage for overtime. The person who would rather his kids go to college than have fun? Need I go on?

avatar

But some... will suffer the most because they simply didn't have the means to evacuate.

Not true.  We should be clear.  The poor people of New Orleans are the victims because they are poor and black, but the reason is not just that they didn't have the means to evacuate.

They are suffering because the governental authorities who had the responsibility to evacuate them didn't do their jobs. Those authorities: local state, but especially Federal, were criminally negligent.  Bush and his appointees spent boatloads of taxpayer dollars without seriously attempting to do their jobs. In the real world this is called fraud.


George W. Bush, whose job is to protect and defend the citizens of the United States appointed an obviously unqualified political crony to run the agency charged with protecting those people.  That appointee was totally incompetent, a man who had no relevant experience and who was fired from his last job for completely botching it.

These people are directly responsible for most of the death and destruction in New Orleans, all of which was exactly what was predictable when the responsible authorities failed their duty.

avatar

Is New Orleans that poor or did the people with money already leave?  What happened in the NO suburbs?  What will happen in those suburbs if NO does not get back on its feet in a reasonable time?  


If as I suspect those with money and their own cars left why didn't the different layers of government do something to organize an evacuation?  

avatar

the people who stayed are responsible for what happened to them.


I absolutely agree, although several of my family members did not evacuate and two are still unaccounted for.  The big difference, though, is that all of my relatives could have evacuated-- even the poorer ones still had transportation and available shelter farther inland-- and so may have borne more responsibility simply because their risk was calculated, not forced on them by untenable circumstances.  I will be deeply saddened if my cousins did not survive, but my horror & outrage are reserved for those who had no choice.

avatar

Senator Edwards, you have been trying to draw the nation's attention to the plight of the [working] poor and now the entire nation can see the dimensions of that problem.  The failure of emergency planning agencies to develop a workable plan to evacuate the poor in the face of danger is an unconscionable moral failure.

"Bleeding heart" planners who view the lives of poor people to be as valuable as the lives of affluent people would have recognized that society needed to arrange for an extraordinary and massive organization of resources in order to remove the poor of New Orleans from danger.  Republican administrators were made aware of the danger they face, but apparently did not want to take on the expense of saving them.

The magnitude of the disaster in New Orleans is a direct result of the profound detachment of the Republican Party from the very real needs of the poor.  We may not be able to make every citizen of the United States wealthy, but we can surely muster all of the resources we have available in order to protect poor people from a foreseeable disaster.

People died and suffered in New Orleans because the gang of elitists running our government simply did not care enough about them.  It is a disgrace.

http://taxwisdom.org/republican_nemesis.htm 

A great flood came to the Gulf Coast of America and washed away the surface, exposing for all to see the 3rd world nation that lived beneath the facade.

Perhaps now that it is starkly apparent, we will come together to adopt philosophies and demand policies that will make America the country that it can be and should be. 

avatar

I registered voters for you over here in Ireland. But I still wish I'd done more. Sitting here thousands of miles from the country I grew up in I feel shame, anger and horror. When I go down to the shops, when I meet up with friends in a pub, my accent screams yank.

The rest of the world thinks we are savages. Heartless, incompetent, tightwad savages. The British news has ripped into this administration at a level I have never seen. British news teams were on the ground in New Orleans days before FEMA and the National Guard.

Mr. Edwards, when will decent elected Americans stand up and be counted? Is the Mayor of New Orleans all alone? Will no one speak out publically the anger that we should have if we have *ANY* pride in our nation. Is it truly down to shoe shoppers in NYC to represent the people of New Orleans to members of this administration - as they're dragged away by security.

I don't want to see Democrats defending the indefensible any more. I want them in Bush's face demanding answers. Yes it will be hard, yes it will be difficult, but those who died in filth and squalor in New Orleans deserved better.

I am ashamed to be an American today. In 3 month's time I've planned on running one overseas voter registration clinic every month. I'm wondering why I should bother now. If this sort of thing is acceptable now in America, why should anyone care? It would be better to help evacuees from Katrina find homes in nations that actually care for their citizens.

I wish you'd won. I hope if you and Kerry had been in office this disaster wouldn't be as horrific. But the anger and shame all Americans who have let down their fellow citizens on the Gulf coast should feel - those feelings should have a voice. Democratic leaders are not doing that.

Sigh.  You won't understand this.  I wish you could watch a few minutes of British news coverage.  They hammer on American officials, UN officials and EU officials pushing them to explain when these people will be helped.  The latter two want to help but aren't being allowed.  The first group are feckless.

It's all revolting and the idiots we've elected are apparently trying to match Katrina body for body. Someone has to speak for these people.

Please. 

avatar

Don't be a jerk, you know what I mean. Everybody wants to make more money. If you can do it without working more hours, that is the best way.

avatar

Daniel, what we're seeing now IS the government effort to evacuate. Are we really supposed to wait around until it gets better? While that is going on, I'm going to buy some guns. And lifejackets.

 

avatar

"would have recognized that society needed to arrange for an extraordinary and massive organization of resources in order to remove the poor of New Orleans from danger."


It does not seem to me that it would have taken massive resources to conduct a forced evacuation of NO before the storm.  A few hundred busses perhaps and a place to temporarily house the refugees.  Should not the city and state been able to handle that?  And should the state not have had a standing evacuation plan since they clearly chose to take the risk of designing only CAT 3 capable levies?  Are not the Mayor and Governor Ds?  Do they hate poor people?


Sure the resources of the nation may be required after the fact, but it seems jurisdictionally more appropriate for state and local governments to be responsible for evacuation planning.

avatar

I was really asking questions.  I was trying to figure out the balance of what I am seeing one TV and reading.  Obviously the South has more Blacks, at least as a percentage than the rest of the country.  


I know many people here in NYC who have followed your example.

avatar “We have been too slow to act in the face in the misery of our brothers and sisters.”
Fix the typo: “...in the face in the misery...”  »  “...in the face of the misery...”
avatar

WE NEED NEW LEADERSHIP IN WASHINGTON. Thank you to John Edwards for speaking the truth about the growing gap between the rich and poorest in our country. 

 

Because of Bush Administration policies and ineptitude, we have all but forgotten our responsibility to one another, as a civil society. THAT's what the Democratic party should be standing for. THAT's what our President should be talking about.

 

FDR implored Americans to work together for the benefit of all. Instead, Bush uses FDR's rhetoric to implore us to take action that benefits only the richest among us -- and ignores the poor altogether.

 

New Orleans proves that we cannot lead good lives unless we care for the least among us. Which we did not.

 

The New Orleans disaster plans did not account for the people who do not have an SUV and $300 and relatives outside the storm.  Thousands of new homeless, waiting to be sent to Bushville Refugee Camps. We watch them on TV (as if they were in a zoo), weeping, taking food from shuttered stores, crushed as they attempt to board too-few busses with too little oversight (as babies are torn from mothers), waiting for more busses that rescue tourists from the Hyatt before refugees in the SuperDome. 

 

Praise be to all who are taking care of the poorest among us -- in San Francisco, where Glide Church feeds free lunch to 600 people every day -- in New Orleans, where  brave people offer help, to rescue, to offer food and hope and solace.

 

Thanks to all those who offer bravery and thoughtfulness (and over 66,000 people who have offered housing via MoveOn.org's Hurricane page at http://www.hurricanehousing.org/) --  DESPITE the dreadful example of our President (and Condoleeza Rice, who shopped for $1000 shoes and saw a Broadway comedy, as the storm took its terrible toll.

avatar

This disaster illustrates perfectly Paul Fussell's outline of class in America, with the two ends of the spectrum being the upper out-of-sight (Bush Administration) and the destitute out-of-sight (the impoverished).  Senator, I implore you to speak out on the issue of class and race in this country, hold town meetings on this issue, and galvanize the public to the very real concerns of growing unemployment, skyrocketing poverty, and the obvious abysmal failures of the current administration in handling all manner of national crises.

We are being dragged back into the nineteenth century by an overclass not simply indifferent to the hard times of working people, but actually hell-bent on consolidating wealth and power and solidifying the impassable boundary between privileged overclass and a working class near destitution.

You might want to remind your less mindful and unhistorical peers that out of such circumstances, revolutions are born.  Bloody revolutions.

 

avatar

"This strikes me as possibly criminal incompetence."


Well, I don't think NO has a reputation for good government, but I am not sure it is criminal.


I suspect that part of the problem is making the decision to do a forced evacuation.  The hurricane shifted to the east a bit at the last minute and if the levy had not breached, there would have been political ramifications for a "false" evacuation.

avatar

I say "criminal" in the sense that "it ought to be a crime." 

A society that embraces proper moral values should have high expectations of their public servants.

Forced evacuations are nothing new or extraordinary when public safety is threatened. 

I think it's safe to say that when the mayor of N.O. first gave the evacuation order, sufficient time was then available to evacuate all the low-lying parts of N.O.

IF, of course, a sufficiently massive effort was set into motion.

avatar

The last time I visited I met some friends from Australia there. Being foreigners, they decided that it would be fun to look around. We walked through the city to some tourist destination which turned out not to be there any more. We also rented a car and drove around the countryside.

My impression was that there really isn't a suburban outgrowth. The people outside the city were fishermen, and they looked if anything poorer than the people in the city. The city itself had a section of historic southern homes and a university section where the rich people lived.

The tourist trap area was full of frat boys of all ages. The music scene on Bourbon Street was basically seventeen different bands playing "Mustang Sally". I think I was there for St Patricks Day. They had a parade where they shot cabbages off the floats. What a weird place.

 

avatar

Senator Edwards,

Can you  let sus know if the Bankruptcy Court Budgets are still intact or have they be raided in anticipation of the passing of the No Banckruptcies For You bill?

It sounds as though Amercan infrastructure funds have been quietly raided to pay for the Iraq Vendetta. The Fristians no longer consider the Democrats players so they do what they please legislatively.

 What it all means is that That the poor aren't alone in having an empty cupboard.  The rainy day and social safety net budgets are depleted - we are all broke.

Can you address the state of the Nation's Piggy Bank?  What's left? 

avatar

Incidentally it sounds like plenty of the people who live outside N.O. got killed and the rest are starving to death right now.

 

avatar

Where are the Democrat leaders? I am sick and tired of this parties non response to serious errors by the Repulican leadership. Gary Hart and I are of the same mind. I am starting to wonder if the Democratic party believes in the same things as I. Why are they so hessitant to make a stand. Are they just going through the motions until the Bush term is done? If I was a cartoonist, I would have them hiding behind a boulder, waiting for Bush to leave the playground. It is high time to start calling the Democratic plan to account. I know the 50 million who voted Dem are good people. I am not so sure we can trust Dem senators to push for our ideals. Why was Landrieu standing alone? Why are the senators who want to run this country not in New Orleans, helping. Why was Cindy Sheehan standing alone? We need individual senators to make a stand when they are not behind the podium or in a TV studio. Dem citizens know how this country should run, why won't our senators fight for us?

avatar

Welcome back Senator Edwards, I appreciated seeing your entry on this blog after I'd returned from a long absence. Keep speaking out on this as so many around the country are suffering, and too many are only just becoming aware of this... your message will not fall on deaf ears, please get yourself on Al Franken or Randi Rhodes show on Air America Radio and spread it far and wide.
 
--------------

Misterciii, The democratic leaders were the ones returning to Washington to force an early session so as to demand something be done to help the victims of the hurricane. They weren't posturing for the cameras, like Bill Frist and members of Bush's cabinet.. who were stammering in shameful embarassment when they got caught asleep at the wheel. Why not demand answers to the media blackout of the democrats return to congress, why did C-SPAN not cover the Senate and House proceedings? But then again, that wouldn't serve your neo-left (kissing cousins to the neo-cons) propaganda. Here's a question for you.. why aren't the Nader reichers, like Medea Benjamin, Jeff Cohen to name a few, who laughed off the facts that Bush would force us into a war, and impose mass suffering upon the most powerless, apologizing and admitting to the blood on their hands.. why do types like Benjamin try and act as though they have no culpability in what they sought to achieve by rationalizing Bush's election? Could it be because in their blind lust for power, they sought to sacrifice innocents as a means to an end... their ambitions of power? How dare you or anyone else replay this same stupid gambit.. ?!?! All during the last election, wonderful candidates like John Edwards and John Kerry talked about what Bush was doing to people.. the destruction of the economy, the cruelty and unfairness of a health care system that discriminates against those who cannot afford adequate insurance, and who warned that the pain would only migrate upwards further into the middle class if nothing is done. They also discussed the dangers of shoreline erosion, focusing on what has been happening in along the Louisiana coastline for decades.. and the dangers it presented in the future. If anyone has been asleep at the wheel, it's been the right wing, and yes, the neo-left who have been so drunk on political ambition and a desire for power that they have absolutely no right to be deserving of it.

avatar

"Why was Cindy Sheehan standing alone?"


Because she is a nut case and no serious politician wants to be associated with her rants.

avatar

Then f*ck serious politicians.  It's time to elect nut cases.  Serious politicians vote for wars in Iraq.  Serious politicians cut funding for levees.  Serious politicians vote for bankruptcy bills that harm the poor.

Nutcases don't.  It's time to fill congress with nutcases.  It's time to house serious politicians in the Louisiana Superdome. 

avatar Senator Edwards:

I love the two America's analysis;  hey, I'm sold.  I gave money and made calls and hosted parties for HD and I'm ready to go to work in NH for you right now, but unfairness and injustice are hard sell issues:  just ask RFK and JFK and MLK.

You need to show middle Americans why this matters to them. 

existenz writes:  "the big story is LACK OF FEDERAL PREPARATION," and I think that is right, but not just because of the Bush administration is packed with incompetent cronies. 

Cronyism is practically a religion in the upper and middle classes.  And competence is a hard sell.  Dukakis couldn't make the case, and GWB proved you don't need it.

National Security is still the key to the heartland's political heartstrings and terrorism is the bete noire du jour. 

And the Bush administration's incompetence has exposed our vulnerability to terrorist attack because it could not be more clear to the world that we don't have a plan for dealing with it despite the billions we spent on color-coded threat levels and the DHS.     

So grab these jerks by the short hairs and rub their noses in it.

Please.
avatar

Senator Edwards, I would be more impressed with your theme of two Americas if you managed somehow to speak about how the war in Iraq affects these two Americas. We know from the many reports that funds for hurricane protection and disaster management were plundered by the Bush administration to finance the war in Iraq. We know that the National Guard no longer is capable of acting in natural disasters since most units are in Iraq sustaining casualties in a war of regime change that has made us more vulnerable to terrorist attack AND to natural disasters.This war was undertaken with your support and with the support of the Democratic leadership; you and the leadership still have not spoken out clearly regarding the immorality of this war and how we get out of it. I find this disgraceful; I find your moralizing about two Americas and not speaking out about the wasting of American lives and resources hypocritical, morally repugnant and unacceptable.

avatar

I agree with kevin lyda above. The serious politicians that Robert Brown seems to admire so much have given given us the debacle in Iraq, growing poverty at home, a runaway debt, an economy that has stalled for the last five years, monumental environmental  dangers, erosion of basic rights, torture as a war policy. A serious politician like, say, John Kerry gave us one of the most convoluted and unintelligible positions on the war in Iraq imaginable (if I remember correctly he was challenged by Bush: "if you knew all the problems would you still have voted for the war in Iraq". John Kerry, a VERY serious politician rushed to make it clear that of course he would support such an enterprise.). I don't agree with everything Sheehan or anyone else says, but I prefer her to the serious politicians. I also find your (Robert Brown) characterization of her as a "ranting nut case" really offensive. I am restraining myself from replying to such tendentious crap in kind.

Thank you Senator Edwards. You have finally given the human side, the political side, the moral side of this "natural disaster" powerful and eloquent voice. We cannot be who we claim to be as a nation if we do not listen, and far more important, respond.

avatar Sen. Edwards:

Unfortunately, you seem to be one of the few people with any authority in this government who have any clue what life is like for a poor person in this country. 
How can the people in charge govern in a world they've never lived in.
Welfare checks come in the mail the first day of every month.  Food stamps (or cards) are picked up within the first 10 days of the month.  By the middle of the month, I'd have to really start stretching dollars.  By the end of the month I'm living on 25-cent boxes of macaroni & cheese and buying cigarettes one at a time for 10-cents from a local convenience store.  

Hurricane Katrina made landfall onthe 29th of the month.  I'd bet on it that most of those people, even if they had cars, wouldn't have had enough money for gas to make it past the New Orleans suburbs.  I just told a crappy story about how I wasn't able to put gas in my car once because I only had 85-cents and the gas pump couldn't be programmed for anything less than a dollar.  

And the leaders of this country HAVE NO CLUE.  They don't have to think about not having avaiable cash, not having health care, not having transportation, because its not happening to them; for most, it never has and never will. 

That's why we have the crisis we have in New Orleans.  The people in charge of this problem never addressed the issue of evacuating poor people and what would happen if they didn't because it simply didn't occur to them that income would detrmine ability to evacuate.  Oops, you mean poor people don't have access to cars?  Seven people in one house and not one of them has a car?  What a surprise!!

One can only hope this mess will open some eyes.  This is not a Third World country, but it sure is starting to look like one.

Thank you again for being "aware".



 




   



avatar

RIght you are. 

avatar

Twas also basically one of the main catalysts of what we know as the "culture wars" today, ramping up with Ronald Reagan talking about mythical welfare queens with Cadillacs, Daniel Patrick Moynihan doing a little study or two on the incredible unexpected blowback that naive social engineering programs can have, and liberals being tarred for decades with the "tax and spend/butt in people's private business" label that still won't shake loose.

avatar Dr. King said: "AN INJUSTICE ANYWHERE IS A THREAT TO JUSTICE EVERYWHERE."

NEVER WAS THIS MORE TRUE THAN TODAY.


avatar

Senator Edwards--

I just learned today that the very first people bussed out of New Orleans this week were 700 guests and employees of a Hyatt Hotel, not the desperately ill and dying, not babies and children, not the elderly and vulnerable.

(It's included in Maureen Dowd's column today. My husband also saw them interviewed on TV a couple days ago.)

To me, it sounds reminiscent of the segregated bussing days before civil rights legislation of the 1960s.

What is happening here? How can it be stopped?  The tragedy and travesty is so large, we all almost don't even know the questions to ask anymore.

Where do we start with solid legislation and actions....not just camera-ready rhetoric?  Who do we contact to change things? How can we change things?



avatar It's a real priveledge to be able to comment to such Americans in high places as John Edwards and Wesley Clark.  Generally with other media, they seem out of touch from our own lives, yet with blogs you feel as if you are conversing with friends.  I'd say this is one of the best uses of Internet i've seen in 11 or so years of using the Internet.

Anyhow, I too felt like the rescues were coming way too slowly in New Orleans.  But I was watching through the telescope of news media cameras in helicopters and on the ground.  The news can make a place look small.  But New Orleans is no small city.

Although a proactive President would have taken the bull by the horns regarding this hurricane, and sent national guard trucks to evacuate residents of New Orleans *before* the levy broke, and even if the President is a 100 percent delegator and expected FEMA to be proactive in this way, if the mayor had been proactive in this way, the governor, the list goes on.  I think they all scre*ed up.

And I don't see this as a race card thing nor a scr*w the poor thing.  I see it plainly and simply as reactive management.

The entire idea behind disaster preparedness is to be proactive.  So all the various top managers involved from mayor to President, are to blame for the sluggish reaction to the broken levy in New Orleans.  I really think it had not to do with not caring about New Orleans citizens, but had to do with ineptitude, sloth, mis-organization, and un-preparedness.

Now I do think Bush can be squarely at blame for cutting the funds that were going to make the levies in New Orleans bigger.  This is a no brainer regarding pointing the finger on this one, which may be the biggest blunder in the New Orleans tragedy, since the levy probably would not have broken if it was built up larger and reinforced.

When we get more and more hurricanes in the future, Bush will also be squarely at blame for not utilizing the Government's role to curb miles per gallon standards in cars sold in the United States.

However, let's not forget New Orleans is no small town.  I don't know the reasons boat rescue operations were "suspended", but they were suspended.  It had to do with they were too dangerous.  But it seems to me that power to the city could be switched off, yet I am no expert on what is dangerous about boat rescues.  This only left helicopter rescues as the water was too deep for vehicles to get in.  We did see large military trucks driving through the waters in some streets recently though, but the water may not have been as deep in those streets as many streets.

Helicopter rescues are limited in how many people you can rescue at a time, and limited as far as how many helicopters and trained crews you can muster up for the effort.  Why the military helicopters seemed to take a long time to get to New Orleans seems like more sluggishness and lack of proactive management.

Although everyone knew that New Orleans was a bowl and that the category 5 hurricane approaching might fill up the bowl with water, that the levies might be overrun by water higher then the levies, it seemed at first New Orleans would be spared the flooding nightmare, as the hurricane turned to the right, but then a day later a levy breached.

I think the reaction despite everyone knowing that it was a reality that one day New Orleans might fill up with water, was "what do we do now?"

And this is not preparedness.  It shows an utter lack of preparedness.

At any rate - In my opinion the sluggishness most likely didn't have anything to do with race, class, whether New Orleans is a "red city" or a "blue city" (if it is mostly Democrats), I really think it just showed us an example of across the board ineptitude by top managers ranging from mayor of new orleans to president of the united states.




avatar

"The serious politicians that Robert Brown seems to admire so much "


I don't thing I expressed any admiration for serious politicians, only suggested why they do not want to associate with Cindy.


"I also find your (Robert Brown) characterization of her as a "ranting nut case" really offensive. I am restraining myself from replying to such tendentious crap in kind. "


Cindy may not be a "nut case" but she plays one well on T.V.

avatar

I hope what comes of this terrible sadness is a new America. I hope the phoenix to rise from the ashes is a movement towards the destruction of a class society.  It came from the Mississippi flood in 1927 as a man, Huey Long, who was disgusted with President Calvin Coolidges false promises of help. Some say he influenced FDR.  I know Mayor Nagin had his heart in it, as well as LA's governor. Something good will come of this...

Who wants to bet that the corporations profit?  I hate to say that, but that's what has happened after 9/11.  War Profiteers...  I don't understand it...Must we lock the cupboard??? Maybe the flood/hurricane victims shouldn't take it so hard...it's just business as usual in an administration of failed ex-businessmen.  I know, I am so awful...

The comparison to RFK is a scary thought.  I remember the day he died...a lot of hope died on that day, too.  We had felt like we belonged to America, that we were important and a part of it
.
But, anyhow...as one woman said, "It's a test...we have to survive!"

God Bless all of America, and hold the hearts of the newly tramatized in His hand, until they can survie on their own again.

avatar

Please remember that the media and the right wing also turned a war hero (Kerry) into a coward, transformed Gore into a liar, Sheehan into a nut case. If you buy their lies, you will wait a very long time for a very very serious politician.  It would help debunk their lies, if the Democratic leaders were challenging all their lies. That will come when challengers to the Republican incumbents want to tap into the anger that we all feel. And it is from the pool of new leaders, we will have to reform the Democratic party if ther is to be change in America. It cannot come from the tired, domesticated, neutered leadership in place. They are not worth much.

avatar

An alienated, poor, black populace shoved out of their homes by a detached, vengeful, wealthy leader. I'm talking about Zimbabwe. To me, it's not that dissimilar to what's happening in New Orleans, yes, a natural disaster this time, but the followup speaks volumes. Did I hear Hastert say we ought to bulldoze N.O.? Would that include the Garden District? Almost like the people left in N.O. are being punished for being poor, black, and not Republican, in the same way Zimbabweans were punished. It breaks the heart, if you're human at least.

avatar

criteria.
John Edwards started giving that speech on January 3rd, I believe. At that point he was at 5% in the polls nationwide. He finished the primaries with 30% and ended up on the ticket because he was the only candidate who was really generating a great deal of enthusiasm.
However, that speech didn't work because of this. It worked becuase it's true.

avatar

The "Two Americas" provokes a very powerful image - but it is one the Republicans have learned to counter by screaming "Class Warfare", talking about Welfare Cadillacs, and Lucky Duckies. Katrina has shown how vicious the result of their rhetoric is. They need to be pounded hard on this, becuase they have shown they CAN mobilize government when they want to.      Billmon over at http://billmon.org/archives/002125.html lays out in detail how the Bush Administration in  2004 pulled out all the stops to smother Florida with help for the hurricanes that hit that year - just before the presidential election. The record of their success then shows the excuses coming out of the administration for Katrina now are just that - excuses. As Iraq was a war of choice, so too the Federal lack of response to Katrina was a disaster of choice.      When the President deems it important, he and his Congressional allies can move with blazing speed. I am referring of course to the Terry Schiavo passion play staged earlier this year. Contrast their actions regarding Katrina with this:
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palm_Sunday_Compromise)
"On March 19, congressional leaders announced that they were drafting a bill which would transfer the case from state court to federal court. In the very early hours of March 21, Congress approved emergency legislation. Despite an absence of a quorum, the Senate approved the bill (S. 686 CPS) by voice vote. The bill passed unanimously, 3-0, with 97 of 100 Senators not present. Meanwhile, in the House of Representatives, deliberation continued during an unusual Sunday session. When it came to a vote, the motion was passed 203-58 (156 Republicans and 47 Democrats in favor, 5 Republicans and 53 Democrats against), with 174 Representatives (74 Republicans and 100 Democrats) not present on the floor at the time of the vote. The vote concluded at 12:41 a.m. EST; President Bush returned from vacation at his Prairie Chapel Ranch in Crawford, Texas to Washington, D.C. and signed the bill at 1:11 a.m. when it became Public Law 109-3. [1]" 
  Take special note of that. The President cut his vacation short and flew back to Washington to sign a bill in the wee hours of the morning. He CAN stay in touch and act with all deliberate speed - when it suits his purposes. 
   Election year Florida. Terry Schiavo. Hurricane Katrina. When you look at those three examples, it becomes clear that there is only One America for Bush - his base. Everyone else is expendable.

"We have been too slow to act in the face in the misery of our brothers and sisters.  This is an ugly and horrifying wake-up call to America.  Let us pray we answer this call. Now is the time to act."


Is this not a bit of hypocrisy on the part of Mr. Edwards?

Where was Mr. Edwards (a trial lawyer fighting for justice of poor underprivileged people?) when those voters were treated so badly when they wanted to cast their vote in the cold and freezing weather last November?

Where was Mr. Edwards (a trial lawyer fighting for justice of poor underprivileged people?) and his friends when Congressman John Conyers Jr.'s was investigating what happened in Ohio in November 2004?

Where was Mr. Edwards (a trial lawyer fighting for justice of poor underprivileged people?) when Congressman John Conyers Jr. released his damming report of the elections of November 2004?

Where was Mr. Edwards (a trial lawyer fighting for justice of poor underprivileged people?) at the time the Downing Street Minutes were revealed to the world?

He, and almost all his Democrat colleagues, have been zipping to act for the interests of the misery of our brothers and sisters, haven't they?

The problem appears to be that their zips are frozen solid in the heat of the equator!

avatar

The lack of preparation didn't harm everyone equally. The poor bore the brunt of the misery.
Furthermore, this disaster is also an allegory for thousands of other miseries the poor bear out of proportion.

avatar

...leadership. It's a crisis in what we believe in as a nation.
And it's not just going to take military organzation brought to us by some authoritarian at the top to fix this problem. We, as a nation, need to lead from the bottom up. We need to collectively tell our government what we believe in. 
 

avatar

history. I think any state would have been pushing the limits of its resources to move over 100,000 households out of danger.

avatar

Yup, there's no doubt that evacuation of 100,000 people would seriously tax the resources of any nation.  I would expect the exercise to be much like a war, with all of the screw ups and second-guessing endemic in any such chaotic situation.  What's unforgiveable (and I meaean that in the most fire and brimstone sense) is the total absence of any plan whatsoever.  It's almost exactly four years since the US began devoting massive economic and political energy to disaster preparedness.  Yet evacuation of refugees, an integral component of any large scale terrorist attack or natural disaster, hasn't even been considered.

avatar

 I'm not denying the racial component of this tragedy, but I feel it's mostly an incidental result (which doesn't excuse it)  of the culture of corruption, privilege, and incompetence that got us into this mess and seems powerless to get us out. I  haven't heard the reports about the hotel  guests, but I wouldn't be  surprised if their transportation was provided by Hyatt Regency, not the federal government.  If so, it's another example of the incompetence of the whole operation. And it might have been the feds, too.  My capacity to be amazed disappeared about 2 days ago.

avatar

I wrote a long post of what Bobby Kennedy might have said about the tragedy in Katrina, based on his other statements in related circumstances. Check it out at http://www.boomantribune.com/?op=displaystory;sid=2005/9/4/13955/
16397.

Truly, I miss his leadership now more than ever. Thanks, John Edwards, for taking up the voice of the disenfranchised. There are so few who care to speak for them.

avatar

jmatthan,

Firstly, the candidates and the democratic party had people at precincts all over the country, and were reporting on the problems. I don't remember where John Edwards or John Kerry were supposed to be on the night of the election.. I do remember they were still traveling to get out the vote. But I do know something about what John Edwards has been doing since the election, and I'm replying because not only are your comments unfair jmatthan, they hint at a mindset who in all probability seeks to exploit the sufferings you pretend to care about. I've seen alot of that since the 2000 election.. the neo-left working in tandem with their neo-con brothers to further increase the suffering of the people, both seeking one profit or another from said suffering.

John Edwards wife, Elizabeth had been diagnosed with breast cancer during the campaign, yet they both still threw themselves in to campaign to help take back our country from George Bush's corrupt administration.  Having myself taken care of a critically ill spouse, I can only imagine how he had to step in and help his family, especially as they have small children, through what was a difficult and stressful situation.

During that time he also help create the One America Foundation, and has been a part of a program dealing with poverty at the University of North Carolina.
 

avatar In the beginning of human history, people felt loyalty to only a very small group of people: a kinship group, a tribe, etc.  As civilization grew, so did the size of the groups with which people identified: feudal societies, ethnic groups, nation-states.  In fact I think "civilization" itself can be simplistically summed up as the extension of family-like loyalty to larger and larger groups of people, who discovered that there can be strength in the banding together of many "for the common good".

That is why it is so deeply distressing to witness a wealthy society's abandonment of its weakest members to poverty and worse.  It is truly a backward step, not just for a nation, but for civilization itself.

Is it OK to abandon your own 84-year-old grandmother to drowning?  How about your neighbor's grandmother?  A grandmother in the next state?  A grandmother across the country?  Likewise, is it OK to refuse to contribute to healthcare for your own child?  Is it OK to refuse to help your neighbor's child?  A child in the next county? 

Obviously, in the harsh "real world" it is not yet possible to always provide for everyone in need.  But the point is, "banding together for the common good" does mean ALL the time, as much as humanly possible.  It doesn't mean we can send Emily Jones' grandson off to Iraq, gladly taking one of the biggest sacrifices anyone can be asked to give to others, and then, when she needs help, give her nothing.

A liberal is someone who is liberal with their empathy, generosity, and sense of community, and I am proud to say that I try to be worthy of the label.  It is time liberal ideals and SHARED sacrifice replaced the greed and self-interest that has commandeered the American political discourse.
avatar

If a storm blew across our Appalachian Mountains washing us down to Interstate 75 you would see the Second America you saw on Interstate 10 in New Orleans last week.

Our Second America seeks acceptance,not just handouts. Listen to us and enable us to act in our own One America.  When Vista Volunteers came to our communities in the War on Poverty in 1966 they helped us produce local school plays that our parents attended. They gave us confidence and hope. They gave us hope for college and professional careers, as the GI Bill did for WW!! veterans.

We have thousands of children without hope washed onto the interstates. Volunteer in your city. Help children act in their own play. Let's play a role in ONE AMERICA by helping the refugees in Houston and across the South.

The poliitcal reality is that John Edwards has the rare ability to advocate for this ONE AMERICA. Yet the very people he wishes to help don't have broadband or CNN. They follow the populist figures on the Religious Right because that is the only message they receive. Lend your support to getting out the message of hope and understanding to our dispossesd people. Let's make it ONE AMERICA.

 

 

 

avatar

Edwards: spare me. Please. A Kerry-Edwards admin would still have thousands of national guard in Iraq, and be wasting 1.5 billion in tax money a week there.

We need read leaders. Not fake politicans who pretend to give a shit about there poor and yet continue to talk their tough-guy BS about staying the course.

 You democrats are just as responsible for this shit as these murderous republican thugs.

 You've got no heart at all. Just empty words.

avatar

Good for you. Loved your comment. All these politicans can buzz the hell off as far as I'm concerned.

I'd vote Atrios before Edwards in a heartbeat.

<