Seeing Red
It had to, right? Polls show that families care more about how they are doing economically than any other single factor when they vote, and they generally view Democrats more favorably than Republicans on economic issues. Aside from the second half of the 1990s – Bill Clinton’s second term -- the middle class struggled throughout those three decades while facing heightened financial risks.
So why is the damned pendulum still moving in the wrong direction?
Thomas Frank captures the myriad ways in which the very real economic damage that swirled through crimson Kansas spawned anger directed at just about everything except for the tornado itself. Stoked by an assortment of fuming demagogues, Frank writes, “the [conservative] backlash mobilizes voters with explosive issues—summoning public outrage over everything from busing to un-Christian art.” The stories Frank tells to illustrate that insight explain a lot to those of us who have been scratching our heads along the northern half of Interstate 95. Capsules of a few:
-- In Garden City, a “rural boomtown” that thrives on its meat-packing industry, new waves of immigrant workers from Southeast Asia and Mexico have been imported to work in the slaughterhouses and live in dilapidated trailer parks. Frank writes: “Confronted with some of the most advanced union-avoidance strategies ever conceived by the mind of business man, these people receive mediocre wages for doing what is statistically the most dangerous work in industrial America. Thanks to the rapid turnover at the slaughterhouses, few of them receive health or retirement benefits. The ‘social costs’ of supporting them—education, health care, law enforcement—are…pushed off onto the towns themselves, or onto church groups and welfare agencies, or onto the countries from which the workers come.”
Frank cites two anthropologists who studied the region and warned about the impact of a development strategy that forever puts a town “at the mercy of the meat industry’s insatiable appetite for cheap labor and the social turmoil that follows from it.” Frank reports that Garden City voted for George W. Bush in even greater numbers than did affluent Johnson City.
-- John D.Altevogt is a former county GOP chairman writing a column for the Kansas City Star who Frank describes as a “one-man symphony of indignation, a composer of rhapsodic rages as well as dark dirges of self-pity, all of them orchestrated around a single, favorite note that he pounds again and again. Religious conservatives, he argues, asserts, hollers, wails, are the victims of unspeakable persecution by the ruling class, that is, by liberals….In setting up this vision of a hostile world, Altevogt draws heavily on the language of the other side….Commenting on a news story about the squabble in the Anglican Church over homosexual marriages, he writes: ‘All of the rhetoric of the sixties comes alive describing our totalitarian liberal establishment. Fascist pig, baby killers, sick society, it’s all applicable. What we need to do now is change it by any means necessary. Power to the people.’
-- In the summer of 1991, Operation Rescue organized protests in Wichita that prompted the city’s abortion clinics to close for a week on the advice of police. That “success” prompted thousands more protesters to come throughout the summer, with the climactic event a mass meeting that filled the football stadium at Wichita State University. Frank writes, “In one Spartacus-like moment, an event organizer asked those from out of town to stand up; according to press accounts, two-thirds of the audience did so. Then she called on Wichitans to stand, and the whole crowd got to its feet.” Frank later quotes Mark Gietzen, a Christian activist who became chairman of the Sedgwick County GOP, as saying that the 1991 “Summer of Mercy” definitively shifted Wichita to the right, bringing in thousands of conservative recruits who were enthusiastic about campaigning door to door.
Frank’s a polemicist, and his own rage often matches that of his colorful cast of characters. That style has worked beautifully in helping to get the broadest possible audience to pay attention to his observations about what has happened in Kansas. As for his arguments about what liberals/progressives/Democrats have done to inadvertently spill red ink on the state, and what they can do to begin adding some blue tint, for now I’ll leave that to the other contributors – who may want to do some venting of their own.












I think we make a mistake when we seperate culture (or values) from economics. Our economic policy reflects our values and culture. The right has done a fantastic job of obscuring this. How can the GOP claim to be pro-life when they are cutting Healthy Start funding and protecting MTBE and mercury producers from lawsuits? How can they be pro-family yet cut food stamps, education, and urban development funding? How can they be for smaller government while supporting the liberty-stealing Patriot Act and running up record deficits?
And that should be our strategy: exposing the GOP hypocrisy. The challenge is overcoming their noise machine to get the word out. I am heartened somewhat that in elections last year, Democrats did much better on the local level than they did on the national level. This disconnect is frustrating, but it shows that we can reach people through the grass roots.
July 27, 2005 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Laura Rozen over at War and Piece notes that, as a Kansan, the big issues she keeps hearing during her visits home are all about the culture wars. People are frantic about homosexuality, abortion/easy sex, kinky Teletubbies, and the whole nine yards.
The lack of interest in money makes sense in this context. People tend to be willing to sacrifice and die for what they believe in, and, let's face it, what they believe is that sex can destroy everything they care about. The "sixties" is just a code word for free sex. So is abortion.
There is no point talking money to people who fear losing their way of life. We need to address the issues they care about.
Some ideas on approaches:
Democrats could get behind really good and effective methods of filtering media content, to cut out spammers as well as porn or violence or whatever annoys you. This would fit well with a "Freedom and Fairness" message. (What better slogan to distinguish Us from the unfree and unfair Them?) Note: this isn't censorship but a way of increasing personal choice.
A harder task is educating people that tolerance is essential to the American way of life. That's kind of been lost in the shuffle. The Unitarians had a good ad on that topic last year. We need vastly more like that and even more hard-hitting.
We need to get the message across that "Republican values"-lies-hypocrisy are what is most damaging to the life they care about. Neocon values lead to more abortions, for instance. Neocon values lead to family break-ups.
We should be careful to draw the distinction between regular cautious conservatives and corrupt hypocritical warmongers. That way people can identify their past allegiances with something good, even as they cut loose from the bad. If we ever want to win people back, we have to give them a way to think well of themselves. Not many people will say, "Yeah, I was a dope," but lots will say, "Yeah, he/she was a real jerk."
July 27, 2005 9:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
If these people feel that cultural issues trump economic issues, let them feel (and vote) that way. Its illogical from a self-interest perspective, but America and liberal ideology is built on collective interest. If you are poor, have no healthcare, etc. it is in your self-interest to have Dems politicians, but If you truly blieve abortion is murder, you are acting in the collective interest of the nation to vote conservative (social and economic) than liberal on both. It seems voters don't vote simply vote in self-interest, nor should they (wealthy folks who are liberal on economic policy prove this). The Dems really need to try to get social liberals/libertarians and Rockefeller Republican moderates to break away from the GOP and Clintonesque politicians are the best way to do this. Their is no reason that Olympia Snowe or Lincoln Chafee should be Republicans in the new days of political polarization. If Dems are more serious on foreign policy (polls show Kerry would have won if he had ANY consistent message on international affairs) and hold the line on social issues, we will break off enough centrist GOP to create a governing majority.
July 31, 2005 6:06 PM | Reply | Permalink