More History Books
Okay, it wasn't much of a post. But I loved the discussion it spawned in the comments section. And I found about a couple dozen history books I'm going to go buy and read. Or rather, buy, have them sit on my shelf for eight months, and then read. So here's a follow-up on the question a couple days ago about great books of narrative history.
When I chose my history reading, for various reasons, I try to find areas of history that are as distant from my experience and knowledge as possible. So I end up reading very little contemporary history, or much in the last few centuries. And I get on little kicks about the crusades, or first century Islam, or Medieval monasticism, colonial Mexico or whatever. Eventually I usually make my way back to the 16th and 17th centuries. But that's another story.
So here's another question ... What is the most captivating, interesting, engrossing (any way of saying something you really liked) book of history you've read that isn't American history and covers a period before the beginning of the 20th century?















Certainly, Shelby Foote's trilogy on the Civil War would have to rank right up there.
June 10, 2005 9:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, this isn't really a history book but ...
"I, Claudius" and "Cladius the God" by Robert Graves.
June 10, 2005 9:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Schama, Schama, Schama.
If you must restrict yourself to one, "Citizens" it is.
As an aside, Schama is certainly no right-winger or friend of GWB. But with just a little tweaking/slanting, "Citizens" could be cast as the most anti-French book of all time - if "French" is taken to mean "pretensions to intellectual/moral superiority." Certainly that's how his book was received when it was first published.
June 10, 2005 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/02261244
44/qid=1118422653/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-2481379-1370435?v=glance&
amp;s=books">Rebellion in the Backlands</a> by Euclides da Cunha, a contemporary account of a 19th century utopian/millenarian peasant movement in Brazil that (of course) was brutally crushed by the military. Absolutely fascinating. This episode was dramatized by Vargas Llosa in his novel <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/01402626
01/ref=pd_sim_b_2/002-2481379-1370435?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glan
ce">War of the End of the World</a>.
June 10, 2005 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Apologies for the screwy html. Haven't gotten the hang of this, obviously.
June 10, 2005 10:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dova Sobel's Longitude is a wonderful book. Not only demostrates the value of persistence but also the conflict between elite intellectuals and artisans.
June 10, 2005 10:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
<strong class="sans">Captain Sir Richard Francis Burton: The Secret Agent Who Made the Pilgrimage to Mecca, Discovered the Kama Sutra, and Brought the Arabian Nights to the West, by Edward Rice</strong><br />
June 10, 2005 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
My favorite history book of all time is Salt. As someone that has an obsession with food, it is nice to know that civilizations rose and fell on the stuff.
June 10, 2005 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
<p><span class="sans">Culture and History in Medieval Iceland: An Anthropological Analysis of Structure and Change</span><strong class="sans"> </strong>by <a target="_self" href="/comments/2005/6/10/12391/7823//">Kristen Hastrup</a></p><p>Fantastic book about the development of Iceland and its colonization. Also amazing for its use of sociology to describe the differences between pre-Christian and Christian Iceland. You won't be disappointed.<br /> </p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/index=books&field-author-exact=Kristen%20Hastrup/002-9133247-7016813"></a>
June 10, 2005 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
This may have come up in the comments to the other post, but Brunelleschi's Dome by Ross King was great.
Also the Professor and the Madman by Simon Winchester. It spills into the 20th C. I guess. Also, both of these are sort of pop-history, so probably not unheard of or even maybe unread.
anyway...
June 10, 2005 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hi,
As an avid TPM reader, I just thought some of you may be interested in helping us with a petition site that several of us former Wes Clark campaign staff members just put it. Its an email petition to Senators urging them to vote against John Bolton. I hope you check it out:
www.StopJohnBolton.com
Thanks!
take care,
Aaron
June 10, 2005 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
I really enjoyed William Bernstein's The Birth of Plenty (first chapter available online). It includes American and 20th century history, but it's not centered on either. On first blush it looks like an endorsement of laissez-faire capitalism, but it's as much about what governments need to do to ensure prosperity as it is about what governments shouldn't do. (Especially fascinating are analyses of how nations that allowed too much income inequality saw their prosperity derailed.
June 10, 2005 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
M by Peter Robb. It's a biography of Caravaggio, so not strictly history. But the detailed recounting of day to day life, church politics and social structure in late 16th / early 17th century Italy is remarkable.
June 10, 2005 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Somebody already picked "I, Claudius". Damn.
However, there is still the Plantagenet trilogy of Thomas B. Costain. It consists of "The Conquering Family", "The Three Edwards" and the "Last Plantagents" Much swashbuckling and derring-do by a family of outsized characters including some of England's best and worst kings.
--PatF
June 10, 2005 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
I have a special fondness for the 18th century social history -- any culture. But truthfully, I really like biographies of historical figures and social histories of just about any era.
June 10, 2005 10:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
I’m having a difficult time coming up with suggestions of narrative histories. It could be that I’m being too much of a stickler in my definition. So let me start with a related question instead. What exactly is a narrative history? The distinctions between analytic and narrative history are of course porous, with many works falling somewhere in the middle. Still, what are the defining characteristics of a narrative history?
I haven’t thought much about this, but I think a good starting definition would be that narrative histories are defined by implicit hypothesis that are embedded in the narrative. Analytical histories, on the other hand, have embedded narratives, but are organized around parts of the explicit argument.
In an earlier post I’d also mentioned Hobsbawn’s four-volume series (Age of Revolution, Capital, Empire, Extremes), but now that I think about it, I’m not sure it qualifies. Hobsbawn is, in the end, an analytical historian with a brilliant narrative thrust. The same applies, for example, to Keith Thomas’s wonderful book, Religion and the Decline of Magic: Studies in Popular Beliefs in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century England. My first suggestion in response to the original post, Zapata and the Mexican Revolution by John Womack, certainly qualifies as a straight-up narrative history (and the best contemporary, academic narrative history I’ve ever read). But for the most part, pure narrative histories, while often popular, aren’t particularly good (think of anything written, for example, by David McCullough).
June 10, 2005 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
A Coffin For King Charles by C.V. Wedgwood, about the trial and execution of King Charles I, is a fascinating history with a very compressed time span. Another of my favorites is The Reason Why by Cecil Woodham-Smith, about Lord Lucan and Lord Cardigan, the cavalry leaders at the center of the Charge of the Light Brigade. I got both of them as part of a whole series of Time-Life books that I picked up at a local surplus store for like a dollar apiece. They appear to have been part of some sort of a book-of-the-month club, and every one of them has been excellent, ranging from books about the Inuit, to the Korean War, to the Pilgrims, to the one I'm reading right now, Reveille in Washington, 1860-1865, which I'm enjoying even though I've never been much of a Civil War guy.
June 10, 2005 10:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
June 10, 2005 10:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
I just wanted to add that the 1799 French invasion of Ireland referenced in my short review actually happened.
June 10, 2005 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Conquest of the Incas" by John Hemming is a captivating account of the destruction of the Incan empire by a handful of conquistadors. It's an amazing story and very readable.
June 10, 2005 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Conquest of New Spain a great 1st person account of the "conquest" of Mexico by Bernal Diaz and the unmissiable classic trilogy by Eduardo Galeano, Memory of Fire: Genesis, Faces and Masks, and Century of the Wind. This trilogy is about the history of the new world from the beginning of time until the 1980's.Atmospheric, poetic, whip smart and moving. Required reading for any true citizen of the Americas.
June 10, 2005 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Three very random suggestions . . .
*Quentin Skinner, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, vols. 1-2
*Elinor G. K. Melville, A Plague of Sheep: Environmental Consequences of the Conquest of Mexico
*Andrew L. Knaut, The Pueblo Revolt of 1680: Conquest and Resistance in Seventeenth-Century New Mexico
*C. L. R. James, The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L'Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution
*Stuart Schwartz, Sugar Plantations in the Formation of Brazilian Society : Bahia, 1550-1835
June 10, 2005 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think Josh mentioned the Diaz book about a year ago on TPM. Fascinating. A more up-to-date and very detailed (a little too detailed for me) history of the Spanish invasion of Mexico is "Conquest" by Hugh Thomas.
Probably my favorite, non-academic, easy reading history is "The Fatal Shore" on the founding of Australia. Absolutely loved that book when I read it about 10 years ago.
June 10, 2005 10:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Robert Massie, Peter the Great. Can't overstate how brilliant this book is in the "captures a whole ERA and a society and links it up to issues of plain modern relevance without saying so in so many words" sense. You know that sense. A wonderful journey for any reader.
June 10, 2005 10:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Two of my favorite books are about economic history:
The Weath and Poverty of Nations: Why Some are So Rich and Some are So Poor by David S. Landes. He's at an age where he can follow his interests freely and it is fun for the reader to tag along.
Another favorite is A Free Nation Deep in Debt: The Financial Roots of Democracy by James Macdonald. He's a good writer. It's amazing how readable a book about "national debt" can turn out to be. It includes a number of interesting mini-histories of particular debt situations.
June 10, 2005 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Robert Hughes, The Fatal Shore (the establishment of the Australian penal colony)
Peter Hopkirk, The Great Game (Russia and Great Britain's geopolotical chess game in Central Asia during the 19th century)
Henry Kamm, Dragon Ascending (history of Vietnam)
June 10, 2005 11:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thucydides. Distant runner-ups would be The Coming of the French Revolution and The Guns of August.
June 10, 2005 11:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gore Vidal's Julian was fantastic. I think it's back in print.
June 10, 2005 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
1. its half 19th/half 20th century, but Enrique Krauze's Mexico: A
Biography is a model of easily accesible political history that still provides insights of the highest order.
2. Peter Green's Alexander to Actium, on the Hellenistic world, can be dauntingly encyclopedic in its scope, but it contains so much good stuff and is written so well I can recommend it without reservation.
3. Eugen Weber's Peasants into Frenchmen, on how what we think of as a sort of immutable French culture and nationality was only recently grafted onto much of the populace during the nineteenth century, often through government programs.
4. Roy Jenkins' Gladstone. Written with an easy grace and humor, it opens up to us a figure that in many ways seems so near to the current day in many of his principles and actions, yet whose entire outlook and intellectual foundation is utterly strange to us.
5. Just picked it up, but Mark Mazower's Salonlika looks pretty good on first perusal.
June 10, 2005 11:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Barrington Moore The Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. It's been almost thirty years since I read it but I used it to prepare for my general exam in history as an undergraduate. I passed the exam; thus, I think the book was great
June 10, 2005 11:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Must respectfully disagree. Schama makes some very good points and I learned a lot. My problem with 'Citizens' is that:
After 600 pages, I was begging for the next 200 to go by, so I can't recommend it.
Gibbon is tough to beat for style and content, and TDAFOTRE is so long that you can go back over and over again and still pick up something new!
June 10, 2005 11:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
There have been some comments recently about Jared Diamond's "Collapse," which I enjoyed, but even better was his previous book, "Guns, Germs, and Steel." Also I second "Fatal Shore."
June 10, 2005 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Laurent Dubois's A Colony of Citizens: Revolution and Slave Emancipation in the French Caribbean, 1787-1804 is one of the best written histories that I have recently read because it manages to artfully combine insightful and complex analyses of French national rhetoric with a captivating but ultimately heartbreaking narrative of the emancipation of French Carribbean slaves in the early years of the Revolution and their eventual reenslavement by Napoleon's government. Unlike most works on abolitionism and independence in the Carribbean, this book doesn't focus on Haiti, preferring to tell the story of smaller (but perhaps more important) French Islands of Martinique and Guadeloupe.
June 10, 2005 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
also in the same class we read The Great Divergence: Europe, China, and the making of the modern world economy by Kenneth Pomeranz.
Both books give insight into the mess we are in today.
June 10, 2005 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've always been on the lookout for "niche" history books so here are a couple of my recent finds.
"The Battle that Stopped Rome" by Peter Wells is the history of the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest in which Germanic warriors massacred three Roman legions. The loss was so great that Augustus ordered an end to Roman territorial expanison.
"When Jesus Became God" by Richard Rubenstein looks at the struggle between followers of Arius and Athanasius to define the divinity of Jesus in the fourth Century. That was a time when theological issues were literally fought out in the street.
"Many Thousands Gone" by Ira Berlin is the history of American slavery from the beginning until the 1840's. It's thoughtful, deeply researched and pulls no punches. This book, and "Trouble in Mind" a history of Jim Crow by Leon Litwack, were invaluable to me when I moved to the Deep South.
June 10, 2005 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would like to second Sobel's "Longitude". Absolutely fascinating and very well written. I would also like to recommend a historical novel that I dearly love. Frank Delaney's "Ireland: A Novel". I've read quite a few books about various eras in Irish history and while this is obviously fiction, I have never run across a more enjoyable tale that captures the true story-telling tradition and explores the mythology as well as the history of this nation. A real joy. Another great book that spans the oceans is Kurlansky's "Cod: A Biography of the Fish that Changed the World".
June 10, 2005 12:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'll second The Fatal Shore and throw in Hughes' Barcelona as well. Fernand Braudel's works Civilization and Capitalism (3 vols.) are a masterpiece- I was forced to read Immanuel Wallerstien's books on the same subject in grad school, which just proved all the dense prose and theoretical jargon in the world can't beat a good narrative structure.
I just finished Jack Weatherford's Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World which does an excellent job of looking at Temujin's early life and how it shaped his worldview and move to conquest, though it leans a bit hagiographic in dealing with the brutality of the Mongol campaigns, it does point out the encouragement of trade and religious toleration that made the Mongols ahead of their time.
June 10, 2005 12:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Alexis de Toqueville's Souvenirs (usually translated as Recollections
or Memoirs.) Ringside account of the 1848 French revolution and its aftermath. He's better known of course for Democracy in America, but this book is superb in its own way, more personal, leavened with bitter humor, a fine mixture of personal memoir and hard edgedanalysis. Hard to find english translations in print though.
June 10, 2005 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dust: A History of the Small and the Invisible
by Joseph A. Amato; University of California Press, $22.50, 262 pages.
by Deborah Peifer
"And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust?"
William Shakespeare
I’ll confess that I ordered Dust from the University of California Press more to see if the entry was an academic joke than actually to read the book, but when it arrived I felt honor bound at least to look at it. Could there be a book’s worth of things to say about dust? Imagine my surprise to find Dust readable, entertaining, and ultimately fascinating, a thoughtful look at the way we see the world. Author Joseph Amato explains that, "once, not so long ago, dust constituted the finest thing the human eye could see" (clearly he’s never seen the dust at my house). He continues: "Dust was the most minuscule thing people encountered. Like darkness and skin, dust was an omnipresent boundary, in this case between the visible and the invisible."
"The dust of exploded beliefs may make a fine sunset."
Geoffrey Madan
Amato traces attitudes toward dust throughout history, ranging from the good, such as the gold or medicinal dust connected with the upper classes, to the bad, which was, of course, the province of the peasantry. This dust "filled dwellings whose walls, floors, and roofs were composed of mud and thatch. All over the world, people of times past fell asleep and woke up in dusty beds." Dust was powerful: it could create the miasma, which was the cause, according to early scientists, of all disease. With the invention of the microscope, things smaller than dust could be observed and studied. The theory of miasma or foul humors gave way to germ theory, and ideas about the way the world worked changed forever.
"I am sent with broom before,/To sweep the dust behind the door."
William Shakespeare
With the discovery of germs, dust became an enemy of life itself. No longer merely unpleasant, dust was seen as the dwelling place of deadly diseases. The public health service was created, designed to teach the great unwashed the value of cleanliness as well as the danger of disregarding what came to be considered basic hygiene. Cleanliness became nothing less than "a matter of public morality." Public health "officials tended to be members of the upper classes, which identified disease with the working class." The great clean-up led to a series of inventions, cleaning products, and easy-to-clean surfaces, all designed to keep dust under control and disease at bay. One such invention was a "vacuum powered by a bellows connected to a rocking chair. The idea was that the man of the house could enjoy the evening paper rocking in the chair while his wife performed the vacuuming." Thus ever do sexism and classism walk hand in hand.
"We have first raised a dust and then complain we cannot see."
George Berkeley
Don’t think for a moment that Amato’s only purpose in this book is to provide an abundance of facts with which to regale friends and acquaintances, although Dust serves admirably in that regard. I had it with me during jury duty, and delighted my fellow jurors with all manner of dusty data. Amato has in addition a larger thesis having to do with things small, smaller and smallest. He argues that the expansion of knowledge in the area of the small does not result in an equal enlargement in human imagination. "The mind will not forsake the body and its senses." People have bodies, and we measure the world in relation to our body. A thing too small to be seen by the unaided eye loses metaphoric power to the dust which we can see. "Even when human beings have written the obituaries of minuscule things past and embraced infinitesimal and virtual things new, they will still fear dust’s final requiem for all life. They will still dread the infinite granularity of all things, their own selves and meanings included."
Dust provides an extraordinary consideration of the detritus of the everyday. Writing with style and more than a little humor, Amato takes a dry subject and makes it live. I know I’ll never think of dust in the same way again.
"Even such is Time, which takes in trust/Our youth, our joys, and all we have,/And pays us but with age and dust."
Walter Ralegh
Deborah Peifer is a Bay Area critic whose own dust collection is the envy of all who see it.
All quotes about dust from The Oxford Dictionary of Phrase, Saying, and Quotation, edited by Elizabeth Knowles; Oxford University Press.
June 10, 2005 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
"A World Lit Only By Fire", by Manchester for engaging reading about medieval life.
"Joseph Smith", by Fawn Brodie for a facinating look at the creation of a truly American religion. Also deals with early 19th c. American mysticism and spiritualism. Very engaging history book.
June 10, 2005 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
For anyone interested in a particularly brutal and divisive era of English history, I'd recommend Alison Weir's "The Wars of the Roses." It helps readers sort through the thicket of claims and counter-claims that the House of Lancaster and the House of York made to the throne of England.
June 10, 2005 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Someone beat me to Weatherford's Genghis Khan work. Best part about the book is not the bio but the description of the world post-Genghis.
Also worth a look is Warriors of God, which chronicles the third crusade by focusing on Saladin and the Lionheart. Very exciting read.
June 10, 2005 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I enjoyed "The Trial of Gilles de Rais" by Georges Bataille. Based on trial transcripts of the most infamous villian of the Middle Ages.
June 10, 2005 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Steven Runciman, The Fall of Constantinople 1453
A mere 200 pages, and a riveting account of a pivotal event in world history. Runciman tells the dramatic story of the siege and conquest and also sets it in the larger political context, especially the East-West schism in Christianity.
The detail is terrific. Runciman has a touch for finding the heroism, the hypocrisy, the irony, and maybe above all, the sense of a lost cause.
My approach to Gibbon isn't to read the work straight through. I'm much too plodding a reader for that. I think of Gibbon as someone to sit down and spend time with. I very much enjoy his company.
June 10, 2005 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sure you and all of your vry astuter readers have already gotten around to all of the biographies on T.E. Lawrence, but I would suggest they are worth a second look. The politics and strategies of the countries involved is fascinating to me.
His autobiography "Seven Pillars of Wisdom" is a might muddled, but interesting nonetheless.
June 10, 2005 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Double damn!
Someone already listed Costain's books!
On the historical fiction front:
Gore Vidal's Burr and Lincoln. Those were great reads as far as historical fiction goes.
Mary Renault is terrific historical fiction and nobody beats Patrick O'Brian
June 10, 2005 1:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Also: Fernand Braudel: The Mediterranean World in the Age of Phillip II, and Marshall Hodgson: The Venture of Islam.
These and Thucydides were far and away the best non fiction books I read in college, for whatever it’s worth. Also, I read Moorish Spain on Josh Marshall’s recommendation, and it was very good, so thanks! Is there anything TPM can't do?
June 10, 2005 1:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is a historical novel rather than a real history book, but I recommend "Leo Africanus" by Amin Maalouf. It's the story of El Hasan ben Muhammed el-Wazzan-ez-Zayyati (later known as Johannis Leo de Medici) and the Moors' exodus from Spain after the fall of Granada and their integration into Morocco and other North African countries in the early 16th century.
June 10, 2005 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Islands of History", Marshall Sahlins.
Captain Cook and Hawaii. Sahlins argues that by by the time that Captain Cook was killed, he had become an integral part of the Hawaiian political system, and that he was killed not as a foreign invader, but for the same partly-ritual reasons that they killed many of their indigenous chiefs.
Also includes the story of a Hawaiian queen who estimated that she had had over fifty husbands.
Rather like early Iceland, Hawaii was something of a counterexample to the Hobbesian notion of the nasty, brutish state of nature. They were extremely violent societies, but with many compensatory good things.
June 10, 2005 1:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Some British history books.
I mentioned - as did others - in the last thread EP Thompson's The Making of the English Working Class. And I'll recommend it again.
Also, I have to recommend Linda Colley's Britons: The Forging of a Nation. One of the most important books ever written about Britain, IMO. Basically a description of how a unique British (not English, although she deals with this tension well) national identity formed in the 18th and 19th centuries.
A very interesting book if you want to get inside the ideology/mind of the Victorian liberal party is Eugenio Biagini's Liberty, Retrenchment, and Reform
June 10, 2005 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Priscilla Roosevelt, Life on the Russian Country Estate. This is a meticulously researched and beautifully written portrait of life among the Russian nobility prior to the l9l7 revolution. Also, staying in eastern Europe, Charles Jelavich, South Slav Nationalisms. Jelavich is one half of the great Jelavich duo, who wrote most of the fundamental books on Yugoslavia and the Balkans in the l970s and 80s. Here, he looks at several generations of textbooks used in the south Slavic lands and demonstrates that however much people talked about one, harmonious Yugoslav people, none of the constituent groups was ever much interested. Essential for those hoping to understand Yugoslavia's violent 20th century.
June 10, 2005 1:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
One mark of a good book is that you hate to reach the end of it, and one narrative history that was true of for me was Garret Mattingly's The Armada. It reads like a novel, with each chapter a new "scene," and a "You Are There" feel of immediacy. It would be good summer read, and in fact, I think I will plan to re-read my own copy this summer.
June 10, 2005 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The Kingdom of the Sun" by John Julius Norwich. About the time that the Normans conquered England in 1066 they also invaded and conquered Sicily and established the Norman kingdom of the two Sicilies on the island and in southern Italy.
In the 1100s and early 1200s the Normans established and ran an amazing rich polyglot kingdom with enlightened (for the time) laws and religious tolerance. There was a great floresence of art and architecture. The population was a mix of Italian, Byzantine Greek, and Arabs. Ironically, the Arabs were the most reliable portion of the population for stability and there are amazing stories of Norman knights leading armies that were 75% Arabs into Italy to subdue rebellious Italian towns. Also fascinating pictures of Roman Catholic cathederals built in Arabic architectural style that have Byzantine Greek mosaics on the walls as well as the Lord's Prayer engraved in the wall in Arabic.
Fun and fascinating stuff
June 10, 2005 2:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gore Vidal's "Empire" novel about McKinley and Spanish-American War and the establishment of America's global prescence (sp).
June 10, 2005 2:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'd echo the recommendations for "Citizens," "Guns, Germs, and Steel," and even though it violates the no-American history rule, Vidal's "Lincoln" is one of the best historical novels I've ever read (Richard Slotkin's "Abe" is a worthwhile companion piece).
Felipe Fernandez-Armesto is an excellent guide for exploring historical roads less travelled.
I also enjoyed Barbara Tuchman's "A Distant Mirror," and, more recently, Orlando Fige's "Natasha's Dance."
June 10, 2005 2:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. Schama's a fine, maybe a great, historian but he's not a story-teller. Josh asked for narratives. On the French Revolution, Carlyle or RR (no relation to Robert but still simply irresistible) Palmer are much more fun.
People say Orlando Figes (?sp)' recent history of the Russian Revolution is likewise compelling and fresh. Haven't read it yet but look forward to.
Perhaps the greatest narrative of our time is the one that's yet to be written: a history of the unimaginable suffering, on an almost unimaginable scope, of the Russian people during the Great Patriotic War for the Fatherland, aka WWII.
June 10, 2005 2:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Three books meeting Josh's criteria:
Siamese White, Maurice Collis, 1935: Story of an Englishman named Samuel White, appointed Governor of the port of Mergui in Burma (but then in Thailand) in the early 1680s by his friend Constantine Phaulkon, a Greek character who had, roughly speaking, been appointed Prime Minister of Siam. White proceeds to rob his employers, launch pirate attacks on the British East India Company across the bay, and flee for his life from the irate Siamese and Brits. Elihu Yale, founder of the college, makes a brief but memorable appearance as a jewelry swindler.
Historical Records, Sima Qian, 90 BC: the first major work of Chinese history, translated beautifully by Burton Watson in a short and long version, tells the story of the rise and collapse of China's first imperial dynasty. Sima has a humane moral vision, a vast series of colorful anecdotes and personalities, and an extraordinary personal story.
1066: Year of the Conquest, David Howart, 1979?: a short and fascinating look at William, Harold, Tostig and Harald Hardrada, along with supporting cast including Pope Hildebrand, Edwawrd the Confessor and the rest. "I would have liked Harold, been utterly terrified of Duke William, and had nothing whatsoever to say to King Harald Hardraada of Norway."
The Twelve Caesars, Suetonius, 110 AD: sort of the People Magazine version of Roman history. Nero's taste in interior decorating, Tiberius as the "gloomiest man in the world," Caesar's baldness, etc.
June 10, 2005 2:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Many good selections (the Manchester book is great as is Hughes' The Fatal Shore) also I can use some of the others as part of a summer reading list. Dava Sobel's Galileo's Daughter was good in its depiction of the politics of Italy and the papacy. Her small book, Longitude, was also good.
June 10, 2005 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Galleys at Lepanto by Jack Beeching
A ripping good yarn about the crucial 1571 battle. The subject still echoes today.
June 10, 2005 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
The World of Maluku by Leonard Andaya is a great history of fifteenth- to seventeenth-century northern Maluku; what the Europeans called the Spice Islands and are now part of eastern Indonesia. The book is unusual for the area because it's about the place, and is written from the point of view of both the foreign traders and the indigenous Malukans. Writing such a history for this time and place is easier said than done, because basically all the sources now available were produced by Europeans; there is little that remains that was produced by the Malukans. Andaya writes well, tells a good story, and is able to tie together a complex area with difficult primary sources.
June 10, 2005 4:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
For the French Revolution, I prefer the late Francois Furet's Revolutionary France: 1770-1880 to Schama. If anyone wants a little historiography to go along with their history, Furet's Interpreting the French Revolution would do nicely as well.
For ancient history, it's hard to do better than Thucydides or Gibbon, as others have already said. I also enjoy Arrian on Alexander the Great and, to pick a modern author, almost anything by Peter Brown on late antiquity. If I had to chose, I'd go with Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity or the collection of essays, Society and the Holy in Late Antiquity. For those new to the period, his more popular work, The World of Late Antiquity, 150-750, may be of more interest. All are beautifully written, and the last has many terrific photographs of late Roman and early Christian art.
Final recommendations, to get away from the political or social history side: Jacob Burckhardt's The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy and Johan Huizinga's The Autumn of the Middle Ages. Two classic works that deserve to be read again and again. Oh heck, one more: a masterful look at how historians through the modern era approached art and artefacts as evidence, Francis Haskell's History and Its Images. As with the Peter Brown, there's a heavy debt here to the work of Arnaldo Momgliano.
June 10, 2005 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Very cool thread. Someone up-thread beat me to Robert Massey's "Peter the Great." Massey's "Dreadnought" is a similarly compelling survey of the English/German naval arms race before WWI. I'm not sure Massey is an innovative historian but he writes incredibly well.
A very interesting, very readable book is Jonathan Spence's "God's Chinese Son", which is a cross between a biography of Hong Xiuquan, the leader of the Tapei Rebellion, and a history of the Rebellion itself.
I'd also recommend anything by William McNeil---especially Plagues and Peoples and The Pursuit of Power. A pet peeve of mine is the amount of attention heaped on Jared Diamond when his ideas seem fairly derivative in light of McNeil.
June 10, 2005 4:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you're not quite up to reading Thuycides (sp?) try "The Peloponnesian War" by Donal Kagan.
Also, I'll recommend again "The Trial of Socrates" by I.F. Stone. I read Plato's Republic a long time ago (I think high school but it could have been college) and always wondered why it was so revered. My reaction was that it was the perfect primer for a Hitler or Stalin. Years later reading Stone I finally realized that that was a reasonable reaction to Plato. Stone shows the proper amount of disrepect for Socrates and Plato who were the ultra-right wingnuts of their day and explains why the execution of Socrates seemed like a rational response to the contempary Greeks. This is a book which gave me a certain amount of courage to form my own opinions even when I disagreed with the near unanimous convention wisdom. (It may also be the only history book with a special shout out to the Macintosh in the dedication which as a Mac user I loved.)
Finally, a book I am about 1/3 of the way through but so far is great - "The First Crusade" by Thomas Asbridge. Very relevant but utterly foreign to contempary experience. I consider myself pretty well read but I learn something new (and interesting and important) on every page.
June 10, 2005 5:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can't agree with those upthread who recommended Schama's Citizens -- not because of the style or length but because so much of what he says is just wrong, taking the work of others out of context or using partial truths to bring home an overly determined argument about violence. A much more even-handed, better researched, more engaginly readable and more economical book on violence in the French Revolution is RR Palmer's "peerless" Twelve Who Ruled, probably still the best book on the Terror ever written.
And while many of its conclusions are dated, Crane Brinton's Anatomy of a Revolution remains fascinating and full of detail in comparing the English, American, French and Russian Revolutions.
June 10, 2005 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was assigned to read The Armada in college, and did so reluctantly, since I didn't care about the topic at all. But I was almost stunned at how good it was. That a European historian could write well was something I hadn't considered possible.
June 10, 2005 7:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
June 10, 2005 7:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have to agree that Sobel's "Longitude" is a great book. The fact that it canbe read in one sitting mad eit all the more pleasurable.
June 10, 2005 7:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Procopius, The Secret History, discussing in the blackest of terms the tyranny of the Roman Emperor Justinian in the 6th century AD. The 1966 translation by Williamson is a Penguin paperback.
Paul de Kruif's Microbe Hunters, which appeared in 1926, wrote the early history of microbiology in such an engaging fashion that it never needed redoing. Forty-four different vendors will sell you a used copy at Amazon.
The Sun in the Church: Cathedrals as Solar Observatories (Harvard:1999), by J.L. Heilbron, tells the fascinating story of sixteenth-through-eighteenth-century cutting-edge astronomical research performed by Roman Catholic clerics using their institutional homes as means for obtaining the highest possible precision. The story is told with rich social and personal contexts, not a little humor, and a serious point about the attitude of the Catholic Church toward scientific work.
June 10, 2005 8:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agree on The Black Jacobins--Toussaint L'Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution, by C.L.R. James; and the three-volume Records of the Grand Historian, by Sima Qian (translated by Burton Watson).
Capitalism and Slavery, by Eric Williams.
Strangers at the Gate--Social Disorder in South China 1839-1861, by Frederic Wakeman Jr.
Russia and Britain in Persia, 1864-1914--A Study in Imperialism, by Firuz Kazemzadeh.
June 10, 2005 8:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
None of these really counts as "narrative history," but Josh's request wasn't so specific this time, so I'll just go ahead. I want to second the person who recommended Francis Haskell's _History and its Images_, if only for Haskell's virtuosity in trotting across centuries and cultures. Also any recommendation of Peter Brown; I was the person who rmentioned the Augustine biography back in the other thread, but I hadn't yet created an account.
Some specialists in precolumbian argue with her conclusions, but Inga Clendinnen's _Aztecs_ raises so many interesting questions and she appraoches problems with such an interesting turn of mind that the book is worth the price of any stretched arguments. Clendinnen is also a really wonderful writer. Still in Latin America, Sabine MacCormack's _Religion in the Andes. Vision and Imagination in Early Colonial Peru_ is another book I've gone back to over and over again.
For tales of scholarly deceit (one of my weaknesses) there's Anthony Grafton's _Forgers and Critics. Creativity and Duplicity in Western Scholarship_, which traces the parallel development of textual scholarship and the faking of texts, and Ingrid Rowland's _The Scarith of Scornello. A Tale of Renaissance Forgery_. Rowland's book is about a very smart teenager in seventeenth-century Tuscany who decides to invent a series of fake Etruscan documents, and what happens to him.
June 10, 2005 9:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire: From the First Century A.D. to the Third" by Edward N. Luttwak. This is the finest 200 page book on geopolitical strategy around. The book was written 30 years ago during the Cold War, but still reads as if sections were written specifically to address modern strategic issues. Rome was the first 'hyperpower' and ruled vast areas of land through the use of financial, military, diplomatic, psychological, and cultural levers. A brilliant work by a writer I sometimes disagree with, but never discount.
June 10, 2005 9:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I haven't read this particular book, but I absolutely do not trust Alison Weir's scholarship and wouldn't recommend anything by her. From that period, I loved Paul Murray Kendall's biography of Richard III.
June 10, 2005 9:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pagans and Christians, by Robin Lane Fox
The End of Ancient Christianity, by Robert Markus
The Other Greeks, by Victor Davis Hansen*
(more elementary) The World of Late Antiquity, by Peter Brown
*Many years ago I knew and rather liked Victor. I also admire some of the things he has written on California and rural America; I find his recent stuff on current affairs and the boilerplate military/cultural stuff repugnant. But The Other Greeks is a great antidote to a lot of our casual assumptions.
June 10, 2005 9:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm a scientist, but I'm also a dilettante in a variety of areas. So I'll recommend two science history books and two non-science.
The How and The Why, by David Park. A history, from the earliest written records down to today, of the major changes in our understanding of what it means to say that we understand the beahvior of the universe. Not particularly technical, and one of the most beautifully written books I have ever read.
Because of that, I also read Park's The Fire in the Eye, a history of vision, which wanders into areas of optics, biology and philosophy in pursuit of how we understand the relationship between what we see and what is.
The First Century, by William Klingaman. Summarizes a period of intellectual tumult in far flung places in the world, and draws together the beginnings of the Christian and Eastern threads that have influenced contemporary civilization. The parallels between what was happening in the far east and the middle east at this time are positively spooky.
The Enlightenment: An Interpretation. OK, this one is a bit of a cheat since it is two books (The Rise of Modern Paganism, and The Science of Freedom) but it is one continuous stream of thought and, since it is written by the preeminent expert on the Enlightenment, Peter Gay, and since it is deeply concerned with the intellectual forces that gave birth to the United States, everyone should read it. I've read it twice.
June 10, 2005 10:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Someone up above mentioned Wedgewood's "A Coffin for King Charles." It is actually the conclusion of a trilogy about the English Civil War that begins with "The King's Peace" and "the King's War." Superb narrative history.
I also have very fond memories of "The Lion and the Throne" by Catherine Drinker Bowen. It is a biography of the Elizabethian jurist Lord Coke, but it is really a story about the protestant-catholic struggles, their political context, and how they affected the development of legal protections for individuals in ways that remain with us. Absolutely terrific stuff. And the portraits of prosecutors, defense lawyers and judges lead one to the conclusion that the various personality types have not changed since 1600.
June 10, 2005 10:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Great Game by Peter Hopkirk was wonderful thrilling story of the british and russians messing about in central asia.
Also one of my favorites is the Pax Britanica trilogy by James ( now it's Jan after her sex change) Morris. Three volumes about the places and history of the british empire. It's a great travel book as well as history lesson. Not sure if this fits the original criteria but great anyway.
June 10, 2005 10:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, sort of 'not American' and definitely pre 20th-century try Daniel Boorstein's "The Discoverers".
P.S. Off-topic to this thread but Boorstein's 3-volume history of the U.S. was required reading for me in college and was instrumental in opening up the entire field for me personally.
June 11, 2005 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Curiously few non-English references for such an enlightened audience. To fill the void - two superb Russian biographies of Napoleon, one by the eminent historian E.V.Tarle, written before the WW2, the other - by his student A.Z.Manfred, an excellent historian in his own right, written in early 1980s. There is an English translation of the former, don't know about the latter. Both authors have many other great books - well worth looking up.
As for historic novels - many good ones by Lion Feuchtwanger, especially Jew Suss, and the Josephus Flavius trilogy (The Judean War, et al). And what about Maurice Druon? and Heinrich Mann?
June 11, 2005 1:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the mention of Crane Brinton's wonderful book. I had forgotten the title, but not the author's first name.
Had to read it in a Western Civ class in the early 80s. Loved it.
June 11, 2005 3:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Definitely 20th century, but . . . "On a Field of Red" about the white, then red revolution in Russia and the American invasion of Russia through Archangel. Ever wonder why Russia is suspicious of the U.S?
On my "To Read" list:
Thomas Madden - A Concise History of the Crusades.
June 11, 2005 3:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
A few history book suggestions:
There is nothing like Gerhard Weinberg’s “A World at Arms: A Global History of World War II.”
Just about everything by Hugh Thomas is notable. But I particularly like: “Rivers of Gold, The Rise of the Spanish Empire from Columbus to Magellan”; “The Slave Trade”; and “The Spanish Civil War.”
Geoff Eley’s “Forging Democracy: The History of the Left in Europe, 1850-2000” is an important, but demanding, read.
Orlando Figes, who was mentioned earlier, “A People’s Tragedy: The Russian Revolution, 1891-1924” taught me a lot.
The late Roy Porter was one of my favorite historians. Everyone should read his near masterpiece “The Greatest Benefit to Mankind: A Medical History of Humanity.”
I almost forgot Albert Hourani, “A History of the Arab Peoples,” which puts the current ‘mess o potomia’ in a broad perspective.
June 11, 2005 6:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is what Josh asked for:
The question that dealt with narratives was the last question.
June 11, 2005 6:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
An excellent introduction/reintroduction to the northern Enlightenment and the political and social thinkers who most directly influenced our Founding Fathers:
How the Scots Invented the Modern World, Arthur Herman, Crown, 2001.
And, for the generation that followed: Holy Madness: Romantics, Patriots, and Revolutionaries, 1776-1871, Adam Zamoyski, Viking, 1999.
The end of the Hapsburgs the rise of the radical right and left, art, culture, modernity: Fin-de-Siecle Vienna: Politics and Culture, Carl E. Schorske, Knopf,1980
June 11, 2005 6:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I second Donald Kagan's The Peloponnesian War and Johann Hiuzinga's The Twilight of the Middle Ages.
Also, David Herbert Donald's Lincoln. I'm not a Stephen Ambrose fan, but his Crazy Horse and Custer was his best book and I'd recommend it. Burge's Heloise and Abelard was a great read as was James Reston's Warriors of God (concerns the third crusade). (Reston also wrote an interesting book on the year AD 1000 titled The Last Apocalypse.) Also, Thomas Goodrich's War to the Knife explores the critical and interesting question of Kansas prior to the civil war.
June 11, 2005 7:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
From Dawn to Decadence by Jacques Barzun.
Barzun is a great historian. It took him a very long time to write this book. He states in his Author's Note: "During the writing of this book I was frequently asked by friends and colleagues how long its preparation had taken. I could only answer: a lifetime." Barzun, J., From Dawn to Decadence, Author's Note, p. X.
Barzun is a great historian and this is a great book. Epic in scope it covers "500 Years of Western Cultural Life." It is essentially a comprehensive historical and cultural review of western life from 1500 until the present.
It is a very long book that took a lifetime to read. It is not a book you will plow through during a weekend at the beach. Even with a BA and an MA in history, I find myself needing to double check stuff to make sure I am understanding everything he is covering. I still haven't finished the book, I come and go - picking it up, reading a few hundred pages and then coming back to it later.
Believe me its worth it. A wonderful book that covers many things left out of other books and/or ideas/issues that you would need a lifetime to discover one by one.
June 11, 2005 8:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Jonathan Kirsch's books, Moses and King David, are a nice blend of history and Biblical scholarship.
For those who like the (really) big picture, Karen Armstrong's A History of God would be interesting.
For a great history of religion in America, see Martin Marty's Pilgrims in Their Own Land.
For an engaging history of African-Americans, see Lerone Bennett Jr.'s Before the Mayflower.
For an absolutely stellar history of philosophy, see Richard Tarnas' The Passion of the Western Mind.
June 11, 2005 8:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Brad Gregory, Salvation at Stake — probably the best book out there on the experience of the Protestant and Catholic reformations. It’s insightful and reads well.
June 11, 2005 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I recently read and enjoyed Maria Menocal's The Ornament of the World, a collection of vignettes about Muslim Iberia. I'll also second the nominations of God's Chinese Son and Plagues and Peoples.
June 11, 2005 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Tale of Genji my Murasaki Shikibu is one of my favorite historical novels. There are two translations that I am aware of readily available; one by Edward Seidenstecker, the other by Royall Tyler. Each is very different and comparing them can be enlightening. I read Seidenstecker in College and still feel it is the best.
June 11, 2005 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
You might try Antonia Fraser's tome, 'Cromwell, the Lord Protector' if you're interested in the period. While a lengthy read, it's worth it for dispelling the Restoration character assassination of the man.
June 11, 2005 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would recommend George Williams' The Radical Reformation, which provides a panoramic view of the 16th century ferment within European Protestantism that produced the Anabaptists, the Spiritualists, and the Unitarians--all of which subsequently influenced American religious life.
June 11, 2005 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Looking to understand how the various groups of Europeans thought about staking claim to the new lands in the Americas? Try Patricia Seed's wonderful (and brief) Ceremonies of Possession in Europe's Conquest of the New World, 1492-1640.
June 11, 2005 2:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not enough of a connoisseur of history books to be able to say how this stacks up against other account but - I just read a fascinating biography of Matilda of Canossa (Tuscan Countess: The life and extraordinary times of…). Seems that the person credited with founding modern law, Irnerius, did so because she sent him to Bolognia to review and teach Roman law because it was where the only remaining copy resided of the Justinian handbook containing the code of civil law that defined rights and obligations between the state and its citizens. OK, here is what makes it even more interesting - the reason she did this first and foremost was to legitimize her own inheritance rights - under feudalism, women could not own property. After her father's death she had been married off for political reasons to a hunchback she couldn't stand and whom she left - but after he died, her father's lands going to the German Kings. So she had also allied herself with the pope Gregory the VII against the Henry the IVth. To make a long story short, the result was that in getting her own rights recognized, she also allowed civil rights to be defined to include everyone, and freed everyone in her territory of their feudal obligations. Her death marks the beginning of the era of free communes throughout Italy north of Rome which also needed a legal system. Irnerius's students went on to become the lawyers and judges in the towns that her father had once controlled.
June 11, 2005 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
June 11, 2005 5:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
An amazing history of Judaism, Christianity and Islam written by a former Catholic Nun. I learned so much from this book about why people I didn't understand behave the way they do !!
Contrary to popular belief, fundamentalism is not a throwback to some ancient form of religion but rather a response to the spiritual crisis of the modern world.
Armstrong focuses on three movements: Protestant fundamentalism in America, Jewish fundamentalism in Israel and Islamic fundamentalism in Egypt + Iran.
She provides a compelling and compassionate study of a radical form of religious expression that is critically shaping the course of world history.
June 11, 2005 10:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I'm about 12 hours late for this thread, but I'll throw something in anyway. I definitely enjoyed "Guns, Germs, and Steel." I think it should be required reading for any high school history class. It's an engaging look at why and how the modern world is the way it is.
Another history book I thoroughly enjoyed is "A History of Japan" by RHP Mason (I think that's the author, the book has vanished to my friend's bookshelf so I had to google it). It gives me a good context about Japanese culture. I'm certainly less lost and confused than Bill Murray was in "Lost in Translation" because of this book.
June 12, 2005 1:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Two Princes of Calabar by Randy J Sparks 2004
http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/SPATWO.html
Truly excellent, fascinating look at the 18th-century slave trade from an African perspective. Gives an in-depth picture of the slave trade from Africa to the colonies to Britain and back to Africa. Chronicles two brothers who go from being princely African slave traders, taken as slaves themselves, and despite numerous setbacks and overwhelming odds they manage to escape, secure their freedom in the British courts only to return to Africa and pick up where they left off as slave traders. Siblings who perservere through setback after setback. Theirs is a true version version of Lemony Snicket's unfortunate events.
Motorcycle Diaries by Ernesto Che Guevara 2003
The movie is good, but the actual letters are awesome! Get to know Che as he becomes Che.
Both of these books are relatively short but thoroughly informative, frequently hillarious, and above all captivating.
June 12, 2005 2:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Reformation, A History, by Diarmaid MacCulloch, told me a number of things I either didn't know, or hadn't connected, like:
1. The Reformation was almost as much about changing the RC church as it was about establishing Protestantism. The medieval catholic church did not survive; what we see today is the Tridentine Church.
2. Everybody, just about, that was religious and attained political power killed people for their theology.
3. Reformed Protestantism was almost as much a split from non-Reformed as Protestantism was from RC.
JC
June 12, 2005 7:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
<div><br /> "To the Finland Station," - Edmund Wilson's thrillling study of the development of the revolutionary idea, from Paris to Petrograd. 65 years after publication it is still provocative.<br />And, although not exactly part of this list, the same author's "Patriotic Gore." <br />Both books exemplify Wilson's vigorous style and confident critical judgment. </div><br />
June 12, 2005 7:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've seen several suggestions I can easily second:
The Great Game; A World Lit Only by Fire; When Jesus Became God, et. al. But here is one no one has yet mentioned:
"The Washing of the Spears" by Donald Morris, on the Zulu Wars. A book I found hard to put down despite its size.
June 12, 2005 8:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just read "The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000" by Paul Kennedy. A study of how geography, demographics, and economics shaped modern conflicts and power balances. It was written in 85-86, and it's interesting to see how close Kennedy got with his predictions about what would happen in East Germany or how the USSR's contradictions would lead to trouble down the road.
June 13, 2005 8:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry I'm a bit late getting around to this. A book I picked up at a library sale a few years back that I loved was Peter the Great: His Life and World, by Robert K. Massie. It was published in 1980, so this is in no way a recent book, but I found it fascinating. His struggle to forcibly enlighten Russia when it was still considered a backwater by the rest of Europe made for interesting reading.
I find that a good biography can really help me get a grasp on the historical era of the subject. I understand people's motives better, and can more easily comprehend how different historical events are actually related to one another.
I also recently finished The Seven Ages of Paris by Alistair Horne. He's a British francophile, and unashamedly admits that this is in no way a comprehensive history of the city, but focuses on specific eras he finds most interesting, such as Louis IV's reign. While it does come into the 20th century, I found the earlier periods much more intriguing.
Lisa
June 14, 2005 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink